Neotrotsky
Council to Supreme Soviet
In Papa Obama's case that is very true
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If you didn't put your weakest links in positions of prominence..........we'd not pay them any mind at all. Your entire premise is false as is the "most likely explanation" that you have settled on.
It would be an act of monumental proportions just to get one of you irrational nutjobs to accept simple truths as fact when discussing President Obama's first term in office. You make completely ridiculous claims as you have in this thread........and demand that sane people make an effort to refute them. If, by some lapse of judgement, a liberal takes you to task for your stupidity, you never........and I mean never......stay on the topic.
I don't have words to describe how fucking lame most of you nuts are. It is far more satisfying to mock you. As you may have noticed, that is what most liberals end up doing here. We mock you.
If you didn't put your weakest links in positions of prominence..........we'd not pay them any mind at all. Your entire premise is false as is the "most likely explanation" that you have settled on.
and yet you have Obama leading your ticket.
It would be an act of monumental proportions just to get one of you irrational nutjobs to accept simple truths as fact when discussing President Obama's first term in office. You make completely ridiculous claims as you have in this thread........and demand that sane people make an effort to refute them. If, by some lapse of judgement, a liberal takes you to task for your stupidity, you never........and I mean never......stay on the topic.
I don't have words to describe how fucking lame most of you nuts are. It is far more satisfying to mock you. As you may have noticed, that is what most liberals end up doing here. We mock you.
Name calling aside, along with intelligence questions, one must ask, "Why not address your candidates strengths?"
Why Do Some Liberals Spend More Time On Republican
candidates or issues, than defending their own? I don't get it.