Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He inherited a recovery and gave us the worst economic performance since the 1930s
He got Americans angry and screaming about race.
Get real! He inherited a disaster !
We have one of the strongest economies in a world were most places are in economic distress .
Race relations improve more than ever . Just cause you are angry doesn't mean everyone else is .
Obama MADE IT FAR WORSE than it would have been if someone who weren't a complete Economic Illiterate Corruptocrat had been elected instead.
Uh.....if things are DEMONSTRABLY BETTER than they were in January 2009, how could Obama have made it "worse"?
We've had the worst recovery ever, with annual economic growth never getting above 3%. We should have had a few years over 4%. The net result of this anemic performance is that millions of jobs were Never Created...one of the reasons why the Labor Force Participation Rate has cratered, bub.
Bub?
Do you have any idea what constitutes the components of GDP?
He inherited a recovery and gave us the worst economic performance since the 1930sHe brought us out of a 2nd Great Depression . And he got americAns talking about race like we have never done before .
Side effect : racists came jumping out the woodwork! But hey better to see it up front .
He got Americans angry and screaming about race.
Get real! He inherited a disaster !
We have one of the strongest economies in a world were most places are in economic distress .
Race relations improve more than ever . Just cause you are angry doesn't mean everyone else is .
Obama MADE IT FAR WORSE than it would have been if someone who weren't a complete Economic Illiterate Corruptocrat had been elected instead.
Uh.....if things are DEMONSTRABLY BETTER than they were in January 2009, how could Obama have made it "worse"?
We've had the worst recovery ever, with annual economic growth never getting above 3%. We should have had a few years over 4%. The net result of this anemic performance is that millions of jobs were Never Created...one of the reasons why the Labor Force Participation Rate has cratered, bub.
Have you ever considered not lying in your posts? Especially when someone has just posted the facts that blow your idiotic assertations out of the water.He inherited a recovery and gave us the worst economic performance since the 1930s
He got Americans angry and screaming about race.
Get real! He inherited a disaster !
We have one of the strongest economies in a world were most places are in economic distress .
Race relations improve more than ever . Just cause you are angry doesn't mean everyone else is .
Obama MADE IT FAR WORSE than it would have been if someone who weren't a complete Economic Illiterate Corruptocrat had been elected instead.
Uh.....if things are DEMONSTRABLY BETTER than they were in January 2009, how could Obama have made it "worse"?
We've had the worst recovery ever, with annual economic growth never getting above 3%. We should have had a few years over 4%. The net result of this anemic performance is that millions of jobs were Never Created...one of the reasons why the Labor Force Participation Rate has cratered, bub.
GDP is the sum of Consumption (C), Investment (I), Government Spending (G) and Net Exports (X – M): Y = C + I + G + (X - M).Get real! He inherited a disaster !
We have one of the strongest economies in a world were most places are in economic distress .
Race relations improve more than ever . Just cause you are angry doesn't mean everyone else is .
Obama MADE IT FAR WORSE than it would have been if someone who weren't a complete Economic Illiterate Corruptocrat had been elected instead.
Uh.....if things are DEMONSTRABLY BETTER than they were in January 2009, how could Obama have made it "worse"?
We've had the worst recovery ever, with annual economic growth never getting above 3%. We should have had a few years over 4%. The net result of this anemic performance is that millions of jobs were Never Created...one of the reasons why the Labor Force Participation Rate has cratered, bub.
Bub?
Do you have any idea what constitutes the components of GDP?
As a matter of fact, I do. And it's NOT government "investment".
If it were, then 2008 would have been a much much much better than the "superior" economy of the Obama era about which you've been crowing.
Speaking of crow, your pie is ready. Eat up, bub.
He inherited a recovery and gave us the worst economic performance since the 1930s
He got Americans angry and screaming about race.
Get real! He inherited a disaster !
We have one of the strongest economies in a world were most places are in economic distress .
Race relations improve more than ever . Just cause you are angry doesn't mean everyone else is .
Obama MADE IT FAR WORSE than it would have been if someone who weren't a complete Economic Illiterate Corruptocrat had been elected instead.
Uh.....if things are DEMONSTRABLY BETTER than they were in January 2009, how could Obama have made it "worse"?
We've had the worst recovery ever, with annual economic growth never getting above 3%. We should have had a few years over 4%. The net result of this anemic performance is that millions of jobs were Never Created...one of the reasons why the Labor Force Participation Rate has cratered, bub.
Labor Force participation peaked more than 15 years ago.....it's demographics....
Net private sector job growth from Feb 2001 to Feb 2009 was NEGATIVE...falling 8 million short of growth in the labor force...we've been exceeding growth in the labor force by more than 250% since mid 2010.....
GDP is the sum of Consumption (C), Investment (I), Government Spending (G) and Net Exports (X – M): Y = C + I + G + (X - M).Obama MADE IT FAR WORSE than it would have been if someone who weren't a complete Economic Illiterate Corruptocrat had been elected instead.
Uh.....if things are DEMONSTRABLY BETTER than they were in January 2009, how could Obama have made it "worse"?
We've had the worst recovery ever, with annual economic growth never getting above 3%. We should have had a few years over 4%. The net result of this anemic performance is that millions of jobs were Never Created...one of the reasons why the Labor Force Participation Rate has cratered, bub.
Bub?
Do you have any idea what constitutes the components of GDP?
As a matter of fact, I do. And it's NOT government "investment".
If it were, then 2008 would have been a much much much better than the "superior" economy of the Obama era about which you've been crowing.
Speaking of crow, your pie is ready. Eat up, bub.
Don't breed....
Have you ever considered not lying in your posts? Especially when someone has just posted the facts that blow your idiotic assertations out of the water.Get real! He inherited a disaster !
We have one of the strongest economies in a world were most places are in economic distress .
Race relations improve more than ever . Just cause you are angry doesn't mean everyone else is .
Obama MADE IT FAR WORSE than it would have been if someone who weren't a complete Economic Illiterate Corruptocrat had been elected instead.
Uh.....if things are DEMONSTRABLY BETTER than they were in January 2009, how could Obama have made it "worse"?
We've had the worst recovery ever, with annual economic growth never getting above 3%. We should have had a few years over 4%. The net result of this anemic performance is that millions of jobs were Never Created...one of the reasons why the Labor Force Participation Rate has cratered, bub.
* Sigh *
Your economic and historical illiteracy makes it impossible to have a rational discussion. Here, look at the pretty picture.
7239 by boedicca on US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Get real! He inherited a disaster !
We have one of the strongest economies in a world were most places are in economic distress .
Race relations improve more than ever . Just cause you are angry doesn't mean everyone else is .
Obama MADE IT FAR WORSE than it would have been if someone who weren't a complete Economic Illiterate Corruptocrat had been elected instead.
Uh.....if things are DEMONSTRABLY BETTER than they were in January 2009, how could Obama have made it "worse"?
We've had the worst recovery ever, with annual economic growth never getting above 3%. We should have had a few years over 4%. The net result of this anemic performance is that millions of jobs were Never Created...one of the reasons why the Labor Force Participation Rate has cratered, bub.
Bub?
Do you have any idea what constitutes the components of GDP?
We're spending the least on infrastructure and non-green energy r&d since at least 1990. Yet, these assholes want to cut it more and weaken our nation. Most of the money is being poured into the war and healthcare of some sort.
Get real! He inherited a disaster !
We have one of the strongest economies in a world were most places are in economic distress .
Race relations improve more than ever . Just cause you are angry doesn't mean everyone else is .
Obama MADE IT FAR WORSE than it would have been if someone who weren't a complete Economic Illiterate Corruptocrat had been elected instead.
Uh.....if things are DEMONSTRABLY BETTER than they were in January 2009, how could Obama have made it "worse"?
We've had the worst recovery ever, with annual economic growth never getting above 3%. We should have had a few years over 4%. The net result of this anemic performance is that millions of jobs were Never Created...one of the reasons why the Labor Force Participation Rate has cratered, bub.
Labor Force participation peaked more than 15 years ago.....it's demographics....
Net private sector job growth from Feb 2001 to Feb 2009 was NEGATIVE...falling 8 million short of growth in the labor force...we've been exceeding growth in the labor force by more than 250% since mid 2010.....
No, it's not all due to Demographics. The LFPR for older people has increased, while that of young and prime working age men has decreased. You can look up the data on BLS.gov.
Have you ever considered not lying in your posts? Especially when someone has just posted the facts that blow your idiotic assertations out of the water.Obama MADE IT FAR WORSE than it would have been if someone who weren't a complete Economic Illiterate Corruptocrat had been elected instead.
Uh.....if things are DEMONSTRABLY BETTER than they were in January 2009, how could Obama have made it "worse"?
We've had the worst recovery ever, with annual economic growth never getting above 3%. We should have had a few years over 4%. The net result of this anemic performance is that millions of jobs were Never Created...one of the reasons why the Labor Force Participation Rate has cratered, bub.
* Sigh *
Your economic and historical illiteracy makes it impossible to have a rational discussion. Here, look at the pretty picture.
7239 by boedicca on US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Employment peak was in late 2007......add 58 months and we are part way through 2012.....
Go eyeball a calendar while you are sober enough....
Obama MADE IT FAR WORSE than it would have been if someone who weren't a complete Economic Illiterate Corruptocrat had been elected instead.
Uh.....if things are DEMONSTRABLY BETTER than they were in January 2009, how could Obama have made it "worse"?
We've had the worst recovery ever, with annual economic growth never getting above 3%. We should have had a few years over 4%. The net result of this anemic performance is that millions of jobs were Never Created...one of the reasons why the Labor Force Participation Rate has cratered, bub.
Labor Force participation peaked more than 15 years ago.....it's demographics....
Net private sector job growth from Feb 2001 to Feb 2009 was NEGATIVE...falling 8 million short of growth in the labor force...we've been exceeding growth in the labor force by more than 250% since mid 2010.....
No, it's not all due to Demographics. The LFPR for older people has increased, while that of young and prime working age men has decreased. You can look up the data on BLS.gov.
It is PRIMARILY due to demographics.....LFPR is up for the post 65 cohort....but that is from a low base.....and 4 out of 5 are still retired.....their ranks grow by 10,000 ever day....
Obama MADE IT FAR WORSE than it would have been if someone who weren't a complete Economic Illiterate Corruptocrat had been elected instead.
Uh.....if things are DEMONSTRABLY BETTER than they were in January 2009, how could Obama have made it "worse"?
We've had the worst recovery ever, with annual economic growth never getting above 3%. We should have had a few years over 4%. The net result of this anemic performance is that millions of jobs were Never Created...one of the reasons why the Labor Force Participation Rate has cratered, bub.
Bub?
Do you have any idea what constitutes the components of GDP?
We're spending the least on infrastructure and non-green energy r&d since at least 1990. Yet, these assholes want to cut it more and weaken our nation. Most of the money is being poured into the war and healthcare of some sort.
Why didn't Obabble spend the Stimulus money on real infrastructure when he had the chance? Oh wait, unions and cronies and stuff.
Have you ever considered not lying in your posts? Especially when someone has just posted the facts that blow your idiotic assertations out of the water.Uh.....if things are DEMONSTRABLY BETTER than they were in January 2009, how could Obama have made it "worse"?
We've had the worst recovery ever, with annual economic growth never getting above 3%. We should have had a few years over 4%. The net result of this anemic performance is that millions of jobs were Never Created...one of the reasons why the Labor Force Participation Rate has cratered, bub.
* Sigh *
Your economic and historical illiteracy makes it impossible to have a rational discussion. Here, look at the pretty picture.
7239 by boedicca on US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Employment peak was in late 2007......add 58 months and we are part way through 2012.....
Go eyeball a calendar while you are sober enough....
I see that graphical representation of statistics elude you.
Uh.....if things are DEMONSTRABLY BETTER than they were in January 2009, how could Obama have made it "worse"?
We've had the worst recovery ever, with annual economic growth never getting above 3%. We should have had a few years over 4%. The net result of this anemic performance is that millions of jobs were Never Created...one of the reasons why the Labor Force Participation Rate has cratered, bub.
Labor Force participation peaked more than 15 years ago.....it's demographics....
Net private sector job growth from Feb 2001 to Feb 2009 was NEGATIVE...falling 8 million short of growth in the labor force...we've been exceeding growth in the labor force by more than 250% since mid 2010.....
No, it's not all due to Demographics. The LFPR for older people has increased, while that of young and prime working age men has decreased. You can look up the data on BLS.gov.
It is PRIMARILY due to demographics.....LFPR is up for the post 65 cohort....but that is from a low base.....and 4 out of 5 are still retired.....their ranks grow by 10,000 ever day....
No, it's not. Boomers LFRP has increased. Prime working age men, Millennials and Teenagers have declining rates.
GDP is the sum of Consumption (C), Investment (I), Government Spending (G) and Net Exports (X – M): Y = C + I + G + (X - M).Uh.....if things are DEMONSTRABLY BETTER than they were in January 2009, how could Obama have made it "worse"?
We've had the worst recovery ever, with annual economic growth never getting above 3%. We should have had a few years over 4%. The net result of this anemic performance is that millions of jobs were Never Created...one of the reasons why the Labor Force Participation Rate has cratered, bub.
Bub?
Do you have any idea what constitutes the components of GDP?
As a matter of fact, I do. And it's NOT government "investment".
If it were, then 2008 would have been a much much much better than the "superior" economy of the Obama era about which you've been crowing.
Speaking of crow, your pie is ready. Eat up, bub.
Don't breed....
Investment is not the same as Government Spending, moron.
GDP is the sum of Consumption (C), Investment (I), Government Spending (G) and Net Exports (X – M): Y = C + I + G + (X - M).We've had the worst recovery ever, with annual economic growth never getting above 3%. We should have had a few years over 4%. The net result of this anemic performance is that millions of jobs were Never Created...one of the reasons why the Labor Force Participation Rate has cratered, bub.
Bub?
Do you have any idea what constitutes the components of GDP?
As a matter of fact, I do. And it's NOT government "investment".
If it were, then 2008 would have been a much much much better than the "superior" economy of the Obama era about which you've been crowing.
Speaking of crow, your pie is ready. Eat up, bub.
Don't breed....
Investment is not the same as Government Spending, moron.
Calling you a cretin is an insult to Bripat...
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
Let me know if you need help.....
