- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,023
- 47,212
- 2,180
It already is. Child porn and defamation are both illegal.And how do you propose we regulate the 1st Amendment with strict regulations regarding harmful content?You people really over blow this "banning all guns" crap and I don't get why. I guess it makes it easier to demonize the left by wanting to believe it is only made up of tree hugging extremists. The large majority of Americans do not want to abolish the 2nd amendment. Most gun control advocates such as myself simply want the 2nd amendment regulated with strict background checks and ending the gun show loophole. The fact that you people can't at all compromise on this issue makes you come across as toddlers.Lets see how many honest libs we have on this board? At least 4 in another couple threads admitted they wanted to do away with everyone's rights under the 2nd. meanwhile a couple more claimed NO ONE ever said that.
Child porn is physical evidence of a crime against an innocent person.
I don't think the Libel should be an exception to the first amendment.
Child porn is only a crime if the courts deny it 1st amendment protection. Child porn is only a crime because the 1st Amendment, like everything else in the Constitution,
is open to interpretation.
Child porn is evidence of a crime. You can't make it without committing a crime.