Why is it a 'leak' when it concerns presidential collusion with a rival like Russia?

JohnnyApplesack

Gold Member
Feb 8, 2011
2,660
355
130
Have we 1984'd ourselves into believing those who alert the country to high treason in the WH are merely 'leakers' and should be ignored?

unreal, nice work righties
 
Have we 1984'd ourselves into believing those who alert the country to high treason in the WH are merely 'leakers' and should be ignored?

unreal, nice work righties

Flynn has been cleared, he did not talk about sanctions or anything vital.

Intel agents were doing obama's bidding. Wikileaks on Obama
 
Because it's the definition of a leak, which is when confidential information is disclosed. Apparently it's considered confidential when Flynn was talking to the Russian ambassador. And there is absolutely no proof of any collusion with anyone. One thing about liberals, they make a hell of a lot of accusations but actual hard proof is VERY hard to come by.

Flynn is gone because he lied to Pence, not because he colluded with Russia.
 
JohnyBallsack wants it both ways. Hypocritical leftie ballsack
 
Have we 1984'd ourselves into believing those who alert the country to high treason in the WH are merely 'leakers' and should be ignored?

unreal, nice work righties

Feel free to show us any "high treason" committed by the Trump staff.
 
Because it's the definition of a leak, which is when confidential information is disclosed. Apparently it's considered confidential when Flynn was talking to the Russian ambassador. And there is absolutely no proof of any collusion with anyone. One thing about liberals, they make a hell of a lot of accusations but actual hard proof is VERY hard to come by.

Flynn is gone because he lied to Pence, not because he colluded with Russia.

this you Spicer?
 
The word leak you used is misused. The word should be rumor.

no, documents were leaked to the press

There was nothing in the conversation that was wrong, it is just the fact the two spoke while flynn was a private citizen. No wrongdoing
 
Have we 1984'd ourselves into believing those who alert the country to high treason in the WH are merely 'leakers' and should be ignored?

unreal, nice work righties
Bwahahahahaha!!! I agree with you. The question is: why don't you agree with yourself? That sure as hell wasnt your position with the info released by WikiLeaks about the DNC.

Talk about "high treason" - it showed that the DNC was rigging their own primary for Hitlery Clinton. Taking away the voice of their mindless minions - such as yourself.
 
Have we 1984'd ourselves into believing those who alert the country to high treason in the WH are merely 'leakers' and should be ignored?

unreal, nice work righties
Bwahahahahaha!!! I agree with you. The question is: why don't you agree with yourself? That sure as hell wasnt your position with the info released by WikiLeaks about the DNC.

Talk about "high treason" - it showed that the DNC was rigging their own primary for Hitlery Clinton. Taking away the voice of their mindless minions - such as yourself.
Exactly. The hypocritical leftie ballsacks weren't concerned with the content of the released Clinton leaks, just the source, now they're concerned with the content, but not the source.
 
Have we 1984'd ourselves into believing those who alert the country to high treason in the WH are merely 'leakers' and should be ignored?

unreal, nice work righties
Bwahahahahaha!!! I agree with you. The question is: why don't you agree with yourself? That sure as hell wasnt your position with the info released by WikiLeaks about the DNC.

Talk about "high treason" - it showed that the DNC was rigging their own primary for Hitlery Clinton. Taking away the voice of their mindless minions - such as yourself.
Exactly. The hypocritical leftie ballsacks weren't concerned with the content of the released Clinton leaks, just the source, now they're concerned with the content, but not the source.
That's a primary trait of the left-wing hatriots.
 
Have we 1984'd ourselves into believing those who alert the country to high treason in the WH are merely 'leakers' and should be ignored?

unreal, nice work righties

Flynn has been cleared, he did not talk about sanctions or anything vital.

Intel agents were doing obama's bidding. Wikileaks on Obama

pretty sure you're in the bubble, can't make much sense of all that but appreciate the feedback anyway
 

Forum List

Back
Top