Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not only that, he ends up looking very Presidential, when you see how the other side is throwing hissy fits.LMAO! This entire week has shown Obama is a constitutional scholar.Who enforces a contempt citation against the AG, counselor?
3 guesses.
The ACA will be ruled Constitutional.
Long days can be great days!
Lot of grumpy Republicans today
Its been a looooooong day
Hope it never ends
I am not so sure AG Holder would agree with you on that sentiment.
Yes, he picked a bad week to give up sniffing glue..
Not only that, he ends up looking very Presidential, when you see how the other side is throwing hissy fits.LMAO! This entire week has shown Obama is a constitutional scholar.
So what do you believe the contempt citation will be for? Lying? No. Not showing up before Congress? No. Being a Democrat? Yes.
What is the reason in your opinion?
WTF are you babbling about. The Committee already voted for the contempt citation for the refusal to produce the documents demanded by subpoena.
The House will probably also vote to hold this disgraceful AG in contempt for that same refusal to comply with the Congressional subpoena.
And the bogus claim of Exec. Priv. will get pissed on in the process. That's why the matter will have to get referred to the U.S. Attorney -- who unfortunately is a subordinate of the contemnor. So it may require a special prosecutor or the old fashioned self help remedy whereby the Congress has the Sgt. at Arms arrest and detain the contemnor. That would be cool.
You are aware that it would be illegal for Holder to turn over said documents, correct?
Lot of grumpy Republicans today
Is that a good omen for AG Holder?
WTF are you babbling about. The Committee already voted for the contempt citation for the refusal to produce the documents demanded by subpoena.
The House will probably also vote to hold this disgraceful AG in contempt for that same refusal to comply with the Congressional subpoena.
And the bogus claim of Exec. Priv. will get pissed on in the process. That's why the matter will have to get referred to the U.S. Attorney -- who unfortunately is a subordinate of the contemnor. So it may require a special prosecutor or the old fashioned self help remedy whereby the Congress has the Sgt. at Arms arrest and detain the contemnor. That would be cool.
You are aware that it would be illegal for Holder to turn over said documents, correct?
Liability:
You probably didn't see this post, through your tears, so I ask again:
You are aware that it would be illegal for Holder to turn over said documents, correct?
Some minor British asshole who couldn't make it on CNN, so naturally he's on FOX.I am sorry I missed Stuart Varney's reaction.
Stuart Varney?
You are aware that it would be illegal for Holder to turn over said documents, correct?
Liability:
You probably didn't see this post, through your tears, so I ask again:
You are aware that it would be illegal for Holder to turn over said documents, correct?
No. I am not aware of that, Nobody is aware of that. It isn't true.
Are you aware that you buy any shit peddled by anybody when it suits your preconceived views?
Go ahead. Thrill me with your acumen. Tell us on what basis you falsely imagine that it would be illegal for the Attorney General to comply with the House Committee's lawful subpoena?
And what is FOXNEWS concentrating on, right now?Not only that, he ends up looking very Presidential, when you see how the other side is throwing hissy fits.LMAO! This entire week has shown Obama is a constitutional scholar.
Could you point to those alleged hissy fits? I haven't seen them.
Admittedly, the opponents of ObamaCare aren't as classy as the DNC: Top DNC staffers gloat over Obamacare, taunt GOP ‘bitches,’ ‘mother******s’ | Twitchy
Lot of grumpy Republicans today
Is that a good omen for AG Holder?
like they'd vote any differently if they'd won?
hacks be hacks, hon.
hacks be hacks.
it's not like issa and pals were suddenly going to be magnanimous if they won.
i will say, though... you guys are both horrible winners and horrible losers.
You cannot turn over documents that violate the secrecy laws that govern grand jury testimony.You are aware that it would be illegal for Holder to turn over said documents, correct?
Liability:
You probably didn't see this post, through your tears, so I ask again:
You are aware that it would be illegal for Holder to turn over said documents, correct?
No. I am not aware of that, Nobody is aware of that. It isn't true.
Are you aware that you buy any shit peddled by anybody when it suits your preconceived views?
Go ahead. Thrill me with your acumen. Tell us on what basis you falsely imagine that it would be illegal for the Attorney General to comply with the House Committee's lawful subpoena?
You are aware that it would be illegal for Holder to turn over said documents, correct?
Liability:
You probably didn't see this post, through your tears, so I ask again:
You are aware that it would be illegal for Holder to turn over said documents, correct?
No. I am not aware of that, Nobody is aware of that. It isn't true.
Are you aware that you buy any shit peddled by anybody when it suits your preconceived views?
Go ahead. Thrill me with your acumen. Tell us on what basis you falsely imagine that it would be illegal for the Attorney General to comply with the House Committee's lawful subpoena?
Is that a good omen for AG Holder?
like they'd vote any differently if they'd won?
hacks be hacks, hon.
hacks be hacks.
it's not like issa and pals were suddenly going to be magnanimous if they won.
i will say, though... you guys are both horrible winners and horrible losers.
HACKS are hacks which explains why the Dims will stage a show walk out -- or at least those playing the race card, again, will.
Dims are the horrible winners and have always been churlish childish losers.
