Sorry, but you're yammering about a tax cut when I'm talking about helping people who really need help.Keeping money you have already earned is not a welfare benefit. Nice little false equivalency there. And, like so many other times, you completely ignored what I wrote. I said nothing about what was needed, but rather focused on those who truly could not provide for themselves vs those who could, but choose not to.The lie is in the term, "who need it". The Republican goal is to help only those who truly need help, and to get even those to the point where they no longer need help. That's the difference between the democrat and the Republican approach. The democrat approach apparently is to get as many people dependent on government assistance as possible, because they continually find new things they think the government should provide.They don't.
Yes they do. They believe assistance fosters dependence. That the poor are to blame for their poverty. They’re lazy. They won’t quit smoking pot so they can pass a drug test. They don’t want to work so many hours that they’ll lose their benefits.
Ray nails every rightwing talking point about the poor every single thread. Every lie that Republicans tell the taxpayers about how the poor are living the high life on their tax dollars.
I love when Republicans attack the poor for receiving a few benefits that republicans think they really don't "need" You don't need a color TV, you don't need air conditioning, you don't need access to the internet
Meanwhile, they extend a $1.5 trillion tax cut to billionaires
Where is the "need"??
You got it completely wrong.
I am not surprised.
Sorry
But a little over 200 years ago, We the People created a more perfect union
In that union we determined how revenue would be raised and that involved taxes on your profit.
Republicans decided it was more important to borrow $1.5 trillion and give it to the rich while they bitch about people having healthcare