Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Still thrown by my use of 'yup', uh-huh', and now 'yes'. Would my use of a different affrimative be more remedial for you?Yup. That's correct. The first line of the plagiarized text does mention the organization who did the study. That's what newspapers do.
The plagiarist represented that text - the paper's text - as his own. As his own, he did not site the actual persons who did the study.
I understand that you think so, but I am not all that concerned as those who cannot grasp simple concepts and don't understand three-letter words are just toys to me.
Holy fuxxing dingleberry dumps.
Posted by the first line in the OP:
"According to The National Sleep Foundations 2010 Sleep in America..."
Embarrass yourself again and claim who did the study was not cited. Bitch.
So the fuck what? He copied the words of another who reported about it word for word.Moron. He copied the words reporting it, word for word.
****, he can't link yet.
now whine about the name calling.
Damn, you are stupid. Plagiarism is not a difficult concept to grasp.
Nor are copyright laws, ESPECIALLY when the content is copied from a daily. They tend to take that seriously.
God, you are seriously stupid. Keep on arguing, moron. You're flat wrong and you have serious issues when you are called out on that. Pussy.
Yup.Still thrown by my use of 'yup', uh-huh', and now 'yes'. Would my use of a different affrimative be more remedial for you?Holy fuxxing dingleberry dumps.
Posted by the first line in the OP:
"According to The National Sleep Foundations 2010 Sleep in America..."
Embarrass yourself again and claim who did the study was not cited. Bitch.
Holy fuxxing dingleberry dumps.
Posted by the first line in the OP:
"According to The National Sleep Foundations 2010 Sleep in America..."
....
Of course my post said nothing about the article because the OP copied it. I searched for the source myself.
Repeating the obvious: The OP copied word for word a newpaper article. The OP did not properly cite those who did the work. Two counts of plagiarism. It's simple yet eludes you.
What an idiot you are.
But, I can understand your and Eder's defense of a racist.
You accused the op of stealing study data on the basis of not citing who did the study.
Yup.
[Emphasis added]You accused the op of stealing study data on the basis of not citing who did the study.
Yup.
This is the thing. You originally said he didn't cite a source that was cited, the organization that did the study, a citation which is perfectly reasonable on a message board, as he wasn't writing a college paper, and which the newspaper article found sufficient as well.
Technically, you are correct about the newspaper article, because he should have cited the paper even if he couldn't produce a link yet. He might have used the quote function, but he may not know how yet, barring that, he should have used "quotes." People are new to things sometimes, and a patient and wise woman would walk a newby through the rules without ripping out his spleen.
That's why you're getting so much flack on this thread, because came right out of the box a know-it-all nasty bitch.
Good luck, I hope this helped.
[Emphasis added]Yup.
This is the thing. You originally said he didn't cite a source that was cited, the organization that did the study, a citation which is perfectly reasonable on a message board, as he wasn't writing a college paper, and which the newspaper article found sufficient as well.
Technically, you are correct about the newspaper article, because he should have cited the paper even if he couldn't produce a link yet. He might have used the quote function, but he may not know how yet, barring that, he should have used "quotes." People are new to things sometimes, and a patient and wise woman would walk a newby through the rules without ripping out his spleen.
That's why you're getting so much flack on this thread, because came right out of the box a know-it-all nasty bitch.
Good luck, I hope this helped.
You need to work on your inferiority complex. You'll be much happier (and look less foolish). Just saying.
By the way, 'yup' is an affirmative. FYI.
Still having trouble grasping an affirmative, I see.[Emphasis added]This is the thing. You originally said he didn't cite a source that was cited, the organization that did the study, a citation which is perfectly reasonable on a message board, as he wasn't writing a college paper, and which the newspaper article found sufficient as well.
Technically, you are correct about the newspaper article, because he should have cited the paper even if he couldn't produce a link yet. He might have used the quote function, but he may not know how yet, barring that, he should have used "quotes." People are new to things sometimes, and a patient and wise woman would walk a newby through the rules without ripping out his spleen.
That's why you're getting so much flack on this thread, because came right out of the box a know-it-all nasty bitch.
Good luck, I hope this helped.
You need to work on your inferiority complex. You'll be much happier (and look less foolish). Just saying.
By the way, 'yup' is an affirmative. FYI.
Inferior? To you? Please. I came here and backed up the central point you were struggling to make, because when you're right, you're right, even if you found out you were right to catch up to your own nasty mouth. You are a mean-spirited hag, Mo, and THAT has become the central focus of this thread. Pity too, it could have been a fun discussion.
Still having trouble grasping an affirmative, I see.[Emphasis added]
You need to work on your inferiority complex. You'll be much happier (and look less foolish). Just saying.
By the way, 'yup' is an affirmative. FYI.
Inferior? To you? Please. I came here and backed up the central point you were struggling to make, because when you're right, you're right, even if you found out you were right to catch up to your own nasty mouth. You are a mean-spirited hag, Mo, and THAT has become the central focus of this thread. Pity too, it could have been a fun discussion.
Don't worry. Others are, too. It's tough being on that extreme end of the bell curve, I imagine. It's sort of hard on my end, but I'm content.
Let's take a pic - we can use it as a post card.Still having trouble grasping an affirmative, I see.Inferior? To you? Please. I came here and backed up the central point you were struggling to make, because when you're right, you're right, even if you found out you were right to catch up to your own nasty mouth. You are a mean-spirited hag, Mo, and THAT has become the central focus of this thread. Pity too, it could have been a fun discussion.
Don't worry. Others are, too. It's tough being on that extreme end of the bell curve, I imagine. It's sort of hard on my end, but I'm content.
The view is better at your end though, mo chara.
smug bitch1: i am awesome!
smug bitch2: hey, i am awesome, too. you know who else is awesome?
smug butch1: me, and you, too! awesome!
smug bitch2: awesome! did i tell you that i am awesome?
smug bitch1: hey, i am, too! awesome!
smug bitch2: AWESOME!
smug bitch1: let's continue being awesome forever! wouldn't that be awesome?
smug bitch2: that would be totally, like, AWESOME..
..
..
You, too, can be awesome. Start here:[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYws8biwOYc]YouTube - Spose - I'm Awesome[/ame]smug bitch1: i am awesome!
smug bitch2: hey, i am awesome, too. you know who else is awesome?
smug butch1: me, and you, too! awesome!
smug bitch2: awesome! did i tell you that i am awesome?
smug bitch1: hey, i am, too! awesome!
smug bitch2: AWESOME!
smug bitch1: let's continue being awesome forever! wouldn't that be awesome?
smug bitch2: that would be totally, like, AWESOME..
..
..
Y..smug bitch1: i am awesome!
smug bitch2: hey, i am awesome, too. you know who else is awesome?
smug butch1: me, and you, too! awesome!
smug bitch2: awesome! did i tell you that i am awesome?
smug bitch1: hey, i am, too! awesome!
smug bitch2: AWESOME!
smug bitch1: let's continue being awesome forever! wouldn't that be awesome?
smug bitch2: that would be totally, like, AWESOME..
..
..
Still having trouble grasping an affirmative, I see.[Emphasis added]
You need to work on your inferiority complex. You'll be much happier (and look less foolish). Just saying.
By the way, 'yup' is an affirmative. FYI.
Inferior? To you? Please. I came here and backed up the central point you were struggling to make, because when you're right, you're right, even if you found out you were right to catch up to your own nasty mouth. You are a mean-spirited hag, Mo, and THAT has become the central focus of this thread. Pity too, it could have been a fun discussion.
Don't worry. Others are, too. It's tough being on that extreme end of the bell curve, I imagine. It's sort of hard on my end, but I'm content.
Wow. Still confused about the meaning of 'yes', I see.Still having trouble grasping an affirmative, I see.Inferior? To you? Please. I came here and backed up the central point you were struggling to make, because when you're right, you're right, even if you found out you were right to catch up to your own nasty mouth. You are a mean-spirited hag, Mo, and THAT has become the central focus of this thread. Pity too, it could have been a fun discussion.
Don't worry. Others are, too. It's tough being on that extreme end of the bell curve, I imagine. It's sort of hard on my end, but I'm content.
You've never admitted to fuxxing up by accusing the op of not citing who did the study. We can all see that.
Most women have periods but you're such a bitch you have paragraphs.
As I said, plagiarism is not a difficult concept to grasp. It's quite easy, as a matter of fact.That's like saying go to the library to find out WHO did the work. It's far from appropriate.
oh come ON. it cited the source, you got caught out there. Aren't you woman enough to admit a blatant error on your part? THAT is "far from appropriate."
Sheesh.
You cannot grasp it, though. Nor can curvelight and Eder (although I suspect Eder can, but he is just bored right now and doesn't care about looking stupid).
Still thrown by my use of 'yup', uh-huh', and now 'yes'. Would my use of a different affrimative be more remedial for you?Yup. That's correct. The first line of the plagiarized text does mention the organization who did the study. That's what newspapers do.
The plagiarist represented that text - the paper's text - as his own. As his own, he did not site the actual persons who did the study.
I understand that you think so, but I am not all that concerned as those who cannot grasp simple concepts and don't understand three-letter words are just toys to me.
Holy fuxxing dingleberry dumps.
Posted by the first line in the OP:
"According to The National Sleep Foundation’s 2010 Sleep in America..."
Embarrass yourself again and claim who did the study was not cited. Bitch.
