Why Is Congress Largely Ignoring Wasserman-Schultz Pakistani Spy Ring?

[mdk]

Republicans need to get control of Congress if we want to get to the bottom of this issue.

 

[DarkFury]

Why Is Congress Largely Ignoring Wasserman-Schultz Pakistani Spy Ring?

Some suggestions about why:

• Because they aren't given to talking conspiracy theories, most especially not with regard to people who matter little or not at all.
• Because handling espionage matters falls within the USIC's purview.
• Because Congress is a political body that isn't well suited to investigating things that have little to no political "red meat" on the bone, so to speak.
• They have bigger fish to fry, as it were.
• Because Rosiak's journalism hasn't risen to level of quality and rigor shown by the likes of Maggie Haberman, Carl Bernstein, Bob Woodward, and others who, unlike Rosiak, are "no joke."

A little history about Woodward and Carl Bernstien. At the time of Watergate they WERE viewed by main stream media as a joke. THEN shit started coming together. Their fame is based on the end result of what they found. They were NOT glorified members of the press.

 

[easyt65]

Why Is Congress Largely Ignoring Wasserman-Schultz Pakistani Spy Ring?

Because Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell hate you.

Obama's FBI, who for some reason gave jurisdiction in this case to the Keystone Cop Capitol Police - the dumbasses who let the server disappear WHILE THEY WERE MONITORING IT.

Again, the Obama administration allowed enemies of this country rape, pillage, and steal and get away with it while Democrats were once again trying to cover-up another crime.

Do you even know what year this is?

Are you SERIOUSLY suggesting that Americans should completely ignore the fact that Federal Democratic Party Politicians hired Hezbollah terrorist-connected spies, gave them illegal access to classified House files / data, allowed them to 'rape, pillage', and steal terabytes worth of classified US data, and engaged in a cover-up of the crimes because all of that was done (only) ONE YEAR AGO?

So not only are Democrats / snowflakes quick to hire terrorists / criminals, not only are they quick to attempt to cover-up their crimes, but they are extremely quick to demand that treason and espionage (and other crimes) that are in the past be ignored...


This coming from a snowflake who has bragged about the indictment of a man for a crime dating back to 2006, before Obama was even elected President, in an attempt to play 'Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon' to try to manufacture non-existent crimes against the current President....

Bwuhahahaha....

 

[easyt65]

Why Is Congress Largely Ignoring Wasserman-Schultz Pakistani Spy Ring?

Some suggestions about why:

• Because they aren't given to talking conspiracy theories, most especially not with regard to people who matter little or not at all.
• Because handling espionage matters falls within the USIC's purview.
• Because Congress is a political body that isn't well suited to investigating things that have little to no political "red meat" on the bone, so to speak.
• They have bigger fish to fry, as it were.
• Because Rosiak's journalism hasn't risen to level of quality and rigor shown by the likes of Maggie Haberman, Carl Bernstein, Bob Woodward, and others who, unlike Rosiak, are "no joke."

A little history about Woodward and Carl Bernstien. At the time of Watergate they WERE viewed by main stream media as a joke. THEN shit started coming together. Their fame is based on the end result of what they found. They were NOT glorified members of the press.

How about we just stick to the topic, which makes snowflakes EXTREMELY uncomfortable.....

 

[easyt65]

Republicans need to get control of Congress if we want to get to the bottom of this issue.

No, the DOJ just needs to fire - then arrest - Mueller and a lot of other Democrats whom existing evidence show committed a host of crimes - everything from 'Gross Negligence' to 'Espionage' to Obstruction' to 'Sedition' to Treason'...

 

[DarkFury]

Why Is Congress Largely Ignoring Wasserman-Schultz Pakistani Spy Ring?

Some suggestions about why:

• Because they aren't given to talking conspiracy theories, most especially not with regard to people who matter little or not at all.
• Because handling espionage matters falls within the USIC's purview.
• Because Congress is a political body that isn't well suited to investigating things that have little to no political "red meat" on the bone, so to speak.
• They have bigger fish to fry, as it were.
• Because Rosiak's journalism hasn't risen to level of quality and rigor shown by the likes of Maggie Haberman, Carl Bernstein, Bob Woodward, and others who, unlike Rosiak, are "no joke."

A little history about Woodward and Carl Bernstien. At the time of Watergate they WERE viewed by main stream media as a joke. THEN shit started coming together. Their fame is based on the end result of what they found. They were NOT glorified members of the press.

How about we just stick to the topic, which makes snowflakes EXTREMELY uncomfortable.....

It is topic, they were sniveling about the reporter. The TRUTH does not need some fancy name speaking it. Just someone interested in finding it.

 

[Muhammed]

Everyone is ignoring your mindless conspiracy theory because it's utter bullshit.

There is no "spy ring".

Could you explain the reasoning that you used to come to that conclusion?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Why Is Congress Ignoring Evidence of A Crime That Threatened / Threatens National Security?

"House investigators concluded that Democratic IT aides made unauthorized access to congressional servers in 2016, allegedly accessing the data of members for whom they did not work, logging in as members of Congress themselves, and covering their tracks, according to a presentation summarizing the findings of a four-month internal probe.

Their behavior mirrored a “classic method for insiders to exfiltrate data from an organization,” and they continued even after orders to stop, the briefing materials allege. There are indications that numerous members’ data may have been secretly residing not on their designated servers, but instead aggregated onto one server, according to the briefing and other sources. Authorities said that the entire server was then physically stolen."

WHY, as evidence now shows, did Democratic Leadership 'misrepresent' (LIE) the issue to their own members as solely a matter of theft and attempt to cover it up? (More Democrat cover up of foreign enemy crime against the US...)

"When acting on the findings, Democratic leadership appear to have misrepresented the issue to their own members as solely a matter of theft, a comparison of the investigators’ findings with Democrats’ recollections and a committee’s public statement shows, leading 44 Democrats to not conduct protective measures typically taken after a breach — including informing constituents whose personal information may have been exposed."

By Democratic Leaders telling their members it was only 'theft' and not an illegal breech perpetrated by terrorist-connected Pakistani spies, the Democrats were in essence helping the Pakistani spies to get away with their crimes!


House Report Concluded Pakistanis Made ‘Unauthorized Access’ To Congressional Servers

Same reason that every rational person in the world seems to "ignore" your absurd ideas... they are absurd. Bizarre, too. I would think that, after years and years of experiencing this same irrelevance, it would occur to you that -- oh just maybe -- your ideas are insane.

 

[easyt65]

There is no "spy ring".

Could you explain the reasoning that you used to come to that conclusion?

I can:

 

[easyt65]

Same reason that every rational person in the world seems to "ignore" your absurd ideas... they are absurd. Bizarre, too. I would think that, after years and years of experiencing this same irrelevance, it would occur to you that -- oh just maybe -- your ideas are insane.

I am sure it seems that way to you... Here's a suggestion....

 

[Siete]

Republicans need to get control of Congress if we want to get to the bottom of this issue.

dont look now but they are in control of congress, and dont tell easy whatever you do.. just allow him to showcase his stupidity..

 

[easyt65]

dont look now but they are in control of congress, and dont tell easy whatever you do.. just allow him to showcase his stupidity..

Yes, and they are faced with yet another case of Democrats helping terrorists. Obama was no starnager to Hezbollah, either.

Please, Siete, tell me how Democrats could not do a simple background check to find out these people were Hezbollah-connected..... before giving them illegal access to US classified.....

 

[mdk]

Republicans need to get control of Congress if we want to get to the bottom of this issue.

No, the DOJ just needs to fire - then arrest - Mueller and a lot of other Democrats whom existing evidence show committed a host of crimes - everything from 'Gross Negligence' to 'Espionage' to Obstruction' to 'Sedition' to Treason'...

It’s the fault of the DOJ that Congress is largely ignoring this matter?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Why Is Congress Ignoring Evidence of A Crime That Threatened / Threatens National Security?

Congress does not review science fiction ....

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Why Is Congress Largely Ignoring Wasserman-Schultz Pakistani Spy Ring?

Because it's not real, ya loon.

 

[Muhammed]

There is no "spy ring".

Could you explain the reasoning that you used to come to that conclusion?

I can:

View attachment 172038

Your concession is accepted.

 

[easyt65]

It’s the fault of the DOJ that Congress is largely ignoring this matter?

Ask the author who wrote the article....

Instead of dealing with proven cases of crimes, espionage, etc, though, we are still being forced to endure the left's witch hunt in which they still can't even prove a crime was ever committed warranting an investigation...

 

[easyt65]

Why Is Congress Ignoring Evidence of A Crime That Threatened / Threatens National Security?

Congress does not review science fiction ....

Damn, you got one of the worst cases of 'denial' I have ever seen. Either that or you just proved you don't know how to open links / read......

 

[DarkFury]

Why Is Congress Ignoring Evidence of A Crime That Threatened / Threatens National Security?

"House investigators concluded that Democratic IT aides made unauthorized access to congressional servers in 2016, allegedly accessing the data of members for whom they did not work, logging in as members of Congress themselves, and covering their tracks, according to a presentation summarizing the findings of a four-month internal probe.

Their behavior mirrored a “classic method for insiders to exfiltrate data from an organization,” and they continued even after orders to stop, the briefing materials allege. There are indications that numerous members’ data may have been secretly residing not on their designated servers, but instead aggregated onto one server, according to the briefing and other sources. Authorities said that the entire server was then physically stolen."

WHY, as evidence now shows, did Democratic Leadership 'misrepresent' (LIE) the issue to their own members as solely a matter of theft and attempt to cover it up? (More Democrat cover up of foreign enemy crime against the US...)

"When acting on the findings, Democratic leadership appear to have misrepresented the issue to their own members as solely a matter of theft, a comparison of the investigators’ findings with Democrats’ recollections and a committee’s public statement shows, leading 44 Democrats to not conduct protective measures typically taken after a breach — including informing constituents whose personal information may have been exposed."

By Democratic Leaders telling their members it was only 'theft' and not an illegal breech perpetrated by terrorist-connected Pakistani spies, the Democrats were in essence helping the Pakistani spies to get away with their crimes!


House Report Concluded Pakistanis Made ‘Unauthorized Access’ To Congressional Servers

Same reason that every rational person in the world seems to "ignore" your absurd ideas... they are absurd. Bizarre, too. I would think that, after years and years of experiencing this same irrelevance, it would occur to you that -- oh just maybe -- your ideas are insane.

The FACT that terrorists had access to our government computers is not absurd its FACT.
Documented by contact and backed up by bank statements. And that most generally is enough to convict someone.

 

[easyt65]

There is no "spy ring".

Could you explain the reasoning that you used to come to that conclusion?

I can:

View attachment 172038

Your concession is accepted.

Just trying to help the guy out.... I have proved over and over everything I have posted. It is interesting though, how snowflakes believe my being a liar is dependent upon how damning the evidence is against Democrats in my posts.