When will Hostess Bakers and Exploited Walmart workers start their own company?

hey exploited workers, if you feel the need to "Control the means of production" in the USA, the first thing you should do is write a business plan.

The American Neo-Marxists are lying to you, striking is for losers and stupid people

Or strike. That works, too.
 
Or strike. That works, too.

yeah, it didn't work for them, did it

Why? Were they not paid? Are they not being paid?

They were paid before the strike, when the company was still operating.

Now, after the strike, which they voted for despite knowing the company would shut down because of it, they're not getting paid.

Really stuck it to The Man, didn't they?
 
yeah, it didn't work for them, did it

Why? Were they not paid? Are they not being paid?

They were paid before the strike, when the company was still operating.

Now, after the strike, which they voted for despite knowing the company would shut down because of it, they're not getting paid.

Really stuck it to The Man, didn't they?

The company was failing anyways, they just wanted to put the blame on the workers. Of course idiots like you side with the executives who mismanaged the company, and have no problem attacking the worker.
And people like you say liberals are unAmerican. Lol
 
yeah, it didn't work for them, did it

Why? Were they not paid? Are they not being paid?

They were paid before the strike, when the company was still operating.

Now, after the strike, which they voted for despite knowing the company would shut down because of it, they're not getting paid.

Really stuck it to The Man, didn't they?

It'll be acquired. The brands are too valuable for it not to be bought. And it seems that the workers and not scabs off the streets is what's needed to run the company successfully so that the new owners see a return on their investment. So they have a right to enjoy some of the fruits, too. Good for them for fighting for a fair share.
 
scabs off the streets .

actually scabs off the street who are willing to work, like the rest of us, for free market wages are far more deserving of our support than those who seek higher wages with union violence.

Imagine the message you send by not condemning unions: you get ahead in life with violence rather than by being worth more to other people. Obviously unions should be illegal again!!
 
Why? Were they not paid? Are they not being paid?

They were paid before the strike, when the company was still operating.

Now, after the strike, which they voted for despite knowing the company would shut down because of it, they're not getting paid.

Really stuck it to The Man, didn't they?

The company was failing anyways, they just wanted to put the blame on the workers. Of course idiots like you side with the executives who mismanaged the company, and have no problem attacking the worker.
And people like you say liberals are unAmerican. Lol
If you put your hand in a door and slam it, it's not the door's fault. :lol:
 
Why? Were they not paid? Are they not being paid?

They were paid before the strike, when the company was still operating.

Now, after the strike, which they voted for despite knowing the company would shut down because of it, they're not getting paid.

Really stuck it to The Man, didn't they?

It'll be acquired. The brands are too valuable for it not to be bought. And it seems that the workers and not scabs off the streets is what's needed to run the company successfully so that the new owners see a return on their investment. So they have a right to enjoy some of the fruits, too. Good for them for fighting for a fair share.
What gives a union member a greater right to work than a non-union member?

NOTE: "Just because!!" is not a valid reason.
 
They were paid before the strike, when the company was still operating.

Now, after the strike, which they voted for despite knowing the company would shut down because of it, they're not getting paid.

Really stuck it to The Man, didn't they?

It'll be acquired. The brands are too valuable for it not to be bought. And it seems that the workers and not scabs off the streets is what's needed to run the company successfully so that the new owners see a return on their investment. So they have a right to enjoy some of the fruits, too. Good for them for fighting for a fair share.
What gives a union member a greater right to work than a non-union member?

NOTE: "Just because!!" is not a valid reason.
Well? Did I disallow your only response?
 
There's no barriers to entry, go to Legal Zoom and files the papers.

Go for it!

What's stopping them?

The idea that you just "start a business" proves you know nothing about economics. Considering your other posts, you don't seem to know much at all.
 
There's no barriers to entry, go to Legal Zoom and files the papers.

Go for it!

What's stopping them?

The idea that you just "start a business" proves you know nothing about economics. Considering your other posts, you don't seem to know much at all.

Tell us what's stopping these master of business from starting their own enterprise.
 
There's no barriers to entry, go to Legal Zoom and files the papers.

Go for it!

What's stopping them?

The idea that you just "start a business" proves you know nothing about economics. Considering your other posts, you don't seem to know much at all.

Tell us what's stopping these master of business from starting their own enterprise.

It's too HAAAAAAAAAARD!!

Right, derp?


Actually, it's interesting: Derp is admitting that the Obama government has made starting your own business prohibitively difficult.
 
Deany had a chance to share his "ideas" but he pussyed out

We can safely say that 6% of Dean's posts are worth reading but these are not them
 
hey exploited workers, if you feel the need to "Control the means of production" in the USA, the first thing you should do is write a business plan.

The American Neo-Marxists are lying to you, striking is for losers and stupid people

Or strike. That works, too.

If you walk off your job you are scum and should be fired.

Indeed.

In fact I'm certain that there is a special cricle of hell designed for Airline personnel and Dock workers.
 
6% might be way overstating the percent of Dean posts that are worth reading
 
What employers of these major companies should do is tell the unions for every day of strike, they will fire an employee. Randomly. If the strike continues, entire stores will be closed until the company is shuttered.
 
Or strike. That works, too.

If you walk off your job you are scum and should be fired.

Indeed.

In fact I'm certain that there is a special cricle of hell designed for Airline personnel and Dock workers.

Fictitious punishments aside why the hell should anyone who walks off a job have the right to keep it?

The job is supplied by the employer and they can give it to whomever they choose. If you want to walk off a job then it is the employer's right to replace you.
 
What employers of these major companies should do is tell the unions for every day of strike, they will fire an employee. Randomly. If the strike continues, entire stores will be closed until the company is shuttered.

why not just go to the government and demand the unions be made illegal again or that every American be placed in a union so no one has to work for a free market wage.
 

Forum List

Back
Top