- Thread starter
- #41
Hilarious!
Wrong AND hilarious!
Wrong AND hilarious!
If you could afford it or get access to it. Unfortunately too many couldn't.
How? How would it be fixed in your opinion?
Here comes the canned answer of tort reform and allowing insurers to sell across state lines, in 3....2......1..........go!
I am glad that you found my facts humerous, but that does not change what is true.
No one was denied medical care in the USA pre-ACA. Have you heard of medicaid? Have you heard of places like St Judes?
Not having insurance is not the same as being denied treatment. But if you have some examples of americans being turned away from hospitals please provide them, being sent from a private hospital to a public hospital does not equal being denied treatment.
There are two good things in ACA: 1. insurance companies have to take you with preexisting conditions 2. there can be no lifetime maximum payment under any policy.
The rest of it is crap------real estate taxes WTF? taxes on medical devices? Forced purchasing of insurance, fines, penalties, rules, regulations, beaurocracy.
Maybe you want your healthcare controlled by a GS 9 with a GED, but I do not.
Nowhere in your answer did you even attempt to explain your solution as I asked.
Surprising? Not at all.
In order to need a solution, one needs a problem. There was no healthcare crisis in the USA that called for the govt taking over 1/6 of the economy.
Yes, there were some problems, ACA fixed two of them. Reforming malpractice laws and allowing interstate competition between insurance companies would both reduce the cost of healthcare, reducing drug patents to 5 years instead of 12 would get cheap generics in the system faster, vigorously attacking medicare and medicaid fraud would save millions, limiting illegals to emergency life saving treatment would save millions.
There is a lot that could be done without putting the govt in charge of healthcare. See my sig--Lenin quote.