Can anybody tell me where the hub is located for organizing and passing H. R. 75
As Iāve said many times, every one of the UNās Universal Declaration of Human Rights has to be paid for with tax dollars; hence, Americans must surrender their Right in order to pay for the UNās charity ripoffs. The Administrationās latest underhanded scheme to hand taxing authority to the United Nations is rooted in a philosophical argument that goes back to at least the 19th century. Then-state senator, the Chicago sewer rat, adopted the Negative-Positive Rights argument to suit his parasitic political goal:
Incidentally, OHCHR is attempting to implement, and cash-in, on Good Samaritan laws. Naturally, they ignore the most important part in the Parable of the Good Samaritan. The Good Samaritan in the Bible took care of the stranger that came into his life. Socialist Good Samaritans wear the title while they insist everyone else do the work.
NOTE: Jesus Christ never preached institutional charity. He preached individual responsibility. āDo to others as you would have them do to you.ā
Bottom line: It should not be that difficult to prove that every tax dollar going to the United Nations is a violation of the First Amendment:
The ugliest document ever written, the UNās 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, is the most devious compendium of institutional morality ever devised. That is why Taqiyya is selling positive Rights for the United Nations as opposed to ānegativeā Rights in our Bill of Rights. His positive Rights is nothing more than justifying tax dollars being collected by government Good Samaritan, while not one negative Right in the Bill of Rights forces another to pay āā as the UNās Universal Declaration of Human Rights is aiming for.
Voluntary charity is the stuff Good Samaritans are made of. Coerced charity is the stuff dictators are made of. In that sense, I never saw a Socialist/Communist who was not afflicted with a twisted Messianic complex if there is such a thing.
Good Samaritan laws
Passing Good Samaritans laws on any level offers the best route to turning America into the country Taqiyya the Liar envisions. Democrats only want Good Samaritan laws because they give the government the authority to tell Americans how they must behave, in addition to further enriching the wealthiest members of the parasite class. (The rich always get richer when taxes go up.)
The worst part of Good Samaritan laws is that they codify coerced charity. The Affordable Care Act is a Good Samaritan law. The ACA is also a philosophical foundation for totalitarian government. Now, Congress is constructing a body of Good Samaritan laws to support illegal aliens and economic refugees.
Regulating INACTIVITY is at the core of Socialismās failed governing philosophy; i.e., tell people what they must do rather than tell them what they must NOT do. Socialism can only survive by prohibiting inactivity. Obviously, forcing activity is the only way to prohibit inactivity. Some might go so far as to call it slave labor. See the Eric Hoffer quote following my signature.
Totalitarian governments must force everyone to do as they are told. Good Samaritan laws do just that. For all of the things Socialists did to this country in the last century they now believe they did not go far enough. The missing component was the governmentās authority to order Americans to purchase goods and services. It is that revelation, codified in HillaryCare II, that put Congress on a collision course with the American people.
NOTE: When the government can punish you for not supporting strangers it is only one baby step shy of abolishing every individual liberty. Put it this way: A country without individual liberties is the only kind of country the Chicago sewer rat wants; certain that his Messianic complex will make it work. Indeed, the Socialist priesthood in Congress assume their morality is perfect. After all, they get paid for it.
The fact is that not one Socialist priest could acquire the power they enjoy in government were they in the private sector. Itās not only elected officials. Take a good look at the freaks that have been testifying at congressional committees of late. Does anyone think they would have the power to dictate behavior to millions of Americans if the freaks worked for a private company? You do not have to listen to them; you need only look at them to know what they are. Every one of those bums would be eating out of garbage cans if they did not have tax dollar jobs.
Socialists/Communists and their parasite supporters have neither the ability, nor the inclination, to hire and pay someone for their labors; so they use the power of government to force everybody to work for them and their sick ideology. Thatās basically why they oppose capitalism. Itās not about the evil rich; itās not about equal distribution of wealth; itās always been about parasites telling everybody what to do without paying them.
Throughout Socialismās long, sorry, life in America the Socialist priesthood failed to turn Socialism into a governing philosophy. Nevertheless, Socialism in America will not be destroyed in one fell swoop. The best thing that can happen to this country right now is to see that HillaryCare II fails right along with the rest of Socialismās failures.
Successful societies always fail because of parasites. The more successful a society is the more the parasites demand until they turn success into failure. There is no societal division more destructive than the one dividing parasites from producers. In American society that divide has been widening incrementally for a century.
Incidentally, I never forced my personal morality on anyone. That morality served the country well for more than two centuries, while legislating love is tearing the country apart.
Letās look at the punishment aspect of Good Samaritan laws.
Socialists always wanted to punish inactivity with lawsuits. As in all things Socialists move forward incrementally. The ACA moved into criminal law; i.e., the government punishes you for not buying insurance. Strip away all of the doublespeak and you are left with this fact: Every law that punishes inactivity is criminal law. The joke is that there is no day in court for those who are punished for NOT buying insurance.
Ultimately, Good Samaritan laws without criminal or civil penalties have no teeth. Indeed, thereās never been a priest who didnāt dream about punishing law-abiding citizens who refused to do as they are told. American judges do it all of the time. The Socialist priesthood is very close to making that dream all-inclusive for bureaucrats as well as for judges.
Those who think Good Samaritan laws are necessary should get their sermons in the church of their choice. In that way they can VOLUNTARILY submit to any punishment their āspiritual leaderā metes out. Do not force me to come along.
Basically, Socialists/Communists are using āyou have a duty to helpā as an engine to change the meaning of law itself. You can see more proof of the Socialist/Communist agenda in so-called hate crime laws.
NOTE: The most vile brutal criminals are never punished by Good Samaritan laws.
Trying to blend voluntary and involuntary charity does not standup to scrutiny any more than it worked blending Socialism and capitalism. Good Samaritan laws order involuntary behavior pure and simple. Every other interpretation amounts to verbal calisthenics.
Just to be clear. So long as the choice remains mine I do not have a problem with helping people.
There is no better way to acquire the power of life and death over everyone than disguising a duty to help. Socialists in Congress are succeeding because most people are afraid they will look cruel and uncaring if they resist āhelping parasites for the common good.ā Result: Individual liberties are slowly being smothered to death by a false duty to help.
An amendment to the Constitution prohibiting the government from forcing Americans to buy anything should be considered no matter what the Court and Congress do with the ACA or open-borders. A clearly written, comprehensive, amendment will block the next attempt Socialists are sure to try. Iāll wager that they are already working on their next move without making the mistakes they made to date.
Let me close with a brief clip from the final episode of the Jerry Seinfeld show which was actually titled The Good Samaritan? To me, that show used humor to promote coerced charity:
EXCLUSIVE: The chief United Nations human rights agency, with the Obama administrationās apparent blessing, is creating a new āregional hubā for itself in Washington, to use as a center for organizing against the death penalty, among other things, and for affecting the legal frameworks, policies, and strategies of American counterterrorism.
In a management plan covering its activities through 2017, the agency, known as the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, or OHCHR, puts the U.S. in the same category for that counterterrorism āalignmentā effort as countries like Iraq and Uganda.
The fast-tracked human rights āhubā also has a number of more nebulous āthematicā objectives for the U.S., which include, according to an OHCHR information document, āthe establishment of national participatory bodies for reporting and implementing recommendations of human rights mechanismsā and the aim of āwidening the democratic spaceā with the aid of undefined āNational Human Rights Institutions.ā
While no longer on the Council, the administration now seems comfortable with bringing the U.N.ās human rights approach into closer contact with U.S. legislators, lobbyists, human rights activists and, perhaps most importantly, financial appropriators, before it leaves office at the end of next year.
In a management plan covering its activities through 2017, the agency, known as the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, or OHCHR, puts the U.S. in the same category for that counterterrorism āalignmentā effort as countries like Iraq and Uganda.
The fast-tracked human rights āhubā also has a number of more nebulous āthematicā objectives for the U.S., which include, according to an OHCHR information document, āthe establishment of national participatory bodies for reporting and implementing recommendations of human rights mechanismsā and the aim of āwidening the democratic spaceā with the aid of undefined āNational Human Rights Institutions.ā
XXXXX
While no longer on the Council, the administration now seems comfortable with bringing the U.N.ās human rights approach into closer contact with U.S. legislators, lobbyists, human rights activists and, perhaps most importantly, financial appropriators, before it leaves office at the end of next year.
Planned UN āhubā in Washington aims to influence US counterterrorism strategy
By George RussellPublished November 19, 2015
Planned UN āhubā in Washington aims to influence US counterterrorism strategy
By George RussellPublished November 19, 2015
Planned UN āhubā in Washington aims to influence US counterterrorism strategy
As Iāve said many times, every one of the UNās Universal Declaration of Human Rights has to be paid for with tax dollars; hence, Americans must surrender their Right in order to pay for the UNās charity ripoffs. The Administrationās latest underhanded scheme to hand taxing authority to the United Nations is rooted in a philosophical argument that goes back to at least the 19th century. Then-state senator, the Chicago sewer rat, adopted the Negative-Positive Rights argument to suit his parasitic political goal:
Incidentally, OHCHR is attempting to implement, and cash-in, on Good Samaritan laws. Naturally, they ignore the most important part in the Parable of the Good Samaritan. The Good Samaritan in the Bible took care of the stranger that came into his life. Socialist Good Samaritans wear the title while they insist everyone else do the work.
NOTE: Jesus Christ never preached institutional charity. He preached individual responsibility. āDo to others as you would have them do to you.ā
Bottom line: It should not be that difficult to prove that every tax dollar going to the United Nations is a violation of the First Amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; . . .
The ugliest document ever written, the UNās 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, is the most devious compendium of institutional morality ever devised. That is why Taqiyya is selling positive Rights for the United Nations as opposed to ānegativeā Rights in our Bill of Rights. His positive Rights is nothing more than justifying tax dollars being collected by government Good Samaritan, while not one negative Right in the Bill of Rights forces another to pay āā as the UNās Universal Declaration of Human Rights is aiming for.
Voluntary charity is the stuff Good Samaritans are made of. Coerced charity is the stuff dictators are made of. In that sense, I never saw a Socialist/Communist who was not afflicted with a twisted Messianic complex if there is such a thing.
Good Samaritan laws
Passing Good Samaritans laws on any level offers the best route to turning America into the country Taqiyya the Liar envisions. Democrats only want Good Samaritan laws because they give the government the authority to tell Americans how they must behave, in addition to further enriching the wealthiest members of the parasite class. (The rich always get richer when taxes go up.)
The worst part of Good Samaritan laws is that they codify coerced charity. The Affordable Care Act is a Good Samaritan law. The ACA is also a philosophical foundation for totalitarian government. Now, Congress is constructing a body of Good Samaritan laws to support illegal aliens and economic refugees.
Regulating INACTIVITY is at the core of Socialismās failed governing philosophy; i.e., tell people what they must do rather than tell them what they must NOT do. Socialism can only survive by prohibiting inactivity. Obviously, forcing activity is the only way to prohibit inactivity. Some might go so far as to call it slave labor. See the Eric Hoffer quote following my signature.
Totalitarian governments must force everyone to do as they are told. Good Samaritan laws do just that. For all of the things Socialists did to this country in the last century they now believe they did not go far enough. The missing component was the governmentās authority to order Americans to purchase goods and services. It is that revelation, codified in HillaryCare II, that put Congress on a collision course with the American people.
NOTE: When the government can punish you for not supporting strangers it is only one baby step shy of abolishing every individual liberty. Put it this way: A country without individual liberties is the only kind of country the Chicago sewer rat wants; certain that his Messianic complex will make it work. Indeed, the Socialist priesthood in Congress assume their morality is perfect. After all, they get paid for it.
The fact is that not one Socialist priest could acquire the power they enjoy in government were they in the private sector. Itās not only elected officials. Take a good look at the freaks that have been testifying at congressional committees of late. Does anyone think they would have the power to dictate behavior to millions of Americans if the freaks worked for a private company? You do not have to listen to them; you need only look at them to know what they are. Every one of those bums would be eating out of garbage cans if they did not have tax dollar jobs.
Socialists/Communists and their parasite supporters have neither the ability, nor the inclination, to hire and pay someone for their labors; so they use the power of government to force everybody to work for them and their sick ideology. Thatās basically why they oppose capitalism. Itās not about the evil rich; itās not about equal distribution of wealth; itās always been about parasites telling everybody what to do without paying them.
Throughout Socialismās long, sorry, life in America the Socialist priesthood failed to turn Socialism into a governing philosophy. Nevertheless, Socialism in America will not be destroyed in one fell swoop. The best thing that can happen to this country right now is to see that HillaryCare II fails right along with the rest of Socialismās failures.
Successful societies always fail because of parasites. The more successful a society is the more the parasites demand until they turn success into failure. There is no societal division more destructive than the one dividing parasites from producers. In American society that divide has been widening incrementally for a century.
Incidentally, I never forced my personal morality on anyone. That morality served the country well for more than two centuries, while legislating love is tearing the country apart.
Letās look at the punishment aspect of Good Samaritan laws.
Socialists always wanted to punish inactivity with lawsuits. As in all things Socialists move forward incrementally. The ACA moved into criminal law; i.e., the government punishes you for not buying insurance. Strip away all of the doublespeak and you are left with this fact: Every law that punishes inactivity is criminal law. The joke is that there is no day in court for those who are punished for NOT buying insurance.
Ultimately, Good Samaritan laws without criminal or civil penalties have no teeth. Indeed, thereās never been a priest who didnāt dream about punishing law-abiding citizens who refused to do as they are told. American judges do it all of the time. The Socialist priesthood is very close to making that dream all-inclusive for bureaucrats as well as for judges.
Those who think Good Samaritan laws are necessary should get their sermons in the church of their choice. In that way they can VOLUNTARILY submit to any punishment their āspiritual leaderā metes out. Do not force me to come along.
Basically, Socialists/Communists are using āyou have a duty to helpā as an engine to change the meaning of law itself. You can see more proof of the Socialist/Communist agenda in so-called hate crime laws.
NOTE: The most vile brutal criminals are never punished by Good Samaritan laws.
Trying to blend voluntary and involuntary charity does not standup to scrutiny any more than it worked blending Socialism and capitalism. Good Samaritan laws order involuntary behavior pure and simple. Every other interpretation amounts to verbal calisthenics.
Just to be clear. So long as the choice remains mine I do not have a problem with helping people.
There is no better way to acquire the power of life and death over everyone than disguising a duty to help. Socialists in Congress are succeeding because most people are afraid they will look cruel and uncaring if they resist āhelping parasites for the common good.ā Result: Individual liberties are slowly being smothered to death by a false duty to help.
An amendment to the Constitution prohibiting the government from forcing Americans to buy anything should be considered no matter what the Court and Congress do with the ACA or open-borders. A clearly written, comprehensive, amendment will block the next attempt Socialists are sure to try. Iāll wager that they are already working on their next move without making the mistakes they made to date.
Let me close with a brief clip from the final episode of the Jerry Seinfeld show which was actually titled The Good Samaritan? To me, that show used humor to promote coerced charity:
