Why do Republicans bash socialism - when it's all around them?

[Soupnazi630]

Again, you are misapplying the "equal protection clause. No court has or will ever rule in your trying to change the definition. Now, if you have a precedent for your definition please post it. Now back to the subject you refuse to take on because you can't defend it. Why do you defend failed left wing programs? It seems you are not taken seriously by the left or the right.

In this case, enforcing the law could mean a positive multiplier effect and an Institutional upward pressure on wages to outpace inflation.

What enforcement? Nothing in the way of enforcement can be done and the positive multiplier doesn’t exist as proven in Finland. The results had a negative effect. I live in the real world. I think this has about run its course. I’ll never agree with and you are trolling. You need to stop it, unless you have something different to add, you are just repeating the same over and over and we will never agree.

apples and oranges. in our case we are solving simple poverty by correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

In this case, enforcing the law could mean a positive multiplier effect and an Institutional upward pressure on wages to outpace inflation.

There is no such thing as a natural rate of unemployment in capitalism

The law is enforced

the whole and entire field of economics knows you are simply wrong.

Wrong
It knows the opposite

Your claim of a natural rate of unemployment is fiction and all who are knowledgable about economics knows this

 

[danielpalos]

dear, i cited the Actual code. you are simply too inferior to take seriously.

I asked for a link

You provided no link

Proven liar

i cited the actual code.

don't be incompetent. there is no appeal to ignorance of the law.[

dear, i cited the Actual code. you are simply too inferior to take seriously.

I asked for a link

You provided no link

Proven liar

i cited the actual code.

don't be incompetent. there is no appeal to ignorance of the law.

That is not a link dumbass .
You can provide no link and are a proven liar

You cited nothing

do your own research. i gave you the labor code.

No you did not you only made some crap up which you always do.

A claim requires a link you cannot provide one proving you made up some ignorant crap

That is how it works liar.

No link you are exposed as a lying pos.

lol. you are simply incompetent. i gave you the actual labor code.

 

[Soupnazi630]

I asked for a link

You provided no link

Proven liar

i cited the actual code.

don't be incompetent. there is no appeal to ignorance of the law.[

I asked for a link

You provided no link

Proven liar

i cited the actual code.

don't be incompetent. there is no appeal to ignorance of the law.

That is not a link dumbass .
You can provide no link and are a proven liar

You cited nothing

do your own research. i gave you the labor code.

No you did not you only made some crap up which you always do.

A claim requires a link you cannot provide one proving you made up some ignorant crap

That is how it works liar.

No link you are exposed as a lying pos.

lol. you are simply incompetent. i gave you the actual labor code.

No you did not .

Competence means a link

You made it up and are a proven liar

So now we have established there is no such thing

 

[danielpalos]

i don't take floozies seriously.

All you have is blaming others and name calling. The sign of the weak.

only floozies, say that.

No it is true and everyone says it because it is all you do

only the nine hundred ninety-nine say that, in Nexus Six with Zardoz and the incorrigibles.

Everyone says it and it is true a you know it is

We have absolutely proven you are a childish liar and uneducated turd

You admit it

...because I only have one vote?

 

[Soupnazi630]

All you have is blaming others and name calling. The sign of the weak.

only floozies, say that.

No it is true and everyone says it because it is all you do

only the nine hundred ninety-nine say that, in Nexus Six with Zardoz and the incorrigibles.

Everyone says it and it is true a you know it is

We have absolutely proven you are a childish liar and uneducated turd

You admit it

...because I only have one vote?

Because the evidence proves you are a liar

 

[danielpalos]

i cited the actual code.

don't be incompetent. there is no appeal to ignorance of the law.[

i cited the actual code.

don't be incompetent. there is no appeal to ignorance of the law.

That is not a link dumbass .
You can provide no link and are a proven liar

You cited nothing

do your own research. i gave you the labor code.

No you did not you only made some crap up which you always do.

A claim requires a link you cannot provide one proving you made up some ignorant crap

That is how it works liar.

No link you are exposed as a lying pos.

lol. you are simply incompetent. i gave you the actual labor code.

No you did not .

Competence means a link

You made it up and are a proven liar

So now we have established there is no such thing

yes, i did. 2922 of the labor code.

 

[danielpalos]

only floozies, say that.

No it is true and everyone says it because it is all you do

only the nine hundred ninety-nine say that, in Nexus Six with Zardoz and the incorrigibles.

Everyone says it and it is true a you know it is

We have absolutely proven you are a childish liar and uneducated turd

You admit it

...because I only have one vote?

Because the evidence proves you are a liar

it only proves you are incompetent to the point of being frivolous.

 

[Soupnazi630]

That is not a link dumbass .
You can provide no link and are a proven liar

You cited nothing

do your own research. i gave you the labor code.

No you did not you only made some crap up which you always do.

A claim requires a link you cannot provide one proving you made up some ignorant crap

That is how it works liar.

No link you are exposed as a lying pos.

lol. you are simply incompetent. i gave you the actual labor code.

No you did not .

Competence means a link

You made it up and are a proven liar

So now we have established there is no such thing

yes, i did. 2922 of the labor code.

No you did not

You did not link you cited nothing

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it is true and everyone says it because it is all you do

only the nine hundred ninety-nine say that, in Nexus Six with Zardoz and the incorrigibles.

Everyone says it and it is true a you know it is

We have absolutely proven you are a childish liar and uneducated turd

You admit it

...because I only have one vote?

Because the evidence proves you are a liar

it only proves you are incompetent to the point of being frivolous.

Wrong

It proves I am better than you and easily proved you are a liar and ignorant bitch

 

[Soupnazi630]

No you did not you only made some crap up which you always do.

A claim requires a link you cannot provide one proving you made up some ignorant crap

That is how it works liar.

No link you are exposed as a lying pos.

lol. you are simply incompetent. i gave you the actual labor code.

No you did not .

Competence means a link

You made it up and are a proven liar

So now we have established there is no such thing

yes, i did. 2922 of the labor code.

No you did not

You did not link you cited nothing

...do you enjoy doing things naturally, where you come from?

Do you enjoy being the laughing stock of the internet

I have made you a total ass clown and whore

 

[Soupnazi630]

No you did not you only made some crap up which you always do.

A claim requires a link you cannot provide one proving you made up some ignorant crap

That is how it works liar.

No link you are exposed as a lying pos.

lol. you are simply incompetent. i gave you the actual labor code.

No you did not .

Competence means a link

You made it up and are a proven liar

So now we have established there is no such thing

yes, i did. 2922 of the labor code.

No you did not

You did not link you cited nothing

...do you enjoy doing things naturally, where you come from?

No link .
No credibility

Proven liar and coward

Your claims are proven false only liars and incompetents make claims with no supporting evidence

On a forum evidence is a link you have no evidence and your claim proven false

 

[Papageorgio]

You need them

I stated facts

You lied

This has been proven

no, they haven't, floozy.

Yes it has been proven you lied and I stated facts.

You know this now answer the question without a false premise

i don't take floozies seriously.

All you have is blaming others and name calling. The sign of the weak.

only floozies, say that.

Is floozies your word of the day? You are getting ripped off.

 

[Papageorgio]

lol. you are simply incompetent. i gave you the actual labor code.

No you did not .

Competence means a link

You made it up and are a proven liar

So now we have established there is no such thing

yes, i did. 2922 of the labor code.

No you did not

You did not link you cited nothing

...do you enjoy doing things naturally, where you come from?

No link .
No credibility

Proven liar and coward

Your claims are proven false only liars and incompetents make claims with no supporting evidence

On a forum evidence is a link you have no evidence and your claim proven false

Neither the left or the right find him credible. No one takes him seriously.

 

[Papageorgio]

First you claimed solutions. I bring up a disaster in left wing ran governments and now you switch to proposed, which failed in Finland. So you purposed solution has already failed.Why are left wing states not following your advice? Because it already failed.

The solution is equal protection of the law. Don't be such a floozy.

Again, you are misapplying the "equal protection clause. No court has or will ever rule in your trying to change the definition. Now, if you have a precedent for your definition please post it. Now back to the subject you refuse to take on because you can't defend it. Why do you defend failed left wing programs? It seems you are not taken seriously by the left or the right.

In this case, enforcing the law could mean a positive multiplier effect and an Institutional upward pressure on wages to outpace inflation.

What enforcement? Nothing in the way of enforcement can be done and the positive multiplier doesn’t exist as proven in Finland. The results had a negative effect. I live in the real world. I think this has about run its course. I’ll never agree with and you are trolling. You need to stop it, unless you have something different to add, you are just repeating the same over and over and we will never agree.

apples and oranges. in our case we are solving simple poverty by correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

In this case, enforcing the law could mean a positive multiplier effect and an Institutional upward pressure on wages to outpace inflation.

Again you are repeating your nonsense. I will never see your logic and you will never see mine. Best to leave it alone

 

[Ame®icano]

First you claimed solutions. I bring up a disaster in left wing ran governments and now you switch to proposed, which failed in Finland. So you purposed solution has already failed. Why are left wing states in such a mess? What is the left solutions that they implemented? Why are they not obviously working? Maybe they should adopt socialist Venezuela's solutions, oh wait they aren't working their either. Seems the left has no solutions, just poverty, crime, homelessness and excuses.

Unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States,

not fantastical right wing gossip.

More excuses I see from you. Why is it all you have is excuses and blame? You realize that California, Washington and Oregon have all left wingers running them, they can implement your idea and yet choose not to, maybe it is because your idea sucks. Why doesn't the left have solutions for homelessness, poverty, crime? You claim solutions and all you offer is excuses and blame.

We have a federal doctrine regarding this Union issue.

We?

Cite it.

only infidels, protestants, rebels, and renegades have a problem with it.

The federal doctrine regarding employment at the will of either party.

At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."--At-will employment - Wikipedia

Now show where is that a federal issue.

 

[Ame®icano]

There is no social power to tax and never has been

Taxes are taken by government force in every form of government and socialism is only one form of government

You have to be right once to say next and you have been consistently wrong

lol. nobody takes the right wing seriously about Any Thing, serious.

The Congress shall have Power

That is the Socialism part of our social Contract and Republican form of Government.

Where does it say it's "social" contract?

Socialism deals with social Powers not Capital powers and vice versa.

There are NO social powers and socialism strictly requires government power,

There is no social contract and our government is not socialist like most governments.

There must be social powers dealing with society at large under Any form of Government. government is socialism.

only the right wing, never gets it.

No dunce, government is governing body of a nation.
Socialism refers to ownership of means of production, where is owned by government/public.

Apples and oranges, moron.

 

[Lakhota]

 

[Sun Devil 92]

To bad he was as wrong as you are.

He was just less stupid.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Take a close look at your own op.

You are the one who is referring to public services as socialism.

You are the fool Truman was referring to and you are proven wrong.

 

[Lakhota]

We should all be thankful for Democratic Socialism!