Why is gay marriage legal, but not polygamy?

[Syriusly]

That's the only way to make gays as well.

And soon, if you want a girl that is, all you will need is two women...

In your unpondered utopian brave new world, will that blow to the nuclear family also not be allowed to the people to decide upon? What measures of frankensteinian mutilation of natural law will be out of bounds? Can you define that Paint? In the name of "personal freedoms"? I become especially concerned about your flippant disregard for what type of experience that child would be put through (or denied) as if it was not even worthy of being an afterthought. Have we just shitcanned child psychology on the altar of the LGBT downhill freight train without brakes?

Is everyone else enjoying watching Silhouette's complete meltdown over Friday's ruling?

Is anyone surprised?

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Polygamy is a simple extension of the USSC issuance of a right to marry whomever you love.

The USSC never so much as mentions polygamy in the Obergefell ruling. You've hallucinated all of that.

You run like a child in you're denial of that fact. It does not matter what current law states as the right to marry changed with that ruling.

Deal with facts bigot.

On the contrary, fundamental incompatibility with our marriage law would be a perfectly valid justification for denying polygamy. As our current marriage laws simply cannot answer questions that arise under polygamy.

While with same sex marriage, they can.

And you've already conceded the point.

You're still running.

Says the poor soul that abandoned any mention of the law, conceded my entire argument....and now refuses to discuss either.

You're done, troll.

The law changed dummy.

Look in the mirror Skylar, you're looking at a bigot

What law changed?

Gay marriage has been legal in Massachusetts for 10 years- yet there is still no legal polygamous marriage in Mass.

the supreme ct never made a ruling on gay marriage, it was left up to the states. the ruling from the supreme court the other day did not make gay marriage legal or mandatory, it only made it so all states had to recognize a gay marriage from another state. Individual states can still restrict marriage to just a man and a woman.
as far as polygamy being legal or not in Massachusetts, the supreme court did rule on polygamy previously, so that made it a federal restriction that the states could not over ride.

 

[Pop23]

Polygamy is a simple extension of the USSC issuance of a right to marry whomever you love.

The USSC never so much as mentions polygamy in the Obergefell ruling. You've hallucinated all of that.

You run like a child in you're denial of that fact. It does not matter what current law states as the right to marry changed with that ruling.

Deal with facts bigot.

On the contrary, fundamental incompatibility with our marriage law would be a perfectly valid justification for denying polygamy. As our current marriage laws simply cannot answer questions that arise under polygamy.

While with same sex marriage, they can.

And you've already conceded the point.

You're still running.

Says the poor soul that abandoned any mention of the law, conceded my entire argument....and now refuses to discuss either.

You're done, troll.

The law changed dummy.

Look in the mirror Skylar, you're looking at a bigot

What law changed?

Gay marriage has been legal in Massachusetts for 10 years- yet there is still no legal polygamous marriage in Mass.

You are delusional. Until the SC redefined marriage polygamy was almost impossible, now it appears not only possible, but using YOUR arguments, inevitable.

 

[Syriusly]

The USSC never so much as mentions polygamy in the Obergefell ruling. You've hallucinated all of that.

On the contrary, fundamental incompatibility with our marriage law would be a perfectly valid justification for denying polygamy. As our current marriage laws simply cannot answer questions that arise under polygamy.

While with same sex marriage, they can.

And you've already conceded the point.

You're still running.

Says the poor soul that abandoned any mention of the law, conceded my entire argument....and now refuses to discuss either.

You're done, troll.

The law changed dummy.

Look in the mirror Skylar, you're looking at a bigot

What law changed?

Gay marriage has been legal in Massachusetts for 10 years- yet there is still no legal polygamous marriage in Mass.

. Individual states can still restrict marriage to just a man and a woman..

Uh- no.

They can't- that was rather the point of the ruling on Friday.

 

[Pop23]

That's the only way to make gays as well.

And soon, if you want a girl that is, all you will need is two women...

In your unpondered utopian brave new world, will that blow to the nuclear family also not be allowed to the people to decide upon? What measures of frankensteinian mutilation of natural law will be out of bounds? Can you define that Paint? In the name of "personal freedoms"? I become especially concerned about your flippant disregard for what type of experience that child would be put through (or denied) as if it was not even worthy of being an afterthought. Have we just shitcanned child psychology on the altar of the LGBT downhill freight train without brakes?

Is everyone else enjoying watching Silhouette's complete meltdown over Friday's ruling?

Is anyone surprised?

Translation

Progs hate having to justify their absurdity

They also prefer shutting down debate over acting like adults

 

[Syriusly]

The USSC never so much as mentions polygamy in the Obergefell ruling. You've hallucinated all of that.

On the contrary, fundamental incompatibility with our marriage law would be a perfectly valid justification for denying polygamy. As our current marriage laws simply cannot answer questions that arise under polygamy.

While with same sex marriage, they can.

And you've already conceded the point.

You're still running.

Says the poor soul that abandoned any mention of the law, conceded my entire argument....and now refuses to discuss either.

You're done, troll.

The law changed dummy.

Look in the mirror Skylar, you're looking at a bigot

What law changed?

Gay marriage has been legal in Massachusetts for 10 years- yet there is still no legal polygamous marriage in Mass.

You are delusional. Until the SC redefined marriage polygamy was almost impossible, now it appears not only possible, but using YOUR arguments, inevitable.

Do you have any argument against Polygamy other than you think its 'icky'?

If you don't have an argument against polygamy today- then you didn't have one on Thursday.

Not my problem if you cannot figure out why you object to polygamy.

 

[Syriusly]

That's the only way to make gays as well.

And soon, if you want a girl that is, all you will need is two women...

In your unpondered utopian brave new world, will that blow to the nuclear family also not be allowed to the people to decide upon? What measures of frankensteinian mutilation of natural law will be out of bounds? Can you define that Paint? In the name of "personal freedoms"? I become especially concerned about your flippant disregard for what type of experience that child would be put through (or denied) as if it was not even worthy of being an afterthought. Have we just shitcanned child psychology on the altar of the LGBT downhill freight train without brakes?

Is everyone else enjoying watching Silhouette's complete meltdown over Friday's ruling?

Is anyone surprised?

Translation

Progs hate having to justify their absurdity

They also prefer shutting down debate over acting like adults

Translation: Silhouette is a homophobic bigot and I am enjoying her complete meltdown over all of her fantasies being rejected.

And Conservative bigots are still conservative bigots.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

The USSC never so much as mentions polygamy in the Obergefell ruling. You've hallucinated all of that.

On the contrary, fundamental incompatibility with our marriage law would be a perfectly valid justification for denying polygamy. As our current marriage laws simply cannot answer questions that arise under polygamy.

While with same sex marriage, they can.

And you've already conceded the point.

You're still running.

Says the poor soul that abandoned any mention of the law, conceded my entire argument....and now refuses to discuss either.

You're done, troll.

The law changed dummy.

Look in the mirror Skylar, you're looking at a bigot

What law changed?

Gay marriage has been legal in Massachusetts for 10 years- yet there is still no legal polygamous marriage in Mass.

You are delusional. Until the SC redefined marriage polygamy was almost impossible, now it appears not only possible, but using YOUR arguments, inevitable.

the courts will be challeneged, and unless the courts can come up with a reason that it is detrimental to society, then it will have to be allowed, the reason used by the supreme court last time around is no longer a valid excuse.
Being outside of the established norms of society is no longer a valid argument to prohibit polygamy.

 

[Pop23]

You're still running.

Says the poor soul that abandoned any mention of the law, conceded my entire argument....and now refuses to discuss either.

You're done, troll.

The law changed dummy.

Look in the mirror Skylar, you're looking at a bigot

What law changed?

Gay marriage has been legal in Massachusetts for 10 years- yet there is still no legal polygamous marriage in Mass.

You are delusional. Until the SC redefined marriage polygamy was almost impossible, now it appears not only possible, but using YOUR arguments, inevitable.

Do you have any argument against Polygamy other than you think its 'icky'?

If you don't have an argument against polygamy today- then you didn't have one on Thursday.

Not my problem if you cannot figure out why you object to polygamy.

There you go, the ruling justified polygamist marriage. You and Skylar have some talking to do.

 

[Pop23]

You're still running.

Says the poor soul that abandoned any mention of the law, conceded my entire argument....and now refuses to discuss either.

You're done, troll.

The law changed dummy.

Look in the mirror Skylar, you're looking at a bigot

What law changed?

Gay marriage has been legal in Massachusetts for 10 years- yet there is still no legal polygamous marriage in Mass.

You are delusional. Until the SC redefined marriage polygamy was almost impossible, now it appears not only possible, but using YOUR arguments, inevitable.

the courts will be challeneged, and unless the courts can come up with a reason that it is detrimental to society, then it will have to be allowed, the reason used by the supreme court last time around is no longer a valid excuse.
Being outside of the established norms of society is no longer a valid argument to prohibit polygamy.

The same will be for same sex siblings over the age of legal consent

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Says the poor soul that abandoned any mention of the law, conceded my entire argument....and now refuses to discuss either.

You're done, troll.

The law changed dummy.

Look in the mirror Skylar, you're looking at a bigot

What law changed?

Gay marriage has been legal in Massachusetts for 10 years- yet there is still no legal polygamous marriage in Mass.

You are delusional. Until the SC redefined marriage polygamy was almost impossible, now it appears not only possible, but using YOUR arguments, inevitable.

the courts will be challeneged, and unless the courts can come up with a reason that it is detrimental to society, then it will have to be allowed, the reason used by the supreme court last time around is no longer a valid excuse.
Being outside of the established norms of society is no longer a valid argument to prohibit polygamy.

The same will be for same sex siblings over the age of legal consent

dont think so, it can be shown that a straight family tree can lead to birth defects after a few generations.
cousins yes, but siblings no.
as as same sex, if you let the same sex siblings marry, then you are discriminating against opposit sex siblings. All sibling marriage will therefore continue to be illegal.

 

[Pop23]

The law changed dummy.

Look in the mirror Skylar, you're looking at a bigot

What law changed?

Gay marriage has been legal in Massachusetts for 10 years- yet there is still no legal polygamous marriage in Mass.

You are delusional. Until the SC redefined marriage polygamy was almost impossible, now it appears not only possible, but using YOUR arguments, inevitable.

the courts will be challeneged, and unless the courts can come up with a reason that it is detrimental to society, then it will have to be allowed, the reason used by the supreme court last time around is no longer a valid excuse.
Being outside of the established norms of society is no longer a valid argument to prohibit polygamy.

The same will be for same sex siblings over the age of legal consent

dont think so, it can be shown that a straight family tree can lead to birth defects after a few generations.
cousins yes, but siblings no.
as as same sex, if you let the same sex siblings marry, then you are discriminating against opposit sex siblings. All sibling marriage will therefore continue to be illegal.

Ahhhhh, the procreation argument?

Get with the times DOOD.

Please post the name of the same sex coupling that ever produced a child. You are discriminating against them because someone else can procreate?

That's funny than hell

Maybe it should be illegal because it's icky?

 

[Maryland Patriot]

What law changed?

Gay marriage has been legal in Massachusetts for 10 years- yet there is still no legal polygamous marriage in Mass.

You are delusional. Until the SC redefined marriage polygamy was almost impossible, now it appears not only possible, but using YOUR arguments, inevitable.

the courts will be challeneged, and unless the courts can come up with a reason that it is detrimental to society, then it will have to be allowed, the reason used by the supreme court last time around is no longer a valid excuse.
Being outside of the established norms of society is no longer a valid argument to prohibit polygamy.

The same will be for same sex siblings over the age of legal consent

dont think so, it can be shown that a straight family tree can lead to birth defects after a few generations.
cousins yes, but siblings no.
as as same sex, if you let the same sex siblings marry, then you are discriminating against opposit sex siblings. All sibling marriage will therefore continue to be illegal.

Ahhhhh, the procreation argument?

Get with the times DOOD.

Please post the name of the same sex coupling that ever produced a child. You are discriminating against them because someone else can procreate?

That's funny than hell

Maybe it should be illegal because it's icky?

who is discriminating? are you a damn idiot.

 

[Pop23]

You are delusional. Until the SC redefined marriage polygamy was almost impossible, now it appears not only possible, but using YOUR arguments, inevitable.

the courts will be challeneged, and unless the courts can come up with a reason that it is detrimental to society, then it will have to be allowed, the reason used by the supreme court last time around is no longer a valid excuse.
Being outside of the established norms of society is no longer a valid argument to prohibit polygamy.

The same will be for same sex siblings over the age of legal consent

dont think so, it can be shown that a straight family tree can lead to birth defects after a few generations.
cousins yes, but siblings no.
as as same sex, if you let the same sex siblings marry, then you are discriminating against opposit sex siblings. All sibling marriage will therefore continue to be illegal.

Ahhhhh, the procreation argument?

Get with the times DOOD.

Please post the name of the same sex coupling that ever produced a child. You are discriminating against them because someone else can procreate?

That's funny than hell

Maybe it should be illegal because it's icky?

who is discriminating? are you a damn idiot.

The government idiot

 

[Maryland Patriot]

What law changed?

Gay marriage has been legal in Massachusetts for 10 years- yet there is still no legal polygamous marriage in Mass.

You are delusional. Until the SC redefined marriage polygamy was almost impossible, now it appears not only possible, but using YOUR arguments, inevitable.

the courts will be challeneged, and unless the courts can come up with a reason that it is detrimental to society, then it will have to be allowed, the reason used by the supreme court last time around is no longer a valid excuse.
Being outside of the established norms of society is no longer a valid argument to prohibit polygamy.

The same will be for same sex siblings over the age of legal consent

dont think so, it can be shown that a straight family tree can lead to birth defects after a few generations.
cousins yes, but siblings no.
as as same sex, if you let the same sex siblings marry, then you are discriminating against opposit sex siblings. All sibling marriage will therefore continue to be illegal.

Ahhhhh, the procreation argument?

Get with the times DOOD.

Please post the name of the same sex coupling that ever produced a child. You are discriminating against them because someone else can procreate?

That's funny than hell

Maybe it should be illegal because it's icky?

no, you quoted my post and specifically said "You are discriminating against them because someone else can procreate?"
then you said the government? Im not the government.

 

[Pop23]

You are delusional. Until the SC redefined marriage polygamy was almost impossible, now it appears not only possible, but using YOUR arguments, inevitable.

the courts will be challeneged, and unless the courts can come up with a reason that it is detrimental to society, then it will have to be allowed, the reason used by the supreme court last time around is no longer a valid excuse.
Being outside of the established norms of society is no longer a valid argument to prohibit polygamy.

The same will be for same sex siblings over the age of legal consent

dont think so, it can be shown that a straight family tree can lead to birth defects after a few generations.
cousins yes, but siblings no.
as as same sex, if you let the same sex siblings marry, then you are discriminating against opposit sex siblings. All sibling marriage will therefore continue to be illegal.

Ahhhhh, the procreation argument?

Get with the times DOOD.

Please post the name of the same sex coupling that ever produced a child. You are discriminating against them because someone else can procreate?

That's funny than hell

Maybe it should be illegal because it's icky?

no, you quoted my post and specifically said "You are discriminating against them because someone else can procreate?"
then you said the government? Im not the government.

Very sorry, your opinion is discrimatory toward the same sex siblings based on the ability to procreate by the opposite sex couple.

Fixed it

 

[Skylar]

What law changed?

Gay marriage has been legal in Massachusetts for 10 years- yet there is still no legal polygamous marriage in Mass.

You are delusional. Until the SC redefined marriage polygamy was almost impossible, now it appears not only possible, but using YOUR arguments, inevitable.

the courts will be challeneged, and unless the courts can come up with a reason that it is detrimental to society, then it will have to be allowed, the reason used by the supreme court last time around is no longer a valid excuse.
Being outside of the established norms of society is no longer a valid argument to prohibit polygamy.

The same will be for same sex siblings over the age of legal consent

dont think so, it can be shown that a straight family tree can lead to birth defects after a few generations.
cousins yes, but siblings no.
as as same sex, if you let the same sex siblings marry, then you are discriminating against opposit sex siblings. All sibling marriage will therefore continue to be illegal.

Ahhhhh, the procreation argument?

Get with the times DOOD.

Please post the name of the same sex coupling that ever produced a child. You are discriminating against them because someone else can procreate?

That's funny than hell

Maybe it should be illegal because it's icky?

Hey, if you want incest marriage, make your case for it.

 

[Skylar]

That's the only way to make gays as well.

And soon, if you want a girl that is, all you will need is two women...

In your unpondered utopian brave new world, will that blow to the nuclear family also not be allowed to the people to decide upon? What measures of frankensteinian mutilation of natural law will be out of bounds? Can you define that Paint? In the name of "personal freedoms"? I become especially concerned about your flippant disregard for what type of experience that child would be put through (or denied) as if it was not even worthy of being an afterthought. Have we just shitcanned child psychology on the altar of the LGBT downhill freight train without brakes?

Is everyone else enjoying watching Silhouette's complete meltdown over Friday's ruling?

Is anyone surprised?

Nope. This entire scenario, from the rulings to the basis of the ruling, to Silo's reaction to the ruling......was all utterly predictable.

 

[Pop23]

You are delusional. Until the SC redefined marriage polygamy was almost impossible, now it appears not only possible, but using YOUR arguments, inevitable.

the courts will be challeneged, and unless the courts can come up with a reason that it is detrimental to society, then it will have to be allowed, the reason used by the supreme court last time around is no longer a valid excuse.
Being outside of the established norms of society is no longer a valid argument to prohibit polygamy.

The same will be for same sex siblings over the age of legal consent

dont think so, it can be shown that a straight family tree can lead to birth defects after a few generations.
cousins yes, but siblings no.
as as same sex, if you let the same sex siblings marry, then you are discriminating against opposit sex siblings. All sibling marriage will therefore continue to be illegal.

Ahhhhh, the procreation argument?

Get with the times DOOD.

Please post the name of the same sex coupling that ever produced a child. You are discriminating against them because someone else can procreate?

That's funny than hell

Maybe it should be illegal because it's icky?

Hey, if you want incest marriage, make your case for it.

You already won that. You created the argument that will eventually make many incestuous marriages legal. Or you going to go back to you're reliance on tradition, which by the way, is absolutely precious.

 

[Skylar]

the courts will be challeneged, and unless the courts can come up with a reason that it is detrimental to society, then it will have to be allowed, the reason used by the supreme court last time around is no longer a valid excuse.
Being outside of the established norms of society is no longer a valid argument to prohibit polygamy.

The same will be for same sex siblings over the age of legal consent

dont think so, it can be shown that a straight family tree can lead to birth defects after a few generations.
cousins yes, but siblings no.
as as same sex, if you let the same sex siblings marry, then you are discriminating against opposit sex siblings. All sibling marriage will therefore continue to be illegal.

Ahhhhh, the procreation argument?

Get with the times DOOD.

Please post the name of the same sex coupling that ever produced a child. You are discriminating against them because someone else can procreate?

That's funny than hell

Maybe it should be illegal because it's icky?

Hey, if you want incest marriage, make your case for it.

You already won that. You created the argument that will eventually make many incestuous marriages legal. Or you going to go back to you're reliance on tradition, which by the way, is absolutely precious.

The Obergefell ruling makes no mention of 'incest'. So I'm pretty sure you hallucinated that one.

Make your case for why you want incest marriage.