Why Would Russia Contrtibute $$$ to Clinton Foundation?

[DOTR]

 

[ClosedCaption]

The Clinton campaign and the DNC claimed they have NOTHING to do with the Trump dossier. Yet, we now know they both LIED...as they often do, without consequence...and D voters are unaware.

Even the hard left Washington Post reports it...
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier

The post also said that several claims in the dossier have been proven true. So who paid for it doesn't matter. Truth or fiction matters

Here is a good article for you to read. Now...just accept it. I voted for a blowhard, but you voted for a CRIMINAL!

http://nypost.com/2017/10/26/how-team-hillary-played-the-press-for-fools-on-russia/
Hillary Clinton’s campaign didn’t just pay for the Kremlin-aided smear job on Donald Trump before the election; she continued to use the dirt after the election to frame her humiliating loss as a Russian conspiracy to steal the election.

Bitter to the core, she and her campaign aides hatched a scheme, just 24 hours after conceding the race, to spoon-feed the dirty rumors to an eager liberal media and manufacture the narrative Russia secretly colluded with her neophyte foe to sabotage her coronation.

But it was Hillary who was trying to kneecap Trump, even after he licked her, fair and square, in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan and other blue states.

But here's the part you ignored. The stuff in the dossier is real. Since it's real it shows he colluded with Russia and they even admitted it on released emails.

So, while your story telling is grade a level..it has nothing to do with the dossier and it's authenticity.

 

[gipper]

The Clinton campaign and the DNC claimed they have NOTHING to do with the Trump dossier. Yet, we now know they both LIED...as they often do, without consequence...and D voters are unaware.

Even the hard left Washington Post reports it...
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier

The post also said that several claims in the dossier have been proven true. So who paid for it doesn't matter. Truth or fiction matters

Here is a good article for you to read. Now...just accept it. I voted for a blowhard, but you voted for a CRIMINAL!

http://nypost.com/2017/10/26/how-team-hillary-played-the-press-for-fools-on-russia/
Hillary Clinton’s campaign didn’t just pay for the Kremlin-aided smear job on Donald Trump before the election; she continued to use the dirt after the election to frame her humiliating loss as a Russian conspiracy to steal the election.

Bitter to the core, she and her campaign aides hatched a scheme, just 24 hours after conceding the race, to spoon-feed the dirty rumors to an eager liberal media and manufacture the narrative Russia secretly colluded with her neophyte foe to sabotage her coronation.

But it was Hillary who was trying to kneecap Trump, even after he licked her, fair and square, in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan and other blue states.

But here's the part you ignored. The stuff in the dossier is real. Since it's real it shows he colluded with Russia and they even admitted it on released emails.

So, while your story telling is grade a level..it has nothing to do with the dossier and it's authenticity.

What was true about it?

 

[jon_berzerk]

The Clinton campaign and the DNC claimed they have NOTHING to do with the Trump dossier. Yet, we now know they both LIED...as they often do, without consequence...and D voters are unaware.

Even the hard left Washington Post reports it...
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier

The post also said that several claims in the dossier have been proven true. So who paid for it doesn't matter. Truth or fiction matters

Here is a good article for you to read. Now...just accept it. I voted for a blowhard, but you voted for a CRIMINAL!

http://nypost.com/2017/10/26/how-team-hillary-played-the-press-for-fools-on-russia/
Hillary Clinton’s campaign didn’t just pay for the Kremlin-aided smear job on Donald Trump before the election; she continued to use the dirt after the election to frame her humiliating loss as a Russian conspiracy to steal the election.

Bitter to the core, she and her campaign aides hatched a scheme, just 24 hours after conceding the race, to spoon-feed the dirty rumors to an eager liberal media and manufacture the narrative Russia secretly colluded with her neophyte foe to sabotage her coronation.

But it was Hillary who was trying to kneecap Trump, even after he licked her, fair and square, in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan and other blue states.

But here's the part you ignored. The stuff in the dossier is real. Since it's real it shows he colluded with Russia and they even admitted it on released emails.

So, while your story telling is grade a level..it has nothing to do with the dossier and it's authenticity.

What was true about it?

nothing

 

[Geaux4it]

The Clinton campaign and the DNC claimed they have NOTHING to do with the Trump dossier. Yet, we now know they both LIED...as they often do, without consequence...and D voters are unaware.

Even the hard left Washington Post reports it...
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier

The post also said that several claims in the dossier have been proven true. So who paid for it doesn't matter. Truth or fiction matters

Here is a good article for you to read. Now...just accept it. I voted for a blowhard, but you voted for a CRIMINAL!

http://nypost.com/2017/10/26/how-team-hillary-played-the-press-for-fools-on-russia/
Hillary Clinton’s campaign didn’t just pay for the Kremlin-aided smear job on Donald Trump before the election; she continued to use the dirt after the election to frame her humiliating loss as a Russian conspiracy to steal the election.

Bitter to the core, she and her campaign aides hatched a scheme, just 24 hours after conceding the race, to spoon-feed the dirty rumors to an eager liberal media and manufacture the narrative Russia secretly colluded with her neophyte foe to sabotage her coronation.

But it was Hillary who was trying to kneecap Trump, even after he licked her, fair and square, in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan and other blue states.

But here's the part you ignored. The stuff in the dossier is real. Since it's real it shows he colluded with Russia and they even admitted it on released emails.

So, while your story telling is grade a level..it has nothing to do with the dossier and it's authenticity.

Which has nothing to do with the OP.

Why would Russia contribute $$$ to the Clinton Foundation, and why would they pay Bill Clinton nearly 4-times his normal fee for speaking events?

-Geaux

 

[DOTR]

The Clinton campaign and the DNC claimed they have NOTHING to do with the Trump dossier. Yet, we now know they both LIED...as they often do, without consequence...and D voters are unaware.

Even the hard left Washington Post reports it...
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier

The post also said that several claims in the dossier have been proven true. So who paid for it doesn't matter. Truth or fiction matters

Here is a good article for you to read. Now...just accept it. I voted for a blowhard, but you voted for a CRIMINAL!

http://nypost.com/2017/10/26/how-team-hillary-played-the-press-for-fools-on-russia/
Hillary Clinton’s campaign didn’t just pay for the Kremlin-aided smear job on Donald Trump before the election; she continued to use the dirt after the election to frame her humiliating loss as a Russian conspiracy to steal the election.

Bitter to the core, she and her campaign aides hatched a scheme, just 24 hours after conceding the race, to spoon-feed the dirty rumors to an eager liberal media and manufacture the narrative Russia secretly colluded with her neophyte foe to sabotage her coronation.

But it was Hillary who was trying to kneecap Trump, even after he licked her, fair and square, in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan and other blue states.

The Russians got what they paid for with Hillary...a shill to attack American elections and hobble the incoming president. Worked beautifully for them.
Hillar Clinton is a cancer only less attractive.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Are the Russians bad again now?

 

[gipper]

The Clinton campaign and the DNC claimed they have NOTHING to do with the Trump dossier. Yet, we now know they both LIED...as they often do, without consequence...and D voters are unaware.

Even the hard left Washington Post reports it...
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier

The post also said that several claims in the dossier have been proven true. So who paid for it doesn't matter. Truth or fiction matters

Here is a good article for you to read. Now...just accept it. I voted for a blowhard, but you voted for a CRIMINAL!

http://nypost.com/2017/10/26/how-team-hillary-played-the-press-for-fools-on-russia/
Hillary Clinton’s campaign didn’t just pay for the Kremlin-aided smear job on Donald Trump before the election; she continued to use the dirt after the election to frame her humiliating loss as a Russian conspiracy to steal the election.

Bitter to the core, she and her campaign aides hatched a scheme, just 24 hours after conceding the race, to spoon-feed the dirty rumors to an eager liberal media and manufacture the narrative Russia secretly colluded with her neophyte foe to sabotage her coronation.

But it was Hillary who was trying to kneecap Trump, even after he licked her, fair and square, in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan and other blue states.

But here's the part you ignored. The stuff in the dossier is real. Since it's real it shows he colluded with Russia and they even admitted it on released emails.

So, while your story telling is grade a level..it has nothing to do with the dossier and it's authenticity.

Which has nothing to do with the OP.

Why would Russia contribute $$$ to the Clinton Foundation, and why would they pay Bill Clinton nearly 4-times his normal fee for speaking events?

-Geaux

The left sees nothing strange about this, but if Trump did the exact same thing, they would screaming.

 

[gipper]

Are the Russians bad again now?

Not according to your Messiah.

“The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back.”

 

[DOTR]

Are the Russians bad again now?

I wouldn’t say the Russians are bad. I would say they look out for Russian interests as would be expected from any rational people not under the heel of Marxists and liberals.
Hillary and her fellow ruling class elites work for them in undermining the American experiment. Russians don’t have to say America is illegitimate. They have Hillary and the Washington Post.

 

[Geaux4it]

I’m open for the left to present their case to address my basic questions. Maybe there are legitimate reasons

-Geaux

 

[DOTR]

Maybe the Russians just wanted to help Chelsea buy a nice wedding dress.
BTW it was a Bush grandchild with whom Chelsea shared the news that her family had robbed the charity for her wedding dress. What does that tell you?

 

[gipper]

Maybe the Russians just wanted to help Chelsea buy a nice wedding dress.
BTW it was a Bush grandchild with whom Chelsea shared the news that her family had robbed the charity for her wedding dress. What does that tell you?

They and their families are best buds.

 

[jknowgood]

The Clinton campaign and the DNC claimed they have NOTHING to do with the Trump dossier. Yet, we now know they both LIED...as they often do, without consequence...and D voters are unaware.

Even the hard left Washington Post reports it...
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier

The post also said that several claims in the dossier have been proven true. So who paid for it doesn't matter. Truth or fiction matters

Here is a good article for you to read. Now...just accept it. I voted for a blowhard, but you voted for a CRIMINAL!

http://nypost.com/2017/10/26/how-team-hillary-played-the-press-for-fools-on-russia/
Hillary Clinton’s campaign didn’t just pay for the Kremlin-aided smear job on Donald Trump before the election; she continued to use the dirt after the election to frame her humiliating loss as a Russian conspiracy to steal the election.

Bitter to the core, she and her campaign aides hatched a scheme, just 24 hours after conceding the race, to spoon-feed the dirty rumors to an eager liberal media and manufacture the narrative Russia secretly colluded with her neophyte foe to sabotage her coronation.

But it was Hillary who was trying to kneecap Trump, even after he licked her, fair and square, in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan and other blue states.

But here's the part you ignored. The stuff in the dossier is real. Since it's real it shows he colluded with Russia and they even admitted it on released emails.

So, while your story telling is grade a level..it has nothing to do with the dossier and it's authenticity.

So that's why this is happening? No, the Russian collusion is a Democrat thing, not Trumps.

 

[blastoff]

Just curious as to why?

-Geaux

Think of it as an honorarium for greasing the skids.

 

[DOTR]

It is dangerous to deal with anti-democracy sociopaths who favor totalitarian solutions and have gained control of the press and other organs of propaganda. They are even more dangerous in having the backing of oligarchial billionaires while employing ruthless win-at-all costs political operatives who see Stalin, Che, Mao as worthy of emulation.
The Russians should be very careful in doing business with these people in the Clinton camp.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Are the Russians bad again now?

Not according to your Messiah.

“The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back.”

So, is that a yes or no?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The Clinton campaign and the DNC claimed they have NOTHING to do with the Trump dossier. Yet, we now know they both LIED...as they often do, without consequence...and D voters are unaware.

Even the hard left Washington Post reports it...
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier

Isn't this where everyone vomits the standard gipper response, and says, "Anonymous sources? Fake news!"...?

 

[gipper]

Are the Russians bad again now?

Not according to your Messiah.

“The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back.”

So, is that a yes or no?

Depends on what is best for the D party.

 

[gipper]

The Clinton campaign and the DNC claimed they have NOTHING to do with the Trump dossier. Yet, we now know they both LIED...as they often do, without consequence...and D voters are unaware.

Even the hard left Washington Post reports it...
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier

Isn't this where everyone vomits the standard gipper response, and says, "Anonymous sources? Fake news!"...?

Thing is the sources aren’t anonymous.