- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #41
There's far more head hunters on the President's head, than any school childrens.'
Sometimes, perspective and relativity need to be brought up when wounds are fresh. You miss the point, completely.
Which, of course, is why he cited a bunch of people and organizations that aren't trying to take out the President.
^ obscure post makes no sense.
It does if you bother reading what I respond to before responding to me.
Are you honestly saying the President needs armed security to protect him from the Tea Party, Glenn Beck, or Fox news? Because that would be what Hazel was suggesting. That people and groups that have no desire for violence are a threat to the Presidents life.
Meanwhile, it's absolutely crazy to suggest we consider whether armed security may be useful to protect schools from random acts of mass murderers. No discussion on the merits. It's just insane.
It's obvious why we protect the President with armed security. It should be obvious why protecting school children the same way might also be wise if it's feesible.
The argument shouldn't be dismissed out of hand as something that is insane.