Why isn't it Mexico's problem to house, feed and take care of these "immigrant" kids?

[Vigilante]

I don't get it. Why isn't this Mexico's job? It's Mexico that allowed these kids through their southern border.
I get that the Obama administration wants to destroy our nation by getting rid of our border and importing future Democrat voters.
But can someone please explain why no conservatives, or even RINOs, are taking the position that this is Mexico's problem, and demanding that it absorb this population which at least shares with them a common language (for the most part)? And why isn't the United States demanding money from Mexico and every Central American country of origin to pay for the damages that this invasion is causing us?

 

[francoHFW]

They're coming HERE. Idjit. Mexico probably has a good ID card, that Pubs don't allow here...

 

[Vigilante]

They're coming HERE. Idjit. Mexico probably has a good ID card, that Pubs don't allow here...

You're more fucked up tonight than normal, more rants please, your entertainment value increases with the shrillness of your stupidity!

 

[LiberalMedia]

Conservatards could at the very least do the humane thing and ship them up to Canada, so they can live in a country that doesn't hate the poor so much that they would deny them access to healthcare.

But no, your immediate answer is always "HYUCK HYUCK IT'S ALL MEXICO'S FAULT," even for cases in which you acknowledge that the immigrants aren't even all Mexican.

 

[Gracie]

Most are not from mexico?

 

[Vigilante]

Conservatards could at the very least do the humane thing and ship them up to Canada, so they can live in a country that doesn't hate the poor so much that they would deny them access to healthcare.

But no, your immediate answer is always "HYUCK HYUCK IT'S ALL MEXICO'S FAULT," even for cases in which you acknowledge that the immigrants aren't even all Mexican.

How many MS13 gang members can we send you? Perhaps the ones that have felony records for rape, and molestation?/..... 2 maybe three?

They pass through OVER 1000 miles of Mexican territory to get here you dumb liberal bitch, why isn't Mexico stopping them as they used to?

 

[OKTexas]

They're coming HERE. Idjit. Mexico probably has a good ID card, that Pubs don't allow here...

And Mexico is enabling them, now they are providing 72 hour passes to get through Mexico and to the US. All aid should be cut off until these countries stop participating in the trafficking.

 

[R.C. Christian]

The OP is correct.

 

[LiberalMedia]

Conservatards could at the very least do the humane thing and ship them up to Canada, so they can live in a country that doesn't hate the poor so much that they would deny them access to healthcare.

But no, your immediate answer is always "HYUCK HYUCK IT'S ALL MEXICO'S FAULT," even for cases in which you acknowledge that the immigrants aren't even all Mexican.

How many MS13 gang members can we send you? Perhaps the ones that have felony records for rape, and molestation?/..... 2 maybe three?

Whenever a conservatard bigot encounters logic and reason from a strong, independent womyn that he simply cannot counter, the immediate response is invariably some sexual comment, usually involving rape threats or accusations of promiscuity. It's really sad that you're supposedly an adult and you still think and act like such a child. Grow up and embrace lybyrylysm.

They pass through OVER 1000 miles of Mexican territory to get here you dumb liberal bitch, why isn't Mexico stopping them as they used to?

Since when is it Mexico's job to act as America's border patrol?

 

[Vigilante]

Of course, we KNOW WHY, and wonder just what kind of DEAL the Obomanation made with Mexico to allow this...and BTW, where is our MARINE???

 

[AntiParty]

I don't get it. Why isn't this Mexico's job? It's Mexico that allowed these kids through their southern border.
I get that the Obama administration wants to destroy our nation by getting rid of our border and importing future Democrat voters.
But can someone please explain why no conservatives, or even RINOs, are taking the position that this is Mexico's problem, and demanding that it absorb this population which at least shares with them a common language (for the most part)? And why isn't the United States demanding money from Mexico and every Central American country of origin to pay for the damages that this invasion is causing us?

Check out how many Corporations are taking advantage of the cheap labor....That should answer the question for you.

The Right only cares about profits today, not about the people. The Left is getting there too.

 

[Lakhota]

I don't get it. Why isn't this Mexico's job? It's Mexico that allowed these kids through their southern border.
I get that the Obama administration wants to destroy our nation by getting rid of our border and importing future Democrat voters.
But can someone please explain why no conservatives, or even RINOs, are taking the position that this is Mexico's problem, and demanding that it absorb this population which at least shares with them a common language (for the most part)? And why isn't the United States demanding money from Mexico and every Central American country of origin to pay for the damages that this invasion is causing us?

Check out how many Corporations are taking advantage of the cheap labor....That should answer the question for you.

The Right only cares about profits today, not about the people. The Left is getting there too.

Yep, they are being lured north by the great American dream - cheap labor for Republicans and votes for Democrats.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Conservatards could at the very least do the humane thing and ship them up to Canada, so they can live in a country that doesn't hate the poor so much that they would deny them access to healthcare.

But no, your immediate answer is always "HYUCK HYUCK IT'S ALL MEXICO'S FAULT," even for cases in which you acknowledge that the immigrants aren't even all Mexican.

How many MS13 gang members can we send you? Perhaps the ones that have felony records for rape, and molestation?/..... 2 maybe three?

Whenever a conservatard bigot encounters logic and reason from a strong, independent womyn that he simply cannot counter, the immediate response is invariably some sexual comment, usually involving rape threats or accusations of promiscuity. It's really sad that you're supposedly an adult and you still think and act like such a child. Grow up and embrace lybyrylysm.

They pass through OVER 1000 miles of Mexican territory to get here you dumb liberal bitch, why isn't Mexico stopping them as they used to?

Since when is it Mexico's job to act as America's border patrol?

From your posts, you are a very dependent woMEN.

 

[Vigilante]

Conservatards could at the very least do the humane thing and ship them up to Canada, so they can live in a country that doesn't hate the poor so much that they would deny them access to healthcare.

But no, your immediate answer is always "HYUCK HYUCK IT'S ALL MEXICO'S FAULT," even for cases in which you acknowledge that the immigrants aren't even all Mexican.

How many MS13 gang members can we send you? Perhaps the ones that have felony records for rape, and molestation?/..... 2 maybe three?

Whenever a conservatard bigot encounters logic and reason from a strong, independent womyn that he simply cannot counter, the immediate response is invariably some sexual comment, usually involving rape threats or accusations of promiscuity. It's really sad that you're supposedly an adult and you still think and act like such a child. Grow up and embrace lybyrylysm.

They pass through OVER 1000 miles of Mexican territory to get here you dumb liberal bitch, why isn't Mexico stopping them as they used to?

Since when is it Mexico's job to act as America's border patrol?

Listen, bitch, the only thing strong about you is the body odor since you ***** don't use deodorant! It's a shame you've forgotten how to spell also...and you talk about growing up?

It's Mexico's job to enforce their laws as they had been, but the DEAL was brokered, and NO MARINE was part of the Manchurian muslims plan!

Here sweet lips, pick 2 or 3 from this latest group, you might even decide men are better sex partners.... then again!

 

[francoHFW]

They're coming HERE. Idjit. Mexico probably has a good ID card, that Pubs don't allow here...

You're more fucked up tonight than normal, more rants please, your entertainment value increases with the shrillness of your stupidity!

So why do you think we have 11 million illegals working, paying taxes, owning homes, getting health care, etc, etc? Shyttehead.

 

[Dot Com]

because the 2008 law signed by Bush applies to children from everywhere BUT Mexico.

 

[Lakhota]

They're all flooding north hoping that Reagan will arise from the grave and give them amnesty.

 

[Vigilante]

They're coming HERE. Idjit. Mexico probably has a good ID card, that Pubs don't allow here...

You're more fucked up tonight than normal, more rants please, your entertainment value increases with the shrillness of your stupidity!

So why do you think we have 11 million illegals working, paying taxes, owning homes, getting health care, etc, etc? Shyttehead.

Stupidity, and what part of 90 MILLION UNEMPLOYED AMERICANS CITIZENS do these fucking invaders affect?

You ARE the dumbest fucking subversive here...you should be proud of that fact!

 

[Vigilante]

They're all flooding north hoping that Reagan will arise from the grave and give them amnesty.

This will fall on limited IQ's, so you Patriots might want to use this when one of these brain dead zombies brings it up again, and they will....

Ed Meese reported that Ronald Reagan regarded the 1986 amnesty as his biggest presidential mistake. Here`s an article from Conservative Heritage Times....

According to Ronald Reagan himself, as told to his trusted long-time friend and U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese, the biggest mistake of his presidency was signing the 1986 amnesty for what turned out to be more than half the five million illegal immigrants in the country. Reagan was uncomfortable with the amnesty but was persuaded by some of the leaders of his own party (still living) that it would only affect a small number of illegal immigrants and would assure that Congress would follow through with more vigorous enforcement of U.S. immigration laws. The misnamed Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986 was touted by its supporters as “comprehensive immigration reform” that would grant amnesty only to a few long-settled immigrants and strengthen border security and internal immigration enforcement against employers who were hiring illegal immigrants.

Internal enforcement was critical to Reagan. He knew that the real key to stopping illegal immigration was to cut off the job magnet at the employment place. He was also honest enough to call what he believed would only be a small amnesty by its real name—amnesty. He did not try to deceive the American people into thinking it was not really an amnesty, a deception much in vogue with many politicians today.

There are various accounts of how many amnesties were expected with passage of the 1986 amnesty. Figures range from 300,000 (Gingrich, who voted for it) to about 2.1 million. Some reasonable estimates center around 1.2 million. The actual result was 2.7 million. Close to one third of the amnesties given were based on document fraud.
For the first six months after the amnesty there was a modest fall in illegal immigration, but within 12 months illegal immigration was breaking all previous records, rising to 800,000 per year. Friends and relatives of the newly legalized immigrants began to pour into the United States. They were followed by more illegal job seekers who saw continued opportunities for more amnesties. In fact, the 1986 amnesty resulted in six more amnesties from 1994 to 2000, awarding legal status to another 3.0 million illegal immigrants. By 1997, the number of illegal immigrants in the country was already back up to the 5.0 million in the U.S. before the 1986 amnesty. Amnesty has proved to be a slippery slope. Amnesties beget more amnesties and more illegal immigrants. Can you imagine the consequences of amnesty for the 11 million or more illegals now in the United States?

There were 5.0 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. in 1986 because we had allowed cheap-labor special interests to dominate immigration policy to the point of non-enforcement. We had become lax on border security and had ceased to enforce immigration laws at the workplace. Lack of enforcement at the workplace was by far the more important of the two chief causes of illegal immigration, as it is today.

Reagan thought he was trading a small amnesty for all-important workplace enforcement and increased border security. But once the amnesty was done and multiplying far beyond expectations, the special interests went to work at killing enforcement at the employment place. The chief culprits were the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and large agriculture corporations that lobbied Congress into backing off enforcement.
According to a 1997 report by the Center for Immigration Studies, the cost of amnesty for 2.7 million illegal immigrants had accumulated to $156.7 billion (in 1986 dollars!) by 1997. The net cost after $78 billion in tax collections was $78.7 billion dollars. This amounts to a subsidy per amnestied illegal of $29,148 in 1986 dollars, which is an important indirect subsidy for the employers of illegal workers. But U.S. workers paid the highest price. The 1986 amnesty displaced 1,872,000 American workers over the next decade. This and downward pressure on American wages are not adequately accounted for in the report. In fact, downward pressure on U.S. worker income may be the largest cost to the American economy of amnesty and excess immigration levels.

Only 36 percent of the 1986 amnesty recipients spoke English well, and only 28 percent of those over age 24 had graduated from high school.
Recently the liberal media has been pushing its pro-amnesty agenda by painting a false picture of Reagan on immigration and amnesty. Reagan saw that illegal immigration was becoming a big problem and wanted to stop it. He was persuaded to allow a relatively small amnesty as a bargaining chip to strengthen border security, and more importantly, workplace enforcement. Reagan wanted to fine employers $3,000 to $10,000 for each illegal immigrant deliberately hired. Congress betrayed him on the enforcement measures and probably the extent and eventual costs of the amnesty. Blindness to likely consequences and costs of social legislation seems to be an inherent characteristic of liberal politicians of both major parties. One of the great shortcomings of progressives is their inability to progress to step 2 or 3 in thinking through the logical consequences of legislation. They have an unshakeable faith in the wisdom of the latest poll of uninformed voters. Reagan should have known better than to trust the happy-clappy liberals and servants of the big dollar lobbyists. He made a big mistake, but he admitted it.

Ronald Reagan was not comfortable with amnesty. He was pro-enforcement, and he admitted to Edwin Meese that the biggest mistake of his presidency was to sign the 1986 amnesty. We should learn from the wisdom Reagan gained by bitter experience. Any amnesty is a slippery slope to national economic and social disaster.

Ronald Reagan`s Biggest Mistake – According to Reagan Himself, (Conservative Heritage Times, January 2nd, 2012)

 

[francoHFW]

You're more fucked up tonight than normal, more rants please, your entertainment value increases with the shrillness of your stupidity!

So why do you think we have 11 million illegals working, paying taxes, owning homes, getting health care, etc, etc? Shyttehead.

Stupidity, and what part of 90 MILLION UNEMPLOYED AMERICANS CITIZENS do these fucking invaders affect?

You ARE the dumbest fucking subversive here...you should be proud of that fact!

Strangely, Pub dupe, you're actually right- the stupidity of Pub dupes.BREAKING!- Megarich Pubs LOVE cheap, easily bullied labor, and distract chumps like you with bs about useless fences and unconstitutional harassment laws. THINK, if you can...