Why Are Demo Leaders and Fake News so Insecure about Starbucks guy?

The major parties are always afraid of a third party spoiler for obvious reasons. The spoilers steal votes away and hand victory to the GREATER of the two evils.

Paging Ross Perot...
 
I love it how the democrats and Fake News have turned unhinged on Howard Schultz. If he has the funds to run his campaign for an Independent ticket. Then go for it! Can't let the Fake News try to derail Shultz if he's able to make a run at this.

Liz Peek: Democrats are afraid of Howard Schultz because they know he'll expose their empty promises

Another CEO-type is a non-starter. Running a business is not the same as running a nation. Insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting different results.
 
The major parties are always afraid of a third party spoiler for obvious reasons. The spoilers steal votes away and hand victory to the GREATER of the two evils.

Paging Ross Perot...
Or that he's exposing the empty promises democrats are running on for 2020 are flawed.
 
The major parties are always afraid of a third party spoiler for obvious reasons. The spoilers steal votes away and hand victory to the GREATER of the two evils.

Paging Ross Perot...
Or that he's exposing the empty promises democrats are running on for 2020 are flawed.
"Empty promises". Parroting a Fox News talking point is no way to impress, rube. :lol:
 
Here's an empty promise: "You will have such great health care at a tiny fraction of the cost, and it will be so easy!"

Here's an empty promise: "Give us all the power and we will repeal and replace Obamacare!"

You dipshits drank that piss for NINE YEARS running now.
 
The major parties are always afraid of a third party spoiler for obvious reasons. The spoilers steal votes away and hand victory to the GREATER of the two evils.

Paging Ross Perot...
Or that he's exposing the empty promises democrats are running on for 2020 are flawed.
"Empty promises". Parroting a Fox News talking point is no way to impress, rube. :lol:

You Fake News bots divert to deflecting, of course.
 
The major parties are always afraid of a third party spoiler for obvious reasons. The spoilers steal votes away and hand victory to the GREATER of the two evils.

Paging Ross Perot...
Or that he's exposing the empty promises democrats are running on for 2020 are flawed.
"Empty promises". Parroting a Fox News talking point is no way to impress, rube. :lol:

You Fake News bots divert to deflecting, of course.
It always gives me a chuckle when a Fox News piss drinker whines about "fake news".

Irony-Meter-Splode.jpg
 
Here's an empty promise: "You will have such great health care at a tiny fraction of the cost, and it will be so easy!"

Here's an empty promise: "Give us all the power and we will repeal and replace Obamacare!"

You dipshits drank that piss for NINE YEARS running now.

Thanks, John Mccain for ruining a promise?
 
The major parties are always afraid of a third party spoiler for obvious reasons. The spoilers steal votes away and hand victory to the GREATER of the two evils.

Paging Ross Perot...
Or that he's exposing the empty promises democrats are running on for 2020 are flawed.
"Empty promises". Parroting a Fox News talking point is no way to impress, rube. :lol:

You Fake News bots divert to deflecting, of course.
It always gives me a chuckle when a Fox News piss drinker whines about "fake news".

Irony-Meter-Splode.jpg

The Fake News bot has meme's huh.
 
I could never vote for a man that has so brazenly declared War on Christmas™.
 
The major parties are always afraid of a third party spoiler for obvious reasons. The spoilers steal votes away and hand victory to the GREATER of the two evils.

Paging Ross Perot...
And the dems can see Trump failed to live up to his rhetoric on economic populism and healthcare, so they want to lie and promise the moon as he did, and they certainly don't want people like Schultz or Bloomberg trying to tell people about reality .... and denying that billionaires are reaping a disproportionate reward
 
Shultz should run. If he takes votes away from the Democratic Nominee for President, that is the fault of the Democratic Nominee for President. Or, here’s a crazy idea, find out why people are voting for Shultz (if he runs) and see if you can sway them to vote for you; using something other than “he’s not electable!!!” Ya know, it might be that Shultz has better ideas than you do!
 
Shultz should run. If he takes votes away from the Democratic Nominee for President, that is the fault of the Democratic Nominee for President. Or, here’s a crazy idea, find out why people are voting for Shultz (if he runs) and see if you can sway them to vote for you; using something other than “he’s not electable!!!” Ya know, it might be that Shultz has better ideas than you do!
One of the weird things of the 16 election, and really both of Obama's wins was that NEITHER party's nominee seemed to run to their party's more extreme wing in the party .... and then tack back towards being a centrist during the general election.

Reagan came in as a guy who scared the literal shit out of a majority of us, and went out as our favorite uncle. Even Nixon who was a race baiter of the first class, was VERY popular regarding the actual policies he pursued, and what tripped him up was really a personality disorder bordering on paranoia.
 
Shultz should run. If he takes votes away from the Democratic Nominee for President, that is the fault of the Democratic Nominee for President. Or, here’s a crazy idea, find out why people are voting for Shultz (if he runs) and see if you can sway them to vote for you; using something other than “he’s not electable!!!” Ya know, it might be that Shultz has better ideas than you do!



Better yet, how about have him explain his ideas and why they are better then the democrat or Republican Party? Why does it have to be just two parties? How many years has one side said they would fight for you on immigration or racial equality decades ago, yet here we are still “fighting” over the same old shit? The politician you see on TV now bothe republican and Democrat are what’s wrong with America. If only America wasn’t so lazy we could change that.
 
I love it how the democrats and Fake News have turned unhinged on Howard Schultz. If he has the funds to run his campaign for an Independent ticket. Then go for it! Can't let the Fake News try to derail Shultz if he's able to make a run at this.

Liz Peek: Democrats are afraid of Howard Schultz because they know he'll expose their empty promises
Personally, I'm terrified he'll give us another president voted in by a minority of the electorate. Both Trump and Dubya were minority presidents and that didn't go well for the Dems or the country.
 
Shultz should run. If he takes votes away from the Democratic Nominee for President, that is the fault of the Democratic Nominee for President. Or, here’s a crazy idea, find out why people are voting for Shultz (if he runs) and see if you can sway them to vote for you; using something other than “he’s not electable!!!” Ya know, it might be that Shultz has better ideas than you do!



Better yet, how about have him explain his ideas and why they are better then the democrat or Republican Party? Why does it have to be just two parties? How many years has one side said they would fight for you on immigration or racial equality decades ago, yet here we are still “fighting” over the same old shit? The politician you see on TV now bothe republican and Democrat are what’s wrong with America. If only America wasn’t so lazy we could change that.

The voters get to decide that
 
Shultz should run. If he takes votes away from the Democratic Nominee for President, that is the fault of the Democratic Nominee for President. Or, here’s a crazy idea, find out why people are voting for Shultz (if he runs) and see if you can sway them to vote for you; using something other than “he’s not electable!!!” Ya know, it might be that Shultz has better ideas than you do!



Better yet, how about have him explain his ideas and why they are better then the democrat or Republican Party? Why does it have to be just two parties? How many years has one side said they would fight for you on immigration or racial equality decades ago, yet here we are still “fighting” over the same old shit? The politician you see on TV now bothe republican and Democrat are what’s wrong with America. If only America wasn’t so lazy we could change that.
The answer is simply the electoral college. And the irony here is that, while dems complained Trump won only because of the EC (which is true btw), there is zero possibility that Schultz could win 270 EV. He's not wining the left coast, and not Texas. The BEST his campaign could do was deny any candidate 270 and throw the election into the House of Rep.
 

Forum List

Back
Top