I'll give you $1000 if you can show me any place I said that back radiation makes the Earth hotter than the Sun.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Where is the confession?
- Thread starter Crick
- Start date
I'll give you $1000 if you can show me any place I said that back radiation makes the Earth hotter than the Sun.
Naw it's a straw manNo I don'tThe surface absorbs heat and slowly releases it . I thought you knew thatFunny stuff, the surface doesn't get warmer, it stays warm.
Stays warm? How does it do that?
You'll have to explain why that's not the case with the Moon.
That's true, your ignorance prevents that. LOL!
Your ignorance is no straw man.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,667
- 28,004
- 2,180
No you wouldn'tThis threadYou said it didThe surface absorbs heat and slowly releases it . I thought you knew that
Perhaps you could explain how the surface gets warmer than the sun and urban heat
Perhaps you could explain how the surface gets warmer than the sun
The Earth's surface does not get warmer than the Sun.
Link?
I'll give you $1000 if you can show me any place I said that back radiation makes the Earth hotter than the Sun.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,667
- 28,004
- 2,180
Yours isNaw it's a straw manNo I don'tThe surface absorbs heat and slowly releases it . I thought you knew that
You'll have to explain why that's not the case with the Moon.
That's true, your ignorance prevents that. LOL!
Your ignorance is no straw man.
No you wouldn'tThis threadYou said it didPerhaps you could explain how the surface gets warmer than the sun
The Earth's surface does not get warmer than the Sun.
Link?
I'll give you $1000 if you can show me any place I said that back radiation makes the Earth hotter than the Sun.
Sure I would. Just show the post.
But back radiation adds no heat to the surface. So?are you claiming that they are carrying on like drunken frat boys on the government dime when they are supposed to be doing science?
It's becoming more and more obvious that you're not only as stupid as a brick, but that you have no real life.
What is stupid crick is attempting to defend the indefensible.....and lying when you know you are going to be caught out....got that empirical evidence that supports the claim that adding CO2 to the atmosphere will cause warming yet?.....of course not....since it doesn't exist.
Crick is a hopeless enviroweenie, but at least he understands the 2nd Law.
But back radiation adds no heat to the surface.
Is back radiation the only radiation that adds no heat? LOL!
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,667
- 28,004
- 2,180
Previous page, but you wouldn'tNo you wouldn'tThis threadYou said it did
Link?
I'll give you $1000 if you can show me any place I said that back radiation makes the Earth hotter than the Sun.
Sure I would. Just show the post.
Previous page, but you wouldn'tNo you wouldn'tThis threadLink?
I'll give you $1000 if you can show me any place I said that back radiation makes the Earth hotter than the Sun.
Sure I would. Just show the post.
Great, show the post.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,667
- 28,004
- 2,180
How hot is your back radiation? Can you measure it?But back radiation adds no heat to the surface. So?are you claiming that they are carrying on like drunken frat boys on the government dime when they are supposed to be doing science?
It's becoming more and more obvious that you're not only as stupid as a brick, but that you have no real life.
What is stupid crick is attempting to defend the indefensible.....and lying when you know you are going to be caught out....got that empirical evidence that supports the claim that adding CO2 to the atmosphere will cause warming yet?.....of course not....since it doesn't exist.
Crick is a hopeless enviroweenie, but at least he understands the 2nd Law.
But back radiation adds no heat to the surface.
Is back radiation the only radiation that adds no heat? LOL!
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,667
- 28,004
- 2,180
Go read it on the previous pagePrevious page, but you wouldn'tNo you wouldn'tThis thread
I'll give you $1000 if you can show me any place I said that back radiation makes the Earth hotter than the Sun.
Sure I would. Just show the post.
Great, show the post.
How hot is your back radiation? Can you measure it?But back radiation adds no heat to the surface. So?It's becoming more and more obvious that you're not only as stupid as a brick, but that you have no real life.
What is stupid crick is attempting to defend the indefensible.....and lying when you know you are going to be caught out....got that empirical evidence that supports the claim that adding CO2 to the atmosphere will cause warming yet?.....of course not....since it doesn't exist.
Crick is a hopeless enviroweenie, but at least he understands the 2nd Law.
But back radiation adds no heat to the surface.
Is back radiation the only radiation that adds no heat? LOL!
Absolutely.
Go read it on the previous pagePrevious page, but you wouldn'tNo you wouldn'tI'll give you $1000 if you can show me any place I said that back radiation makes the Earth hotter than the Sun.
Sure I would. Just show the post.
Great, show the post.
Find the post, respond to it.
It'll appear below this post.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,667
- 28,004
- 2,180
#169No you wouldn'tThis threadYou said it did
Link?
I'll give you $1000 if you can show me any place I said that back radiation makes the Earth hotter than the Sun.
Sure I would. Just show the post.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,667
- 28,004
- 2,180
Find the post and read itGo read it on the previous pagePrevious page, but you wouldn'tNo you wouldn't
Sure I would. Just show the post.
Great, show the post.
Find the post, respond to it.
It'll appear below this post.
#169No you wouldn'tThis threadLink?
I'll give you $1000 if you can show me any place I said that back radiation makes the Earth hotter than the Sun.
Sure I would. Just show the post.
Naw I learned how heat can't get out.
If heat can't get out, that makes the surface warmer.
I thought you'd never get it. Congrats!
That's weird, I don't see any claim there that back radiation makes the Earth hotter than the Sun.
I thought your ignorance was confined to science, maybe you just can't read?
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,667
- 28,004
- 2,180
Bingo#169No you wouldn'tThis thread
I'll give you $1000 if you can show me any place I said that back radiation makes the Earth hotter than the Sun.
Sure I would. Just show the post.
Naw I learned how heat can't get out.
If heat can't get out, that makes the surface warmer.
I thought you'd never get it. Congrats!
That's weird, I don't see any claim there that back radiation makes the Earth hotter than the Sun.
I thought your ignorance was confined to science, maybe you just can't read?
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,667
- 28,004
- 2,180
Sure, if the surface is warmer than that would be hotter than the sun#169No you wouldn'tThis thread
I'll give you $1000 if you can show me any place I said that back radiation makes the Earth hotter than the Sun.
Sure I would. Just show the post.
Naw I learned how heat can't get out.
If heat can't get out, that makes the surface warmer.
I thought you'd never get it. Congrats!
That's weird, I don't see any claim there that back radiation makes the Earth hotter than the Sun.
I thought your ignorance was confined to science, maybe you just can't read?
Sure, if the surface is warmer than that would be hotter than the sun#169No you wouldn'tI'll give you $1000 if you can show me any place I said that back radiation makes the Earth hotter than the Sun.
Sure I would. Just show the post.
Naw I learned how heat can't get out.
If heat can't get out, that makes the surface warmer.
I thought you'd never get it. Congrats!
That's weird, I don't see any claim there that back radiation makes the Earth hotter than the Sun.
I thought your ignorance was confined to science, maybe you just can't read?
Wow, you may be dumber than SSDD.
Liar.The deniers on this board have claimed over and over and over again that climate scientists have manipulated data - falsified the numbers - with the aim of creating or exaggerating global warming. If this were true, someone would have spilled the beans long ago. It is simply not realistic to think that hundreds if not thousands of individuals could have carried on a deception of this magnitude and duration without either fumbling their work and giving it away or simply choosing to confess.
Yet, they have NOTHING. The only evidence deniers can provide to support their charges is that the data has been adjusted and SOME (the minority) of those adjustment have made global warming look worse than before. That's it. They have no evidence whatsoever indicating from a scientific perspective that any adjustment made by the major data holders was unjustified and, even more tellling, NOT A SINGLE INDIVIDUAL HAS EVER ADMITTED HAVING FALSIFIED THE DATA AS THEY CLAIM. Not a single fucking soul.
What are the odds?
- Thread starter
- #200
Sure, if the surface is warmer than that would be hotter than the sun#169No you wouldn't
Sure I would. Just show the post.
Naw I learned how heat can't get out.
If heat can't get out, that makes the surface warmer.
I thought you'd never get it. Congrats!
That's weird, I don't see any claim there that back radiation makes the Earth hotter than the Sun.
I thought your ignorance was confined to science, maybe you just can't read?
Wow, you may be dumber than SSDD.
Todd, you seem to be having a conversation with yourself. It looks as if someone found the delete button.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 204
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 51
- Views
- 748
- Replies
- 38
- Views
- 651
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 80
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8087
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-