Why are Republicans so upset about Kavanaugh? Brett Kavanaugh & Niel Gorsuch are nothing special.

[oreo]

Republicans campaigned on the SCOTUS nominee in 2016, after making certain that Obama's last nominee, Merrick Garland didn't get a chance. Why? Because you never know who Hillary Clinton would have picked. Well as it turns out, Hillary Clinton may have picked Niel Gorsuch or Brett Kavanaugh as her nominee, because she voted to confirm both of them for Federal District court positions.

In fact, Hillary Clinton along with Barack Obama actually voted for both of them, as they came out of the G.W. Bush administration as Federal District Court judges in year 2006, when Democrats were the majority in the Senate, and could have easily rejected them. This while Senate Democrats were historically turning down a lot of G.W's nominee's. IOW--Both have already run the Democrat gaunlet and passed with flying colors.

Kavanaugh was confirmed to the D.C. Circuit in May 2006 after a series of negotiations between Democratic and Republican U.S. Senators

Brett Kavanaugh - Wikipedia

Anthony Scalia NOT'S !!!

In fact here are the Democrats that confirmed both Brett Kavanuagh & Niel Gorsuch in 2006 for Federal District Court of Appeals positions.

Niel Gorsuch is the only nominee in my memory that stated during confirmation hearings that Roe V Wade is precedent in the Constitution, meaning set in stone. The only reason Democrats tried to block him, is because they were upset that Republicans blocked Merrick Garland.
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

Brett Kavanuagh only caught Trump's attention, because he once stated that Presidents shouldn't undergo prosecution while they're in office. But there is no such thing as prosecution of a sitting President anyway--we have an impeachment process to rid ourselves of criminal and inept behavior of a President.
Analysis | Does Brett Kavanaugh think the president is immune from criminal charges?

So the question is?
Since women have a very unfavorable opinon of Trump, (7 in 10) would it be wiser for Republicans to go ahead with an investigation & or drop Kavanaugh for a woman nominee?
Gallup Poll: 7 in 10 Women Have Unfavorable Opinion of Trump

Wow. That's a lot of words to conceal an entirely bogus false premise!

Hillary would never have nominated Gorsuch or Kavanaugh. Not in a million years.

And if you don't know that, you're even dumber than you sound.

If would have been very easy for a Democrat Senate majority to deny Federal court appointments to both Niel Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh--and if you actually believe that Gorsuch is a conservative coming out of Boulder Colorado--then you're dumber than dumb. Boulder is the most liberal district in Colorado, home to the University of Colorado aka (CU)

Hillary Clinton would have/could have easily chosen Niel Gorsuch as a SCOTUS nominee.

 

[oreo]

we're upset because a man's life has been destroyed and his dreams crushed. this is not about politics. shame on you for thinking like that

politically, the "smart" thing to do is to appoint Amy Coney Barrett because Democrats would go after her catholic faith making themselves look like fools. i wanted Barret

Sandra Day O'Connor was the last SCOTUS nominee on the Republican side of the isle, in 1981. 37 YEARS ago, under Ronald Reagan.

I doubt you'll ever see a Catholic appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court.--We already had a run in with Rick Santorum, a devote Catholic and he didn't go far.

Santorum is actually on video recording stating that States have the "right" to ban birth control contraceptives, meaning your state legislature or your next door neighbor, via a ballot will decide for you if you can use them or not-- Santorum is still arguing with a 1965 Supreme Court decision--(Griswold v Connecticut)
Rick Santorum: States Should Have Power To Ban Birth Control, Sodomy | HuffPost
Griswold v. Connecticut - Wikipedia

It would have been wise for Republicans to nominate a woman to the SCOTUS--just to get their misogyny rating to move up a little out of the ditch.. But as we see again, Republicans really don't have good instincts, nor foresight.

 

[BULLDOG]

we're upset because a man's life has been destroyed and his dreams crushed. this is not about politics. shame on you for thinking like that

politically, the "smart" thing to do is to appoint Amy Coney Barrett because Democrats would go after her catholic faith making themselves look like fools. i wanted Barret

Sandra Day O'Connor was the last SCOTUS nominee on the Republican side of the isle, in 1981. 37 YEARS ago, under Ronald Reagan.

I doubt you'll ever see a Catholic appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court.--We already had a run in with Rick Santorum, a devote Catholic and he didn't go far.

Santorum is actually on video recording stating that States have the "right" to ban birth control contraceptives, meaning your state legislature or your next door neighbor, via a ballot will decide for you if you can use them or not-- Santorum is still arguing with a 1965 Supreme Court decision--(Griswold v Connecticut)
Rick Santorum: States Should Have Power To Ban Birth Control, Sodomy | HuffPost
Griswold v. Connecticut - Wikipedia

It would have been wise for Republicans to nominate a woman to the SCOTUS--just to get their misogyny rating to move up a little out of the ditch.. But as we see again, Republicans really don't good instincts, nor foresight.

santorum

Noun
(uncountable)

1. (neologism, sex, slang) A frothy mixture of lubricant and fecal matter as an occasional byproduct of anal sex. [from 21st c.]
2. (neologism, slang, derogatory) Shit: rubbish, worthless matter, nonsense, bull. [from 21st c.]

 

[OKTexas]

Republicans campaigned on the SCOTUS nominee in 2016, after making certain that Obama's last nominee, Merrick Garland didn't get a chance. Why? Because you never know who Hillary Clinton would have picked. Well as it turns out, Hillary Clinton may have picked Niel Gorsuch or Brett Kavanaugh as her nominee, because she voted to confirm both of them for Federal District court positions.

In fact, Hillary Clinton along with Barack Obama actually voted for both of them, as they came out of the G.W. Bush administration as Federal District Court judges in year 2006, when Democrats were the majority in the Senate, and could have easily rejected them. This while Senate Democrats were historically turning down a lot of G.W's nominee's. IOW--Both have already run the Democrat gaunlet and passed with flying colors.

Kavanaugh was confirmed to the D.C. Circuit in May 2006 after a series of negotiations between Democratic and Republican U.S. Senators

Brett Kavanaugh - Wikipedia

Anthony Scalia NOT'S !!!

In fact here are the Democrats that confirmed both Brett Kavanuagh & Niel Gorsuch in 2006 for Federal District Court of Appeals positions.

Niel Gorsuch is the only nominee in my memory that stated during confirmation hearings that Roe V Wade is precedent in the Constitution, meaning set in stone. The only reason Democrats tried to block him, is because they were upset that Republicans blocked Merrick Garland.
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

Brett Kavanuagh only caught Trump's attention, because he once stated that Presidents shouldn't undergo prosecution while they're in office. But there is no such thing as prosecution of a sitting President anyway--we have an impeachment process to rid ourselves of criminal and inept behavior of a President.
Analysis | Does Brett Kavanaugh think the president is immune from criminal charges?

So the question is?
Since women have a very unfavorable opinon of Trump, (7 in 10) would it be wiser for Republicans to go ahead with an investigation & or drop Kavanaugh for a woman nominee?
Gallup Poll: 7 in 10 Women Have Unfavorable Opinion of Trump

He'll pick a woman next time when he replaces RBG. Don't worry your little commie head about it. LMAO The commiecrats are losing control of their super-legislature. Learn to deal with it.

.

 

[oreo]

Republicans campaigned on the SCOTUS nominee in 2016, after making certain that Obama's last nominee, Merrick Garland didn't get a chance. Why? Because you never know who Hillary Clinton would have picked. Well as it turns out, Hillary Clinton may have picked Niel Gorsuch or Brett Kavanaugh as her nominee, because she voted to confirm both of them for Federal District court positions.

In fact, Hillary Clinton along with Barack Obama actually voted for both of them, as they came out of the G.W. Bush administration as Federal District Court judges in year 2006, when Democrats were the majority in the Senate, and could have easily rejected them. This while Senate Democrats were historically turning down a lot of G.W's nominee's. IOW--Both have already run the Democrat gaunlet and passed with flying colors.

Kavanaugh was confirmed to the D.C. Circuit in May 2006 after a series of negotiations between Democratic and Republican U.S. Senators

Brett Kavanaugh - Wikipedia

Anthony Scalia NOT'S !!!

In fact here are the Democrats that confirmed both Brett Kavanuagh & Niel Gorsuch in 2006 for Federal District Court of Appeals positions.

Niel Gorsuch is the only nominee in my memory that stated during confirmation hearings that Roe V Wade is precedent in the Constitution, meaning set in stone. The only reason Democrats tried to block him, is because they were upset that Republicans blocked Merrick Garland.
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

Brett Kavanuagh only caught Trump's attention, because he once stated that Presidents shouldn't undergo prosecution while they're in office. But there is no such thing as prosecution of a sitting President anyway--we have an impeachment process to rid ourselves of criminal and inept behavior of a President.
Analysis | Does Brett Kavanaugh think the president is immune from criminal charges?

So the question is?
Since women have a very unfavorable opinon of Trump, (7 in 10) would it be wiser for Republicans to go ahead with an investigation & or drop Kavanaugh for a woman nominee?
Gallup Poll: 7 in 10 Women Have Unfavorable Opinion of Trump

He'll pick a woman next time when he replaces RBG. Don't worry your little commie heat about it. LMAO The commiecrats are losing control of their super-legislature. Learn to deal with it.

.

The party of Trump would never nominate a woman to SCOTUS-- The closest a Federal District Court Republican woman would ever get to that court would be with a broom & mop.

Slowly but surely, Bannon turned Breitbart into not only the most-read conservative web outlet but also the most incendiary one. Bannon’s Breitbart also realized that there was a large online community that naturally gravitated to Trump, a mix of people who saw themselves as far too radical to be accepted by polite society. Among them, conservative suspicions of diversity, inclusion, feminism, and political correctness had metastasized into something much darker.This was the alt-right, a collection of racists, pick-up artists, men’s rights activists, and other noxious trolls of the internet.

This is Trump's base & one he doesn't want to lose
Steve Bannon and the alt-right: a primer

 

[OKTexas]

Republicans campaigned on the SCOTUS nominee in 2016, after making certain that Obama's last nominee, Merrick Garland didn't get a chance. Why? Because you never know who Hillary Clinton would have picked. Well as it turns out, Hillary Clinton may have picked Niel Gorsuch or Brett Kavanaugh as her nominee, because she voted to confirm both of them for Federal District court positions.

In fact, Hillary Clinton along with Barack Obama actually voted for both of them, as they came out of the G.W. Bush administration as Federal District Court judges in year 2006, when Democrats were the majority in the Senate, and could have easily rejected them. This while Senate Democrats were historically turning down a lot of G.W's nominee's. IOW--Both have already run the Democrat gaunlet and passed with flying colors.

Kavanaugh was confirmed to the D.C. Circuit in May 2006 after a series of negotiations between Democratic and Republican U.S. Senators

Brett Kavanaugh - Wikipedia

Anthony Scalia NOT'S !!!

In fact here are the Democrats that confirmed both Brett Kavanuagh & Niel Gorsuch in 2006 for Federal District Court of Appeals positions.

Niel Gorsuch is the only nominee in my memory that stated during confirmation hearings that Roe V Wade is precedent in the Constitution, meaning set in stone. The only reason Democrats tried to block him, is because they were upset that Republicans blocked Merrick Garland.
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

Brett Kavanuagh only caught Trump's attention, because he once stated that Presidents shouldn't undergo prosecution while they're in office. But there is no such thing as prosecution of a sitting President anyway--we have an impeachment process to rid ourselves of criminal and inept behavior of a President.
Analysis | Does Brett Kavanaugh think the president is immune from criminal charges?

So the question is?
Since women have a very unfavorable opinon of Trump, (7 in 10) would it be wiser for Republicans to go ahead with an investigation & or drop Kavanaugh for a woman nominee?
Gallup Poll: 7 in 10 Women Have Unfavorable Opinion of Trump

He'll pick a woman next time when he replaces RBG. Don't worry your little commie heat about it. LMAO The commiecrats are losing control of their super-legislature. Learn to deal with it.

.

The party of Trump would never nominate a woman to SCOTUS-- The closest a Federal District Court Republican woman would ever get to that court would be with a broom & mop.

Slowly but surely, Bannon turned Breitbart into not only the most-read conservative web outlet but also the most incendiary one. Bannon’s Breitbart also realized that there was a large online community that naturally gravitated to Trump, a mix of people who saw themselves as far too radical to be accepted by polite society. Among them, conservative suspicions of diversity, inclusion, feminism, and political correctness had metastasized into something much darker.This was the alt-right, a collection of racists, pick-up artists, men’s rights activists, and other noxious trolls of the internet.

This is Trump's base & one he doesn't want to lose
Steve Bannon and the alt-right: a primer

Seems they said the same about Sandra Day O'Conor, she got a 99-0 vote in the senate. A woman was on the short list this time. I'd like to see him nominate an Asian female nest time. It would be a real hoot watching you commiecrats try your character assassination and stay politically correct. It's just too easy for ya with a white guy. But I'm still waiting to hear the race card against Kavanaugh, I'm sure it's coming, you fucking commies are so predictable.

.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Kavanaught IS an activist conservative.

Kavanuagh is an Originalist. I’m talking a true Activist judge, set on moving the court and the nation as far Right as possible.

Good

 

[Snouter]

oreo is riding Shep so much, it is embarrassing to watch. oreo, is he hitting your g spot?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Good question OP.

Kavanaught isn't worth falling on the sword for.

Dump him.

Suuuuuure....we're going to take an opinion from the likes of you?
Screw you! Kavanaugh will be your next SCJ and there's not shit you can do about it.

 

[oreo]

Republicans campaigned on the SCOTUS nominee in 2016, after making certain that Obama's last nominee, Merrick Garland didn't get a chance. Why? Because you never know who Hillary Clinton would have picked. Well as it turns out, Hillary Clinton may have picked Niel Gorsuch or Brett Kavanaugh as her nominee, because she voted to confirm both of them for Federal District court positions.

In fact, Hillary Clinton along with Barack Obama actually voted for both of them, as they came out of the G.W. Bush administration as Federal District Court judges in year 2006, when Democrats were the majority in the Senate, and could have easily rejected them. This while Senate Democrats were historically turning down a lot of G.W's nominee's. IOW--Both have already run the Democrat gaunlet and passed with flying colors.

Kavanaugh was confirmed to the D.C. Circuit in May 2006 after a series of negotiations between Democratic and Republican U.S. Senators

Brett Kavanaugh - Wikipedia

Anthony Scalia NOT'S !!!

In fact here are the Democrats that confirmed both Brett Kavanuagh & Niel Gorsuch in 2006 for Federal District Court of Appeals positions.

Niel Gorsuch is the only nominee in my memory that stated during confirmation hearings that Roe V Wade is precedent in the Constitution, meaning set in stone. The only reason Democrats tried to block him, is because they were upset that Republicans blocked Merrick Garland.
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

Brett Kavanuagh only caught Trump's attention, because he once stated that Presidents shouldn't undergo prosecution while they're in office. But there is no such thing as prosecution of a sitting President anyway--we have an impeachment process to rid ourselves of criminal and inept behavior of a President.
Analysis | Does Brett Kavanaugh think the president is immune from criminal charges?

So the question is?
Since women have a very unfavorable opinon of Trump, (7 in 10) would it be wiser for Republicans to go ahead with an investigation & or drop Kavanaugh for a woman nominee?
Gallup Poll: 7 in 10 Women Have Unfavorable Opinion of Trump

He'll pick a woman next time when he replaces RBG. Don't worry your little commie heat about it. LMAO The commiecrats are losing control of their super-legislature. Learn to deal with it.

.

The party of Trump would never nominate a woman to SCOTUS-- The closest a Federal District Court Republican woman would ever get to that court would be with a broom & mop.

Slowly but surely, Bannon turned Breitbart into not only the most-read conservative web outlet but also the most incendiary one. Bannon’s Breitbart also realized that there was a large online community that naturally gravitated to Trump, a mix of people who saw themselves as far too radical to be accepted by polite society. Among them, conservative suspicions of diversity, inclusion, feminism, and political correctness had metastasized into something much darker.This was the alt-right, a collection of racists, pick-up artists, men’s rights activists, and other noxious trolls of the internet.

This is Trump's base & one he doesn't want to lose
Steve Bannon and the alt-right: a primer

Seems they said the same about Sandra Day O'Conor, she got a 99-0 vote in the senate. A woman was on the short list this time. I'd like to see him nominate an Asian female nest time. It would be a real hoot watching you commiecrats try your character assassination and stay politically correct. It's just too easy for ya with a white guy. But I'm still waiting to hear the race card against Kavanaugh, I'm sure it's coming, you fucking commies are so predictable.

.

A 3rd woman has now come forward. We're talking about 3 women now, this one is a Yale graduate, working for government that has a high security clearance, that have witnessed Kavanuagh's mal behavior during prep school. Now when I was young we had some wild parties, but I never saw men disrespect women, no matter how drunk they were in the way these women are saying what Kavanuagh did. Waving his dick in a woman's face, making lude vulgar comments in their presence. We raise our boys to respect women, not do that.
3rd woman comes forward with accusations against Brett Kavanaugh

These women are showing a lot of courage by coming out and saying something, and I imagine right now they are getting some threats against themselves and their families over it.

I think Kavanaugh is done, and if Republicans go ahead and confirm him, they're DONE with women in this country, which is also the largest voting block in this country.

Blue wave coming this November 2018

Sweet Baby Jesus--I do not understand a party that knows they are in the sewer with women voters in this country, and never thought that "hey" maybe we should nominate a woman SCOTUS to fill this position, to get us out of the sewer.
Seven in 10 Women Have Unfavorable Opinion of Trump

Talk about STUPID!

A FOX NEWS poll

Voter support for Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the U.S. Supreme Court is down in the wake of Christine Ford’s assault allegations, as more believe her than him. Currently, 40 percent of voters would confirm Kavanaugh, while 50 percent oppose him, according to a Fox News poll. Last month, views split 45-46 percent (August 19-21). Women are more likely to believe Ford by 10 points, and among suburban women that jumps to 17. Men side with her by just 1 point. White voters divide by education: those with a college degree believe Ford by a 14-point margin, while those without a degree side with Kavanaugh by 17.

Fox News Poll: Record number of voters oppose Kavanaugh nomination

 

[Deno]

Because decent human beings find it morally reprehensible to falsely accuse people of vile crimes for political reasons

We really don't know if what this woman, Ford is saying is true or not, do we? And let's face it, men typically don't assault women in public places.

Republicans are really in a corner on this one. Worst case scenario, they confirm Kavanaugh--and then find out that Ford was telling the truth. 2nd scenario--they confirm Kavanaugh without an investigation, showing they could care less about women and their claims of sexual assault or harrassement.

And let's face it Republicans already have a yuuuge problem with women voters in this country. Why add more fuel to the fire.
Blue wave coming this November 2018

You libtards are so confused....

Thinking women see you libtards for the SCUM you are...

We are going to kick your asses silly this November...….

 

[martybegan]

Republicans campaigned on the SCOTUS nominee in 2016, after making certain that Obama's last nominee, Merrick Garland didn't get a chance. Why? Because you never know who Hillary Clinton would have picked. Well as it turns out, Hillary Clinton may have picked Niel Gorsuch or Brett Kavanaugh as her nominee, because she voted to confirm both of them for Federal District court positions.

In fact, Hillary Clinton along with Barack Obama actually voted for both of them, as they came out of the G.W. Bush administration as Federal District Court judges in year 2006, when Democrats were the majority in the Senate, and could have easily rejected them. This while Senate Democrats were historically turning down a lot of G.W's nominee's. IOW--Both have already run the Democrat gaunlet and passed with flying colors.

Kavanaugh was confirmed to the D.C. Circuit in May 2006 after a series of negotiations between Democratic and Republican U.S. Senators

Brett Kavanaugh - Wikipedia

Anthony Scalia NOT'S !!!

In fact here are the Democrats that confirmed both Brett Kavanuagh & Niel Gorsuch in 2006 for Federal District Court of Appeals positions.

Niel Gorsuch is the only nominee in my memory that stated during confirmation hearings that Roe V Wade is precedent in the Constitution, meaning set in stone. The only reason Democrats tried to block him, is because they were upset that Republicans blocked Merrick Garland.
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

Brett Kavanuagh only caught Trump's attention, because he once stated that Presidents shouldn't undergo prosecution while they're in office. But there is no such thing as prosecution of a sitting President anyway--we have an impeachment process to rid ourselves of criminal and inept behavior of a President.
Analysis | Does Brett Kavanaugh think the president is immune from criminal charges?

So the question is?
Since women have a very unfavorable opinon of Trump, (7 in 10) would it be wiser for Republicans to go ahead with an investigation & or drop Kavanaugh for a woman nominee?
Gallup Poll: 7 in 10 Women Have Unfavorable Opinion of Trump

He'll pick a woman next time when he replaces RBG. Don't worry your little commie heat about it. LMAO The commiecrats are losing control of their super-legislature. Learn to deal with it.

.

The party of Trump would never nominate a woman to SCOTUS-- The closest a Federal District Court Republican woman would ever get to that court would be with a broom & mop.

Slowly but surely, Bannon turned Breitbart into not only the most-read conservative web outlet but also the most incendiary one. Bannon’s Breitbart also realized that there was a large online community that naturally gravitated to Trump, a mix of people who saw themselves as far too radical to be accepted by polite society. Among them, conservative suspicions of diversity, inclusion, feminism, and political correctness had metastasized into something much darker.This was the alt-right, a collection of racists, pick-up artists, men’s rights activists, and other noxious trolls of the internet.

This is Trump's base & one he doesn't want to lose
Steve Bannon and the alt-right: a primer

Seems they said the same about Sandra Day O'Conor, she got a 99-0 vote in the senate. A woman was on the short list this time. I'd like to see him nominate an Asian female nest time. It would be a real hoot watching you commiecrats try your character assassination and stay politically correct. It's just too easy for ya with a white guy. But I'm still waiting to hear the race card against Kavanaugh, I'm sure it's coming, you fucking commies are so predictable.

.

A 3rd woman has now come forward. We're talking about 3 women now, this one is a Yale graduate, working for government that has a high security clearance, that have witnessed Kavanuagh's mal behavior during prep school. Now when I was young we had some wild parties, but I never saw men disrespect women, no matter how drunk they were in the way these women are saying what Kavanuagh did. Waving his dick in a woman's face, making lude vulgar comments in their presence. We raise our boys to respect women, not do that.
3rd woman comes forward with accusations against Brett Kavanaugh

These women are showing a lot of courage by coming out and saying something, and I imagine right now they are getting some threats against themselves and their families over it.

I think Kavanaugh is done, and if Republicans go ahead and confirm him, they're DONE with women in this country, which is also the largest voting block in this country.

Blue wave coming this November 2018

Sweet Baby Jesus--I do not understand a party that knows they are in the sewer with women voters in this country, and never thought that "hey" maybe we should nominate a woman SCOTUS to fill this position, to get us out of the sewer.
Seven in 10 Women Have Unfavorable Opinion of Trump

Talk about STUPID!

All of the accusations are about as vague as you can make them, no corroboration, no documentation.

Sorry, but none of this is impressing me.

 

[Deno]

Republicans campaigned on the SCOTUS nominee in 2016, after making certain that Obama's last nominee, Merrick Garland didn't get a chance. Why? Because you never know who Hillary Clinton would have picked. Well as it turns out, Hillary Clinton may have picked Niel Gorsuch or Brett Kavanaugh as her nominee, because she voted to confirm both of them for Federal District court positions.

In fact, Hillary Clinton along with Barack Obama actually voted for both of them, as they came out of the G.W. Bush administration as Federal District Court judges in year 2006, when Democrats were the majority in the Senate, and could have easily rejected them. This while Senate Democrats were historically turning down a lot of G.W's nominee's. IOW--Both have already run the Democrat gaunlet and passed with flying colors.

Kavanaugh was confirmed to the D.C. Circuit in May 2006 after a series of negotiations between Democratic and Republican U.S. Senators

Brett Kavanaugh - Wikipedia

Anthony Scalia NOT'S !!!

In fact here are the Democrats that confirmed both Brett Kavanuagh & Niel Gorsuch in 2006 for Federal District Court of Appeals positions.

Niel Gorsuch is the only nominee in my memory that stated during confirmation hearings that Roe V Wade is precedent in the Constitution, meaning set in stone. The only reason Democrats tried to block him, is because they were upset that Republicans blocked Merrick Garland.
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

Brett Kavanuagh only caught Trump's attention, because he once stated that Presidents shouldn't undergo prosecution while they're in office. But there is no such thing as prosecution of a sitting President anyway--we have an impeachment process to rid ourselves of criminal and inept behavior of a President.
Analysis | Does Brett Kavanaugh think the president is immune from criminal charges?

So the question is?
Since women have a very unfavorable opinon of Trump, (7 in 10) would it be wiser for Republicans to go ahead with an investigation & or drop Kavanaugh for a woman nominee?
Gallup Poll: 7 in 10 Women Have Unfavorable Opinion of Trump

He'll pick a woman next time when he replaces RBG. Don't worry your little commie heat about it. LMAO The commiecrats are losing control of their super-legislature. Learn to deal with it.

.

The party of Trump would never nominate a woman to SCOTUS-- The closest a Federal District Court Republican woman would ever get to that court would be with a broom & mop.

Slowly but surely, Bannon turned Breitbart into not only the most-read conservative web outlet but also the most incendiary one. Bannon’s Breitbart also realized that there was a large online community that naturally gravitated to Trump, a mix of people who saw themselves as far too radical to be accepted by polite society. Among them, conservative suspicions of diversity, inclusion, feminism, and political correctness had metastasized into something much darker.This was the alt-right, a collection of racists, pick-up artists, men’s rights activists, and other noxious trolls of the internet.

This is Trump's base & one he doesn't want to lose
Steve Bannon and the alt-right: a primer

Seems they said the same about Sandra Day O'Conor, she got a 99-0 vote in the senate. A woman was on the short list this time. I'd like to see him nominate an Asian female nest time. It would be a real hoot watching you commiecrats try your character assassination and stay politically correct. It's just too easy for ya with a white guy. But I'm still waiting to hear the race card against Kavanaugh, I'm sure it's coming, you fucking commies are so predictable.

.

A 3rd woman has now come forward. We're talking about 3 women now, this one is a Yale graduate, working for government that has a high security clearance, that have witnessed Kavanuagh's mal behavior during prep school. Now when I was young we had some wild parties, but I never saw men disrespect women, no matter how drunk they were in the way these women are saying what Kavanuagh did. Waving his dick in a woman's face, making lude vulgar comments in their presence. We raise our boys to respect women, not do that.
3rd woman comes forward with accusations against Brett Kavanaugh

These women are showing a lot of courage by coming out and saying something, and I imagine right now they are getting some threats against themselves and their families over it.

I think Kavanaugh is done, and if Republicans go ahead and confirm him, they're DONE with women in this country, which is also the largest voting block in this country.

Blue wave coming this November 2018

Sweet Baby Jesus--I do not understand a party that knows they are in the sewer with women voters in this country, and never thought that "hey" maybe we should nominate a woman SCOTUS to fill this position, to get us out of the sewer.
Seven in 10 Women Have Unfavorable Opinion of Trump

Talk about STUPID!

BK will be confirmed......

 

[oreo]

Because decent human beings find it morally reprehensible to falsely accuse people of vile crimes for political reasons

We really don't know if what this woman, Ford is saying is true or not, do we? And let's face it, men typically don't assault women in public places.

Republicans are really in a corner on this one. Worst case scenario, they confirm Kavanaugh--and then find out that Ford was telling the truth. 2nd scenario--they confirm Kavanaugh without an investigation, showing they could care less about women and their claims of sexual assault or harrassement.

And let's face it Republicans already have a yuuuge problem with women voters in this country. Why add more fuel to the fire.
Blue wave coming this November 2018

You libtards are so confused....

Thinking women see you libtards for the SCUM you are...

We are going to kick your asses silly this November...….

I am not a liberal dumbass. I have been on this board since 2008 and have over 17K posts to prove that. I was a lifelong Republican until you made this Ass Clown the poster boy of the Republican party, and then changed my party status to Independent and followed the advice of a long time friend and former staffer of RONALD REAGAN.

 

[oreo]

Republicans campaigned on the SCOTUS nominee in 2016, after making certain that Obama's last nominee, Merrick Garland didn't get a chance. Why? Because you never know who Hillary Clinton would have picked. Well as it turns out, Hillary Clinton may have picked Niel Gorsuch or Brett Kavanaugh as her nominee, because she voted to confirm both of them for Federal District court positions.

In fact, Hillary Clinton along with Barack Obama actually voted for both of them, as they came out of the G.W. Bush administration as Federal District Court judges in year 2006, when Democrats were the majority in the Senate, and could have easily rejected them. This while Senate Democrats were historically turning down a lot of G.W's nominee's. IOW--Both have already run the Democrat gaunlet and passed with flying colors.

Brett Kavanaugh - Wikipedia

Anthony Scalia NOT'S !!!

In fact here are the Democrats that confirmed both Brett Kavanuagh & Niel Gorsuch in 2006 for Federal District Court of Appeals positions.

Niel Gorsuch is the only nominee in my memory that stated during confirmation hearings that Roe V Wade is precedent in the Constitution, meaning set in stone. The only reason Democrats tried to block him, is because they were upset that Republicans blocked Merrick Garland.
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

Brett Kavanuagh only caught Trump's attention, because he once stated that Presidents shouldn't undergo prosecution while they're in office. But there is no such thing as prosecution of a sitting President anyway--we have an impeachment process to rid ourselves of criminal and inept behavior of a President.
Analysis | Does Brett Kavanaugh think the president is immune from criminal charges?

So the question is?
Since women have a very unfavorable opinon of Trump, (7 in 10) would it be wiser for Republicans to go ahead with an investigation & or drop Kavanaugh for a woman nominee?
Gallup Poll: 7 in 10 Women Have Unfavorable Opinion of Trump

He'll pick a woman next time when he replaces RBG. Don't worry your little commie heat about it. LMAO The commiecrats are losing control of their super-legislature. Learn to deal with it.

.

The party of Trump would never nominate a woman to SCOTUS-- The closest a Federal District Court Republican woman would ever get to that court would be with a broom & mop.

Slowly but surely, Bannon turned Breitbart into not only the most-read conservative web outlet but also the most incendiary one. Bannon’s Breitbart also realized that there was a large online community that naturally gravitated to Trump, a mix of people who saw themselves as far too radical to be accepted by polite society. Among them, conservative suspicions of diversity, inclusion, feminism, and political correctness had metastasized into something much darker.This was the alt-right, a collection of racists, pick-up artists, men’s rights activists, and other noxious trolls of the internet.

This is Trump's base & one he doesn't want to lose
Steve Bannon and the alt-right: a primer

Seems they said the same about Sandra Day O'Conor, she got a 99-0 vote in the senate. A woman was on the short list this time. I'd like to see him nominate an Asian female nest time. It would be a real hoot watching you commiecrats try your character assassination and stay politically correct. It's just too easy for ya with a white guy. But I'm still waiting to hear the race card against Kavanaugh, I'm sure it's coming, you fucking commies are so predictable.

.

A 3rd woman has now come forward. We're talking about 3 women now, this one is a Yale graduate, working for government that has a high security clearance, that have witnessed Kavanuagh's mal behavior during prep school. Now when I was young we had some wild parties, but I never saw men disrespect women, no matter how drunk they were in the way these women are saying what Kavanuagh did. Waving his dick in a woman's face, making lude vulgar comments in their presence. We raise our boys to respect women, not do that.
3rd woman comes forward with accusations against Brett Kavanaugh

These women are showing a lot of courage by coming out and saying something, and I imagine right now they are getting some threats against themselves and their families over it.

I think Kavanaugh is done, and if Republicans go ahead and confirm him, they're DONE with women in this country, which is also the largest voting block in this country.

Blue wave coming this November 2018

Sweet Baby Jesus--I do not understand a party that knows they are in the sewer with women voters in this country, and never thought that "hey" maybe we should nominate a woman SCOTUS to fill this position, to get us out of the sewer.
Seven in 10 Women Have Unfavorable Opinion of Trump

Talk about STUPID!

All of the accusations are about as vague as you can make them, no corroboration, no documentation.

Sorry, but none of this is impressing me.

Well they're being cooberated as we speak. 3 women now have confirmed that Kavanaugh was a drunk, vile, vulgar, individual disrespecting women when he was in prep school. These women are Yale and other high level graduates, in good careers and didn't walk out of some trailer park to make these accusations. They are also putting their lives & families at risk by making these accusations and they know it. Women won't do that for no reason.

Anyone that doesn't respect women, does not belong anywhere near the U.S. Supreme court.

For 35 years victims kept secret the sexual abuse of Catholic priests, and then it blew wide open.

A FOX NEWS poll for you.
Fox News Poll: Record number of voters oppose Kavanaugh nomination

 

[Deno]

Because decent human beings find it morally reprehensible to falsely accuse people of vile crimes for political reasons

We really don't know if what this woman, Ford is saying is true or not, do we? And let's face it, men typically don't assault women in public places.

Republicans are really in a corner on this one. Worst case scenario, they confirm Kavanaugh--and then find out that Ford was telling the truth. 2nd scenario--they confirm Kavanaugh without an investigation, showing they could care less about women and their claims of sexual assault or harrassement.

And let's face it Republicans already have a yuuuge problem with women voters in this country. Why add more fuel to the fire.
Blue wave coming this November 2018

You libtards are so confused....

Thinking women see you libtards for the SCUM you are...

We are going to kick your asses silly this November...….

I am not a liberal dumbass. I have been on this board since 2008 and have over 17K posts to prove that. I was a lifelong Republican until you made this Ass Clown the poster boy of the Republican party, and then changed my party status to Independent and followed the advice of a long time friend and former staffer of RONALD REAGAN.

If you walk like a libtard and you Quack like a libtard….

You’re a libtard Dumb Ass…..

doug elmets is a traitorous RINO like yourself….

So he like you supported the Cop Haters, the Ice Haters

and most important the America Haters.

I was also a lifelong republican, but no more….

Trump has exposed the fact that we had one party

Masquerading as two……Fools like yourself don’t get it…..

If you were a true Conservative you would understand

that Trump is appointing Judges that will change the

direction of this Country for a Generation. I could go

on and on about the benefits of Trump but I know you

are full of Shit and I am wasting my time with you…..

 

[OKTexas]

Republicans campaigned on the SCOTUS nominee in 2016, after making certain that Obama's last nominee, Merrick Garland didn't get a chance. Why? Because you never know who Hillary Clinton would have picked. Well as it turns out, Hillary Clinton may have picked Niel Gorsuch or Brett Kavanaugh as her nominee, because she voted to confirm both of them for Federal District court positions.

In fact, Hillary Clinton along with Barack Obama actually voted for both of them, as they came out of the G.W. Bush administration as Federal District Court judges in year 2006, when Democrats were the majority in the Senate, and could have easily rejected them. This while Senate Democrats were historically turning down a lot of G.W's nominee's. IOW--Both have already run the Democrat gaunlet and passed with flying colors.

Kavanaugh was confirmed to the D.C. Circuit in May 2006 after a series of negotiations between Democratic and Republican U.S. Senators

Brett Kavanaugh - Wikipedia

Anthony Scalia NOT'S !!!

In fact here are the Democrats that confirmed both Brett Kavanuagh & Niel Gorsuch in 2006 for Federal District Court of Appeals positions.

Niel Gorsuch is the only nominee in my memory that stated during confirmation hearings that Roe V Wade is precedent in the Constitution, meaning set in stone. The only reason Democrats tried to block him, is because they were upset that Republicans blocked Merrick Garland.
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'

Brett Kavanuagh only caught Trump's attention, because he once stated that Presidents shouldn't undergo prosecution while they're in office. But there is no such thing as prosecution of a sitting President anyway--we have an impeachment process to rid ourselves of criminal and inept behavior of a President.
Analysis | Does Brett Kavanaugh think the president is immune from criminal charges?

So the question is?
Since women have a very unfavorable opinon of Trump, (7 in 10) would it be wiser for Republicans to go ahead with an investigation & or drop Kavanaugh for a woman nominee?
Gallup Poll: 7 in 10 Women Have Unfavorable Opinion of Trump

He'll pick a woman next time when he replaces RBG. Don't worry your little commie heat about it. LMAO The commiecrats are losing control of their super-legislature. Learn to deal with it.

.

The party of Trump would never nominate a woman to SCOTUS-- The closest a Federal District Court Republican woman would ever get to that court would be with a broom & mop.

Slowly but surely, Bannon turned Breitbart into not only the most-read conservative web outlet but also the most incendiary one. Bannon’s Breitbart also realized that there was a large online community that naturally gravitated to Trump, a mix of people who saw themselves as far too radical to be accepted by polite society. Among them, conservative suspicions of diversity, inclusion, feminism, and political correctness had metastasized into something much darker.This was the alt-right, a collection of racists, pick-up artists, men’s rights activists, and other noxious trolls of the internet.

This is Trump's base & one he doesn't want to lose
Steve Bannon and the alt-right: a primer

Seems they said the same about Sandra Day O'Conor, she got a 99-0 vote in the senate. A woman was on the short list this time. I'd like to see him nominate an Asian female nest time. It would be a real hoot watching you commiecrats try your character assassination and stay politically correct. It's just too easy for ya with a white guy. But I'm still waiting to hear the race card against Kavanaugh, I'm sure it's coming, you fucking commies are so predictable.

.

A 3rd woman has now come forward. We're talking about 3 women now, this one is a Yale graduate, working for government that has a high security clearance, that have witnessed Kavanuagh's mal behavior during prep school. Now when I was young we had some wild parties, but I never saw men disrespect women, no matter how drunk they were in the way these women are saying what Kavanuagh did. Waving his dick in a woman's face, making lude vulgar comments in their presence. We raise our boys to respect women, not do that.
3rd woman comes forward with accusations against Brett Kavanaugh

These women are showing a lot of courage by coming out and saying something, and I imagine right now they are getting some threats against themselves and their families over it.

I think Kavanaugh is done, and if Republicans go ahead and confirm him, they're DONE with women in this country, which is also the largest voting block in this country.

Blue wave coming this November 2018

Sweet Baby Jesus--I do not understand a party that knows they are in the sewer with women voters in this country, and never thought that "hey" maybe we should nominate a woman SCOTUS to fill this position, to get us out of the sewer.
Seven in 10 Women Have Unfavorable Opinion of Trump

Talk about STUPID!

A FOX NEWS poll

Voter support for Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the U.S. Supreme Court is down in the wake of Christine Ford’s assault allegations, as more believe her than him. Currently, 40 percent of voters would confirm Kavanaugh, while 50 percent oppose him, according to a Fox News poll. Last month, views split 45-46 percent (August 19-21). Women are more likely to believe Ford by 10 points, and among suburban women that jumps to 17. Men side with her by just 1 point. White voters divide by education: those with a college degree believe Ford by a 14-point margin, while those without a degree side with Kavanaugh by 17.

Fox News Poll: Record number of voters oppose Kavanaugh nomination

Why would this third woman admit to at the minimum complicity, and possibly being an accomplice to 10 gang rapes????? She may no think that's what she's done, but she did. She was an adult at kids parties, this woman has broad legal exposure, judging by her sworn statement. Chew on that a while.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Because decent human beings find it morally reprehensible to falsely accuse people of vile crimes for political reasons

We really don't know if what this woman, Ford is saying is true or not, do we? And let's face it, men typically don't assault women in public places.

Republicans are really in a corner on this one. Worst case scenario, they confirm Kavanaugh--and then find out that Ford was telling the truth. 2nd scenario--they confirm Kavanaugh without an investigation, showing they could care less about women and their claims of sexual assault or harrassement.

And let's face it Republicans already have a yuuuge problem with women voters in this country. Why add more fuel to the fire.
Blue wave coming this November 2018

You libtards are so confused....

Thinking women see you libtards for the SCUM you are...

We are going to kick your asses silly this November...….

I am not a liberal dumbass. I have been on this board since 2008 and have over 17K posts to prove that. I was a lifelong Republican until you made this Ass Clown the poster boy of the Republican party, and then changed my party status to Independent and followed the advice of a long time friend and former staffer of RONALD REAGAN.

No you're a paid poster who piles all this off topic crap in your posts, which I rarely read.

.

 

[Deno]

Because decent human beings find it morally reprehensible to falsely accuse people of vile crimes for political reasons

We really don't know if what this woman, Ford is saying is true or not, do we? And let's face it, men typically don't assault women in public places.

Republicans are really in a corner on this one. Worst case scenario, they confirm Kavanaugh--and then find out that Ford was telling the truth. 2nd scenario--they confirm Kavanaugh without an investigation, showing they could care less about women and their claims of sexual assault or harrassement.

And let's face it Republicans already have a yuuuge problem with women voters in this country. Why add more fuel to the fire.
Blue wave coming this November 2018

You libtards are so confused....

Thinking women see you libtards for the SCUM you are...

We are going to kick your asses silly this November...….

I am not a liberal dumbass. I have been on this board since 2008 and have over 17K posts to prove that. I was a lifelong Republican until you made this Ass Clown the poster boy of the Republican party, and then changed my party status to Independent and followed the advice of a long time friend and former staffer of RONALD REAGAN.

No you're a paid poster who piles all this off topic crap in your posts, which I rarely read.

.

If oreo is getting paid for that Bull Shit he spews.....

Someone sure as hell ain't getting their monies worth...

 

[MarathonMike]

Because decent human beings find it morally reprehensible to falsely accuse people of vile crimes for political reasons

We really don't know if what this woman, Ford is saying is true or not, do we? And let's face it, men typically don't assault women in public places.

Republicans are really in a corner on this one. Worst case scenario, they confirm Kavanaugh--and then find out that Ford was telling the truth. 2nd scenario--they confirm Kavanaugh without an investigation, showing they could care less about women and their claims of sexual assault or harrassement.

And let's face it Republicans already have a yuuuge problem with women voters in this country. Why add more fuel to the fire.
Blue wave coming this November 2018

You libtards are so confused....

Thinking women see you libtards for the SCUM you are...

We are going to kick your asses silly this November...….

I am not a liberal dumbass. I have been on this board since 2008 and have over 17K posts to prove that. I was a lifelong Republican until you made this Ass Clown the poster boy of the Republican party, and then changed my party status to Independent and followed the advice of a long time friend and former staffer of RONALD REAGAN.

Number of posts does not equate to intelligence. We have plenty of examples of that. Democrats are setting a new low and may be on the verge of destroying a man who has led an exemplary life. That will be your definition of "winning". I will take Donald Trump's definition of winning thanks.