Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The thing is since Roe was threatened States like NY and CA have modified their laws to basically do what is being claimed, i.e. as long as a doctor is OK with it for basically any reason an abortion is legal up to the moment of birth.
late term abortions are extremely rare ... & the 'choice' to abort at that time is even rarer.
there are more innocent post born lives who've already owned a life history, being killed every day on a much more catastrophic scale.
but but states' rights.
No, that’s fine you’ve clarified that this thing you’re worried about essentially or now “effectively” never happens, so a ban shouldn’t bother you.it effectively has been since r V w was law.
That isn’t an important distinction.good point, I knew I was going to forget one.
You can call it "nanny state policies", or whatever else you want, but nonetheless, in the modern age, with all of the technology and resources that we have at our disposal, there is no reason why we should have people living in abject poverty. We should afford people the right to the basics, and by doing so we eliminate a host of very destructive and expensive outcomes that undermine the standard of living of every member of society. Even if we don't do it from a position of "humanistic concern" or compassion but rather from cold, calculating pragmatism, it's still worth it.Although I don't cotton to all of your nanny state policies, for the most part I agree with your post.
We've gone round and round on this. When you "give" people all the shit you're talking about, then there is no incentive for people to earn things, or work harder than others to gain a higher standard of living.You can call it "nanny state policies", or whatever else you want, but nonetheless, in the modern age, with all of the technology and resources that we have at our disposal, there is no reason why we should have people living in abject poverty. We should afford people the right to the basics, and by doing so we eliminate a host of very destructive and expensive outcomes that undermine the standard of living of every member of society. Even if we don't do it from a position of "humanistic concern" or compassion but rather from cold, calculating pragmatism, it's still worth it.
No, that’s fine you’ve clarified that this thing you’re worried about essentially or now “effectively” never happens, so a ban shouldn’t bother you.
Just monstrous and misanthropic and nihilistic. What an awful point of view.I believe in no restrictions whatsoever.
1. Life is horrible. Each time a fetus is aborted, we are doing that potential human being a huge favor.
2. Also, of course, each abortion may lessen the potential criminal population.
Dr. Joemoma says that if she brought 'em into the world then she can take 'em out of the world, no age limit.
After 15 weeks if you can't figure out if you were raped or had incest, it's on you.
Per my sarcastic remark to Rightwinger, yes. In reality, no. I am a pro-lifer in reality.So, post puberty abortion is fine?
So are unarmed black folk who get murdered by police.. but we sure as hell put millions of dollars and gov't intense focus on that.late term abortions are extremely rare
So are unarmed black folk who get murdered by police.. but we sure as hell put millions of dollars and gov't intense focus on that.
Why the double standard
