DJT for Life
Gold Member
- Jun 21, 2017
- 3,468
- 899
- 195
yea, i was just glossing over the obvious to be sure. your points are valid and i'd agree with you. a 3rd party would have to fight the other 2 and they won't give it up easily. last election the 3rd party was gaining steam but the pothead in charge couldn't name a single foreign leader and in the end, to me, did more damage than good for the overall heath of a 3rd party.because they keep failing to attract people to them.Why isn't there a third major political party besides the Republicans and the Democrats?
It probably goes a bit farther than that. (Although yours is the direct result.)
People are not going to throw their vote away.
A person may not like Alabama as a dominant College Football team, but he
won't bet against them with his own money, when they play The Citadel
this year.
And for the others who complain about only two parties, how would
three parties be any different? Another choice? So to get anything
accomplished in government, you would have the lesser of the three
really pissing on their electorate when they sell their vote to one of
the other two.
OMG...yes! "What is Aleppo?" I was stunned. I couldn't believe it.
But look at him. If you have access to Andy Griffith videos...Find the
Episode..."Merchant of Mayberry." I forget the actor's name but he
is/was the spitting image of Gary Johnson. In the episode he plays
some derelick salesman that Andy opens up a street store for...a real
Klutz. It'll all come into focus