JBeukema
Rookie
- Banned
- #81
Definitions of liar on the Web:
a person who has lied or who lies repeatedly
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
a person who has lied or who lies repeatedly
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Then stop following me around and posting to me puddlecakes.You really need to learn that I don't give a shit what you do asshat...
I'll sleep well tonight no matter what....
Bookmark that, child...
Everything after the red is pretty much bullshit on your part. Nice try junior, but you fail, unless being idiotic is your goal.The problem with Republicans is they just can't admit when they are wrong. Wilson said he yelled "Liar" at Obama because he said the bill Obama references covers illegals.
The bill says EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE IN CAPITAL LETTERS so even a "Geico Caveman" could read it.
How can Republicans defend this? Is this same group that still says Saddam was behind 9/11 even when Bush said he wasn't?
The problem with you is that YOU LIE.
Hey, wait, didn't Mr Wilson shout "YOU LIE", not "liar"?
Did you actually watch and listen to the speech, or do you just spout democrat talking points from The Daily Kos or whatever your chosen biased media source is?
Oh yea. You are absolutely right. He said, "You lie" and not "liar". They mean such completely different things. Why didn't I catch that?
It's the different between being someone who plays "tennis" and a "tennis" player. See the difference?
This is an example of why less than 6% of Republicans are scientists and why they believe science is a religion.
Definitions of liar on the Web:
a person who has lied or who lies repeatedly
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
The problem with Republicans is they just can't admit when they are wrong. Wilson said he yelled "Liar" at Obama because he said the bill Obama references covers illegals.
The bill says EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE IN CAPITAL LETTERS so even a "Geico Caveman" could read it.
How can Republicans defend this? Is this same group that still says Saddam was behind 9/11 even when Bush said he wasn't?
The problem with you is that YOU LIE.
Hey, wait, didn't Mr Wilson shout "YOU LIE", not "liar"?
Did you actually watch and listen to the speech, or do you just spout democrat talking points from The Daily Kos or whatever your chosen biased media source is?
Oh yea. You are absolutely right. He said, "You lie" and not "liar". They mean such completely different things. Why didn't I catch that?
It's the different between being someone who plays "tennis" and a "tennis" player. See the difference?
This is an example of why less than 6% of Republicans are scientists and why they believe science is a religion.
Hellooooooooo out there????? I am still waiting on that link about the monkey and the kid during the campaign, could it be that really did not happen and that you actually have absolutely no facts or links to back up your claim. Ohhhhh no, you wouldn't do that now would you.
Definitions of liar on the Web:
a person who has lied or who lies repeatedly
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
Must you suck the fun out of things?
I judge a person by their character, not by the color of their skin. And when it omes to President of the United States, I judge by character and policy and not by the color of their skin.
Colored people do NOT like white people in general.
They in fact they despise white people behind their backs.
ThanksColored people do NOT like white people in general.
They in fact they despise white people behind their backs.
That's a broad sweeping generalization my friend. I think it more likely that people of color acknowledge racism behind white people's backs and don't discuss it openly. JMO no science behind it.
Just a anecdote of people I know of mixed racial heritage who have reported that to me. Blacks are more conscious of and discuss race among themselves more than whites do.
BTW nice to see you again,
I am a white man who is married to a black African woman. (not African American)
She used to work at a public medical center.
The staff was composed of all races; black, white, hispanic, asian
She has told me that behind their backs, whites are talked about and despised.
Oddly enough, she told me that the more friendy a white person is to their fellow minority workers .
The worse they are thought of, and were considered fools.
You might be suprised.... and how would you even know if they did???ThanksThat's a broad sweeping generalization my friend. I think it more likely that people of color acknowledge racism behind white people's backs and don't discuss it openly. JMO no science behind it.
Just a anecdote of people I know of mixed racial heritage who have reported that to me. Blacks are more conscious of and discuss race among themselves more than whites do.
BTW nice to see you again,
I am a white man who is married to a black African woman. (not African American)
She used to work at a public medical center.
The staff was composed of all races; black, white, hispanic, asian
She has told me that behind their backs, whites are talked about and despised.
Oddly enough, she told me that the more friendy a white person is to their fellow minority workers .
The worse they are thought of, and were considered fools.
They never talked about me behind my back.........
You might be suprised.... and how would you even know if they did???Thanks
I am a white man who is married to a black African woman. (not African American)
She used to work at a public medical center.
The staff was composed of all races; black, white, hispanic, asian
She has told me that behind their backs, whites are talked about and despised.
Oddly enough, she told me that the more friendy a white person is to their fellow minority workers .
The worse they are thought of, and were considered fools.
They never talked about me behind my back.........
Wrong, dumbass. It's an observation.It is an ad hominem attack to call somone a liar.
Wrong, dumbass. It's an observation.It is an ad hominem attack to call somone a liar.
You can observe facts are not in evidence. Congressman Joe Wilson could have said " I don't believe it'. Calling someone a liar is ad hominem attack. Lying implies deliberate deceit without proving any proof and is an ad hominem attack. It took the debate off course.
Wrong, dumbass. It's an observation.
You can observe facts are not in evidence. Congressman Joe Wilson could have said " I don't believe it'. Calling someone a liar is ad hominem attack. Lying implies deliberate deceit without proving any proof and is an ad hominem attack. It took the debate off course.
Do you even know what an ad hom is? Calling someone a liar because their statement is an obvious lie isn't an ad hom, you uneducated tool.
do a Google search on Ad Hominum