Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Liberalism is just Communism LiteLibertarianism has the same problem as Communism.
Human nature makes both unworkable.
Otherwise there's this saying in a democracy, when it comes to a small minority who want their way against the will of the majority: Fuck you.
Otherwise there's this saying in a democracy, when it comes to a small minority who want their way against the will of the majority: Fuck you.
Absolutely. That's the core of unlimited democracy (aka mob rule). Which is why we've tried to put constitutional constraints on that power - to prevent the minority from getting fucked.
Ron Paul offers a lot of individual freedom and this scares Republicans. After all, the outcome of liberty is unknown and most Republicans are scared of the unknown. They need control and they need to manipulate the outcome.
Hence, whey they want to impose their social conservative beliefs onto society. They are afraid of liberty and seek control. Hence, why they lied and manipulate wars instead of practicing diplomacy. Diplomacy brings into the unknown and this does not resonate well with Republicans. They need control, hence why they lied and manipulated into war.
American Conservatism is most closely related to classical liberalism in which there is an element of the unknown. However, an element of the unknown goes against the grain of the Republican and scares them. Instead, they seek to power to control and manipulate, instead of allowing man to be free.
Liberty scares Republicans, hence why they constantly throw their support behind statists freaks like Romney, Santorum, Bush, and even Reagan. Not to mention Nixon and Ike. Liberty scares Republicans and always has. They have always been mostly authoritative statists freaks, backed by soft appeals to liberty.
p.s. liberals are not better. They clamor for individual freedom, yet look for the state to grant them it, often times violating someone's elses freedom. So, please keep your strawman arguments to yourself.
That would be....nuts.Boy I'll tell you, for being irrelevant there certainly are a lot of the usual suspects showing up in this thread to talk about him.
Gonebezerk thinks he's so irrelevant that every time a Ron Paul thread appears it grabs his attention for a certain part of the day
The irrelevancy is duly noted
He is irrelevant, that is why he comes in last or 3rd in most races.
Just because we acknowledge he is nuts doesn't make him relevant.
Boy I'll tell you, for being irrelevant there certainly are a lot of the usual suspects showing up in this thread to talk about him.
Gonebezerk thinks he's so irrelevant that every time a Ron Paul thread appears it grabs his attention for a certain part of the day
The irrelevancy is duly noted
He is irrelevant, that is why he comes in last or 3rd in most races.
Just because we acknowledge he is nuts doesn't make him relevant.
Boy I'll tell you, for being irrelevant there certainly are a lot of the usual suspects showing up in this thread to talk about him.
Gonebezerk thinks he's so irrelevant that every time a Ron Paul thread appears it grabs his attention for a certain part of the day
The irrelevancy is duly noted
The OWS crowd and other anarchists would love you anti-US people at their rallies....He is irrelevant, that is why he comes in last or 3rd in most races.
Just because we acknowledge he is nuts doesn't make him relevant.
Boy I'll tell you, for being irrelevant there certainly are a lot of the usual suspects showing up in this thread to talk about him.
Gonebezerk thinks he's so irrelevant that every time a Ron Paul thread appears it grabs his attention for a certain part of the day
The irrelevancy is duly noted
Yeah, relevancy is based on winning alone, and nothing else
Relevancy couldn't possibly be based on how someone might shape the future of the party, affect potential platform changes, possibly have a keynote speech at the convention.
You're an idiot, sir.
why do paulians think ANYONE is afraid of ron paul?
Because you CLEARLY are. You are afraid of what might become of Israeli relations if, GASP, a man like Ron Paul were president that would push for leaving nations to decide their own fates.
He's the only candidate that wouldn't be Israel's enforcer, and that scares the living shit out of you.
Insert obligatory and predictable anti-semite reply:
You mean like Jesus killers?
Actually, you're the idiot supporting Ron Paul.
You and him are fringe people.
Most Americans (gasp) even Democrats understand the evil threats out there that you and Ron Paul ignore.
Pretty much you are in bed with he wacko left that hates this country and the US military too, congrats.
He is irrelevant, that is why he comes in last or 3rd in most races.
Just because we acknowledge he is nuts doesn't make him relevant.
Yeah, relevancy is based on winning alone, and nothing else
Relevancy couldn't possibly be based on how someone might shape the future of the party, affect potential platform changes, possibly have a keynote speech at the convention.
You're an idiot, sir.
Actually, you're the idiot supporting Ron Paul.
You and him are fringe people.
Most Americans (gasp) even Democrats understand the evil threats out there that you and Ron Paul ignore.
Pretty much you are in bed with he wacko left that hates this country and the US military too, congrats.
Yeah, relevancy is based on winning alone, and nothing else
Relevancy couldn't possibly be based on how someone might shape the future of the party, affect potential platform changes, possibly have a keynote speech at the convention.
You're an idiot, sir.
What the fuck are you talking about???
You really HAVE gonebezerk
It figures you are too stupid to understand your anti-military rants here would fit in with the OWS and other far-left rallies.
But then again you are stupid enough to believe finishing 3rd or 4th is winning and being the norm.
Actually, you're the idiot supporting Ron Paul.
You and him are fringe people.
Most Americans (gasp) even Democrats understand the evil threats out there that you and Ron Paul ignore.
Pretty much you are in bed with he wacko left that hates this country and the US military too, congrats.
What the fuck are you talking about???
You really HAVE gonebezerk
It figures you are too stupid to understand your anti-military rants here would fit in with the OWS and other far-left rallies.
But then again you are stupid enough to believe finishing 3rd or 4th is winning and being the norm.
What the fuck are you talking about???
You really HAVE gonebezerk
My anti-military rants?? Are you fucking kidding me? I'm going to assume you have some posts to quote to display my "anti-military" stance, right?
And to preempt you, you understand that non-interventionism does not even REMOTELY equal anti-military. I'm all for arming to the bone and locking and loading our military for a potential fight against an enemy.
So this being said, I'll await your citations.
Idiot, you've said many times here our military actions in the middle east led to 9/11. Afterall they were just repsonding to us and our support of Israel.
You've also pushed for gutting the DoD budget, that isn't supporting the troops.
We know your kind, you hide behind the military when 9/11 happens but then blame the military and trash all the spending years after the dust settles.
Pretty much anyone that supports Ron Paul supports his 9/11 theories and anti-military (MIC) stance.
Oh, pulling back the troops to within our own borders doesn't help the US military, you've only made the job worse. Leaving the world's hotspot regions only gives the evil ones the idea of actually starting a war. There is a reason why we stayed in Europe after WWII, idiot.
It figures you are too stupid to understand your anti-military rants here would fit in with the OWS and other far-left rallies.
But then again you are stupid enough to believe finishing 3rd or 4th is winning and being the norm.
My anti-military rants?? Are you fucking kidding me? I'm going to assume you have some posts to quote to display my "anti-military" stance, right?
And to preempt you, you understand that non-interventionism does not even REMOTELY equal anti-military. I'm all for arming to the bone and locking and loading our military for a potential fight against an enemy.
So this being said, I'll await your citations.
Idiot, you've said many times here our military actions in the middle east led to 9/11. Afterall they were just repsonding to us and our support of Israel.
You've also pushed for gutting the DoD budget, that isn't supporting the troops.
We know your kind ...
Oh, that is going to destroy the US economy when our trading partners are invaded or we have to spend even more to go save them.....Idiot, you've said many times here our military actions in the middle east led to 9/11. Afterall they were just repsonding to us and our support of Israel.
That's not anti-military, it's anti-stupidity.
You've also pushed for gutting the DoD budget, that isn't supporting the troops.
If you bring most of the troops home, you can cut the budget considerably. That's the kind of 'support' most troops would really appreciate.
We know your kind ...
We have a 'kind'?
