I can agree with that...with the caveat that parts of all could be true.1 – All religions were true – this seemed unlikely since there were almost an infinite number across the planet and they appeared to fundamentally contradict one another in their morality, concept of God(s), history, etc.
That's not an argument against the existence of a god, but rather against the posession by a god of certain qualities. If there is any thing powerful enough to be classified as a god, do we really have the perspective to say what one could/couldn't, should/shouldn't do? We just don't have the framework.2 – One religion was true while all others were false – this too seemed unlikely as why would God allow people to grow up learning lies and then judge them? Ideally it seemed God would want children to grow up without a religion and would, when they were adult enough to decide for themselves, choose which religion was true based on reason, morality, etc. It would be a conscious decision, not one made for them by their parents or community so if God were to later judge them at least they had a shot at salvation. Obviously this has never been the norm anywhere at any time in the past.
I find it interesting that you phrased it as a decision. For me it wasn't. It was a conclusion, not a decision.3 – No religion was true – this seemed the only logical answer then and didn’t seem so radical when I realized that if #2 above were true the majority of people in the world were WRONG. It seemed a modest leap from believing most people were wrong to all people were wrong (at that time I didn’t know anyone who admitted to me they did not believe in God).
Despite a lifetime of inquiry, I’ve never found a reason to change this decision.
Here's how I looked at it:
- What is a god, exactly?
- How could we distinguish a god from some other supernatural being or natural but completely different beings?
- Taking the world as it is, what would be the difference between a god (any one) and no gods, but people still believing as they do?
Since there is no good answer for 1. No solution to 2. And it couldn't figure out any difference between the two propositions in 3, I concluded that there is no reliable way to know if there are any gods or not.
That there is no way to tell if a god does or does not exist is the same as saying that no objective evidence can exist to support the existence of any god.
Therefore there is no reason to accept the existence of any.
Last edited: