Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How about you list the biggest mass shootings in the US over the past few years and the type of weapon used... I’m not talking about gang homicides in Chicago, I’m talking about mass shootings in public forums... you obviously need to do the research so have fun.im not twisting numbers to form a narrative just providing the most obvious reason for supporting regulation by most people. They hear AR15 and think of most the major mass shootings we’ve had in the USA. Schools, night clubs, churches... that’s why they support regulation. The OP left out the most obvious point.I wasn’t lying.. just stating an observationwhat about the most obvious reason... they are most often used to kill school children and innocent citizens in mass murder shootings. Why did you leave that very obvious reason out?
That's a lie. Hand guns are used in most mass shootings.
.
Yeah, an observation that has been debunked in every thread on firearms. I'm sure I've seen you in at least a couple of them. So what would you call an observation that has been proven to be untrue?
.
And the only reason people think that way is due to propaganda pushed by the commiecrats and their lackey media. ARs have lower body counts than fist, feet and clubs, they just get all the publicity. Studies show the last AW ban had no measurable effect on crime. It's all planned to eventually disarm law abiding citizens. That's why I say, NO MORE COMPROMISE!!!!!!!!!!
.
Can you read? Where are all homicides given?You are as ignorant as you are uninformed. But I repeat myself.You might want to check you stats, you're way off.
edit...My apologies. You are right, I meant to say around half of all US homicides are committed with handguns. They should be severely restricted in order to lower that rate.
Damn, are you not reading the thread, the real numbers have been posted a couple of times.
Can you do math?“In 2010, 358 murders were reported involving a rifle while 6,009 were reported involving a handgun; another 1,939 were reported with an unspecified type of firearm.
.
The point about a handgun is one doesn't have to be much of a specialist at close range.In fact, a Shiv Specialist can inflict the same body count as the handgun in the same time and space.
Yeah but bear with me for a second...practically speaking...if you are in close quarters (office, school...mosque...etc.) and wish to effect max damage...a handgun is just as effective a tool as an AR.Yes, in some situations, but not as consistently as the AR. The AR's accuracy doesn't degrade any where near as quickly as any other commonly available gun, including pistols, and concealment isn't always an issue.
I mean there is a reason police carry handguns and not rifles. You have a valid point Bulldog not arguing just saying.
In practical situations one can maximize the kill ratio with a handgun on concealment and a greater element of surprise alone.
Is that why the military only issues handguns to our soldiers?
They also issue machine guns. Do you want everyone to have access to a Ma Deuce?
Actually, I have the legal right to own a Ma Deuce as long as I have a Class 3 FFL license and have the facility for storage and security for the weapon. And the hundred grand to purchase one.
Bullshit.***\\\This Is My Opinion///***
I believe Liberals want to ban the AR-15 for two reasons...
1. The AR-15 is scary looking, it's that simple. The AR-15 is scary looking and it's easy to get people to think the AR-15 is bad because of the way it looks.
2. Here's the main reason why Liberals want to ban the AR-15. If Liberals are successful, they can then point to other guns as more powerful and say "We banned the AR-15 so we should ban all of these other weapons because they are more powerful and accurate."
That's why the big push to ban the AR-15.
And you are wrong. No other gun, freely available to civilians, is designed for or capable of killing as many people as possible in as short a time as possible as the AR-15.
Show me the part of the Constitution that states the right to sell drugs to school children.That´s the purpose of a weapon.***\\\This Is My Opinion///***
I believe Liberals want to ban the AR-15 for two reasons...
1. The AR-15 is scary looking, it's that simple. The AR-15 is scary looking and it's easy to get people to think the AR-15 is bad because of the way it looks.
2. Here's the main reason why Liberals want to ban the AR-15. If Liberals are successful, they can then point to other guns as more powerful and say "We banned the AR-15 so we should ban all of these other weapons because they are more powerful and accurate."
That's why the big push to ban the AR-15.
And you are wrong. No other gun, freely available to civilians, is designed for or capable of killing as many people as possible in as short a time as possible as the AR-15.
Those who intent to use weapons illegally are not going to turn them in. Borders open to criminal cartels, citizens stripped of their arms, that is not in your interest.
Those who are intent to manufacture meth and sell it to school kids won't turn their equipment either. Does that mean it shouldn't be illegal?
You just admitted that AR-15s are not the primary weapon used for mass shootings, but you imagine that justifies banning handguns?Jesus. What a load. But handguns should be severely restricted, I agree.mass shootings are all done at short ranges. A handgun is actually more suited for the job.
What is the reason?Wrong. It's a semi-automatic rifle. Those are common as dirt.***\\\This Is My Opinion///***
I believe Liberals want to ban the AR-15 for two reasons...
1. The AR-15 is scary looking, it's that simple. The AR-15 is scary looking and it's easy to get people to think the AR-15 is bad because of the way it looks.
2. Here's the main reason why Liberals want to ban the AR-15. If Liberals are successful, they can then point to other guns as more powerful and say "We banned the AR-15 so we should ban all of these other weapons because they are more powerful and accurate."
That's why the big push to ban the AR-15.
And you are wrong. No other gun, freely available to civilians, is designed for or capable of killing as many people as possible in as short a time as possible as the AR-15.
Being semi automatic is not the reason they should be regulated.
Which shows why you can't depend on the police to protect you.Nevertheless, he killed 11 people and wounded 31.***\\\This Is My Opinion///***
I believe Liberals want to ban the AR-15 for two reasons...
1. The AR-15 is scary looking, it's that simple. The AR-15 is scary looking and it's easy to get people to think the AR-15 is bad because of the way it looks.
2. Here's the main reason why Liberals want to ban the AR-15. If Liberals are successful, they can then point to other guns as more powerful and say "We banned the AR-15 so we should ban all of these other weapons because they are more powerful and accurate."
That's why the big push to ban the AR-15.
And you are wrong. No other gun, freely available to civilians, is designed for or capable of killing as many people as possible in as short a time as possible as the AR-15.
Not really. Check out what guns Charles Whitman used. There is also Lee Harvy Oswald. Even for his times the fun he used to kill a presidant was about as shitty as they come. It's not the weapons it's the people behind them.
The AR-15 wasn't as readily available for Whitman, and Lee Harvey Oswald shot one person.
Over a period of more than 1 1/2 hours with no real response to his attack.
That's why lawmakers should never make any laws about gun controlNo other gun, freely available to civilians, is designed for or capable of killing as many people as possible in as short a time as possible as the AR-15.
I love when people who have never shot a gun think they are an expert.
12 gauge shotgun and a revolverNo other gun, freely available to civilians, is designed for or capable of killing as many people as possible in as short a time as possible as the AR-15.
I love when people who have never shot a gun think they are an expert.
You think I have never shot a gun? That makes sense to you because you think only gun nuts own guns. You are wrong on both counts.
***\\\This Is My Opinion///***
I believe Liberals want to ban the AR-15 for two reasons...
1. The AR-15 is scary looking, it's that simple. The AR-15 is scary looking and it's easy to get people to think the AR-15 is bad because of the way it looks.
2. Here's the main reason why Liberals want to ban the AR-15. If Liberals are successful, they can then point to other guns as more powerful and say "We banned the AR-15 so we should ban all of these other weapons because they are more powerful and accurate."
That's why the big push to ban the AR-15.
1. It's Calibers.Calibres in handguns with mags holding that many don't have the killing power of AR 15 calibres at the same ranges.Many handguns hold 15-18 rounds. Handgun are much more mobile and concealable. The rounds they hold can be excessively deadly.
***\\\This Is My Opinion///***
I believe Liberals want to ban the AR-15 for two reasons...
1. The AR-15 is scary looking, it's that simple. The AR-15 is scary looking and it's easy to get people to think the AR-15 is bad because of the way it looks.
2. Here's the main reason why Liberals want to ban the AR-15. If Liberals are successful, they can then point to other guns as more powerful and say "We banned the AR-15 so we should ban all of these other weapons because they are more powerful and accurate."
That's why the big push to ban the AR-15.
And you are wrong. No other gun, freely available to civilians, is designed for or capable of killing as many people as possible in as short a time as possible as the AR-15.
Except for this little ranch rifle.
Hate to break it to you but if they get the chance to ban AR's no firearm will be safe from the next ban.***\\\This Is My Opinion///***
I believe Liberals want to ban the AR-15 for two reasons...
1. The AR-15 is scary looking, it's that simple. The AR-15 is scary looking and it's easy to get people to think the AR-15 is bad because of the way it looks.
2. Here's the main reason why Liberals want to ban the AR-15. If Liberals are successful, they can then point to other guns as more powerful and say "We banned the AR-15 so we should ban all of these other weapons because they are more powerful and accurate."
That's why the big push to ban the AR-15.
And you are wrong. No other gun, freely available to civilians, is designed for or capable of killing as many people as possible in as short a time as possible as the AR-15.
Except for this little ranch rifle.
Dont give liberals any ideas
If they ban the AR-15 they will come after all the other guns in due time
***\\\This Is My Opinion///***
I believe Liberals want to ban the AR-15 for two reasons...
1. The AR-15 is scary looking, it's that simple. The AR-15 is scary looking and it's easy to get people to think the AR-15 is bad because of the way it looks.
2. Here's the main reason why Liberals want to ban the AR-15. If Liberals are successful, they can then point to other guns as more powerful and say "We banned the AR-15 so we should ban all of these other weapons because they are more powerful and accurate."
That's why the big push to ban the AR-15.
Many handguns hold 15-18 rounds. Handgun are much more mobile and concealable. The rounds they hold can be excessively deadly.***\\\This Is My Opinion///***
I believe Liberals want to ban the AR-15 for two reasons...
1. The AR-15 is scary looking, it's that simple. The AR-15 is scary looking and it's easy to get people to think the AR-15 is bad because of the way it looks.
2. Here's the main reason why Liberals want to ban the AR-15. If Liberals are successful, they can then point to other guns as more powerful and say "We banned the AR-15 so we should ban all of these other weapons because they are more powerful and accurate."
That's why the big push to ban the AR-15.
And you are wrong. No other gun, freely available to civilians, is designed for or capable of killing as many people as possible in as short a time as possible as the AR-15.
Yes, in some situations, but not as consistently as the AR. The AR's accuracy doesn't degrade any where near as quickly as any other commonly available gun, including pistols, and concealment isn't always an issue.
