So when the Supreme Court rules a law, or part of a law, is unconstitutional, which jurisdiction do you believe can still enforce it?The Supreme Court has no authority to declare any law unconstitutional. The Court attempted to give itself that power in the Case Marbury vs Madison.
The authority for this type of judicial review must be granted by the we the people. We have never done so. The Constitution gives the Court no such authority. Look it up.
I wish you were right but sadly the court has the authority and has been exercising it for 120 years or so.
The Court gave itself this Power. The Power does not derive from the Constitution or from We the People. Therefore it is Unconstitutional. It has never been legally challenged, It should.
The Founders intended that if a Court deems a Law to be unconstitutional it goes back to the Congress to fix the problem. After all....Congress created the problem in the first place.
The legal term is remediation, and it is the Legislative Branches' job to remediate, not the Courts.
That was what Marbury v Madison determined, it was the founding fathers judges they voted in place who came to the conclusion otherwise. If the legislative branches create a law which the Supreme Court deems unconstitutional, it is up to the Legislative branches to make that law Constitutional for it to become law.
That was where the Supreme Court was recognized as having the power to review all acts of Congress where constitutionality was at issue, and judge whether they abide by the Constitution, and deem them null if they are not Constitutional. And not one of those founding fathers moved for an amendment to take that power away.