Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
A Jury decided Trump did not rape E. Jean Carroll. Bet you did not know that.
Here is a video that shows the facts of this case. Evaluate it honestly. Do not presume guilt. The Jury did not presume guilt. So you should not.
That is correct. But don't you notice Democrats posting here act like it is a criminal trial?Uh...it's already been decided. He's liable. All he can do is appeal the judgement. It might be reduced, but these are rarely overturned.
And just to reiterate, this wasn't a criminal trial...you do know that...right?
A Jury decided Trump did not rape E. Jean Carroll. Bet you did not know that.
Here is a video that shows the facts of this case. Evaluate it honestly. Do not presume guilt. The Jury did not presume guilt. So you should not.
www.politico.com
Funny thing. This is the full page of the verdict form. Seems he did sexually assault her according to the jury. I wonder why this person on youtube telling us all what "the MSM doesn't say", made it a point to just include that sentence and not the other sentences of what the jury said he did do? Might it be that he's trying to spin the narrative for his own needs?
And it has NOTHING to do with civil or criminal trials. It has to do with what constitutes rape in NY. Mind you, I say NY, because what the jury said he did, would be considered rape in some other states. In NY you need to penetrate with your dick. He just used his fingers. That's why Kaplan dismissed Trump's counter claim to Carrol saying he raped her. Because... and this is a judge talking. He did rape her if not in the NY legal sense, then for sure in the colloquial way.
Unless of course you want to hang your hat on the idea that forcing your finger into a woman's vagina against her will is in any way OK?
Read the full jury verdict form from the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial
Trump's legal team did not call any witnesses during the trial, and Trump himself did not testify in court during the trial.
Carrol has 2 contemporaneous witnesses, 2 other people willing to testify under oath Trump assaulted them too, 2 people who worked at Bergdorf's confirming her descriptions of both the stores procedures and attendance... Plus of course Trump's own words. Trump provided.... NO DEFENSE whatsoever.
A Jury decided Trump did not rape E. Jean Carroll. Bet you did not know that.
Here is a video that shows the facts of this case. Evaluate it honestly. Do not presume guilt. The Jury did not presume guilt. So you should not.
Stop being partisan for once and see this legally.I wouldn't bet on that. He lost. 85 million ways.
That is all in the video. First the Jury did not allege Trump put his fingers anyplace.Funny thing. This is the full page of the verdict form. Seems he did sexually assault her according to the jury. I wonder why this person on youtube telling us all what "the MSM doesn't say", made it a point to just include that sentence and not the other sentences of what the jury said he did do? Might it be that he's trying to spin the narrative for his own needs?
And it has NOTHING to do with civil or criminal trials. It has to do with what constitutes rape in NY. Mind you, I say NY, because what the jury said he did, would be considered rape in some other states. In NY you need to penetrate with your dick. He just used his fingers. That's why Kaplan dismissed Trump's counter claim to Carrol saying he raped her. Because... and this is a judge talking. He did rape her if not in the NY legal sense, then for sure in the colloquial way.
Unless of course you want to hang your hat on the idea that forcing your finger into a woman's vagina against her will is in any way OK?
Read the full jury verdict form from the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial
Trump's legal team did not call any witnesses during the trial, and Trump himself did not testify in court during the trial.
Carrol has 2 contemporaneous witnesses, 2 other people willing to testify under oath Trump assaulted them too, 2 people who worked at Bergdorf's confirming her descriptions of both the stores procedures and attendance... Plus of course Trump's own words. Trump provided.... NO DEFENSE whatsoever.
Trump has a super path to getting this overturned.
Hah, a partisan Trumphumper never gets it right.Stop being partisan for once and see this legally.
As the video states, Trump has a super path to getting this overturned.
Well, when Trump wins, you can expect me to remind you of this.Hah, a partisan Trumphumper never gets it right.
You are delusional. You remind me constantly.Well, when Trump wins, you can expect me to remind you of this.
I have a pretty strong legal background. I have experience in such cases. So watch who you insult. I would not believe you have my background to use.You are delusional. You remind me constantly.
Hah! I call BS.I have a pretty strong legal background. I have experience in such cases. So watch who you insult. I would not believe you have my background to use.
To help you start. What was the outcome of the case where you were charged with defaming a party? In my case, I won.
Uh...it's already been decided. He's liable. All he can do is appeal the judgement. It might be reduced, but these are rarely overturned.
And just to reiterate, this wasn't a criminal trial...you do know that...right?
You should team up with BackAgain and help Trump. His crappy lawyers are supposed to have legal backgrounds also, so what makes you so special?I have a pretty strong legal background. I have experience in such cases. So watch who you insult. I would not believe you have my background to use.
To help you start. What was the outcome of the case where you were charged with defaming a party? In my case, I won.
Trumps lawyers are doing very well. Frankly I learned the hard way about those sorts of lawsuits. I did not ask for it. I was worried in fact. I first hired a lawyer who represented a newspaper. For that reason he later had to turn me over to different lawyers. It was nip and tuck. I was examined by lawyers for the plaintiff. I had to tell them honestly who told me what I said to my board of Realtors. I told everybody the truth. I ended up driving all the way into San Francisco to see for my own eyes the apology my board of realtors wrote to me. I could not even have a copy of the apology to me. But in return all of my legal expenses were paid by the Boards own insurance firm.You should team up with BackAgain and help Trump. His crappy lawyers are supposed to have legal backgrounds also, so what makes you so special?
You are amazing!Trumps lawyers are doing very well. Frankly I learned the hard way about those sorts of lawsuits. I did not ask for it. I was worried in fact. I first hired a lawyer who represented a newspaper. For that reason he later had to turn me over to different lawyers. It was nip and tuck. I was examined by lawyers for the plaintiff. I had to tell them honestly who told me what I said to my board of Realtors. I told everybody the truth. I ended up driving all the way into San Francisco to see for my own eyes the apology my board of realtors wrote to me. I could not even have a copy of the apology to me. But in return all of my legal expenses were paid by the Boards own insurance firm.
Thanks but I do not think that way. I post a lot based on my own experiences.You are amazing!
