Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
what?And how would only speaking to women in public help?-------------------------------------------------- goes both ways doesn't it ?? Lots of 'gold diggers' , women out there willing to lie at the drop of a hat TNHarley !!So your solution is to make it harder for everyone because a few men cant help from being perverted assholes?The rules he was criticized for, like never having a one on one meeting with a women unless someone else wasn't present. That was the main one, I think there were a couple others.
"he came in the bathroom"
cant prove, disprove. Problem is still there. Will his word finally count for something? Doubt it.
Maybe he was feeling like a women at that time, of which he has every right to go into the women's bathroom right?
Nice label. I forgot we were discussing things. Hmmm weird.what?And how would only speaking to women in public help?-------------------------------------------------- goes both ways doesn't it ?? Lots of 'gold diggers' , women out there willing to lie at the drop of a hat TNHarley !!So your solution is to make it harder for everyone because a few men cant help from being perverted assholes?
"he came in the bathroom"
cant prove, disprove. Problem is still there. Will his word finally count for something? Doubt it.
Maybe he was feeling like a women at that time, of which he has every right to go into the women's bathroom right?
I responded to you're red herring hypothetical with another red herring hypothetical, but still if any so called "man" is feeling like a women, they should be able to go into any women's bathroom without being accused of being pervert by insensitive people right?
Nice label. I forgot we were discussing things. Hmmm weird.what?And how would only speaking to women in public help?-------------------------------------------------- goes both ways doesn't it ?? Lots of 'gold diggers' , women out there willing to lie at the drop of a hat TNHarley !!
"he came in the bathroom"
cant prove, disprove. Problem is still there. Will his word finally count for something? Doubt it.
Maybe he was feeling like a women at that time, of which he has every right to go into the women's bathroom right?
I responded to you're red herring hypothetical with another red herring hypothetical, but still if any so called "man" is feeling like a women, they should be able to go into any women's bathroom without being accused of being pervert by insensitive people right?
No, they shouldn't. Why, do you think men should be able to go into womens bathrooms?
So Mike Pence does not trust his own self-control. And will only speak to a woman if a third party moderator is present. Great VP material right there.Mike Pence has a rule where he cannot speak to an unescorted woman. Hmm.... that reminds me of some rules from something else... HMMM......So if Mike Pence ever finds himself alone with a woman, he can't help but harass her? Lol
No that would be strawman, can you make an honest argument?
Pence does so to never put himself in the situation, where A. An emotional or physical affair could happen. B. His wife doesn't have anxiety about an emotional/physical affair. C. Not to give the illusion to others that there might be some sort of affair.
The result is that, if Mike pence follows these rules, neither the above will happen, nor will he be accused of sexual harassment, since there won't be any ammo there. And it serves to reason that he probably won't ever sexually harass anyone if he respects his wife enough to impose these rules on himself. It'd be like someone who grew up seeing their father being an alcoholic, and decides that it's prudent for them not to go into bars and not to hang out around booze, they don't want to become anything like what their father was...now does that mean that person is an alcoholic? Or that they just can't control themselves? Not at all, they are exerting their control from the get go, nipping anything in the butt that might come back later to haunt them. Does that mean this person is prejudice against all people who partake in alcohol? No that's another ridiculous statement.
And again, I bet there's plenty of women who have faced sexual harassment from some pig out there, and there's been nobody else around to back up or confirm their story...I bet they'd appreciate the pence rules.
Yea that's not entirely the case he can be the one escorted. Again it's not out of disrespect for women, it's to preemptively shut down any of the problems that have been KNOWN to arise when men and women meet one on one without their significant others. Say an affair, or sexual harassment, sexual harassment allegation. That's not a rule he forces on anyone, a rule he forces on himself. It may effect women, but guess the ways it's not going to effect women, no sexual harassment or inappropriate relationships, in or outside of the work place.
Its rare and outlandish to think a women would accuse a guy of harassment in a private setting? Lol ok.Nice label. I forgot we were discussing things. Hmmm weird.what?And how would only speaking to women in public help?
"he came in the bathroom"
cant prove, disprove. Problem is still there. Will his word finally count for something? Doubt it.
Maybe he was feeling like a women at that time, of which he has every right to go into the women's bathroom right?
I responded to you're red herring hypothetical with another red herring hypothetical, but still if any so called "man" is feeling like a women, they should be able to go into any women's bathroom without being accused of being pervert by insensitive people right?
No, they shouldn't. Why, do you think men should be able to go into womens bathrooms?
It's a red herring when it distracts from the main point. There's probably a million hypotheticals one could think of where these rules wouldn't work, however rare and outlandish, and those distract from the main point.
I never claimed I thought that genetic man should be able to go into women's bathrooms, it is however what many on the left believe, and it's based on how that individual is feeling at that given moment. So let's say someone did accuse pence of walking into the women's restroom, he's got all the cover he needs to just claim that he felt like a women that day and has every right to walk into the bathroom.
What does this have to do with anything?Matt Walsh: The ‘harassment’ allegations at Fox only prove the wisdom of Mike Pence’s policy
Love much of what Matt Walsh has to say. Makes a great point here, the Mike pence rules are one way to avoid sexual harassment in general or accusations...whether you're a public figure or a Joe Schmo. For women, usually sexual harassment occurs when nobody else is around, and if nobody else is around it turns into a he said she said. Something to think about lefties.
Some who sexually harass women actually believe they are flirting, even when they touch the object of their attention she cringes. That suggests pathology. Years and years ago there was a singles bar in San Francisco (Pierce St. Annex) where this sign hung prominently:
NO means NO!
Lounge lizards, narcissist, sociopaths and worse, who didn't get the message were tossed out to applause by guys and gals.
Now that's a ridiculous non-sequitur. You don't have to be an alcoholic to not want to drink. It's not because you don't have self control. You don't have to be addicted to narcotics to not want to be around cocaine, and that's also not because you lack self control. You don't choose to drive under the speed limit because you can't control your car going 30 in a 25...So Mike Pence does not trust his own self-control. And will only speak to a woman if a third party moderator is present. Great VP material right there.Mike Pence has a rule where he cannot speak to an unescorted woman. Hmm.... that reminds me of some rules from something else... HMMM......So if Mike Pence ever finds himself alone with a woman, he can't help but harass her? Lol
No that would be strawman, can you make an honest argument?
Pence does so to never put himself in the situation, where A. An emotional or physical affair could happen. B. His wife doesn't have anxiety about an emotional/physical affair. C. Not to give the illusion to others that there might be some sort of affair.
The result is that, if Mike pence follows these rules, neither the above will happen, nor will he be accused of sexual harassment, since there won't be any ammo there. And it serves to reason that he probably won't ever sexually harass anyone if he respects his wife enough to impose these rules on himself. It'd be like someone who grew up seeing their father being an alcoholic, and decides that it's prudent for them not to go into bars and not to hang out around booze, they don't want to become anything like what their father was...now does that mean that person is an alcoholic? Or that they just can't control themselves? Not at all, they are exerting their control from the get go, nipping anything in the butt that might come back later to haunt them. Does that mean this person is prejudice against all people who partake in alcohol? No that's another ridiculous statement.
And again, I bet there's plenty of women who have faced sexual harassment from some pig out there, and there's been nobody else around to back up or confirm their story...I bet they'd appreciate the pence rules.
Yea that's not entirely the case he can be the one escorted. Again it's not out of disrespect for women, it's to preemptively shut down any of the problems that have been KNOWN to arise when men and women meet one on one without their significant others. Say an affair, or sexual harassment, sexual harassment allegation. That's not a rule he forces on anyone, a rule he forces on himself. It may effect women, but guess the ways it's not going to effect women, no sexual harassment or inappropriate relationships, in or outside of the work place.
Wow someone didn't eat their wheates today. I never said that at all...clearly. It's pretty obvious what I was doing there, which was I used a talking point from the lefts own playbook to counter your red herring argument.Its rare and outlandish to think a women would accuse a guy of harassment in a private setting? Lol ok.Nice label. I forgot we were discussing things. Hmmm weird.what?Maybe he was feeling like a women at that time, of which he has every right to go into the women's bathroom right?
I responded to you're red herring hypothetical with another red herring hypothetical, but still if any so called "man" is feeling like a women, they should be able to go into any women's bathroom without being accused of being pervert by insensitive people right?
No, they shouldn't. Why, do you think men should be able to go into womens bathrooms?
It's a red herring when it distracts from the main point. There's probably a million hypotheticals one could think of where these rules wouldn't work, however rare and outlandish, and those distract from the main point.
I never claimed I thought that genetic man should be able to go into women's bathrooms, it is however what many on the left believe, and it's based on how that individual is feeling at that given moment. So let's say someone did accuse pence of walking into the women's restroom, he's got all the cover he needs to just claim that he felt like a women that day and has every right to walk into the bathroom.
For gawd sakes, don't read your OP
What? Your fucking premise is built on privacy, you idiot. How is a woman accusing a man of harassment in a private setting so outlandish to you?Wow someone didn't eat their wheates today. I never said that at all...clearly. It's pretty obvious what I was doing there, which was I used a talking point from the lefts own playbook to counter your red herring argument.Its rare and outlandish to think a women would accuse a guy of harassment in a private setting? Lol ok.Nice label. I forgot we were discussing things. Hmmm weird.what?
I responded to you're red herring hypothetical with another red herring hypothetical, but still if any so called "man" is feeling like a women, they should be able to go into any women's bathroom without being accused of being pervert by insensitive people right?
No, they shouldn't. Why, do you think men should be able to go into womens bathrooms?
It's a red herring when it distracts from the main point. There's probably a million hypotheticals one could think of where these rules wouldn't work, however rare and outlandish, and those distract from the main point.
I never claimed I thought that genetic man should be able to go into women's bathrooms, it is however what many on the left believe, and it's based on how that individual is feeling at that given moment. So let's say someone did accuse pence of walking into the women's restroom, he's got all the cover he needs to just claim that he felt like a women that day and has every right to walk into the bathroom.
For gawd sakes, don't read your OP
Matt Walsh: The ‘harassment’ allegations at Fox only prove the wisdom of Mike Pence’s policy
Love much of what Matt Walsh has to say. Makes a great point here, the Mike pence rules are one way to avoid sexual harassment in general or accusations...whether you're a public figure or a Joe Schmo. For women, usually sexual harassment occurs when nobody else is around, and if nobody else is around it turns into a he said she said. Something to think about lefties.
A woman is not alcohol or cocaine, and if Mike Pence fears them, then he cannot properly represent them.Now that's a ridiculous non-sequitur. You don't have to be an alcoholic to not want to drink. It's not because you don't have self control. You don't have to be addicted to narcotics to not want to be around cocaine, and that's also not because you lack self control. You don't choose to drive under the speed limit because you can't control your car going 30 in a 25...So Mike Pence does not trust his own self-control. And will only speak to a woman if a third party moderator is present. Great VP material right there.Mike Pence has a rule where he cannot speak to an unescorted woman. Hmm.... that reminds me of some rules from something else... HMMM......So if Mike Pence ever finds himself alone with a woman, he can't help but harass her? Lol
No that would be strawman, can you make an honest argument?
Pence does so to never put himself in the situation, where A. An emotional or physical affair could happen. B. His wife doesn't have anxiety about an emotional/physical affair. C. Not to give the illusion to others that there might be some sort of affair.
The result is that, if Mike pence follows these rules, neither the above will happen, nor will he be accused of sexual harassment, since there won't be any ammo there. And it serves to reason that he probably won't ever sexually harass anyone if he respects his wife enough to impose these rules on himself. It'd be like someone who grew up seeing their father being an alcoholic, and decides that it's prudent for them not to go into bars and not to hang out around booze, they don't want to become anything like what their father was...now does that mean that person is an alcoholic? Or that they just can't control themselves? Not at all, they are exerting their control from the get go, nipping anything in the butt that might come back later to haunt them. Does that mean this person is prejudice against all people who partake in alcohol? No that's another ridiculous statement.
And again, I bet there's plenty of women who have faced sexual harassment from some pig out there, and there's been nobody else around to back up or confirm their story...I bet they'd appreciate the pence rules.
Yea that's not entirely the case he can be the one escorted. Again it's not out of disrespect for women, it's to preemptively shut down any of the problems that have been KNOWN to arise when men and women meet one on one without their significant others. Say an affair, or sexual harassment, sexual harassment allegation. That's not a rule he forces on anyone, a rule he forces on himself. It may effect women, but guess the ways it's not going to effect women, no sexual harassment or inappropriate relationships, in or outside of the work place.
Got to love the logic of the left.
Imagine being lectured about sexual harassment by people who voted for Donald "Pussy Grabber" TrumpImagine being lectured about sexual harassment by the party that endorsed a world class enabler for husband's abuse of women. It must be easy for a leftie in the mainstream media, they can never be accused of immoral behavior because they don't promote moral values. Political turncoat Joe Scarborough had to resign from congress because his girlfriend committed suicide in his freaking office but he goes on postulating about politics and morality.
What? Your fucking premise is built on privacy, you idiot. How is a woman accusing a man of harassment in a private setting so outlandish to you?Wow someone didn't eat their wheates today. I never said that at all...clearly. It's pretty obvious what I was doing there, which was I used a talking point from the lefts own playbook to counter your red herring argument.Its rare and outlandish to think a women would accuse a guy of harassment in a private setting? Lol ok.Nice label. I forgot we were discussing things. Hmmm weird.I responded to you're red herring hypothetical with another red herring hypothetical, but still if any so called "man" is feeling like a women, they should be able to go into any women's bathroom without being accused of being pervert by insensitive people right?
No, they shouldn't. Why, do you think men should be able to go into womens bathrooms?
It's a red herring when it distracts from the main point. There's probably a million hypotheticals one could think of where these rules wouldn't work, however rare and outlandish, and those distract from the main point.
I never claimed I thought that genetic man should be able to go into women's bathrooms, it is however what many on the left believe, and it's based on how that individual is feeling at that given moment. So let's say someone did accuse pence of walking into the women's restroom, he's got all the cover he needs to just claim that he felt like a women that day and has every right to walk into the bathroom.
For gawd sakes, don't read your OP
And why the fuck would I care about you using "the lefts on argument" against me? Do you think im a leftist?
A woman is not alcohol or cocaine, and if Mike Pence fears them, then he cannot properly represent them.Now that's a ridiculous non-sequitur. You don't have to be an alcoholic to not want to drink. It's not because you don't have self control. You don't have to be addicted to narcotics to not want to be around cocaine, and that's also not because you lack self control. You don't choose to drive under the speed limit because you can't control your car going 30 in a 25...So Mike Pence does not trust his own self-control. And will only speak to a woman if a third party moderator is present. Great VP material right there.Mike Pence has a rule where he cannot speak to an unescorted woman. Hmm.... that reminds me of some rules from something else... HMMM......No that would be strawman, can you make an honest argument?
Pence does so to never put himself in the situation, where A. An emotional or physical affair could happen. B. His wife doesn't have anxiety about an emotional/physical affair. C. Not to give the illusion to others that there might be some sort of affair.
The result is that, if Mike pence follows these rules, neither the above will happen, nor will he be accused of sexual harassment, since there won't be any ammo there. And it serves to reason that he probably won't ever sexually harass anyone if he respects his wife enough to impose these rules on himself. It'd be like someone who grew up seeing their father being an alcoholic, and decides that it's prudent for them not to go into bars and not to hang out around booze, they don't want to become anything like what their father was...now does that mean that person is an alcoholic? Or that they just can't control themselves? Not at all, they are exerting their control from the get go, nipping anything in the butt that might come back later to haunt them. Does that mean this person is prejudice against all people who partake in alcohol? No that's another ridiculous statement.
And again, I bet there's plenty of women who have faced sexual harassment from some pig out there, and there's been nobody else around to back up or confirm their story...I bet they'd appreciate the pence rules.
Yea that's not entirely the case he can be the one escorted. Again it's not out of disrespect for women, it's to preemptively shut down any of the problems that have been KNOWN to arise when men and women meet one on one without their significant others. Say an affair, or sexual harassment, sexual harassment allegation. That's not a rule he forces on anyone, a rule he forces on himself. It may effect women, but guess the ways it's not going to effect women, no sexual harassment or inappropriate relationships, in or outside of the work place.
Got to love the logic of the left.
Another terrible analogy. Mike Pence is a grown ass man. Not a kid. He's a public servant. Meaning he works for women. Weed is not the same as a woman, and it is not the kid in your story's boss.A woman is not alcohol or cocaine, and if Mike Pence fears them, then he cannot properly represent them.Now that's a ridiculous non-sequitur. You don't have to be an alcoholic to not want to drink. It's not because you don't have self control. You don't have to be addicted to narcotics to not want to be around cocaine, and that's also not because you lack self control. You don't choose to drive under the speed limit because you can't control your car going 30 in a 25...So Mike Pence does not trust his own self-control. And will only speak to a woman if a third party moderator is present. Great VP material right there.Mike Pence has a rule where he cannot speak to an unescorted woman. Hmm.... that reminds me of some rules from something else... HMMM......
Yea that's not entirely the case he can be the one escorted. Again it's not out of disrespect for women, it's to preemptively shut down any of the problems that have been KNOWN to arise when men and women meet one on one without their significant others. Say an affair, or sexual harassment, sexual harassment allegation. That's not a rule he forces on anyone, a rule he forces on himself. It may effect women, but guess the ways it's not going to effect women, no sexual harassment or inappropriate relationships, in or outside of the work place.
Got to love the logic of the left.
Yea but your saying his only motivation to do so is out of fear because he lacks self control, which is where you're wrong. If you take your high school kid to a get together with their friends, and then you get a call from them to pick them up earlier because there was drugs there they didn't want to be around, would you say your kid can't control themselves and is fearful of it, and is in the wrong because they should be able to be around that because they have so much self control?
So because they're kids they lack self control? And it's ok for them to take them out of the situation because they lack self control and will wind up doing drugs. But pence is a grown ass man and has all the self control in the world? Well if adults have all this self control...why is it so many affairs still happen?Another terrible analogy. Mike Pence is a grown ass man. Not a kid. He's a public servant. Meaning he works for women. Weed is not the same as a woman, and it is not the kid in your story's boss.A woman is not alcohol or cocaine, and if Mike Pence fears them, then he cannot properly represent them.Now that's a ridiculous non-sequitur. You don't have to be an alcoholic to not want to drink. It's not because you don't have self control. You don't have to be addicted to narcotics to not want to be around cocaine, and that's also not because you lack self control. You don't choose to drive under the speed limit because you can't control your car going 30 in a 25...So Mike Pence does not trust his own self-control. And will only speak to a woman if a third party moderator is present. Great VP material right there.Yea that's not entirely the case he can be the one escorted. Again it's not out of disrespect for women, it's to preemptively shut down any of the problems that have been KNOWN to arise when men and women meet one on one without their significant others. Say an affair, or sexual harassment, sexual harassment allegation. That's not a rule he forces on anyone, a rule he forces on himself. It may effect women, but guess the ways it's not going to effect women, no sexual harassment or inappropriate relationships, in or outside of the work place.
Got to love the logic of the left.
Yea but your saying his only motivation to do so is out of fear because he lacks self control, which is where you're wrong. If you take your high school kid to a get together with their friends, and then you get a call from them to pick them up earlier because there was drugs there they didn't want to be around, would you say your kid can't control themselves and is fearful of it, and is in the wrong because they should be able to be around that because they have so much self control?
What does this have to do with anything?Matt Walsh: The ‘harassment’ allegations at Fox only prove the wisdom of Mike Pence’s policy
Love much of what Matt Walsh has to say. Makes a great point here, the Mike pence rules are one way to avoid sexual harassment in general or accusations...whether you're a public figure or a Joe Schmo. For women, usually sexual harassment occurs when nobody else is around, and if nobody else is around it turns into a he said she said. Something to think about lefties.
Some who sexually harass women actually believe they are flirting, even when they touch the object of their attention she cringes. That suggests pathology. Years and years ago there was a singles bar in San Francisco (Pierce St. Annex) where this sign hung prominently:
NO means NO!
Lounge lizards, narcissist, sociopaths and worse, who didn't get the message were tossed out to applause by guys and gals.
A woman is not alcohol or cocaine, and if Mike Pence fears them, then he cannot properly represent them.Now that's a ridiculous non-sequitur. You don't have to be an alcoholic to not want to drink. It's not because you don't have self control. You don't have to be addicted to narcotics to not want to be around cocaine, and that's also not because you lack self control. You don't choose to drive under the speed limit because you can't control your car going 30 in a 25...So Mike Pence does not trust his own self-control. And will only speak to a woman if a third party moderator is present. Great VP material right there.Mike Pence has a rule where he cannot speak to an unescorted woman. Hmm.... that reminds me of some rules from something else... HMMM......No that would be strawman, can you make an honest argument?
Pence does so to never put himself in the situation, where A. An emotional or physical affair could happen. B. His wife doesn't have anxiety about an emotional/physical affair. C. Not to give the illusion to others that there might be some sort of affair.
The result is that, if Mike pence follows these rules, neither the above will happen, nor will he be accused of sexual harassment, since there won't be any ammo there. And it serves to reason that he probably won't ever sexually harass anyone if he respects his wife enough to impose these rules on himself. It'd be like someone who grew up seeing their father being an alcoholic, and decides that it's prudent for them not to go into bars and not to hang out around booze, they don't want to become anything like what their father was...now does that mean that person is an alcoholic? Or that they just can't control themselves? Not at all, they are exerting their control from the get go, nipping anything in the butt that might come back later to haunt them. Does that mean this person is prejudice against all people who partake in alcohol? No that's another ridiculous statement.
And again, I bet there's plenty of women who have faced sexual harassment from some pig out there, and there's been nobody else around to back up or confirm their story...I bet they'd appreciate the pence rules.
Yea that's not entirely the case he can be the one escorted. Again it's not out of disrespect for women, it's to preemptively shut down any of the problems that have been KNOWN to arise when men and women meet one on one without their significant others. Say an affair, or sexual harassment, sexual harassment allegation. That's not a rule he forces on anyone, a rule he forces on himself. It may effect women, but guess the ways it's not going to effect women, no sexual harassment or inappropriate relationships, in or outside of the work place.
Got to love the logic of the left.
