Why I call the left commiecrats

[freedombecki]

You call them "commiecrats" because you are paranoid, delusional and retarded.

Agreed.

If it isn't the fault of liberals then it is the fault of Jews, gays, Mexicans, blacks, etc., etc., etc.

Maybe paranoid nutters shouldn't be allowed to own weapons.

That's just silly, Republicans freed the blacks in 1865. It cost 618,000 American lives to do it. Democrats fought Republicans tooth and nail to keep blacks down. Then nearly 100 years later, Lyndon B. Johnson convinces John F. Kennedy to stop the lynching and take the black vote over any which way they could. Now, they've convinced blacks to hate the people who gave up much to free them from the bonds of slavery, give them the vote, give them equal opportunities in school, as much as we could.

We risked all to make black people equal, but Democrats, eager for power, gave blacks a chance at revenge--at OTHER people than Democrats.

Blacks are now taking revenge on the party that freed them and saw them through until every path of equality was opened.

Now, they're chasing an illusion built up by Democrat politicians who want to open the vaults of the treasury and give America away to its enemies.

It's a cheat-and-cheat war the Democrats are waging. They're adopting communist doctrines as an expedient means to getting what they want instantly. Total domination.

The last time this was tried, millions of Russians died between 1917 until the Berlin Wall fell when George H. W. Bush was president.

 

[Ravi]

You call them "commiecrats" because you are paranoid, delusional and retarded.

Agreed.

If it isn't the fault of liberals then it is the fault of Jews, gays, Mexicans, blacks, etc., etc., etc.

Maybe paranoid nutters shouldn't be allowed to own weapons.

That's just silly, Republicans freed the blacks in 1865. It cost 618,000 American lives to do it. Democrats fought Republicans tooth and nail to keep blacks down. Then nearly 100 years later, Lyndon B. Johnson convinces John F. Kennedy to stop the lynching and take the black vote over any which way they could. Now, they've convinced blacks to hate the people who gave up much to free them from the bonds of slavery, give them the vote, give them equal opportunities in school, as much as we could.

We risked all to make black people equal, but Democrats, eager for power, gave blacks a chance at revenge--at OTHER people than Democrats.

Blacks are now taking revenge on the party that freed them and saw them through until every path of equality was opened.

Now, they're chasing an illusion built up by Democrat politicians who want to open the vaults of the treasury and give America away to its enemies.

It's a cheat-and-cheat war the Democrats are waging. They're adopting communist doctrines as an expedient means to getting what they want instantly. Total domination.

The last time this was tried, millions of Russians died between 1917 until the Berlin Wall fell when George H. W. Bush was president.

^Proving my point. Have some farina.

 

[NoNukes]

Didn't read the links did ya boy? All I can do is provide you the origin of the ideology you proclaim, I can't force you to learn.

not my ideology, try again, buckwheat

"Buckwheat" was the only black character in "our gang." Using a racist rant is not all it's cracked up to be. Really.

There were two other Black characters in Our Gang.

 

[Coloradomtnman]

Had you read the link more thoroughly, OkTex-ass, you would have noticed this in the first paragraphs:

"Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.

At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen:"

These communist goals are what some nutty woman in Florida in 1963 believed she obtained from an anti-communist book. These quotes are her interpretation of another's interpretation of communism.

What that has to do with the modern Democrat party I don't understand.

 

[Coloradomtnman]

The Freeman article reiterates the old argument that liberal values erode the nuclear family, which is the primary vehicle for creating moral adults - but it doesn't offer any biological, sociological or anthropological basis for this claim. I've read some interesting arguments about why the family has eroded and why divorce rates are so high, but this paper doesn't provide any interesting data or arguments for its conclusions. Nor does it say why a traditional family is better than an untraditional family. It seems to presuppose it's conclusions rather than supporting them with statistics or carefully weighed premises. This is a "think tank" piece, so it is not cleansed by the rigorous standards of peer reviewed work. I tend to think that the family was destroyed by the post New Deal loss of high wages/benefits for Labor. This forced the mother into the workforce and left the kids to be raised by MTV. I first head this argument (ironically) from Conservative commentator Christopher Lasch. Point is, I think there might be some interesting arguments on both sides.

But yes, of course this think tank piece recites the same old stuff about liberal values being too permissive, focusing too much on self-esteem over discipline, which leads children to think they won't be punished. It advocates strict uniform regulations, tighter security. Ends with an argument for private schools because the state cannot bear the administrative burden. I don't recall reading the old saw about the slippery slope between atheism and barbarism, but this is a very common argument against liberalism. Once you remove God, all is permitted. etc. etc.

If you're on the Right, you are likely to be persuaded by the OPs links. If your on the fence and need better arguments, look elsewhere.

I'd recommend Allan Bloom's "Closing of the American Mind". He reiterates all these arguments but with a lot more substance.

FYI: appreciate that the OP is trying to offer ideas rather than calling all Liberals evil scum.

Thanks for the info, I haven't heard of Bloom's book, I just read a summary and it sounds interesting. In a forum like this most will not take the time to actually read long pieces so I just try to provoke thought and hope folks will look else where for more information. Then you have those who are only interested in attempting to demean those they disagree with, well they're just pathetic.

So that's why you call them commiecrats?

 

[NoNukes]

You call them "commiecrats" because you are paranoid, delusional and retarded.

Agreed.

If it isn't the fault of liberals then it is the fault of Jews, gays, Mexicans, blacks, etc., etc., etc.

Maybe paranoid nutters shouldn't be allowed to own weapons.

That's just silly, Republicans freed the blacks in 1865. It cost 618,000 American lives to do it. Democrats fought Republicans tooth and nail to keep blacks down. Then nearly 100 years later, Lyndon B. Johnson convinces John F. Kennedy to stop the lynching and take the black vote over any which way they could. Now, they've convinced blacks to hate the people who gave up much to free them from the bonds of slavery, give them the vote, give them equal opportunities in school, as much as we could.

We risked all to make black people equal, but Democrats, eager for power, gave blacks a chance at revenge--at OTHER people than Democrats.

Blacks are now taking revenge on the party that freed them and saw them through until every path of equality was opened.

Now, they're chasing an illusion built up by Democrat politicians who want to open the vaults of the treasury and give America away to its enemies.

It's a cheat-and-cheat war the Democrats are waging. They're adopting communist doctrines as an expedient means to getting what they want instantly. Total domination.

The last time this was tried, millions of Russians died between 1917 until the Berlin Wall fell when George H. W. Bush was president.

The present Republican Party is no more the party that freed the slaves than the Democratic Party is the party that kept them slaves. Time to live in the present.

 

[Toro]

Communism is a socioeconomic system which centralizes ownership of property at the state, subjugates the pricing system to government dictat, and directs all allocation of capital.

References to gay rights, higher education, and children's sports is not evidence of a system that effectively bans all property rights. Get back to us when the Democrat party starts talking about banning the stock market.

You should learn what communism is first. The rest of the world and most Americans laugh at the American right when it makes such silly arguments.

Tell me, how would you go about installing such a system in a country like ours, without creating social and economic chaos? That's the plan, destroy the social and economic fabric of the country and it's easily conquered. Politician like your dear leader create problems then the claim they can fix them, of course the fixes always require sacrificing liberty, security or property and some require all of them. BTW if you think the fed printing 43 billion a month and buying bad mortgage bonds won't end up destroying the economy you might want to think again. As strong central bank is a pillar of communism.

No it is not. You don't know anything. The central bank in a communist state is under the complete power of the central government. It is weak by definition. As for money printing, Lenin noted that inflation destroys democracies, hardly a recipe for a guy running a country.

 

[del]

Didn't read the links did ya boy? All I can do is provide you the origin of the ideology you proclaim, I can't force you to learn.

not my ideology, try again, buckwheat

"Buckwheat" was the only black character in "our gang." Using a racist rant is not all it's cracked up to be. Really.

tell stymie and farina, otay?

 

[del]

Agreed.

If it isn't the fault of liberals then it is the fault of Jews, gays, Mexicans, blacks, etc., etc., etc.

Maybe paranoid nutters shouldn't be allowed to own weapons.

That's just silly, Republicans freed the blacks in 1865. It cost 618,000 American lives to do it. Democrats fought Republicans tooth and nail to keep blacks down. Then nearly 100 years later, Lyndon B. Johnson convinces John F. Kennedy to stop the lynching and take the black vote over any which way they could. Now, they've convinced blacks to hate the people who gave up much to free them from the bonds of slavery, give them the vote, give them equal opportunities in school, as much as we could.

We risked all to make black people equal, but Democrats, eager for power, gave blacks a chance at revenge--at OTHER people than Democrats.

Blacks are now taking revenge on the party that freed them and saw them through until every path of equality was opened.

Now, they're chasing an illusion built up by Democrat politicians who want to open the vaults of the treasury and give America away to its enemies.

It's a cheat-and-cheat war the Democrats are waging. They're adopting communist doctrines as an expedient means to getting what they want instantly. Total domination.

The last time this was tried, millions of Russians died between 1917 until the Berlin Wall fell when George H. W. Bush was president.

^Proving my point. Have some farina.

she seems stymied

 

[Ravi]

That's just silly, Republicans freed the blacks in 1865. It cost 618,000 American lives to do it. Democrats fought Republicans tooth and nail to keep blacks down. Then nearly 100 years later, Lyndon B. Johnson convinces John F. Kennedy to stop the lynching and take the black vote over any which way they could. Now, they've convinced blacks to hate the people who gave up much to free them from the bonds of slavery, give them the vote, give them equal opportunities in school, as much as we could.

We risked all to make black people equal, but Democrats, eager for power, gave blacks a chance at revenge--at OTHER people than Democrats.

Blacks are now taking revenge on the party that freed them and saw them through until every path of equality was opened.

Now, they're chasing an illusion built up by Democrat politicians who want to open the vaults of the treasury and give America away to its enemies.

It's a cheat-and-cheat war the Democrats are waging. They're adopting communist doctrines as an expedient means to getting what they want instantly. Total domination.

The last time this was tried, millions of Russians died between 1917 until the Berlin Wall fell when George H. W. Bush was president.

^Proving my point. Have some farina.

she seems stymied

She ain't got no Sunshine, Sammy.

 

[rightwinger]

Commies?

How 1950s.....I guess our conservatives have not progressed much from McCarthy

 

[mjollnir]

Had you read the link more thoroughly, OkTex-ass, you would have noticed this in the first paragraphs:

"Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.

At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen:"

These communist goals are what some nutty woman in Florida in 1963 believed she obtained from an anti-communist book. These quotes are her interpretation of another's interpretation of communism.

What that has to do with the modern Democrat party I don't understand.

If you're expecting a rational, cogent answer from the OP, you're asking the impossible of the incapable.

 

[jillian]

OK, let the bashing and denial begin.

so many words just to say you're an idiot.

 

[jillian]

Commies?

How 1950s.....I guess our conservatives have not progressed much from McCarthy

that's because they aren't 'conservatives'. they're reactionaries who like calling themselves conservative.

 

[Wolfsister77]

I’ve had many on the left whining when I say the policies they have instituted over the past 40 years or so have contributed to the moral decline of the country.
I’ll keep this as concise as I can, but it may get lengthy.

Who the hell cares?

Here, my answer will be short.

You are an idiot.

There, have a nice day.

 

[rightwinger]

I find it curious how conservatives have gone back to calling Democrats COMMIES

It was popular up until the end of the Cold War. Then the term became mostly irrelevant. Commies were no longer the Red Menace they once were. A new boogieman was needed.

After 9-11, that boogieman became terrorism. Now it became "Democrats are soft on terrorism!" With the election of Obama, it became very clear that Democrats are anything but soft on terrorism

So I guess they had to go back to the old reliable.....COMMIES!

 

[regent]

There is a lot of life left in in the use of communism for name calling. It has served Republicans well for almost 100 years and still serves. True some people are beginning to question, asking what is communism but they are a minority. Islam hasn't done it, nor even socialism so until a new label emerges Republicans should stick with communism for the biggies and socialism for the lesser.

 

[occupied]

There is a lot of life left in in the use of communism for name calling. It has served Republicans well for almost 100 years and still serves. True some people are beginning to question, asking what is communism but they are a minority. Islam hasn't done it, nor even socialism so until a new label emerges Republicans should stick with communism for the biggies and socialism for the lesser.

I think the term has been robbed of it's power through overuse and misuse, commies used to be scary because we thought they were bent on wiping us out with A-bombs, where are the real card carrying, self described, Marx quoting communists now? Isolated academic types no one pays any attention to is where. In the meantime, no one has much positive interest in the subject leaving the conservatives to call everything to the left of their extreme fascist positions "communism".

 

[bripat9643]

Commies?

How 1950s.....I guess our conservatives have not progressed much from McCarthy

that's because they aren't 'conservatives'. they're reactionaries who like calling themselves conservative.

what's the difference between a "reactionary" and a "conservative" in your mind?

We're all dying to know.

 

[Ravi]

Commies?

How 1950s.....I guess our conservatives have not progressed much from McCarthy

that's because they aren't 'conservatives'. they're reactionaries who like calling themselves conservative.

what's the difference between a "reactionary" and a "conservative" in your mind?

We're all dying to know.

The difference between you and posters like Toro, Del, and g5000.