NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
Just wondering
Why can't American citizens easily obtain automatic weapons?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just wondering
Oh good the op wants to look stupid.
Obviously because his life and the lives of his family are worth far more than the taxpayers who foot the bill.
Just wondering
Just wondering
Bigots, crazies, teabaggers, glenn beck, fox news...
A 400% increase on threat to POTUS since Obama took office due to all of the above.
So you're saying the President needs armed guards to defend himself from people and organizations who aren't going to hurt him physically, but our arming security guards in schools is just nuts despite the fact that there are people targetting them frequently.
Obviously because his life and the lives of his family are worth far more than the taxpayers who foot the bill.
His dog Bo is more important than you.
Just wondering
Bigots, crazies, teabaggers, glenn beck, fox news...
A 400% increase on threat to POTUS since Obama took office due to all of the above.
So you're saying the President needs armed guards to defend himself from people and organizations who aren't going to hurt him physically, but our arming security guards in schools is just nuts despite the fact that there are people targetting them frequently.
Just wondering
Just wondering
If your question is...
Is it easier to protect one person who is a known target of assasins than it is to protect 80 million schoolchildren?
Then I guess the answer is yes
Bigots, crazies, teabaggers, glenn beck, fox news...
A 400% increase on threat to POTUS since Obama took office due to all of the above.
So you're saying the President needs armed guards to defend himself from people and organizations who aren't going to hurt him physically, but our arming security guards in schools is just nuts despite the fact that there are people targetting them frequently.
There's far more head hunters on the President's head, than any school childrens.'
Sometimes, perspective and relativity need to be brought up when wounds are fresh. You miss the point, completely.
So you're saying the President needs armed guards to defend himself from people and organizations who aren't going to hurt him physically, but our arming security guards in schools is just nuts despite the fact that there are people targetting them frequently.
There's far more head hunters on the President's head, than any school childrens.'
Sometimes, perspective and relativity need to be brought up when wounds are fresh. You miss the point, completely.
Which, of course, is why he cited a bunch of people and organizations that aren't trying to take out the President.
Bigots, crazies, teabaggers, glenn beck, fox news...
A 400% increase on threat to POTUS since Obama took office due to all of the above.
So you're saying the President needs armed guards to defend himself from people and organizations who aren't going to hurt him physically, but our arming security guards in schools is just nuts despite the fact that there are people targetting them frequently.
The secret services has been protecting American presidents since the 19th century. This really isn't something the Obama adminstration came up with.
The fact is, there's more people out to kill the President than any school children. These are blips in the probability department, when these things happen.
Just wondering
Just wondering
Because our gun laws are too lax.
The fact is, there's more people out to kill the President than any school children. These are blips in the probability department, when these things happen.
Excellent point. So then you'll stand against any attempts to inhibit law abiding citizens from their inalienable right to self defense, right?
So you're saying the President needs armed guards to defend himself from people and organizations who aren't going to hurt him physically, but our arming security guards in schools is just nuts despite the fact that there are people targetting them frequently.
The secret services has been protecting American presidents since the 19th century. This really isn't something the Obama adminstration came up with.
Two different things. No one is a position of power is likely to try to rape or abuse Obama. Giving guns to teachers, security guards, etc., is going to give some child abusers more power than they should have.Just wondering
If your question is...
Is it easier to protect one person who is a known target of assasins than it is to protect 80 million schoolchildren?
Then I guess the answer is yes
That's not my question. So the answer is irrelevant.
For days we've been told it's absolutely crazy and insane to even consider arming school security or allowing teachers or administrations to conceal-carry. I can understand discussing it and coming to different conclusions and positions. But there is absolutely nothing crazy or insane finding ways to defend children at school.
And yet, many of the same people labeling it insane see the obvious reasons that the President has armed security. The point of this thread was to make people think about the issue rather than just try to label people who disagree with them in a way to avoid the topic.