That doesn't refute a word of the data that they've collected, which debunks the lies of WHO and EPA.You are a yellow bellied coward. You squealed that I attacked your source. Well, your source SAYS:
This list should put an end to the diatribe on passive smoke since it conclusively demonstrates, step by step and in extremely simple language accessible, to all the incredible misrepresentation of evidence used to transform a non-danger into an "epidemic" and into a collective hysteria phenomenon.
Do you stand by YOUR source, or should we disregard your source?
Disprove the source, hysterical dickweed.
I already did Jethro. Your 'scientific' source is founded on BELIEFS and doctrinaire.
WHO WE ARE
FORCES International is an organisation in support of human rights and - in particular, but not limited to - the defence of those who expect from life the freedom to smoke, eat, drink and, in general, to enjoy personal lifestyle choices without restrictions and state interference.
Philosophy and message
The message of FORCES is based on the values of liberty for every individual in his personal choices. In this, FORCES is aligned with those who fight the antismoking movement, which is essentially false and oppressive.
To FORCES belong those who consider what follows unacceptable:
public and private health - instead of general and individual liberty of choice, behaviour and enterprise - is the paramount value of society, to which any and all other values must submit.
The ideological equation of health with liberty.
What your 'scientific ' source is saying in plain English.
My right to smoke is more important than human life. If some kid dies because of my right to smoke anywhere I want, too fucking bad.
You really, really, REALLY suck at this, Gomer.