Why do democrats want more people on foodstamps and welfare

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Hal-9000, Jan 1, 2018.

  1. danielpalos
    Online

    danielpalos Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2015
    Messages:
    27,094
    Thanks Received:
    713
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Alta California, federalist.
    Ratings:
    +3,347
    Healthcare reform and a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage!
     
  2. rightwinger
    Offline

    rightwinger Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    145,671
    Thanks Received:
    23,075
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Ratings:
    +63,694
    WTF are you babbling about?
     
  3. hadit
    Offline

    hadit Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2013
    Messages:
    13,441
    Thanks Received:
    1,664
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +7,340
    Yes, and if the MW increase is small and done slowly enough, we won't see too much disruption. That's not what so many want, however. They want to double it quickly, which would disrupt over half the workforce. Too much too fast.

    Do it slowly, and we would just see some of the low skilled jobs disappear.

    The only way the MW really works is if you keep it like enough that it really doesn't make that much of a difference.
     
  4. hadit
    Offline

    hadit Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2013
    Messages:
    13,441
    Thanks Received:
    1,664
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +7,340
    Then you'll have to compensate businesses for carrying net loss jobs.

    Here's the thing. Business exists to create a profit. It does not exist to do social engineering, it does not exist to provide a fiscal safety net to anyone, or to guarantee any lifestyle to anyone. Thus, trying to force business to pay artificially high wages is a losing proposition. Business will either raise prices or reduce workforces to compensate.

    If you want to guarantee people a lifestyle, the honest way is to put it to the people to vote, raise taxes to pay for, and implement welfare.

    Bottom line, if you want business to pay high wages, the job must generate enough revenue to pay for itself or be a justified cost. Companies cannot stay in business paying more for work than it generates.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. rightwinger
    Offline

    rightwinger Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    145,671
    Thanks Received:
    23,075
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Ratings:
    +63,694
    We have not raised minimum wage in the last 9 years
    The increase will have to cover the past 9 years as well as the next 9 till we get around to raising it again

    $15 is reasonable
     
  6. rightwinger
    Offline

    rightwinger Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    145,671
    Thanks Received:
    23,075
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Ratings:
    +63,694
    We just cut their taxes in half

    Taxpayers should not have to subsidize a low wage workforce
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. hadit
    Offline

    hadit Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2013
    Messages:
    13,441
    Thanks Received:
    1,664
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +7,340
    You're ignoring the fact that over 60% of the American work force makes $20/hr or less, and most, if not all, of them are going to demand raises. I know I would if I was making $17/hr and all of a sudden I'm making only 2 bucks more than minimum. That's a huge impact.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. hadit
    Offline

    hadit Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2013
    Messages:
    13,441
    Thanks Received:
    1,664
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +7,340
    Companies should not be welfare distribution centers either. Let's put it this way. If raising the MW was really sufficient to solve poverty, why not just take it to $100/hr and be done with it? Obviously, that wouldn't work. Therefore, it does have an impact on real life economics. The trick is to find a way to increase it without causing too many problems. Jacking it to $15/hr too quickly is not a good way.

    Like I said, if you want a government mandated solution, be honest and create a welfare program.
     
  9. Thinker101
    Offline

    Thinker101 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2017
    Messages:
    3,206
    Thanks Received:
    410
    Trophy Points:
    150
    Ratings:
    +2,563
    Gee, I was replying to your dumbass comment...dumbass.
     
  10. Thinker101
    Offline

    Thinker101 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2017
    Messages:
    3,206
    Thanks Received:
    410
    Trophy Points:
    150
    Ratings:
    +2,563
    I agree, how about you start a company and pay your lowest level employee $15/hour. Let us know how that works out for ya.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

news