When it comes time behind the voting booth curtain... Trump supporters can be honest..

[The VOR]

You know nothing about women, its more likely they will never vote for that bitch.

"Clinton has opened a wide lead among women in particular — 58 percent to his 35 percent. Among college-educated women, she leads Trump by 19 percentage points, 57 percent to 38 percent."

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/national-poll-clinton-surging-among-women-leads-trump-by-8-226762#ixzz4HbBTT2wW

But you keep on telling women how they feel, right up to election day.

she enables her perv husband to run around banging interns half his age also doesn't help her.

Really? Please back up the statement that Bill Clinton was enabled to run around banging interns half his age, with credible sources. And no, breitbart, gatway pundit, etc... doesn't count. LOL.

 

[BluesLegend]

You know nothing about women, its more likely they will never vote for that bitch.

"Clinton has opened a wide lead among women in particular — 58 percent to his 35 percent. Among college-educated women, she leads Trump by 19 percentage points, 57 percent to 38 percent."

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/national-poll-clinton-surging-among-women-leads-trump-by-8-226762#ixzz4HbBTT2wW

But you keep on telling women how they feel, right up to election day.

she enables her perv husband to run around banging interns half his age also doesn't help her.

Really? Please back up the statement that Bill Clinton was enabled to run around banging interns half his age, with credible sources. And no, breitbart, gatway pundit, etc... doesn't count. LOL.

Ahahaha Monica Lewinsky ring a bell? Wow talk about uninformed.

 

[Defiant1]

You know nothing about women, its more likely they will never vote for that bitch.

"Clinton has opened a wide lead among women in particular — 58 percent to his 35 percent. Among college-educated women, she leads Trump by 19 percentage points, 57 percent to 38 percent."

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/national-poll-clinton-surging-among-women-leads-trump-by-8-226762#ixzz4HbBTT2wW

But you keep on telling women how they feel, right up to election day.

The bitches that vote for Hillary should go to her when they need support.

See what they get.

 

[healthmyths]

[

Polls only poll fewer than two thousand people, and the media runs with it. So far, they say Hillary is winning. But how about if we poll 100,000 people: does bobblehead Hillary win?

Not at all, says a smartphone app developer. Their results reveal that the opposite is true.

When more people are polled, the data shows that Donald Trump will be the victor.
New Poll Reveals Trump Will Smash Bobblehead Hillary Big Time - Freedom Outpost

So, you're going to go with something unproven and ignore established polling that more often than not calls the races accurately.

And you do this why? Because Trump supporters don't want to tell pollsters how they really feel because they think the pollster is going to call them a racist? Doesn't pan out, robocall polling also has Clinton leading.

You're a Trump supporter who is letting their bias getting the better of them and are choosing to ignore polls because they tell you what you don't want to hear. Man up, son.

Last I checked the poll on here had Trump winning by over 10 points.

Could be but the MSM /pollster are so biased I don't believe any poll till I see the demographics of who was polled.
Most people reading that poll don't go to the last page and see this:
10% MORE Democrats then GOP in the poll! So naturally she will be ahead.
But this is the only example of this gross misrepresentation of people being polled!
The Post-ABC poll was conducted Monday to Thursday among a random national sample of 1,002 adults interviewed on cellular and landline phones.
33% or 330 Democrats...... 23% or 230 GOP......... 36% or 360 Independent.

A clear lead for Clinton after the conventions - The Washington Post

Of course there's 10% more Democrats in the sample. That represents their majority nationwide and explains why Hillary is going to be the next President of the United States.

Where are your FACTS that Democrats represents the majority???
There has NEVER been 10% more Democrats then GOP... again a false premise that the biased pollsters do when they do a poll.
Since 1988 33% Dem.. 31% GOP up to 2014... 29% Dems..... 26% GOP..
So what is the justification for this:
A clear lead for Clinton after the conventions - The Washington Post

Democratic, Republican Identification Near Historical Lows

 

[HappyJoy]

Polls only poll fewer than two thousand people, and the media runs with it. So far, they say Hillary is winning. But how about if we poll 100,000 people: does bobblehead Hillary win?

Not at all, says a smartphone app developer. Their results reveal that the opposite is true.

When more people are polled, the data shows that Donald Trump will be the victor.
New Poll Reveals Trump Will Smash Bobblehead Hillary Big Time - Freedom Outpost

So, you're going to go with something unproven and ignore established polling that more often than not calls the races accurately.

And you do this why? Because Trump supporters don't want to tell pollsters how they really feel because they think the pollster is going to call them a racist? Doesn't pan out, robocall polling also has Clinton leading.

You're a Trump supporter who is letting their bias getting the better of them and are choosing to ignore polls because they tell you what you don't want to hear. Man up, son.

Last I checked the poll on here had Trump winning by over 10 points.

What does the 'poll on here' have to do with anything related to who is going to be the next President?

 

[HappyJoy]

[

Polls only poll fewer than two thousand people, and the media runs with it. So far, they say Hillary is winning. But how about if we poll 100,000 people: does bobblehead Hillary win?

Not at all, says a smartphone app developer. Their results reveal that the opposite is true.

When more people are polled, the data shows that Donald Trump will be the victor.
New Poll Reveals Trump Will Smash Bobblehead Hillary Big Time - Freedom Outpost

So, you're going to go with something unproven and ignore established polling that more often than not calls the races accurately.

And you do this why? Because Trump supporters don't want to tell pollsters how they really feel because they think the pollster is going to call them a racist? Doesn't pan out, robocall polling also has Clinton leading.

You're a Trump supporter who is letting their bias getting the better of them and are choosing to ignore polls because they tell you what you don't want to hear. Man up, son.

Last I checked the poll on here had Trump winning by over 10 points.

Could be but the MSM /pollster are so biased I don't believe any poll till I see the demographics of who was polled.
Most people reading that poll don't go to the last page and see this:
10% MORE Democrats then GOP in the poll! So naturally she will be ahead.
But this is the only example of this gross misrepresentation of people being polled!
The Post-ABC poll was conducted Monday to Thursday among a random national sample of 1,002 adults interviewed on cellular and landline phones.
33% or 330 Democrats...... 23% or 230 GOP......... 36% or 360 Independent.

A clear lead for Clinton after the conventions - The Washington Post

Of course there's 10% more Democrats in the sample. That represents their majority nationwide and explains why Hillary is going to be the next President of the United States.

Where are your FACTS that Democrats represents the majority???
There has NEVER been 10% more Democrats then GOP... again a false premise that the biased pollsters do when they do a poll.
Since 1988 33% Dem.. 31% GOP up to 2014... 29% Dems..... 26% GOP..
So what is the justification for this:
A clear lead for Clinton after the conventions - The Washington Post
View attachment 85898

View attachment 85897

Democratic, Republican Identification Near Historical Lows

Does that include leaners?

 

[healthmyths]

[

So, you're going to go with something unproven and ignore established polling that more often than not calls the races accurately.

And you do this why? Because Trump supporters don't want to tell pollsters how they really feel because they think the pollster is going to call them a racist? Doesn't pan out, robocall polling also has Clinton leading.

You're a Trump supporter who is letting their bias getting the better of them and are choosing to ignore polls because they tell you what you don't want to hear. Man up, son.

Last I checked the poll on here had Trump winning by over 10 points.

Could be but the MSM /pollster are so biased I don't believe any poll till I see the demographics of who was polled.
Most people reading that poll don't go to the last page and see this:
10% MORE Democrats then GOP in the poll! So naturally she will be ahead.
But this is the only example of this gross misrepresentation of people being polled!
The Post-ABC poll was conducted Monday to Thursday among a random national sample of 1,002 adults interviewed on cellular and landline phones.
33% or 330 Democrats...... 23% or 230 GOP......... 36% or 360 Independent.

A clear lead for Clinton after the conventions - The Washington Post

Of course there's 10% more Democrats in the sample. That represents their majority nationwide and explains why Hillary is going to be the next President of the United States.

Where are your FACTS that Democrats represents the majority???
There has NEVER been 10% more Democrats then GOP... again a false premise that the biased pollsters do when they do a poll.
Since 1988 33% Dem.. 31% GOP up to 2014... 29% Dems..... 26% GOP..
So what is the justification for this:
A clear lead for Clinton after the conventions - The Washington Post
View attachment 85898

View attachment 85897

Democratic, Republican Identification Near Historical Lows

Does that include leaners?

What it does indicate that the massive lie that there are 10% more Democrats and for that reason pollsters count more Democrats then GOP!

 

[Skylar]

Polls only poll fewer than two thousand people, and the media runs with it. So far, they say Hillary is winning. But how about if we poll 100,000 people: does bobblehead Hillary win?

Not at all, says a smartphone app developer. Their results reveal that the opposite is true.

When more people are polled, the data shows that Donald Trump will be the victor.
New Poll Reveals Trump Will Smash Bobblehead Hillary Big Time - Freedom Outpost

You're citing an APP......that lets you vote as many times as you want, but only in polls that interest you?

Yeah, that's called a Straw Poll. And if they were worth a damn, Ron Paul would have had enough votes to be elected president twice in 2008.

But hey, what's a little willful ignorance and confirmation bias when your candidate's numbers are this bad?

 

[Care4all]

And Hillary voters that are conservatives can be honest as well, behind that curtain.... there are a lot of never trumpers out there who say #NEVERTRUMP,

but also don't say they are voting for Hillary in public...

well behind the curtain, in order to assure a never trump situation, their only choice is to vote for Clinton....and they will.

 

[healthmyths]

Polls only poll fewer than two thousand people, and the media runs with it. So far, they say Hillary is winning. But how about if we poll 100,000 people: does bobblehead Hillary win?

Not at all, says a smartphone app developer. Their results reveal that the opposite is true.

When more people are polled, the data shows that Donald Trump will be the victor.
New Poll Reveals Trump Will Smash Bobblehead Hillary Big Time - Freedom Outpost

You're citing an APP......that lets you vote as many times as you want, but only in polls that interest you?

Yeah, that's called a Straw Poll. And if they were worth a damn, Ron Paul would have had enough votes to be elected president twice in 2008.

But hey, what's a little willful ignorance and confirmation bias when your candidate's numbers are this bad?

OK for the RECORD!!!

From USATODAY OK???

When folks sign up for the app, they reveal age, date of birth and geographic location.
What Zip doesn’t get, unlike traditional polls, is demographic, income and education information.

Users can only answer questions once.

Zip maker responds to critics

Some of the questions posed Monday:
— ”Who is going to win the presidential election?
90% Trump
10% Clinton

(The Upshot column in the New York Times Monday gave Clinton an 88% chance of winning in November.
The Realclearpolitics average of polls gives Clinton a 47.8%-41% edge over Trump.)

— ”Are the polls for Trump and Clinton rigged?
84% yes
16% no

— ”Are more people who use Zip conservative or independent?
69% conservative
31% independent

Militi based his projection on our #TalkingTech podcast that Trump would win, on the “passionate” and overwhelming response from users on his app, which he says averaged 100,000 answers to questions daily.
Militi says he has “hundreds of thousands,” of users, and they were obtained by advertising on Facebook in all 50 states.
Many of our comments said the Zip app questions are written in a way to garner conservative responses, but Militi says 99% of the questions are written by users.
“We absolutely didn’t do anything intentional to skew it,” he says. “The Trump supporters seem to more motivated and passionate about it.”

SO BECAUSE YOU PROBABLY SKIPPED THE BIG BOLD PRINT!!!

YOU SAID: You're citing an APP......that lets you vote as many times as you want, but only in polls that interest you?
A) You are so wrong! Why didn't you do a little research before jumping to conclusions??
B) You are one of those people that ignore the facts and believe the MSM is telling you the whole unbiased story!
C) Most polls are counting MORE DEMOCRATS in their answers then GOP! And to back up my point here are the facts!
HuffPollster, which aggregates hundreds of polls across nearly 100 different pollsters, finds that averaging across 2016 polls,
34.8 percent of Americans identify as Democrats and
28.7 percent identify as Republicans—roughly a six-point Democratic advantage.
No, The Polls Aren’t Biased. Clinton Really Is Leading Trump

YET the FACTS of who is a Democrat and who is a GOP?

Democratic, Republican Identification Near Historical Lows

So why are pollster counting 10% more democrats then GOP?

AGAIN Prove with YOUR FACTS OK??? I just laugh at your seat of the pants GUESSING!!!

 

[Skylar]

Polls only poll fewer than two thousand people, and the media runs with it. So far, they say Hillary is winning. But how about if we poll 100,000 people: does bobblehead Hillary win?

Not at all, says a smartphone app developer. Their results reveal that the opposite is true.

When more people are polled, the data shows that Donald Trump will be the victor.
New Poll Reveals Trump Will Smash Bobblehead Hillary Big Time - Freedom Outpost

You're citing an APP......that lets you vote as many times as you want, but only in polls that interest you?

Yeah, that's called a Straw Poll. And if they were worth a damn, Ron Paul would have had enough votes to be elected president twice in 2008.

But hey, what's a little willful ignorance and confirmation bias when your candidate's numbers are this bad?

OK for the RECORD!!!

From USATODAY OK???

When folks sign up for the app, they reveal age, date of birth and geographic location.
What Zip doesn’t get, unlike traditional polls, is demographic, income and education information.

Users can only answer questions once.

Zip maker responds to critics

Some of the questions posed Monday:
— ”Who is going to win the presidential election?
90% Trump
10% Clinton

(The Upshot column in the New York Times Monday gave Clinton an 88% chance of winning in November.
The Realclearpolitics average of polls gives Clinton a 47.8%-41% edge over Trump.)

— ”Are the polls for Trump and Clinton rigged?
84% yes
16% no

— ”Are more people who use Zip conservative or independent?
69% conservative
31% independent

Militi based his projection on our #TalkingTech podcast that Trump would win, on the “passionate” and overwhelming response from users on his app, which he says averaged 100,000 answers to questions daily.
Militi says he has “hundreds of thousands,” of users, and they were obtained by advertising on Facebook in all 50 states.
Many of our comments said the Zip app questions are written in a way to garner conservative responses, but Militi says 99% of the questions are written by users.
“We absolutely didn’t do anything intentional to skew it,” he says. “The Trump supporters seem to more motivated and passionate about it.”

SO BECAUSE YOU PROBABLY SKIPPED THE BIG BOLD PRINT!!!

YOU SAID: You're citing an APP......that lets you vote as many times as you want, but only in polls that interest you?
A) You are so wrong! Why didn't you do a little research before jumping to conclusions??
B) You are one of those people that ignore the facts and believe the MSM is telling you the whole unbiased story!
C) Most polls are counting MORE DEMOCRATS in their answers then GOP! And to back up my point here are the facts!
HuffPollster, which aggregates hundreds of polls across nearly 100 different pollsters, finds that averaging across 2016 polls,
34.8 percent of Americans identify as Democrats and
28.7 percent identify as Republicans—roughly a six-point Democratic advantage.
No, The Polls Aren’t Biased. Clinton Really Is Leading Trump

YET the FACTS of who is a Democrat and who is a GOP?

Democratic, Republican Identification Near Historical Lows

View attachment 85938

So why are pollster counting 10% more democrats then GOP?

AGAIN Prove with YOUR FACTS OK??? I just laugh at your seat of the pants GUESSING!!!

Laughing....they can register with as many IDs as they want and vote with each ID.

And....only interested parties vote.

Its a Strawpoll. And Strawpolls have a an absymal record of accuracy. Here's the results of a political strawpoll where only interested parties voted.....and they only voted once:

The final results were as follows: Paul 612, Huntsman 382, Bachmann 191, businessman Herman Cain 104, Romney 74, former House speaker Newt Gingrich 69, former Alaska governor Sarah Palin 41, former senator Rick Santorum 30, Pawlenty 18, former New Mexico governor Gary Johnson 10, former Louisiana governor Buddy Roemer 9, and Rep. Thaddeus McCotter (Mich.) 2.

Ron Paul takes RLC straw poll

And again, only weeks earlier:

Ron Paul emerged victorious in the Conservative Political Action Conference's annual presidential straw poll, the second straight year that the libertarian-leaning Texas Congressman has won the vote.

Paul took 30 percent while former Gov. Mitt Romney (Mass.) placed second with 23 percent. No other candidate received double digit support.

The Fix - Ron Paul wins CPAC straw poll

For the record, it was Mitt Romney that actually won the nomination.

But good luck with your Strawpoll!

 

[HappyJoy]

[

Last I checked the poll on here had Trump winning by over 10 points.

Could be but the MSM /pollster are so biased I don't believe any poll till I see the demographics of who was polled.
Most people reading that poll don't go to the last page and see this:
10% MORE Democrats then GOP in the poll! So naturally she will be ahead.
But this is the only example of this gross misrepresentation of people being polled!
The Post-ABC poll was conducted Monday to Thursday among a random national sample of 1,002 adults interviewed on cellular and landline phones.
33% or 330 Democrats...... 23% or 230 GOP......... 36% or 360 Independent.

A clear lead for Clinton after the conventions - The Washington Post

Of course there's 10% more Democrats in the sample. That represents their majority nationwide and explains why Hillary is going to be the next President of the United States.

Where are your FACTS that Democrats represents the majority???
There has NEVER been 10% more Democrats then GOP... again a false premise that the biased pollsters do when they do a poll.
Since 1988 33% Dem.. 31% GOP up to 2014... 29% Dems..... 26% GOP..
So what is the justification for this:
A clear lead for Clinton after the conventions - The Washington Post
View attachment 85898

View attachment 85897

Democratic, Republican Identification Near Historical Lows

Does that include leaners?

What it does indicate that the massive lie that there are 10% more Democrats and for that reason pollsters count more Democrats then GOP!

They count more because there are more. Your argument is the exact same argument that was made in 2012 and your point of view was proven wrong then. Any professional pollster and analyst worth his salt disagrees with you. All you have are right wing sites like the gatewaypundit who also got it wrong in 2012.

If you think the pollsters are wrong then come up with overwhelming evidence that by and large they are consistently wrong. No cherry picking, no using obvious outliers or crappy polling institutions like Gallup. Present us with demonstrable proof that a majority of pollsters get it wrong most of the time.

 

[Old Rocks]

LOL We have heard all of this in 2012. And the polls were right then. If anything, the underestimated the margin of President Obama's victory.

 

[Skylar]

[

Could be but the MSM /pollster are so biased I don't believe any poll till I see the demographics of who was polled.
Most people reading that poll don't go to the last page and see this:
10% MORE Democrats then GOP in the poll! So naturally she will be ahead.
But this is the only example of this gross misrepresentation of people being polled!
The Post-ABC poll was conducted Monday to Thursday among a random national sample of 1,002 adults interviewed on cellular and landline phones.
33% or 330 Democrats...... 23% or 230 GOP......... 36% or 360 Independent.

A clear lead for Clinton after the conventions - The Washington Post

Of course there's 10% more Democrats in the sample. That represents their majority nationwide and explains why Hillary is going to be the next President of the United States.

Where are your FACTS that Democrats represents the majority???
There has NEVER been 10% more Democrats then GOP... again a false premise that the biased pollsters do when they do a poll.
Since 1988 33% Dem.. 31% GOP up to 2014... 29% Dems..... 26% GOP..
So what is the justification for this:
A clear lead for Clinton after the conventions - The Washington Post
View attachment 85898

View attachment 85897

Democratic, Republican Identification Near Historical Lows

Does that include leaners?

What it does indicate that the massive lie that there are 10% more Democrats and for that reason pollsters count more Democrats then GOP!

They count more because there are more. Your argument is the exact same argument that was made in 2012 and your point of view was proven wrong then. Any professional pollster and analyst worth his salt disagrees with you. All you have are right wing sites like the gatewaypundit who also got it wrong in 2012.

If you think the pollsters are wrong then come up with overwhelming evidence that by and large they are consistently wrong. No cherry picking, no using obvious outliers or crappy polling institutions like Gallup. Present us with demonstrable proof that a majority of pollsters get it wrong most of the time.

C'mon....just because Health's record of using polls to predict elections is a steaming pile of dog shit doesn't mean you should hold it against him...

Obama will lose Big Time per Washington Post Polling data!!!

After all, Obama lost big time in 2012, exactly as Myth predicted he would. Oh...wait. It was Romney that lost big time, by almost 6 million votes.

Well surely Myth did better in his other foray into polling:

Romney winner Polls were biased!!!!

Nope, dog shit there too. Maybe third time is a charm?

PLEASE!!! Don't change the POLLING DATA!!

Nope, pure hapless dog shit then too. Lucky Number 4?

If the Polls are "Skewed"

Sigh...still dog shit? This is getting embarrassing

Perhaps you're right.

 

[HappyJoy]

[

Of course there's 10% more Democrats in the sample. That represents their majority nationwide and explains why Hillary is going to be the next President of the United States.

Where are your FACTS that Democrats represents the majority???
There has NEVER been 10% more Democrats then GOP... again a false premise that the biased pollsters do when they do a poll.
Since 1988 33% Dem.. 31% GOP up to 2014... 29% Dems..... 26% GOP..
So what is the justification for this:
A clear lead for Clinton after the conventions - The Washington Post
View attachment 85898

View attachment 85897

Democratic, Republican Identification Near Historical Lows

Does that include leaners?

What it does indicate that the massive lie that there are 10% more Democrats and for that reason pollsters count more Democrats then GOP!

They count more because there are more. Your argument is the exact same argument that was made in 2012 and your point of view was proven wrong then. Any professional pollster and analyst worth his salt disagrees with you. All you have are right wing sites like the gatewaypundit who also got it wrong in 2012.

If you think the pollsters are wrong then come up with overwhelming evidence that by and large they are consistently wrong. No cherry picking, no using obvious outliers or crappy polling institutions like Gallup. Present us with demonstrable proof that a majority of pollsters get it wrong most of the time.

C'mon....just because Health's record of using polls to predict elections is a steaming pile of dog shit doesn't mean you should hold it against him...

Obama will lose Big Time per Washington Post Polling data!!!

After all, Obama lost big time in 2012, exactly as Myth predicted he would. Oh...wait. It was Romney that lost big time, by almost 6 million votes.

Well surely Myth did better in his other foray into polling:

Romney winner Polls were biased!!!!

Nope, dog shit there too. Maybe third time is a charm?

PLEASE!!! Don't change the POLLING DATA!!

Nope, pure hapless dog shit then too. Lucky Number 4?

If the Polls are "Skewed"

Sigh...still dog shit? This is getting embarrassing

Perhaps you're right.

Geez, that is just ad, poor SOB hasn't learned his lesson.

 

[Skylar]

[Where are your FACTS that Democrats represents the majority???
There has NEVER been 10% more Democrats then GOP... again a false premise that the biased pollsters do when they do a poll.
Since 1988 33% Dem.. 31% GOP up to 2014... 29% Dems..... 26% GOP..
So what is the justification for this:
A clear lead for Clinton after the conventions - The Washington Post
View attachment 85898

View attachment 85897

Democratic, Republican Identification Near Historical Lows

Does that include leaners?

What it does indicate that the massive lie that there are 10% more Democrats and for that reason pollsters count more Democrats then GOP!

They count more because there are more. Your argument is the exact same argument that was made in 2012 and your point of view was proven wrong then. Any professional pollster and analyst worth his salt disagrees with you. All you have are right wing sites like the gatewaypundit who also got it wrong in 2012.

If you think the pollsters are wrong then come up with overwhelming evidence that by and large they are consistently wrong. No cherry picking, no using obvious outliers or crappy polling institutions like Gallup. Present us with demonstrable proof that a majority of pollsters get it wrong most of the time.

C'mon....just because Health's record of using polls to predict elections is a steaming pile of dog shit doesn't mean you should hold it against him...

Obama will lose Big Time per Washington Post Polling data!!!

After all, Obama lost big time in 2012, exactly as Myth predicted he would. Oh...wait. It was Romney that lost big time, by almost 6 million votes.

Well surely Myth did better in his other foray into polling:

Romney winner Polls were biased!!!!

Nope, dog shit there too. Maybe third time is a charm?

PLEASE!!! Don't change the POLLING DATA!!

Nope, pure hapless dog shit then too. Lucky Number 4?

If the Polls are "Skewed"

Sigh...still dog shit? This is getting embarrassing

Perhaps you're right.

Geez, that is just ad, poor SOB hasn't learned his lesson.

Sure he did. He just let the GOP teach him rather than history.

 

[jknowgood]

Polls only poll fewer than two thousand people, and the media runs with it. So far, they say Hillary is winning. But how about if we poll 100,000 people: does bobblehead Hillary win?

Not at all, says a smartphone app developer. Their results reveal that the opposite is true.

When more people are polled, the data shows that Donald Trump will be the victor.
New Poll Reveals Trump Will Smash Bobblehead Hillary Big Time - Freedom Outpost

So, you're going to go with something unproven and ignore established polling that more often than not calls the races accurately.

And you do this why? Because Trump supporters don't want to tell pollsters how they really feel because they think the pollster is going to call them a racist? Doesn't pan out, robocall polling also has Clinton leading.

You're a Trump supporter who is letting their bias getting the better of them and are choosing to ignore polls because they tell you what you don't want to hear. Man up, son.

Last I checked the poll on here had Trump winning by over 10 points.

What does the 'poll on here' have to do with anything related to who is going to be the next President?

Because even with all you Looney liberals on here. Hillary loses, just like on election day.

 

[HappyJoy]

Polls only poll fewer than two thousand people, and the media runs with it. So far, they say Hillary is winning. But how about if we poll 100,000 people: does bobblehead Hillary win?

Not at all, says a smartphone app developer. Their results reveal that the opposite is true.

When more people are polled, the data shows that Donald Trump will be the victor.
New Poll Reveals Trump Will Smash Bobblehead Hillary Big Time - Freedom Outpost

So, you're going to go with something unproven and ignore established polling that more often than not calls the races accurately.

And you do this why? Because Trump supporters don't want to tell pollsters how they really feel because they think the pollster is going to call them a racist? Doesn't pan out, robocall polling also has Clinton leading.

You're a Trump supporter who is letting their bias getting the better of them and are choosing to ignore polls because they tell you what you don't want to hear. Man up, son.

Last I checked the poll on here had Trump winning by over 10 points.

What does the 'poll on here' have to do with anything related to who is going to be the next President?

Because even with all you Looney liberals on here. Hillary loses, just like on election day.

There is one thing this board isn't, a representative example of the make up of this country. You must live in a dim gray rainbow world to think that.

 

[healthmyths]

Polls only poll fewer than two thousand people, and the media runs with it. So far, they say Hillary is winning. But how about if we poll 100,000 people: does bobblehead Hillary win?

Not at all, says a smartphone app developer. Their results reveal that the opposite is true.

When more people are polled, the data shows that Donald Trump will be the victor.
New Poll Reveals Trump Will Smash Bobblehead Hillary Big Time - Freedom Outpost

So, you're going to go with something unproven and ignore established polling that more often than not calls the races accurately.

And you do this why? Because Trump supporters don't want to tell pollsters how they really feel because they think the pollster is going to call them a racist? Doesn't pan out, robocall polling also has Clinton leading.

You're a Trump supporter who is letting their bias getting the better of them and are choosing to ignore polls because they tell you what you don't want to hear. Man up, son.

Last I checked the poll on here had Trump winning by over 10 points.

What does the 'poll on here' have to do with anything related to who is going to be the next President?

Because even with all you Looney liberals on here. Hillary loses, just like on election day.

There is one thing this board isn't, a representative example of the make up of this country. You must live in a dim gray rainbow world to think that.

How did you come to that conclusion? What FACTS provide you that statement?
What sources do you have to tell you my race,my age,my location, my education, my marital status,my income,etc....?
See this is the problem with people like you! You make grandiose unsubstantiated statements as if they are TRUE!
Come on have a little scholastic honesty here!

 

[HappyJoy]

So, you're going to go with something unproven and ignore established polling that more often than not calls the races accurately.

And you do this why? Because Trump supporters don't want to tell pollsters how they really feel because they think the pollster is going to call them a racist? Doesn't pan out, robocall polling also has Clinton leading.

You're a Trump supporter who is letting their bias getting the better of them and are choosing to ignore polls because they tell you what you don't want to hear. Man up, son.

Last I checked the poll on here had Trump winning by over 10 points.

What does the 'poll on here' have to do with anything related to who is going to be the next President?

Because even with all you Looney liberals on here. Hillary loses, just like on election day.

There is one thing this board isn't, a representative example of the make up of this country. You must live in a dim gray rainbow world to think that.

How did you come to that conclusion? What FACTS provide you that statement?
What sources do you have to tell you my race,my age,my location, my education, my marital status,my income,etc....?
See this is the problem with people like you! You make grandiose unsubstantiated statements as if they are TRUE!
Come on have a little scholastic honesty here!

There is no evidence at all this place represents the United States. Political forum members are more partisan, to the left and to the right, we are not a random sample.

Trump won a poll here over Clinton, doesn't match established polling results.

The fact that you aren't even more laughed at by your moronic conspiracy about skewed polls is also evidence that this place isn't normal.

Also, after seeing your 2012 record on skewed polls demonstrates to me that I'm better off just disagreeing with you at face value.