Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I think think the main problem with the science is that the facts were flawed from the start. The only reason the removed the medieval warm period was so they could show that the change in temperature would be greater and sharper.
On either side of the issue, what's in it for you?
Are you worried or concerned about the planet being destroyed?
Is it that you are afraid you are going to die?
Is it about the high price of gas and the economy?
I'm on this rock for another 50 years and I'm going to follow the predetermined path.
If free will wasn't an illusion, then yeah, I'd have free choice.
For me, I like reading about the sun, asteroids, comets, volcanoes, earthquakes.
It's the best entertainment outside of getting laid.
We'll pass......as will most........let the k00ks get all arrogant and uppity about caring more about their planet. Fine with us......go......go......go. We'll stick with our trusty fossil fuels ftw.......
Carbon capture dying out in Germany. Ooooops.
Carbon capture technology loses out in Germany | Germany | DW.DE | 07.08.2013
But those not embracing the hysterical AGW movement are delusional!!!
Like I said......nobody cares about the science.
Carbon capture dying out in Germany. Ooooops.
Carbon capture technology loses out in Germany | Germany | DW.DE | 07.08.2013
But those not embracing the hysterical AGW movement are delusional!!!
Like I said......nobody cares about the science.
If there had been just a few more skeptics in Germany --- they might have avoided spilling all those D-Marks into the ground.. Must not be a big private K-12 population..
I'm not ready to hang up on CCS --- I believe that you COULD economically burn coal much more cleanly.. Emphasis should be on POLLUTANTS tho --- no CO2 sequestration.
Plenty of VALID choices.. ALL being drowned out by fundamentally flawed "politically correct" ideas like wind turbines..
We should be emphasizing Hydrogen as a stored fuel.. The most abundant element in the universe.. We KNOW how to use that.. It got us to the moon probably before you were born..
Nuclear power could end the imaginary CO2 crisis tomorrow.
But right now --- the OP is correct. Doesn't matter what the latest AGW scientific excuses are.. Because the alternative agenda -- the "non-fossil-fuel" alternatives are D.O.A.
The general public ASSUMES that wind and solar are ALTERNATIVES to fossil fuel. They are not.. They are at best (the way we are using them NOW) ---- supplements.
Emphasis should be on POLLUTANTS tho --- not CO2 sequestration.
Fossil fuels are not here to stay, you ignoramus.
There is a finite supply of fossil fuels on earth.
Some day, we will run out of fossil fuels.
What then?
OH GAWD!!!!
s0n.......you're going to be in your box for many decades before that even becomes a remote concern.
The progressives can never see out of their bubble.......but for the rest of us, there is something called technological innovation and the development of energy that we cant even fathom in 2013.
In the meantime........its fossil fuels baby!! FTMFW.......because that's just the way its going to be.
So you admit don't give a shit about what happens to your descendent's after you die.
If you actually gave a shit about our future descendent's ,you would be for getting government under control and get the trillions of debt we owe, starting to be paid off now.
Our Government has to be trimmed back by the very minimum of at least 1.5 trillion in spending each year.
It's sacrifice a little amount somewhat now, or future generations who will sacrifice a lot and they won't have a better life, than we have had.
The Earth's climate will take care of herself just like it always has.
The Earths axis has shifted and so has our weather.
Also our magnetic poles are staring to shift.
No matter what humans do or not do, it is not going to effect what the Earth is going to do naturally.
If you actually gave a shit about our future descendent's ,you would be for getting government under control and get the trillions of debt we owe, starting to be paid off now.
Our Government has to be trimmed back by the very minimum of at least 1.5 trillion in spending each year.
It's sacrifice a little amount somewhat now, or future generations who will sacrifice a lot and they won't have a better life, than we have had.
The Earth's climate will take care of herself just like it always has.
The Earths axis has shifted and so has our weather.
Also our magnetic poles are staring to shift.
No matter what humans do or not do, it is not going to effect what the Earth is going to do naturally.
The government comments are off-topic and thus moot.
The Earth's climate will "take care of herself". The question is who is going to take care of US as it does so.
The climate change of the last 150 years is not due to any shift in the Earth's rotational axis.
The Earth's magnetic poles have moved and flipped since the planet was formed. That process has no effect on our climate.
Human activity is the largest source of greenhouse gases on the planet and is the primary cause of the the last 150 years warming.
Plenty of VALID choices.. ALL being drowned out by fundamentally flawed "politically correct" ideas like wind turbines..
Astounding that the world's power generation industries could be led astray by uninformed politicians. Astounding to the level of disbelief.
We should be emphasizing Hydrogen as a stored fuel.. The most abundant element in the universe.. We KNOW how to use that.. It got us to the moon probably before you were born..
It is great stuff and we will get there eventually. When the workable fuel cell and the workable storage media have both arrived, the infrastructure will likely follow.
It's not imaginary. But "tomorrow" is.
But right now --- the OP is correct. Doesn't matter what the latest AGW scientific excuses are.. Because the alternative agenda -- the "non-fossil-fuel" alternatives are D.O.A.
They're certainly growing quickly for being dead. Zombie-tech??
The general public ASSUMES that wind and solar are ALTERNATIVES to fossil fuel. They are not.. They are at best (the way we are using them NOW) ---- supplements.
This is just more semantic bullshit. When we put power into our grid generated by something other than fossil fuel consumption - and thus are able to burn less fossil fuel, it is an alternative energy source.
