Why didn't liberals call for Lynch and Comey to recuse themselves during the Hillary investigation?

[K9Buck]

Comey was tasked with making a recommendation to Lynch as to whether or not his likely, future boss should be indicted. Shouldn't Comey have been recused from having to make such a recommendation?

And why didn't Lynch recuse herself, as Sessions later did? After all, she was in charge of determining whether or not to send Hillary's case to a grand jury, even though Hillary appeared to likely be Lynch's next boss.

And why didn't liberals call for them to be recused and appoint an independent counsel to investigate and determine if Hillary's case should be presented before a grand jury?

Here's the cold, hard, truth. There was NO WAY Obama and Lynch were going to allow Hillary to face indictment. Basically, the Democratic Party was investigating itself and, naturally, exonerated itself. They couldn't, and wouldn't, take the risk of having all of their crimes, malfeasance and corruption being exposed...and liberals were 100% ok with that.

 

[Pete7469]

Noboby told them too.

 

[K9Buck]

Noboby told them too.

to.

 

[candycorn]

No need for recusal

 

[K9Buck]

No need for recusal

Riiiiight. There was no conflict of interest, right? LOL. They were only making decisions about whether or not their probable FUTURE BOSS should face a grand jury. LOL. If this wasn't a clear case of conflict-of-interest, then nothing is. You're a partisan hack.

 

[candycorn]

No need for recusal

Riiiiight. There was no conflict of interest, right? LOL. They were only making decisions about whether or not their probable FUTURE BOSS should face a grand jury. LOL. If this wasn't a clear case of conflict-of-interest, then nothing is. You're a partisan hack.

No conflict of interest existed or does exist

 

[K9Buck]

No conflict of interest existed or does exist

If that's true, then the concept of "conflict of interest" does not exist.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

Comey was tasked with making a recommendation to Lynch as to whether or not his likely, future boss should be indicted. Shouldn't Comey have been recused from having to make such a recommendation?

And why didn't Lynch recuse herself, as Sessions later did? After all, she was in charge of determining whether or not to send Hillary's case to a grand jury, even though Hillary appeared to likely be Lynch's next boss.

And why didn't liberals call for them to be recused and appoint an independent counsel to investigate and determine if Hillary's case should be presented before a grand jury?

Here's the cold, hard, truth. There was NO WAY Obama and Lynch were going to allow Hillary to face indictment. Basically, the Democratic Party was investigating itself and, naturally, exonerated itself. They couldn't, and wouldn't, take the risk of having all of their crimes, malfeasance and corruption being exposed...and liberals were 100% ok with that.

It come to mind that Winestien was connected with Comey who was connected with Hilly Clinton. The Deep State was in charged for so many years that they put their plants deep within the Government. Massive cover up have and will continue into the future. Just standby for the next one. If the Senate does not move with the President to put the skids on this, the Nation is going to change and not for the good. This included the securing of the Borders.

 

[candycorn]

No conflict of interest existed or does exist

If that's true, then the concept of "conflict of interest" does not exist.

It does. Your fantasies are dumb

 

[K9Buck]

No conflict of interest existed or does exist

If that's true, then the concept of "conflict of interest" does not exist.

It does. Your fantasies are dumb

The reason we have significant corruption in government is because of political hacks like you. Criminals like Hillary know that useful idiots like yourself will continue to support them, regardless of their crimes and corruption.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

No need for recusal

Riiiiight. There was no conflict of interest, right? LOL. They were only making decisions about whether or not their probable FUTURE BOSS should face a grand jury. LOL. If this wasn't a clear case of conflict-of-interest, then nothing is. You're a partisan hack.

No conflict of interest existed or does exist

Both Marxists Obama and Hillary raised their arms covenanting to uphold the Constitution of the United States. Then they broke that solemn oath by following Saul Alinsky’s plan to des troy it (numbered below). 1. Healthcare - Control healthcare and you control the people 2. Poverty - Increase the poverty level as high as possible; poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. 3. Debt - Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. 4. Gun Control - Remove the ability of the citizens to defend themselves from the government. That way you are able to create a police state. 5. Welfare - Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income). 6. Education - Take control of what people read and listen to - take control of what children learn in school. 7. Religion - Remove the belief in God from the government and schools. 8. Class Warfare - Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to tax the wealthy wiLouis Farrakhan is not a tireless public servant. He is an anti-Semitic bigot who has been warmly embraced by the leaders of the Democratic party who now condemn Donald Trump. As we mourn the tragedy in Pittsburgh, let us remember who the enablers of such horrific hate have been.th the support of the poor.

 

[aaronleland]

You can't just spin it to fit your narrative by calling Hillary their "probable future boss". She had over 20 people running against her, and she lost.

 

[K9Buck]

You can't just spin it to fit your narrative by calling Hillary their "probable future boss". She had over 20 people running against her, and she lost.

Hillary had already won the Democratic primary when Comey and Lynch were supposed to make decisions regarding the person who was widely expected to win the election and, if she had, would have been their boss. If this wasn't a clear case of "conflict of interest", then that concept doesn't exist. Liberals demanded that Sessions recuse himself because they felt it would be a "conflict of interest" for him to make a decision regarding his boss. So why didn't this same logic apply to Comey and Lynch?

 

[aaronleland]

You can't just spin it to fit your narrative by calling Hillary their "probable future boss". She had over 20 people running against her, and she lost.

Hillary had already won the Democratic primary when Comey and Lynch were supposed to make decisions regarding the person who was widely expected to win the election and, if she had, would have been their boss. If this wasn't a clear case of "conflict of interest", then that concept doesn't exist. Liberals demanded that Sessions recuse himself because they felt it would be a "conflict of interest" for him to make a decision regarding his boss. So why didn't this same logic apply to Comey and Lynch?

Sessions recused himself after Trump was his boss, and only after it was revealed he had contact with a Russian Ambassador.

 

[K9Buck]

You can't just spin it to fit your narrative by calling Hillary their "probable future boss". She had over 20 people running against her, and she lost.

Hillary had already won the Democratic primary when Comey and Lynch were supposed to make decisions regarding the person who was widely expected to win the election and, if she had, would have been their boss. If this wasn't a clear case of "conflict of interest", then that concept doesn't exist. Liberals demanded that Sessions recuse himself because they felt it would be a "conflict of interest" for him to make a decision regarding his boss. So why didn't this same logic apply to Comey and Lynch?

Sessions recused himself after Trump was his boss, and only after it was revealed he had contact with a Russian Ambassador.

Whatever. Sessions recused himself. Why didn't Lynch and Comey recuse themselves? Why didn't liberals call for them to recuse themselves? Why wasn't an independent counsel appointed?

The simple answer, Obama, Hillary and many of their aids would have been caught engaging in crimes and corruption. End of story.