YWN666
Freelance Beer Tester
- Nov 11, 2008
- 3,209
- 453
- 98
it's pretty simple really. Not one scientific theory is any more plausible, nor supported by any more evidence that religious creation.
Religious creation can't even qualify as a scientific theory.
I guess the real question would be is why science religionists spend sop damned much time trying to prove there is no God when you can't?
I've never seen a scientist try to prove the non-existence of God. It can't be done because it is an illogical challenge - you can't prove the non-existence of anything.
Thread after thread on this board is nothing but science worshippers and those who believe in not believing trying their best to demean, discredit, ridicule nd otherwise insult Christians; which, is nothing more than a big neon sign that says "Insecurity Here!"
If you're so strong in your beliefs, don't worry about what I believe. Of course, that would actually be liberal of you and we couldn't have THAT, could we?
If someone tries to impose their religion on the rest of the population by having the government endorse it, we MUST necessarily pick it apart to demonstrate why that can't happen. If your religious beliefs don't jive with science and pointing that out is an insult to you, that is not our problem. It has nothing to do with insecurity.