- May 20, 2009
- 145,646
- 68,456
- 2,330
A core tenant of the Theory of AGW states that temperature increase by 1.5C for ever doubling of CO2 from 280 PPM. Let's say that could be true, why don't we test this by comparing a 250PPM CO2 environment to a 1,000PPN CO2 environment. According to the American CO2 is bad Theory of Manmade Global Warming, the latter should be 3C warmer than the former. Correct?
Well, it might not be, because you see "3C is the Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity, Frank, not the Transient Climate Response"
Which sounds to be like an excuse for CO2 laboratory performance anxiety. What he means to say is that, "Sure there is no temperature increase in the lab, but our models show a 3C increase based upon Transient Climate Response, you Denier!"
Can someone please explain why doubling is not really doubling?
Well, it might not be, because you see "3C is the Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity, Frank, not the Transient Climate Response"
Which sounds to be like an excuse for CO2 laboratory performance anxiety. What he means to say is that, "Sure there is no temperature increase in the lab, but our models show a 3C increase based upon Transient Climate Response, you Denier!"
Can someone please explain why doubling is not really doubling?