Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Military conquest was not illegal back then.That would be the same definition for Americans, Australians right?European colonists and their offspring.
It was illegal in the 20th century.
Name the law that made it illegal and I will show that the UN, ICC and ICJ have ignored when ther muslims have conquered with military foece in the last 75 years
You mean like when Iraq conquered Kuwait by force?
So, because the Europeans colonized, committed genocide and ethnic cleansing in the Americas starting about 5 centuries ago, Americans of European background are self-righteous if they criticize Israel for attempting to do same thing?
There is a whole list of international laws that were not around in 1492 or 1776.Military conquest was not illegal back then.That would be the same definition for Americans, Australians right?European colonists and their offspring.
It was illegal in the 20th century.
Name the law that made it illegal and I will show that the UN, ICC and ICJ have ignored when ther muslims have conquered with military foece in the last 75 years
Perhaps you should read up.
Like which ones?There is a whole list of international laws that were not around in 1492 or 1776.Military conquest was not illegal back then.That would be the same definition for Americans, Australians right?European colonists and their offspring.
It was illegal in the 20th century.
Name the law that made it illegal and I will show that the UN, ICC and ICJ have ignored when ther muslims have conquered with military foece in the last 75 years
Perhaps you should read up.
No different to the international laws that were not around in 1917, 1923, 1929, 1947, 1949 and 1967 that you try and impose on the Jews retrospectively.
Military conquest was not illegal back then.That would be the same definition for Americans, Australians right?European colonists and their offspring.
It was illegal in the 20th century.
Name the law that made it illegal and I will show that the UN, ICC and ICJ have ignored when ther muslims have conquered with military foece in the last 75 years
You mean like when Iraq conquered Kuwait by force?
No when the muslims took Yugoslavia apart and claimed part of it, or when the muslims took India apart and claimed part of it. Then there are all the Horn of Africa nations that muslims took apart and claimed for islam.
Where are the UN troops evicting the muslim terrorists who have no legal rights to the lands they have stolen by armed force since the inception of the UN.
Like which ones?There is a whole list of international laws that were not around in 1492 or 1776.Military conquest was not illegal back then.That would be the same definition for Americans, Australians right?
It was illegal in the 20th century.
Name the law that made it illegal and I will show that the UN, ICC and ICJ have ignored when ther muslims have conquered with military foece in the last 75 years
Perhaps you should read up.
No different to the international laws that were not around in 1917, 1923, 1929, 1947, 1949 and 1967 that you try and impose on the Jews retrospectively.
Military conquest was not illegal back then.That would be the same definition for Americans, Australians right?
It was illegal in the 20th century.
Name the law that made it illegal and I will show that the UN, ICC and ICJ have ignored when ther muslims have conquered with military foece in the last 75 years
You mean like when Iraq conquered Kuwait by force?
No when the muslims took Yugoslavia apart and claimed part of it, or when the muslims took India apart and claimed part of it. Then there are all the Horn of Africa nations that muslims took apart and claimed for islam.
Where are the UN troops evicting the muslim terrorists who have no legal rights to the lands they have stolen by armed force since the inception of the UN.
Ten Ways Israel Is Treated Differen
It's appalling to see how Israel is treated by a totally different standard than other countrie in the international system. Of course, Israel deserves scrutiny, as does every other nation. But it also merits equal treatment -- nothing more, nothing less.
First, Israel is the only UN member state whose very right to exist is under constant challenge.
Notwithstanding the fact that Israel embodies an age-old connection with the Jewish people as repeatedly cited in the most widely read book in the world, the Bible, that it was created based on the 1947 recommendation of the UN, and that it has been a member of the world body since 1949, there's a relentless chorus of nations, institutions, and individuals denying Israel's very political legitimacy.
No one would dare question the right to exist of many other countries whose basis for legitimacy is infinitely more questionable than Israel's, including those that were created by brute force, occupation, or distant mapmakers. Just look around at how many nations fit those categories, including, by the way, quite a few Arab countries. Why, then, is it open hunting season only on Israel? Could it possibly have anything to do with the fact that it's the only Jewish-majority country in the world?
Second, Israel is the only UN member state that's been targeted for annihilation by another UN member state.
Ten Ways Israel Is Treated Differently David Harris
Ten Ways Israel Is Treated Differen
It's appalling to see how Israel is treated by a totally different standard than other countrie in the international system. Of course, Israel deserves scrutiny, as does every other nation. But it also merits equal treatment -- nothing more, nothing less.
First, Israel is the only UN member state whose very right to exist is under constant challenge.
Notwithstanding the fact that Israel embodies an age-old connection with the Jewish people as repeatedly cited in the most widely read book in the world, the Bible, that it was created based on the 1947 recommendation of the UN, and that it has been a member of the world body since 1949, there's a relentless chorus of nations, institutions, and individuals denying Israel's very political legitimacy.
No one would dare question the right to exist of many other countries whose basis for legitimacy is infinitely more questionable than Israel's, including those that were created by brute force, occupation, or distant mapmakers. Just look around at how many nations fit those categories, including, by the way, quite a few Arab countries. Why, then, is it open hunting season only on Israel? Could it possibly have anything to do with the fact that it's the only Jewish-majority country in the world?
Second, Israel is the only UN member state that's been targeted for annihilation by another UN member state.
Ten Ways Israel Is Treated Differently David Harris
Sounds very familiar. We've heard this crap before.
"South Africa Shouldn't be Singled Out
"WHILE the violation of human rights is the norm rather than the exception in most of Africa's 42 black-ruled states, the spotlight remains on South Africa. The images of racism, white supremacy, Nazism, etc. are a most effective part of a campaign to play on white guilt and to condition hatred for South Africa. While it is true that there are many things wrong in South Africa, the facts are sensationalized and distorted. A cheap political campaign to get black and also well-meaning (though not as well-informed) white liberal votes, is being run by using the white ``racist regime'' in Pretoria as a unifying issue......Contrary to popular belief, the whites did not take the country from the blacks. When the Dutch settled in the Cape in 1652, they found a barren, largely unpopulated land. Together with French and German settlers, they built a dynamic society."
South Africa Shouldn t be Singled Out - CSMonitor.com
Ten Ways Israel Is Treated Differen
It's appalling to see how Israel is treated by a totally different standard than other countrie in the international system. Of course, Israel deserves scrutiny, as does every other nation. But it also merits equal treatment -- nothing more, nothing less.
First, Israel is the only UN member state whose very right to exist is under constant challenge.
Notwithstanding the fact that Israel embodies an age-old connection with the Jewish people as repeatedly cited in the most widely read book in the world, the Bible, that it was created based on the 1947 recommendation of the UN, and that it has been a member of the world body since 1949, there's a relentless chorus of nations, institutions, and individuals denying Israel's very political legitimacy.
No one would dare question the right to exist of many other countries whose basis for legitimacy is infinitely more questionable than Israel's, including those that were created by brute force, occupation, or distant mapmakers. Just look around at how many nations fit those categories, including, by the way, quite a few Arab countries. Why, then, is it open hunting season only on Israel? Could it possibly have anything to do with the fact that it's the only Jewish-majority country in the world?
Second, Israel is the only UN member state that's been targeted for annihilation by another UN member state.
Ten Ways Israel Is Treated Differently David Harris
Sounds very familiar. We've heard this crap before.
"South Africa Shouldn't be Singled Out
"WHILE the violation of human rights is the norm rather than the exception in most of Africa's 42 black-ruled states, the spotlight remains on South Africa. The images of racism, white supremacy, Nazism, etc. are a most effective part of a campaign to play on white guilt and to condition hatred for South Africa. While it is true that there are many things wrong in South Africa, the facts are sensationalized and distorted. A cheap political campaign to get black and also well-meaning (though not as well-informed) white liberal votes, is being run by using the white ``racist regime'' in Pretoria as a unifying issue......Contrary to popular belief, the whites did not take the country from the blacks. When the Dutch settled in the Cape in 1652, they found a barren, largely unpopulated land. Together with French and German settlers, they built a dynamic society."
South Africa Shouldn t be Singled Out - CSMonitor.com
Ten Ways Israel Is Treated Differen
It's appalling to see how Israel is treated by a totally different standard than other countrie in the international system. Of course, Israel deserves scrutiny, as does every other nation. But it also merits equal treatment -- nothing more, nothing less.
First, Israel is the only UN member state whose very right to exist is under constant challenge.
Notwithstanding the fact that Israel embodies an age-old connection with the Jewish people as repeatedly cited in the most widely read book in the world, the Bible, that it was created based on the 1947 recommendation of the UN, and that it has been a member of the world body since 1949, there's a relentless chorus of nations, institutions, and individuals denying Israel's very political legitimacy.
No one would dare question the right to exist of many other countries whose basis for legitimacy is infinitely more questionable than Israel's, including those that were created by brute force, occupation, or distant mapmakers. Just look around at how many nations fit those categories, including, by the way, quite a few Arab countries. Why, then, is it open hunting season only on Israel? Could it possibly have anything to do with the fact that it's the only Jewish-majority country in the world?
Second, Israel is the only UN member state that's been targeted for annihilation by another UN member state.
Ten Ways Israel Is Treated Differently David Harris
Sounds very familiar. We've heard this crap before.
"South Africa Shouldn't be Singled Out
"WHILE the violation of human rights is the norm rather than the exception in most of Africa's 42 black-ruled states, the spotlight remains on South Africa. The images of racism, white supremacy, Nazism, etc. are a most effective part of a campaign to play on white guilt and to condition hatred for South Africa. While it is true that there are many things wrong in South Africa, the facts are sensationalized and distorted. A cheap political campaign to get black and also well-meaning (though not as well-informed) white liberal votes, is being run by using the white ``racist regime'' in Pretoria as a unifying issue......Contrary to popular belief, the whites did not take the country from the blacks. When the Dutch settled in the Cape in 1652, they found a barren, largely unpopulated land. Together with French and German settlers, they built a dynamic society."
South Africa Shouldn t be Singled Out - CSMonitor.com
Wasting your time again,
European colonists and their offspring.
Then what does that make the other 70% of people in Israel, Mongols or Brazilians. Or don't you like the truth about Israel being 60% Sephardic Jews with very few Ashkenazi Jews left. So this one small fact destroys your every post about the Jews being INVADERS and COLONISTS when in fact they are indigenous to the area. Unlike the arab muslims that are just bums from the surrounding lands.
Of the thirty seven people who signed Israel's declaration of Independence, only one was born in Palestine and he was the son of immigrants.European colonists and their offspring.
Then what does that make the other 70% of people in Israel, Mongols or Brazilians. Or don't you like the truth about Israel being 60% Sephardic Jews with very few Ashkenazi Jews left. So this one small fact destroys your every post about the Jews being INVADERS and COLONISTS when in fact they are indigenous to the area. Unlike the arab muslims that are just bums from the surrounding lands.
The original colonists were strictly Europeans. None were indigenous to the area except a handful. As the record shows.
European colonists and their offspring.
Then what does that make the other 70% of people in Israel, Mongols or Brazilians. Or don't you like the truth about Israel being 60% Sephardic Jews with very few Ashkenazi Jews left. So this one small fact destroys your every post about the Jews being INVADERS and COLONISTS when in fact they are indigenous to the area. Unlike the arab muslims that are just bums from the surrounding lands.
The original colonists were strictly Europeans. None were indigenous to the area except a handful. As the record shows.
Of the thirty seven people who signed Israel's declaration of Independence, only one was born in Palestine and he was the son of immigrants.European colonists and their offspring.
Then what does that make the other 70% of people in Israel, Mongols or Brazilians. Or don't you like the truth about Israel being 60% Sephardic Jews with very few Ashkenazi Jews left. So this one small fact destroys your every post about the Jews being INVADERS and COLONISTS when in fact they are indigenous to the area. Unlike the arab muslims that are just bums from the surrounding lands.
The original colonists were strictly Europeans. None were indigenous to the area except a handful. As the record shows.
Israel is a foreign government imposed on Palestine at the point of a gun. And they call it a democracy.
History is my view. What is yours?Of the thirty seven people who signed Israel's declaration of Independence, only one was born in Palestine and he was the son of immigrants.European colonists and their offspring.
Then what does that make the other 70% of people in Israel, Mongols or Brazilians. Or don't you like the truth about Israel being 60% Sephardic Jews with very few Ashkenazi Jews left. So this one small fact destroys your every post about the Jews being INVADERS and COLONISTS when in fact they are indigenous to the area. Unlike the arab muslims that are just bums from the surrounding lands.
The original colonists were strictly Europeans. None were indigenous to the area except a handful. As the record shows.
Israel is a foreign government imposed on Palestine at the point of a gun. And they call it a democracy.
No that is just your view, and with £2 20 will get a cup of coffee
Of the thirty seven people who signed Israel's declaration of Independence, only one was born in Palestine and he was the son of immigrants.European colonists and their offspring.
Then what does that make the other 70% of people in Israel, Mongols or Brazilians. Or don't you like the truth about Israel being 60% Sephardic Jews with very few Ashkenazi Jews left. So this one small fact destroys your every post about the Jews being INVADERS and COLONISTS when in fact they are indigenous to the area. Unlike the arab muslims that are just bums from the surrounding lands.
The original colonists were strictly Europeans. None were indigenous to the area except a handful. As the record shows.
Israel is a foreign government imposed on Palestine at the point of a gun. And they call it a democracy.
European colonists and their offspring.
Then what does that make the other 70% of people in Israel, Mongols or Brazilians. Or don't you like the truth about Israel being 60% Sephardic Jews with very few Ashkenazi Jews left. So this one small fact destroys your every post about the Jews being INVADERS and COLONISTS when in fact they are indigenous to the area. Unlike the arab muslims that are just bums from the surrounding lands.
The original colonists were strictly Europeans. None were indigenous to the area except a handful. As the record shows.
LIAR as your own links show that many of the migrants came from arab muslim and other muslim nations prior to WW2
History is my view. What is yours?Of the thirty seven people who signed Israel's declaration of Independence, only one was born in Palestine and he was the son of immigrants.European colonists and their offspring.
Then what does that make the other 70% of people in Israel, Mongols or Brazilians. Or don't you like the truth about Israel being 60% Sephardic Jews with very few Ashkenazi Jews left. So this one small fact destroys your every post about the Jews being INVADERS and COLONISTS when in fact they are indigenous to the area. Unlike the arab muslims that are just bums from the surrounding lands.
The original colonists were strictly Europeans. None were indigenous to the area except a handful. As the record shows.
Israel is a foreign government imposed on Palestine at the point of a gun. And they call it a democracy.
No that is just your view, and with £2 20 will get a cup of coffee
