Polishprince
Diamond Member
- Jun 8, 2016
- 45,513
- 35,058
- 3,615
If I were Kavanaugh, I'd tell McConnell if the vote isn't this week as scheduled, I'm withdrawing my name and going on a 50 state book tour to regain my reputation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"motherjones" isn't much of a reference at this point.Seriously? ^ Just WoW
Seriously what, moron ?
Something that happened 35 years ago....matters now ?
Please make the connection.
You lost the election.
Suck on it.
If true, this is a serious matter and you should know that.
My country doesn't send gropers/ attempted rapists to lifetime appointments.
And PARTICULARY when the nominee has a history of frowning on women's rights.
You are beyond moronic - You're a Deplorable
Stop faking outrage.
It really gets old.
If you really cared about the issue, and if the press really cared, they would be all over this story 24/7, but they are not
Congress paid $17 million in settlements. Why we know so little about that money. - CNNPolitics
Congress has, for a long time, used taxpayer money to keep women silent whom they have assaulted.
But alas, our problem is Trump, isn't it, and not the Swamp.
In fact, why not focus on drunk 17 year olds instead, right?
The slush fund was a travesty. But the subject here is Christine Blasey Ford and a SCOTUS nominee attempting to rape her while his self-admitted "black out drunk" school buddy watched.
if he was "black out drunk" then you don't remember anything. in their rush to paint him in the worst way possible, they forget that if you're that drunk you're not going to remember a thing now are you? so how can he remember what happened 30 years ago as a blackout drunk high school student? if even true.
----------------------------------------------- yeah , no bottom is sight , i think that the USA is going to heck but that may be the plan .What a horrible, ugly time in this country's history.
And worse, there is no bottom to this in sight.
.
Time to go.....
You losers on the left play the part better and better each day.
He'll be confirmed and she'll go away.......like she should.
Senate looking better for the GOP (where I am spending my time) each day.
When Ruth finally finishes the process of croacking......
Your left wing loser lives are really going to suck.
/----/ In case you missed it:/----/ But Hillary set the standard for harassing women accusers. She deserves the credit, don't ya think?.
That's stupid, so no
Flashback: Hillary Clinton Threatened Bill’s Accusers in 1998
by Kristinn Taylor January 5, 2016 33 Comments
A 1998 interview confirms allegations by leading Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump that Hillary Clinton was involved in attacking women who accused her husband, then President Bill Clinton, of assault and other sexual improprieties.
In the interview, Hillary said those accusing and investigating her husband “would have a lot to answer for” and that their backgrounds would be investigated.
It was a dem. It was all good. Theyre hypocrites. It the Rs bow down to the dems on this, they can all get thrown out.
She'll be testifying. Collins, Corker, Heitkamp, Flake and others will insist on it prior to a vote.
Sorry, but for the ladies especially, not holding out on a vote prior to a hearing would be political suicide.
Its only up to McConnell to decide whether or not to have this broad testify before a vote.
Not up to any of the others.
BTW, they can still vote "no", if they like, even without this broad testifying. I don't have a problem with that.
The Rs will bow down like a wet paper bag to the dems.
Do you not understand that all it takes is ONE who holds out on a vote prior to a hearing that this woman is willing to give.
In this case, there are SEVERAL
Not a matter of paper bags, wet OR dry - It is political reality.
Yes, because they're weak R's that bow to the dems.
The info keeps trickling in:The woman didn’t want to go public with the accusation. And who can blame her. There is nothing ahead for her but attacks and abuse.
She changed her mind. She hoped he would be stopped some other way. When it didn’t happen, she went public.
----------------------------------------- i guess that that'd be Kavanaugh eh Boedicca ?? ---------------------- The woman brings 35 year old unprovable accusations and they should be disregarded . She should be pointed out and advertised as a poor citizen and role model for young people in public school and throughout USA Society .The one person the Fake Accuser cites as being a witness denies the incident took place.
Time to go.....
You losers on the left play the part better and better each day.
He'll be confirmed and she'll go away.......like she should.
Senate looking better for the GOP (where I am spending my time) each day.
When Ruth finally finishes the process of croacking......
Your left wing loser lives are really going to suck.
There is a reason western legal systems provide a statute of limitations. These third world red guards aren’t the same as us.
The statutes are there because (1) it is impossible to mount a defense from a decades old event (where were you aug 16 1996 at 4pm?) and (2) without a statute of limitations it is possible for the government to hold something over your head forever. As we see here.
But Democrats do not embrace our culture and traditions of freedom. They prefer third world systems and their supporters have educations at a third world level.
Ok check, so we'll take that to mean you believe Heitkamp, Collins and Murkowski could be reelected if they rammed through an attempted rapist who would in a heartbeat, vote to overturn Roe?
Get real
Her therapist said she said there were 4 people in on the attack.yea, she had to clean up her profiles first. why is that?Because Dr. Ford wasn't ready to go public.
also - do you believe 1 person over 65? if so, why?
those 65 women weren't in the room with her. AND she has documentation from 2012 thru medical records that it was discussed with her therapist
AND she took a polygraph test where the results said she was being truthful.
i feel sorry for us as a country. look what we're doing to each other with a "my side must be right, fuck them" attitude along the way? we've jaded ourselves close to a point of no return, if not there already.
Her therapist said she said there were 4 people in on the attack.yea, she had to clean up her profiles first. why is that?Because Dr. Ford wasn't ready to go public.
also - do you believe 1 person over 65? if so, why?
those 65 women weren't in the room with her. AND she has documentation from 2012 thru medical records that it was discussed with her therapist
AND she took a polygraph test where the results said she was being truthful.