The Function of American Federal Government - 5 Myths and Facts

Lord Long Rod

Diamond Member
Jan 17, 2023
7,706
8,122
2,138
MYTH 1 - Government is Here to Help People

No. The federal government has a role in our republic that is defined by the Constitution. It should foster things like economic prosperity by assisting The People exercise their civil rights and liberties. Fostering prosperity and providing national defense, for example, does “help” people in that it gives them opportunity to find work and generate wealth. But that is the extent the government exists to “help people”. “Helping people” generally is far too broad of an objective for any government to be charged with. Moreover, it is not in the constitution.

MYTH 2 - “Negative Rights”

The powers of our federal government are enumerated, meaning that unless the constitution grants a particular branch of government a particular power, they DO NOT have that power. Period. This is the whole reason we have enumerated rights in the first place.

Some misguided people claim that if the constitution does not prohibit government from doing some thing, then it is authorized to do it. Thereby, government can create non(un-) constitutional rights so long as not prohibited by the constitution. This is not true. This flies in the face of the stated intent of the Framers of creating a charter that limits government powers and the very reason government powers are enumerated. The constitution is a limiting document. Things like welfare payments and subsidizing select industries are extra-constitutional and, therefore, unconstitutional.

MYTH 3 - The Federal Government Can Choose Which Laws to Enforce and Which Laws They Will Not Enforce

This is directed at the executive branch, and is best demonstrated by the express delegation of immigration enforcement. Obama started our current unconstitutional downward spiral with the DACA program whereby he unilaterally decided that he would not enforce federal immigration law for a certain group of illegal immigrants. Today, the non-enforcement of federal immigration law had expanded to all illegal immigrants, Border regulation and national security are expressly made the duty of the federal government. They must do these things. Otherwise, they are committing nonfeasance.

MYTH 4 - America is a Democracy

We are a constitutional republic that employs a limited form of democracy. Our founding document clearly evidences an intent to protect minority rights from the tyranny of the majority. In fact, it goes to great lengths to do this. One such example is the electoral college. Another example is the Bill of Rights. These limitations are intended to prevent majority rule, which is tyranny by mob rule. These limitations run contra “democracy”.

Many people are crying about democracy these days without really understanding what that means. American democracy is defined by the constitution. Period. What YOU otherwise think “democracy” means is irrelevant.

MYTH 5 - The President Can Use Executive Orders to Make Policy

No. Anything done by the president must be in furtherance of (1) his constitutional duties, or (2) a law passed by Congress and signed by him. Let’s take Obama’s illegal DACA order. The President does not have the power to unilaterally effect a change in the substance of immigration law. That requires Congress. In this vein, prosecutorial discretion is not a basis for making a substantive change in law either. For a man who calls himself a constitutional scholar, Obama’s DACA EO suggests that he has never studied the American constitution.

Public policy is set by Congress, except for certain limited areas where a president has express authorities and duties to do so as set forth in his constitutional duties (e.g., military action, foreign affairs, etc…). The “I gots me a pen and a phone” theory of presidential authority is not constitutional. It is tribal nonsense.
 
MYTH 1 - Government is Here to Help People

No. The federal government has a role in our republic that is defined by the Constitution. It should foster things like economic prosperity by assisting The People exercise their civil rights and liberties. Fostering prosperity and providing national defense, for example, does “help” people in that it gives them opportunity to find work and generate wealth. But that is the extent the government exists to “help people”. “Helping people” generally is far too broad of an objective for any government to be charged with. Moreover, it is not in the constitution.

MYTH 2 - “Negative Rights”

The powers of our federal government are enumerated, meaning that unless the constitution grants a particular branch of government a particular power, they DO NOT have that power. Period. This is the whole reason we have enumerated rights in the first place.

Some misguided people claim that if the constitution does not prohibit government from doing some thing, then it is authorized to do it. Thereby, government can create non(un-) constitutional rights so long as not prohibited by the constitution. This is not true. This flies in the face of the stated intent of the Framers of creating a charter that limits government powers and the very reason government powers are enumerated. The constitution is a limiting document. Things like welfare payments and subsidizing select industries are extra-constitutional and, therefore, unconstitutional.

MYTH 3 - The Federal Government Can Choose Which Laws to Enforce and Which Laws They Will Not Enforce

This is directed at the executive branch, and is best demonstrated by the express delegation of immigration enforcement. Obama started our current unconstitutional downward spiral with the DACA program whereby he unilaterally decided that he would not enforce federal immigration law for a certain group of illegal immigrants. Today, the non-enforcement of federal immigration law had expanded to all illegal immigrants, Border regulation and national security are expressly made the duty of the federal government. They must do these things. Otherwise, they are committing nonfeasance.

MYTH 4 - America is a Democracy

We are a constitutional republic that employs a limited form of democracy. Our founding document clearly evidences an intent to protect minority rights from the tyranny of the majority. In fact, it goes to great lengths to do this. One such example is the electoral college. Another example is the Bill of Rights. These limitations are intended to prevent majority rule, which is tyranny by mob rule. These limitations run contra “democracy”.

Many people are crying about democracy these days without really understanding what that means. American democracy is defined by the constitution. Period. What YOU otherwise think “democracy” means is irrelevant.

MYTH 5 - The President Can Use Executive Orders to Make Policy

No. Anything done by the president must be in furtherance of (1) his constitutional duties, or (2) a law passed by Congress and signed by him. Let’s take Obama’s illegal DACA order. The President does not have the power to unilaterally effect a change in the substance of immigration law. That requires Congress. In this vein, prosecutorial discretion is not a basis for making a substantive change in law either. For a man who calls himself a constitutional scholar, Obama’s DACA EO suggests that he has never studied the American constitution.

Public policy is set by Congress, except for certain limited areas where a president has express authorities and duties to do so as set forth in his constitutional duties (e.g., military action, foreign affairs, etc…). The “I gots me a pen and a phone” theory of presidential authority is not constitutional. It is tribal nonsense.
I will say by and large I agree with this .I will therefore just congratulate you.
Obama and Biden are disgusting,that is all I will add
 
It's simple enough. The Constitution lists the duties of the federal government to "provide for the common defense" and "promote the general welfare". Through the years socialists and liberals have reversed it to "provide for the general welfare" and "promote the common defense".
 
Read Federalist 45....

The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected.

The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. The operations of the federal government will be most extensive and important in times of war and danger; those of the State governments, in times of peace and security. As the former periods will probably bear a small proportion to the latter, the State governments will here enjoy another advantage over the federal government. The more adequate, indeed, the federal powers may be rendered to the national defense, the less frequent will be those scenes of danger which might favor their ascendancy over the governments of the particular States. If the new Constitution be examined with accuracy and candor, it will be found that the change which it proposes consists much less in the addition of NEW POWERS to the Union, than in the invigoration of its ORIGINAL POWERS. The regulation of commerce, it is true, is a new power; but that seems to be an addition which few oppose, and from which no apprehensions are entertained. The powers relating to war and peace, armies and fleets, treaties and finance, with the other more considerable powers, are all vested in the existing Congress by the articles of Confederation. The proposed change does not enlarge these powers; it only substitutes a more effectual mode of administering them.
 
I see us being a democracy and constitutional republic as both semi-myths based on there are things citizens have direct control. However we also have our court system whose interpretation of some of our rights I can't see jiving with what's been put down in the Constitution.
 
THere were 20 Constitutions before the Federal one and every right was first in the states.


1713213562290.png


1713213589410.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top