Pop23
Gold Member
dont think so, it can be shown that a straight family tree can lead to birth defects after a few generations.The same will be for same sex siblings over the age of legal consent
cousins yes, but siblings no.
as as same sex, if you let the same sex siblings marry, then you are discriminating against opposit sex siblings. All sibling marriage will therefore continue to be illegal.
Ahhhhh, the procreation argument?
Get with the times DOOD.
Please post the name of the same sex coupling that ever produced a child. You are discriminating against them because someone else can procreate?
That's funny than hell
Maybe it should be illegal because it's icky?
Hey, if you want incest marriage, make your case for it.
You already won that. You created the argument that will eventually make many incestuous marriages legal. Or you going to go back to you're reliance on tradition, which by the way, is absolutely precious.
The Obergefell ruling makes no mention of 'incest'. So I'm pretty sure you hallucinated that one.
Make your case for why you want incest marriage.
There were no words "same sex" prior to Obergefell idiot.
You opened the door with the "anyone should be free to marry who they wish" nonsense.
Tell me the legal reasoning to deny same sex siblings, above the age of consent?
Go ahead, the best I've heard is the absurd.....
Males and females procreate argument.
Same sex IS NOT the same as opposte sex.
Would allowing it harm your marriage?
Or is it just icky
By the way, I would oppose it, but likely would not have a leg to stand on now.