- Jan 8, 2011
- 65,902
- 35,028
- 2,605
Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.
Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.
Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.
Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.
Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.
Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.
Wall Street has far outpaced all of it. You know, those who don't actually work but live very well off the Socialist policies of the Fed.
Yes some good things have occurred, but you’d have to be blind not to see the injustice of a massive government spending trillions, while throwing peanuts at the masses but greatly enriching the rich.Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.
Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.
Progs are for communism and fascism. Its been their show for 50 years or so. Repubs are not innocent. However Progs do not seem to remove any laws and rules and departments that are deemed communist and fascist. They even add to it.You got it wrong.Democrats are for communism,, but they have to sneak to that point.. they haven’t passed enough liberty stripping laws to fully enforce communism.
cities like Boston Baltimore Chicago Detroit Are communist like..
Trumpers are for fascism. They don't even try to hide it
Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.
Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.
Wall Street has far outpaced all of it. You know, those who don't actually work but live very well off the Socialist policies of the Fed.
So? What you are saying is that if some people are getting wealthy but that wealth growth is also helping wage growth for lower wage earners, that is a bad thing? Envy raises it ugly head again.
BTW, anyone with money in the market or a pension should be happy with the growth in the market. It doesn't bother me one bit that a very wealthy Wall Street guy is doing well.
Yes some good things have occurred, but you’d have to be blind not to see the injustice of a massive government spending trillions, while throwing peanuts at the masses but greatly enriching the rich.Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.
Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.
Barrack Hussein Obama and Bernie Sanders have the same socialist, far left, political beliefs. What is DNC trying to torpedo "The Bern" in favor of Biden?
Obama spearheads campaign against Sanders’ nomination as Democratic presidential candidate
Only thing I can think of is that Sanders is not corrupt enough for them.
BS. Stop believing propaganda.Yes some good things have occurred, but you’d have to be blind not to see the injustice of a massive government spending trillions, while throwing peanuts at the masses but greatly enriching the rich.Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.
Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.
A rising tide lifts all boats. The rich will get richer and the poor are getting richer and by a larger percentage. Envy is the problem here. Plain and simple.
Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.
Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.
Wall Street has far outpaced all of it. You know, those who don't actually work but live very well off the Socialist policies of the Fed.
So? What you are saying is that if some people are getting wealthy but that wealth growth is also helping wage growth for lower wage earners, that is a bad thing? Envy raises it ugly head again.
BTW, anyone with money in the market or a pension should be happy with the growth in the market. It doesn't bother me one bit that a very wealthy Wall Street guy is doing well.
$1 million for me, $1 dollar for you. No, I do not think that is a good thing.
Yes some good things have occurred, but you’d have to be blind not to see the injustice of a massive government spending trillions, while throwing peanuts at the masses but greatly enriching the rich.Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.
Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.
A rising tide lifts all boats. The rich will get richer and the poor are getting richer and by a larger percentage. Envy is the problem here. Plain and simple.
BS. Stop believing propaganda.Yes some good things have occurred, but you’d have to be blind not to see the injustice of a massive government spending trillions, while throwing peanuts at the masses but greatly enriching the rich.Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.
Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.
A rising tide lifts all boats. The rich will get richer and the poor are getting richer and by a larger percentage. Envy is the problem here. Plain and simple.
Yes some good things have occurred, but you’d have to be blind not to see the injustice of a massive government spending trillions, while throwing peanuts at the masses but greatly enriching the rich.Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?Sanders is no further "left" than Trump. The only difference is who their policies benefit.
Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.
A rising tide lifts all boats. The rich will get richer and the poor are getting richer and by a larger percentage. Envy is the problem here. Plain and simple.
No, they are not.
Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?
Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.
Wall Street has far outpaced all of it. You know, those who don't actually work but live very well off the Socialist policies of the Fed.
So? What you are saying is that if some people are getting wealthy but that wealth growth is also helping wage growth for lower wage earners, that is a bad thing? Envy raises it ugly head again.
BTW, anyone with money in the market or a pension should be happy with the growth in the market. It doesn't bother me one bit that a very wealthy Wall Street guy is doing well.
$1 million for me, $1 dollar for you. No, I do not think that is a good thing.
Again, this is simply envy in full force. You can't successfully make the "rich" much less rich and at the same time help all the poor. That is a house of cards, not to mention, stealing. The progressive tax system already has a Robin Hood component, but that can only go so far before the "rich" run out of money.
Yes some good things have occurred, but you’d have to be blind not to see the injustice of a massive government spending trillions, while throwing peanuts at the masses but greatly enriching the rich.Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?
Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.
A rising tide lifts all boats. The rich will get richer and the poor are getting richer and by a larger percentage. Envy is the problem here. Plain and simple.
No, they are not.
They are earning more money. They may not be getting richer depending on how they choose to spend that extra money. There is an element of personal responsibility in play. I know mentioning PR is a big no no for most Democrats/liberals.
Yes some good things have occurred, but you’d have to be blind not to see the injustice of a massive government spending trillions, while throwing peanuts at the masses but greatly enriching the rich.Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.
A rising tide lifts all boats. The rich will get richer and the poor are getting richer and by a larger percentage. Envy is the problem here. Plain and simple.
No, they are not.
They are earning more money. They may not be getting richer depending on how they choose to spend that extra money. There is an element of personal responsibility in play. I know mentioning PR is a big no no for most Democrats/liberals.
They have to spend it on higher rent. Increased automobile costs. Increased food costs. They are at best treading water.
More bull shit. Envy my ass. I’m old. I got mine.Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?
Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.
Wall Street has far outpaced all of it. You know, those who don't actually work but live very well off the Socialist policies of the Fed.
So? What you are saying is that if some people are getting wealthy but that wealth growth is also helping wage growth for lower wage earners, that is a bad thing? Envy raises it ugly head again.
BTW, anyone with money in the market or a pension should be happy with the growth in the market. It doesn't bother me one bit that a very wealthy Wall Street guy is doing well.
$1 million for me, $1 dollar for you. No, I do not think that is a good thing.
Again, this is simply envy in full force. You can't successfully make the "rich" much less rich and at the same time help all the poor. That is a house of cards, not to mention, stealing. The progressive tax system already has a Robin Hood component, but that can only go so far before the "rich" run out of money.
WTF. Reagan started this bs of rising tide lifts all boats, only it hasn’t. Wake up. Income inequality has gone straight up since the 80s.BS. Stop believing propaganda.Yes some good things have occurred, but you’d have to be blind not to see the injustice of a massive government spending trillions, while throwing peanuts at the masses but greatly enriching the rich.Yes. Rather than enact government policy that benefits only the 1%, why not try policies that benefit the 90%?
Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.
A rising tide lifts all boats. The rich will get richer and the poor are getting richer and by a larger percentage. Envy is the problem here. Plain and simple.
Simple facts. The numbers don't lie.
More bull shit. Envy my ass. I’m old. I got mine.Once again you guys ignore facts. Incomes have risen at a higher percent amount lower wage workers than higher wage workers. Lower income earners have benefited more than higher income earners. I know for a fact that I pay significantly more taxes now than I did before the tax cut and I am in the higher income category.
Wall Street has far outpaced all of it. You know, those who don't actually work but live very well off the Socialist policies of the Fed.
So? What you are saying is that if some people are getting wealthy but that wealth growth is also helping wage growth for lower wage earners, that is a bad thing? Envy raises it ugly head again.
BTW, anyone with money in the market or a pension should be happy with the growth in the market. It doesn't bother me one bit that a very wealthy Wall Street guy is doing well.
$1 million for me, $1 dollar for you. No, I do not think that is a good thing.
Again, this is simply envy in full force. You can't successfully make the "rich" much less rich and at the same time help all the poor. That is a house of cards, not to mention, stealing. The progressive tax system already has a Robin Hood component, but that can only go so far before the "rich" run out of money.
Unlike you I care about my fellow Americans, many of whom are struggling financially, while your beloved wealthy live the life of kings and queens.