Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Folks,
Get used to this.....it's going to get worse...a LOT worse because bad spawn creates even worse spawn ....it's a spiraling cycle of bad news
It's been getting worse for decades. Anyone with an IQ in positive territory could see it coming.
This is primarily a failure of Federal government sticking it's nose into the lives of families where it didn't belong.
It's a result of Federal law arresting parents for disciplining their own children.
It's a result of fathers being charged with domestic violence for bustin their smart ass, disrespectful, back talking 16 year old a good one when they needed to learn some respect.
It's the result of a society more concerned with being Politically correct than doing the right thing.
Yep...you ain't seen nothing yet.
This shit is why I carry.
If you shoot an unarmed black teen....you will be indicted and likely convicted.
You need to read the report on the white man in Clearwater, Fl. who actually had the nerve to defend his life against a black thug who had assaulted him.
Anyone now who carries a concealed-weapon has put himself in harms way as juries will consider you guilty from the gitgo because of the media indoctrination of the public into believing no reasonable person would walk around with a concealed weapon....most especially if you dare shoot a black teen and if he is unarmed....you will be facing many years in jail where you will be sexually asaulted, raped etc by black thugs.
Disagree, I think the jury got it right on the Clearwater case. The black dude clearly backed away when the guy pulled his gun. Lethal force was no longer justified at that point. If he had continued to assault it would be a different story.
Nonsense....you watch a slow motion video ....just like the jury and come to an erroneous conclusion.
Michael drejka did not have the benefit of hind sight or a slow motion video...he lived in real time ....that is what too many do not get....the slow motion video misled the jury.
The jury took several hours of watching a slow motion video aka frame by frame to come to their ridiculous decision.
Yet they expected Michael Drejka to come to the same conclusion in approx. 2 to 3 secs. That is all the time he had from the moment he was assaulted till he fired his weapon.
Not even to mention the fact he had been dazed by the assault on him....thus dazed, in shock and in a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm he had to act very, very quickly ....you cannot expect someone in this condition to notice a couple of halting backward steps by his assailant.
Blacks Are Increasingly Above the Law - American Renaissance
This is the video I watched, and I stand by my claim. There was ample time to see he was retreating.
Perhaps ample time for you to come to that conclusion since you sit there behind your computer in complete safety, not being violently shoved to the ground, and then rise up and see a black thug hovering over you....thus being in fear of his life---again-- Michael Drejka had approx. 2 to 3 seconds to make a life or death decision...not to forget he was in a dazed condition due to being assaulted, his right arm injured, he had to struggle to get his weapon out because of that, and no doubt --also--in a mild state of shock .
Under those conditions he had a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm...aka the black dude rushing him and kicking him and or taking his weapon from him and using it against him. His assailant was only l2 feet from him...the thug could have covered that difference very, very quickly and resumed his attack.
I watched the trial the expert witness on body language testified that McGlockton was not retreating.
Also.....look at the white guy following McGlockton out of the store....as soon as he sees Michael Drejka pull out his weapon he runs and hides behind some cars....whilst McGlockton keeps standing there deciding what to do....probably not fully realizing due to being hyped up on drugs that the white dude might actually shoot him.
If he really was trying to retreat he should have taken off running like the white guy did....that would have been a real retreat and it would have saved his life.
The Real Crime Problem Doesn't Make Much News | Manhattan Institute
Probably thought that a stroll through little Mogadishu would be culturally enlightening.maybe a lib dem getting what he deserves and worked for in 'minnisota' . If he is a lefty liberal .
If you shoot an unarmed black teen....you will be indicted and likely convicted.
You need to read the report on the white man in Clearwater, Fl. who actually had the nerve to defend his life against a black thug who had assaulted him.
Anyone now who carries a concealed-weapon has put himself in harms way as juries will consider you guilty from the gitgo because of the media indoctrination of the public into believing no reasonable person would walk around with a concealed weapon....most especially if you dare shoot a black teen and if he is unarmed....you will be facing many years in jail where you will be sexually asaulted, raped etc by black thugs.
Disagree, I think the jury got it right on the Clearwater case. The black dude clearly backed away when the guy pulled his gun. Lethal force was no longer justified at that point. If he had continued to assault it would be a different story.
Nonsense....you watch a slow motion video ....just like the jury and come to an erroneous conclusion.
Michael drejka did not have the benefit of hind sight or a slow motion video...he lived in real time ....that is what too many do not get....the slow motion video misled the jury.
The jury took several hours of watching a slow motion video aka frame by frame to come to their ridiculous decision.
Yet they expected Michael Drejka to come to the same conclusion in approx. 2 to 3 secs. That is all the time he had from the moment he was assaulted till he fired his weapon.
Not even to mention the fact he had been dazed by the assault on him....thus dazed, in shock and in a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm he had to act very, very quickly ....you cannot expect someone in this condition to notice a couple of halting backward steps by his assailant.
Blacks Are Increasingly Above the Law - American Renaissance
This is the video I watched, and I stand by my claim. There was ample time to see he was retreating.
Perhaps ample time for you to come to that conclusion since you sit there behind your computer in complete safety, not being violently shoved to the ground, and then rise up and see a black thug hovering over you....thus being in fear of his life---again-- Michael Drejka had approx. 2 to 3 seconds to make a life or death decision...not to forget he was in a dazed condition due to being assaulted, his right arm injured, he had to struggle to get his weapon out because of that, and no doubt --also--in a mild state of shock .
Under those conditions he had a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm...aka the black dude rushing him and kicking him and or taking his weapon from him and using it against him. His assailant was only l2 feet from him...the thug could have covered that difference very, very quickly and resumed his attack.
I watched the trial the expert witness on body language testified that McGlockton was not retreating.
Also.....look at the white guy following McGlockton out of the store....as soon as he sees Michael Drejka pull out his weapon he runs and hides behind some cars....whilst McGlockton keeps standing there deciding what to do....probably not fully realizing due to being hyped up on drugs that the white dude might actually shoot him.
If he really was trying to retreat he should have taken off running like the white guy did....that would have been a real retreat and it would have saved his life.
The Real Crime Problem Doesn't Make Much News | Manhattan Institute
You have your opinion, I have mine. I say it was a bad shoot.
If you shoot an unarmed black teen....you will be indicted and likely convicted.
You need to read the report on the white man in Clearwater, Fl. who actually had the nerve to defend his life against a black thug who had assaulted him.
Anyone now who carries a concealed-weapon has put himself in harms way as juries will consider you guilty from the gitgo because of the media indoctrination of the public into believing no reasonable person would walk around with a concealed weapon....most especially if you dare shoot a black teen and if he is unarmed....you will be facing many years in jail where you will be sexually asaulted, raped etc by black thugs.
Disagree, I think the jury got it right on the Clearwater case. The black dude clearly backed away when the guy pulled his gun. Lethal force was no longer justified at that point. If he had continued to assault it would be a different story.
Nonsense....you watch a slow motion video ....just like the jury and come to an erroneous conclusion.
Michael drejka did not have the benefit of hind sight or a slow motion video...he lived in real time ....that is what too many do not get....the slow motion video misled the jury.
The jury took several hours of watching a slow motion video aka frame by frame to come to their ridiculous decision.
Yet they expected Michael Drejka to come to the same conclusion in approx. 2 to 3 secs. That is all the time he had from the moment he was assaulted till he fired his weapon.
Not even to mention the fact he had been dazed by the assault on him....thus dazed, in shock and in a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm he had to act very, very quickly ....you cannot expect someone in this condition to notice a couple of halting backward steps by his assailant.
Blacks Are Increasingly Above the Law - American Renaissance
This is the video I watched, and I stand by my claim. There was ample time to see he was retreating.
Perhaps ample time for you to come to that conclusion since you sit there behind your computer in complete safety, not being violently shoved to the ground, and then rise up and see a black thug hovering over you....thus being in fear of his life---again-- Michael Drejka had approx. 2 to 3 seconds to make a life or death decision...not to forget he was in a dazed condition due to being assaulted, his right arm injured, he had to struggle to get his weapon out because of that, and no doubt --also--in a mild state of shock .
Under those conditions he had a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm...aka the black dude rushing him and kicking him and or taking his weapon from him and using it against him. His assailant was only l2 feet from him...the thug could have covered that difference very, very quickly and resumed his attack.
I watched the trial the expert witness on body language testified that McGlockton was not retreating.
Also.....look at the white guy following McGlockton out of the store....as soon as he sees Michael Drejka pull out his weapon he runs and hides behind some cars....whilst McGlockton keeps standing there deciding what to do....probably not fully realizing due to being hyped up on drugs that the white dude might actually shoot him.
If he really was trying to retreat he should have taken off running like the white guy did....that would have been a real retreat and it would have saved his life.
The Real Crime Problem Doesn't Make Much News | Manhattan Institute
You have your opinion, I have mine. I say it was a bad shoot.
.....doy
The whole media narrative about white nationalism is laughable. Since the middle of the Obama years, most white people don't think we have a police or a white supremacist problem. They think we have a black problem......
Blacks are a minority but they committ over half of all violent crimes including rape.
Another day another (well three more) videos of gangs of “youth” and “people” attacking and beating whites in Minneapolis.
Enjoy your future.
Robbery beatdown videos heighten MPD staffing debate
You have to lock, them up. Just having more police on the street doesn't mean much if all you are doing is arresting them. Police can arrest all day long but if they are being released back on the streets or there are no repercussions for juveniles then it isn't going to do much.
How about caning? So far as I know there is very little of rioting or looting or racial attacks in Singapore.
Of course the demographics are quite different than Minneapolis...
SIngapore is a very orderly society, and not that many honkies there either. Very tremendous place, they don't put up with a lot of shit there.
The whole media narrative about white nationalism is laughable. Since the middle of the Obama years, most white people don't think we have a police or a white supremacist problem. They think we have a black problem......
Why is it that the media always preaches that the blacks are the victims?
They certainly do not get that idea from any of the statistics on violent crime.
Blacks are a minority but they committ over half of all violent crimes including rape.
Disagree, I think the jury got it right on the Clearwater case. The black dude clearly backed away when the guy pulled his gun. Lethal force was no longer justified at that point. If he had continued to assault it would be a different story.
Nonsense....you watch a slow motion video ....just like the jury and come to an erroneous conclusion.
Michael drejka did not have the benefit of hind sight or a slow motion video...he lived in real time ....that is what too many do not get....the slow motion video misled the jury.
The jury took several hours of watching a slow motion video aka frame by frame to come to their ridiculous decision.
Yet they expected Michael Drejka to come to the same conclusion in approx. 2 to 3 secs. That is all the time he had from the moment he was assaulted till he fired his weapon.
Not even to mention the fact he had been dazed by the assault on him....thus dazed, in shock and in a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm he had to act very, very quickly ....you cannot expect someone in this condition to notice a couple of halting backward steps by his assailant.
Blacks Are Increasingly Above the Law - American Renaissance
This is the video I watched, and I stand by my claim. There was ample time to see he was retreating.
Perhaps ample time for you to come to that conclusion since you sit there behind your computer in complete safety, not being violently shoved to the ground, and then rise up and see a black thug hovering over you....thus being in fear of his life---again-- Michael Drejka had approx. 2 to 3 seconds to make a life or death decision...not to forget he was in a dazed condition due to being assaulted, his right arm injured, he had to struggle to get his weapon out because of that, and no doubt --also--in a mild state of shock .
Under those conditions he had a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm...aka the black dude rushing him and kicking him and or taking his weapon from him and using it against him. His assailant was only l2 feet from him...the thug could have covered that difference very, very quickly and resumed his attack.
I watched the trial the expert witness on body language testified that McGlockton was not retreating.
Also.....look at the white guy following McGlockton out of the store....as soon as he sees Michael Drejka pull out his weapon he runs and hides behind some cars....whilst McGlockton keeps standing there deciding what to do....probably not fully realizing due to being hyped up on drugs that the white dude might actually shoot him.
If he really was trying to retreat he should have taken off running like the white guy did....that would have been a real retreat and it would have saved his life.
The Real Crime Problem Doesn't Make Much News | Manhattan Institute
You have your opinion, I have mine. I say it was a bad shoot.
Obviously you do not have good analytical skills.
I have seen several like you on here.....
Disagree, I think the jury got it right on the Clearwater case. The black dude clearly backed away when the guy pulled his gun. Lethal force was no longer justified at that point. If he had continued to assault it would be a different story.
Nonsense....you watch a slow motion video ....just like the jury and come to an erroneous conclusion.
Michael drejka did not have the benefit of hind sight or a slow motion video...he lived in real time ....that is what too many do not get....the slow motion video misled the jury.
The jury took several hours of watching a slow motion video aka frame by frame to come to their ridiculous decision.
Yet they expected Michael Drejka to come to the same conclusion in approx. 2 to 3 secs. That is all the time he had from the moment he was assaulted till he fired his weapon.
Not even to mention the fact he had been dazed by the assault on him....thus dazed, in shock and in a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm he had to act very, very quickly ....you cannot expect someone in this condition to notice a couple of halting backward steps by his assailant.
Blacks Are Increasingly Above the Law - American Renaissance
This is the video I watched, and I stand by my claim. There was ample time to see he was retreating.
Perhaps ample time for you to come to that conclusion since you sit there behind your computer in complete safety, not being violently shoved to the ground, and then rise up and see a black thug hovering over you....thus being in fear of his life---again-- Michael Drejka had approx. 2 to 3 seconds to make a life or death decision...not to forget he was in a dazed condition due to being assaulted, his right arm injured, he had to struggle to get his weapon out because of that, and no doubt --also--in a mild state of shock .
Under those conditions he had a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm...aka the black dude rushing him and kicking him and or taking his weapon from him and using it against him. His assailant was only l2 feet from him...the thug could have covered that difference very, very quickly and resumed his attack.
I watched the trial the expert witness on body language testified that McGlockton was not retreating.
Also.....look at the white guy following McGlockton out of the store....as soon as he sees Michael Drejka pull out his weapon he runs and hides behind some cars....whilst McGlockton keeps standing there deciding what to do....probably not fully realizing due to being hyped up on drugs that the white dude might actually shoot him.
If he really was trying to retreat he should have taken off running like the white guy did....that would have been a real retreat and it would have saved his life.
The Real Crime Problem Doesn't Make Much News | Manhattan Institute
You have your opinion, I have mine. I say it was a bad shoot.
Obviouslly you lack good analytical skills....I would like to see you and a few others on here like you in a similar scenario.
I wonder how you would really act ?
Easy to judge or fault someone elses action when it is their life on the line and not yours.
Sure,it is possible that Drejka could have just waved his gun around like some suggest and that might have prevented the black dude from resuming his attack....but if it had been your life in danger...would you have gambled on that?
Since the black dude remained within striking distance of his victim....if Drejka did not shoot the aggressor might have interpeted that as weakness and rushed Drejka and snatched his weapon and used it against him....not like that has not happened before.
I saw a video once of a home invader and the woman of the house confronted him with a pistol. He was 30 ft. away from her when she pulled the gun on him. Did he run away? No....he rushed her...she did manage to get off a shot but missed him....he took the pistol away from her and beat her to death with it.
That is why in self-defense course they teach if you pull your weapon you better use it...lots of people have had their weapon taken from them...even police officers who are well trained.
The black dude was only l2 ft. away from his victim when he got shot. How long would it have taken him to cover l2 ft? about 1.5 secs.
Bottom line Drejka was within the law....he definitely had a reasonable fear of his life being in danger.
Nonsense....you watch a slow motion video ....just like the jury and come to an erroneous conclusion.
Michael drejka did not have the benefit of hind sight or a slow motion video...he lived in real time ....that is what too many do not get....the slow motion video misled the jury.
The jury took several hours of watching a slow motion video aka frame by frame to come to their ridiculous decision.
Yet they expected Michael Drejka to come to the same conclusion in approx. 2 to 3 secs. That is all the time he had from the moment he was assaulted till he fired his weapon.
Not even to mention the fact he had been dazed by the assault on him....thus dazed, in shock and in a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm he had to act very, very quickly ....you cannot expect someone in this condition to notice a couple of halting backward steps by his assailant.
Blacks Are Increasingly Above the Law - American Renaissance
This is the video I watched, and I stand by my claim. There was ample time to see he was retreating.
Perhaps ample time for you to come to that conclusion since you sit there behind your computer in complete safety, not being violently shoved to the ground, and then rise up and see a black thug hovering over you....thus being in fear of his life---again-- Michael Drejka had approx. 2 to 3 seconds to make a life or death decision...not to forget he was in a dazed condition due to being assaulted, his right arm injured, he had to struggle to get his weapon out because of that, and no doubt --also--in a mild state of shock .
Under those conditions he had a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm...aka the black dude rushing him and kicking him and or taking his weapon from him and using it against him. His assailant was only l2 feet from him...the thug could have covered that difference very, very quickly and resumed his attack.
I watched the trial the expert witness on body language testified that McGlockton was not retreating.
Also.....look at the white guy following McGlockton out of the store....as soon as he sees Michael Drejka pull out his weapon he runs and hides behind some cars....whilst McGlockton keeps standing there deciding what to do....probably not fully realizing due to being hyped up on drugs that the white dude might actually shoot him.
If he really was trying to retreat he should have taken off running like the white guy did....that would have been a real retreat and it would have saved his life.
The Real Crime Problem Doesn't Make Much News | Manhattan Institute
You have your opinion, I have mine. I say it was a bad shoot.
Obviously you do not have good analytical skills.
I have seen several like you on here.....
Nonsense....you watch a slow motion video ....just like the jury and come to an erroneous conclusion.
Michael drejka did not have the benefit of hind sight or a slow motion video...he lived in real time ....that is what too many do not get....the slow motion video misled the jury.
The jury took several hours of watching a slow motion video aka frame by frame to come to their ridiculous decision.
Yet they expected Michael Drejka to come to the same conclusion in approx. 2 to 3 secs. That is all the time he had from the moment he was assaulted till he fired his weapon.
Not even to mention the fact he had been dazed by the assault on him....thus dazed, in shock and in a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm he had to act very, very quickly ....you cannot expect someone in this condition to notice a couple of halting backward steps by his assailant.
Blacks Are Increasingly Above the Law - American Renaissance
This is the video I watched, and I stand by my claim. There was ample time to see he was retreating.
Perhaps ample time for you to come to that conclusion since you sit there behind your computer in complete safety, not being violently shoved to the ground, and then rise up and see a black thug hovering over you....thus being in fear of his life---again-- Michael Drejka had approx. 2 to 3 seconds to make a life or death decision...not to forget he was in a dazed condition due to being assaulted, his right arm injured, he had to struggle to get his weapon out because of that, and no doubt --also--in a mild state of shock .
Under those conditions he had a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm...aka the black dude rushing him and kicking him and or taking his weapon from him and using it against him. His assailant was only l2 feet from him...the thug could have covered that difference very, very quickly and resumed his attack.
I watched the trial the expert witness on body language testified that McGlockton was not retreating.
Also.....look at the white guy following McGlockton out of the store....as soon as he sees Michael Drejka pull out his weapon he runs and hides behind some cars....whilst McGlockton keeps standing there deciding what to do....probably not fully realizing due to being hyped up on drugs that the white dude might actually shoot him.
If he really was trying to retreat he should have taken off running like the white guy did....that would have been a real retreat and it would have saved his life.
The Real Crime Problem Doesn't Make Much News | Manhattan Institute
You have your opinion, I have mine. I say it was a bad shoot.
Obviouslly you lack good analytical skills....I would like to see you and a few others on here like you in a similar scenario.
I wonder how you would really act ?
Easy to judge or fault someone elses action when it is their life on the line and not yours.
Sure,it is possible that Drejka could have just waved his gun around like some suggest and that might have prevented the black dude from resuming his attack....but if it had been your life in danger...would you have gambled on that?
Since the black dude remained within striking distance of his victim....if Drejka did not shoot the aggressor might have interpeted that as weakness and rushed Drejka and snatched his weapon and used it against him....not like that has not happened before.
I saw a video once of a home invader and the woman of the house confronted him with a pistol. He was 30 ft. away from her when she pulled the gun on him. Did he run away? No....he rushed her...she did manage to get off a shot but missed him....he took the pistol away from her and beat her to death with it.
That is why in self-defense course they teach if you pull your weapon you better use it...lots of people have had their weapon taken from them...even police officers who are well trained.
The black dude was only l2 ft. away from his victim when he got shot. How long would it have taken him to cover l2 ft? about 1.5 secs.
Bottom line Drejka was within the law....he definitely had a reasonable fear of his life being in danger.
This wasn't a case of someone being attacked while minding his own business. This was a case of a guy who decided to accost a woman over something as stupid as a parking spot. Her boyfriend came to her defense and shoved Drejka. Drejka pulls his firearm, CLEARLY causing the guy to halt his assault and start backing away, and Drejka shoots him anyways. I don't care how many "body language experts" the defense team had saying otherwise, that's literally their job. In situations such as this I make my judgments based upon MY observations and my own life experience, and in my opinion McGlocktons body language is plain as day - he is retreating.
It is the duty of all CCW holders not to go looking for a fight. Your weapon is there to protect you and yours from circumstances beyond your control, not to play "parking lot police". Drejka initiated the confrontation, got assaulted because of it, and then made the stupid decision to shoot someone who had disengaged.
Bad shoot, jury made the right call, and you're not going to convince me otherwise.
Nonsense....you watch a slow motion video ....just like the jury and come to an erroneous conclusion.
Michael drejka did not have the benefit of hind sight or a slow motion video...he lived in real time ....that is what too many do not get....the slow motion video misled the jury.
The jury took several hours of watching a slow motion video aka frame by frame to come to their ridiculous decision.
Yet they expected Michael Drejka to come to the same conclusion in approx. 2 to 3 secs. That is all the time he had from the moment he was assaulted till he fired his weapon.
Not even to mention the fact he had been dazed by the assault on him....thus dazed, in shock and in a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm he had to act very, very quickly ....you cannot expect someone in this condition to notice a couple of halting backward steps by his assailant.
Blacks Are Increasingly Above the Law - American Renaissance
This is the video I watched, and I stand by my claim. There was ample time to see he was retreating.
Perhaps ample time for you to come to that conclusion since you sit there behind your computer in complete safety, not being violently shoved to the ground, and then rise up and see a black thug hovering over you....thus being in fear of his life---again-- Michael Drejka had approx. 2 to 3 seconds to make a life or death decision...not to forget he was in a dazed condition due to being assaulted, his right arm injured, he had to struggle to get his weapon out because of that, and no doubt --also--in a mild state of shock .
Under those conditions he had a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm...aka the black dude rushing him and kicking him and or taking his weapon from him and using it against him. His assailant was only l2 feet from him...the thug could have covered that difference very, very quickly and resumed his attack.
I watched the trial the expert witness on body language testified that McGlockton was not retreating.
Also.....look at the white guy following McGlockton out of the store....as soon as he sees Michael Drejka pull out his weapon he runs and hides behind some cars....whilst McGlockton keeps standing there deciding what to do....probably not fully realizing due to being hyped up on drugs that the white dude might actually shoot him.
If he really was trying to retreat he should have taken off running like the white guy did....that would have been a real retreat and it would have saved his life.
The Real Crime Problem Doesn't Make Much News | Manhattan Institute
You have your opinion, I have mine. I say it was a bad shoot.
Obviously you do not have good analytical skills.
I have seen several like you on here.....
Nonsense....you watch a slow motion video ....just like the jury and come to an erroneous conclusion.
Michael drejka did not have the benefit of hind sight or a slow motion video...he lived in real time ....that is what too many do not get....the slow motion video misled the jury.
The jury took several hours of watching a slow motion video aka frame by frame to come to their ridiculous decision.
Yet they expected Michael Drejka to come to the same conclusion in approx. 2 to 3 secs. That is all the time he had from the moment he was assaulted till he fired his weapon.
Not even to mention the fact he had been dazed by the assault on him....thus dazed, in shock and in a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm he had to act very, very quickly ....you cannot expect someone in this condition to notice a couple of halting backward steps by his assailant.
Blacks Are Increasingly Above the Law - American Renaissance
This is the video I watched, and I stand by my claim. There was ample time to see he was retreating.
Perhaps ample time for you to come to that conclusion since you sit there behind your computer in complete safety, not being violently shoved to the ground, and then rise up and see a black thug hovering over you....thus being in fear of his life---again-- Michael Drejka had approx. 2 to 3 seconds to make a life or death decision...not to forget he was in a dazed condition due to being assaulted, his right arm injured, he had to struggle to get his weapon out because of that, and no doubt --also--in a mild state of shock .
Under those conditions he had a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm...aka the black dude rushing him and kicking him and or taking his weapon from him and using it against him. His assailant was only l2 feet from him...the thug could have covered that difference very, very quickly and resumed his attack.
I watched the trial the expert witness on body language testified that McGlockton was not retreating.
Also.....look at the white guy following McGlockton out of the store....as soon as he sees Michael Drejka pull out his weapon he runs and hides behind some cars....whilst McGlockton keeps standing there deciding what to do....probably not fully realizing due to being hyped up on drugs that the white dude might actually shoot him.
If he really was trying to retreat he should have taken off running like the white guy did....that would have been a real retreat and it would have saved his life.
The Real Crime Problem Doesn't Make Much News | Manhattan Institute
You have your opinion, I have mine. I say it was a bad shoot.
Obviouslly you lack good analytical skills....I would like to see you and a few others on here like you in a similar scenario.
I wonder how you would really act ?
Easy to judge or fault someone elses action when it is their life on the line and not yours.
Sure,it is possible that Drejka could have just waved his gun around like some suggest and that might have prevented the black dude from resuming his attack....but if it had been your life in danger...would you have gambled on that?
Since the black dude remained within striking distance of his victim....if Drejka did not shoot the aggressor might have interpeted that as weakness and rushed Drejka and snatched his weapon and used it against him....not like that has not happened before.
I saw a video once of a home invader and the woman of the house confronted him with a pistol. He was 30 ft. away from her when she pulled the gun on him. Did he run away? No....he rushed her...she did manage to get off a shot but missed him....he took the pistol away from her and beat her to death with it.
That is why in self-defense course they teach if you pull your weapon you better use it...lots of people have had their weapon taken from them...even police officers who are well trained.
The black dude was only l2 ft. away from his victim when he got shot. How long would it have taken him to cover l2 ft? about 1.5 secs.
Bottom line Drejka was within the law....he definitely had a reasonable fear of his life being in danger.
This wasn't a case of someone being attacked while minding his own business. This was a case of a guy who decided to accost a woman over something as stupid as a parking spot. Her boyfriend came to her defense and shoved Drejka. Drejka pulls his firearm, CLEARLY causing the guy to halt his assault and start backing away, and Drejka shoots him anyways. I don't care how many "body language experts" the defense team had saying otherwise, that's literally their job. In situations such as this I make my judgments based upon MY observations and my own life experience, and in my opinion McGlocktons body language is plain as day - he is retreating.
It is the duty of all CCW holders not to go looking for a fight. Your weapon is there to protect you and yours from circumstances beyond your control, not to play "parking lot police". Drejka initiated the confrontation, got assaulted because of it, and then made the stupid decision to shoot someone who had disengaged.
Bad shoot, jury made the right call, and you're not going to convince me otherwise.
THAT CNN would coverThis shit is why I carry.
This shit is why I carry.
Bbbut if you ventilate one of the animals you'll be branded a white supremacist racist
Can you give me a case where a group of black males attacked someone and the victim shot one, two or three of them and folks labeled them a white supremacist.
Bernhard Goetz
If you shoot an unarmed black teen....you will be indicted and likely convicted.
You need to read the report on the white man in Clearwater, Fl. who actually had the nerve to defend his life against a black thug who had assaulted him.
Anyone now who carries a concealed-weapon has put himself in harms way as juries will consider you guilty from the gitgo because of the media indoctrination of the public into believing no reasonable person would walk around with a concealed weapon....most especially if you dare shoot a black teen and if he is unarmed....you will be facing many years in jail where you will be sexually asaulted, raped etc by black thugs.
Disagree, I think the jury got it right on the Clearwater case. The black dude clearly backed away when the guy pulled his gun. Lethal force was no longer justified at that point. If he had continued to assault it would be a different story.
Nonsense....you watch a slow motion video ....just like the jury and come to an erroneous conclusion.
Michael drejka did not have the benefit of hind sight or a slow motion video...he lived in real time ....that is what too many do not get....the slow motion video misled the jury.
The jury took several hours of watching a slow motion video aka frame by frame to come to their ridiculous decision.
Yet they expected Michael Drejka to come to the same conclusion in approx. 2 to 3 secs. That is all the time he had from the moment he was assaulted till he fired his weapon.
Not even to mention the fact he had been dazed by the assault on him....thus dazed, in shock and in a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm he had to act very, very quickly ....you cannot expect someone in this condition to notice a couple of halting backward steps by his assailant.
Blacks Are Increasingly Above the Law - American Renaissance
This is the video I watched, and I stand by my claim. There was ample time to see he was retreating.
Perhaps ample time for you to come to that conclusion since you sit there behind your computer in complete safety, not being violently shoved to the ground, and then rise up and see a black thug hovering over you....thus being in fear of his life---again-- Michael Drejka had approx. 2 to 3 seconds to make a life or death decision...not to forget he was in a dazed condition due to being assaulted, his right arm injured, he had to struggle to get his weapon out because of that, and no doubt --also--in a mild state of shock .
Under those conditions he had a very reasonable fear of his life or of further grievious bodily harm...aka the black dude rushing him and kicking him and or taking his weapon from him and using it against him. His assailant was only l2 feet from him...the thug could have covered that difference very, very quickly and resumed his attack.
I watched the trial the expert witness on body language testified that McGlockton was not retreating.
Also.....look at the white guy following McGlockton out of the store....as soon as he sees Michael Drejka pull out his weapon he runs and hides behind some cars....whilst McGlockton keeps standing there deciding what to do....probably not fully realizing due to being hyped up on drugs that the white dude might actually shoot him.
If he really was trying to retreat he should have taken off running like the white guy did....that would have been a real retreat and it would have saved his life.
He wasnt retreating. He took a step back to get his footing.
I think any cop would have shot the attacker under these circumstances
The WHITE GUY has no run-ins with the law. Cant say the same for the "victim."
Minute 15 talks about the political pressure to get the white guy
The WHITE GUY has no run-ins with the law. Cant say the same for the "victim."
Minute 15 talks about the political pressure to get the white guy
He just had a record of threatening folks in the past.
Records show road rage, gun threats in stand your ground shooter's past
If the Prog agendists actually spoke about this like they the phantom white supremacist bull spewed we would all get a dose of reality. I have no compassion for a Prog socialist voter who gets a beat down in this way. I actually believed my politicians that justice and inclusion were right. And they are. Somehow we are missing something. And what is worse we went from a nation of promoting "A plus" men and women of excellence to one of promoting "B plus" men and women because quotas and political correctness. China is laughing at us. For they have a plan. To rule!
Well they are trying to find a solution. In Baltimore teen Roy’el Byrd gave an interesting explanation for running around beating whites, breaking windows and assaulting cops and motorists....Don’t close the mall...ever!
“Roy’el learned the hard way about White Marsh Mall’s curfew when he and a group of friends were unexpectedly asked to leave one weekend.
“If you really want to help society grow, why would you close a mall and not solve the problem that led to the ruckus?” he said.”
Clashes with teens have become a polarizing issue in Baltimore. As adults argue, some youth feel ignored.
