When freedom of speech crosses the line.

Insulting sacred religious figures is as sacred as the Freedom from Religion movement. Of course the atheists have concentrated on Christians. They should start a billboard campaign against islam.

Making these idle accusation is typical of those caught with their pants down. Atheist only want to be left alone and never make fun or religion but just state their beliefs. No difference between a radical christian and a radical muslim except christain have others to do their dirty deeds and muslim do their own
 
Last edited:
Insulting sacred religious figures is as sacred as the Freedom from Religion movement. Of course the atheists have concentrated on Christians. They should start a billboard campaign against islam.

Making these idle accusation is typical of those caught with their pants down. Atheist only want to be left alone and never make fun or religion but just state their beliefs. No difference between a radical christian and a radical muslim except christain have others to do their dirty deeds and muslim do their own

Atheists never make fun of religion?

You are not only an asshole, but a moron.
 
My opinion is that there is no film or words that can ever be considered justification for murder.

The film itself is stupid. It is no excuse for the actions we've seen.
 
My opinion is that there is no film or words that can ever be considered justification for murder.

The film itself is stupid. It is no excuse for the actions we've seen.

I didn't see the film and don't plan to, but in my experience people are more offended by the truth than they are stupid fiction.
 
Nope, the muslims are the victims. :cool:

Muslims has always been the victims of Chistianity humor. Christians have a long history of making fun of and insulting other nationalities and religions.

Curious. Who are the victims when a Muslim blows himself up in a crowed shopping bazaar full of women and children?

Link? But we have blown up a lot of innocent muslim men, women and children and has a long history of doing just that. We blow them up and call it an act of war.
 
Muslims has always been the victims of Chistianity humor. Christians have a long history of making fun of and insulting other nationalities and religions.

Curious. Who are the victims when a Muslim blows himself up in a crowed shopping bazaar full of women and children?

Link? But we have blown up a lot of innocent muslim men, women and children and has a long history of doing just that. We blow them up and call it an act of war.

You are indeed ignorant, aren't you?

Suicide bomber kills five at Israeli shopping mall | Mail Online
 
My opinion is that there is no film or words that can ever be considered justification for murder.

The film itself is stupid. It is no excuse for the actions we've seen.

The actions you have seen it rightous freedom of speech protesting, what you did not see is acts of terrorism by Al Qaeda that killed four Americans. The protesters did not kill the Americans. What was the reason for the Watts riot,etc?
 
My opinion is that there is no film or words that can ever be considered justification for murder.

The film itself is stupid. It is no excuse for the actions we've seen.

The actions you have seen it rightous freedom of speech protesting, what you did not see is acts of terrorism by Al Qaeda that killed four Americans. The protesters did not kill the Americans. What was the reason for the Watts riot,etc?

When animals want to riot, they will..........
 
WHEN FREEDOM OF SPEECH CROSSES THE LINE.

When freedom of speech incites violence against a race, religion or one’s sexual orientation and causes death of innocent people it crosses the line and is no longer a matter of principle and the person or persons that miss-used their First Amendment Rights should be held accountable. The person that made this video knew what it would incite and is responsible for the death of the Ambassadors. And he is scum at the bottom of the cesspool. Punk ass little bitch hiding behind the Constitution is not how the framers of the Constitution meant it to be used. The scum is probably sitting under his little rock enjoying his 15 minutes untouched fully aware of what he has accomplished. And the federal and state laws protects the LPAB.

I personal know how it feels to have someones freedom of speech lashed out on ones race and religion.

“I've learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.”― Maya Angelou

So if someone posted something on here that meet the standards you laid out the punishment should be what? Who gets to decide what speech might or might not incite violence? When you try and regulate free speech that is the first step in losing it.
 
WHEN FREEDOM OF SPEECH CROSSES THE LINE.

When freedom of speech incites violence against a race, religion or one’s sexual orientation and causes death of innocent people it crosses the line and is no longer a matter of principle and the person or persons that miss-used their First Amendment Rights should be held accountable. The person that made this video knew what it would incite and is responsible for the death of the Ambassadors. And he is scum at the bottom of the cesspool. Punk ass little bitch hiding behind the Constitution is not how the framers of the Constitution meant it to be used. The scum is probably sitting under his little rock enjoying his 15 minutes untouched fully aware of what he has accomplished. And the federal and state laws protects the LPAB.

I personal know how it feels to have someones freedom of speech lashed out on ones race and religion.

“I've learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.”― Maya Angelou

How can making a movie about a guy that has been dead for 1400 years incite anything? Is he going to come back from the grave and demand satisfaction? Maybe the little girl he raped will come back at the same time and demand he be put on trial, that would be interesting.

FYI, there is no line that freedom of speech can cross that justifies any attempt to curtail it.
 
Amazingly, what the rightwing nuts are objecting to most is that normal people are expressing their opinion,

one of disgust,

at this anti-Muslim hate speech.
 
WHEN FREEDOM OF SPEECH CROSSES THE LINE.

When freedom of speech incites violence against a race, religion or one’s sexual orientation and causes death of innocent people it crosses the line and is no longer a matter of principle and the person or persons that miss-used their First Amendment Rights should be held accountable. The person that made this video knew what it would incite and is responsible for the death of the Ambassadors. And he is scum at the bottom of the cesspool. Punk ass little bitch hiding behind the Constitution is not how the framers of the Constitution meant it to be used. The scum is probably sitting under his little rock enjoying his 15 minutes untouched fully aware of what he has accomplished. And the federal and state laws protects the LPAB.

I personal know how it feels to have someones freedom of speech lashed out on ones race and religion.

“I've learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.”― Maya Angelou

How can making a movie about a guy that has been dead for 1400 years incite anything? Is he going to come back from the grave and demand satisfaction? Maybe the little girl he raped will come back at the same time and demand he be put on trial, that would be interesting.

FYI, there is no line that freedom of speech can cross that justifies any attempt to curtail it.

Then what about the people who want to outlaw desecration of the flag?
 
WHEN FREEDOM OF SPEECH CROSSES THE LINE.

When freedom of speech incites violence against a race, religion or one’s sexual orientation and causes death of innocent people it crosses the line and is no longer a matter of principle and the person or persons that miss-used their First Amendment Rights should be held accountable. The person that made this video knew what it would incite and is responsible for the death of the Ambassadors. And he is scum at the bottom of the cesspool. Punk ass little bitch hiding behind the Constitution is not how the framers of the Constitution meant it to be used. The scum is probably sitting under his little rock enjoying his 15 minutes untouched fully aware of what he has accomplished. And the federal and state laws protects the LPAB.

I personal know how it feels to have someones freedom of speech lashed out on ones race and religion.

“I've learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.”― Maya Angelou

Well, I just put up a thread about the true motive of the Libyan embassy attack. It was in retaliation for Obama's drone kill of AQ #2. Zawahiri asked Libyan rebels to exact revenge.

This was no protest in Libya. This was a full assault right from the get go. And the Ambassador and others died because AQ was pissed off and wanted revenge.

That makes a whole lot more sense than this bullshit red herring of a movie.
 
WHEN FREEDOM OF SPEECH CROSSES THE LINE.

When freedom of speech incites violence against a race, religion or one’s sexual orientation and causes death of innocent people it crosses the line and is no longer a matter of principle and the person or persons that miss-used their First Amendment Rights should be held accountable. The person that made this video knew what it would incite and is responsible for the death of the Ambassadors. And he is scum at the bottom of the cesspool. Punk ass little bitch hiding behind the Constitution is not how the framers of the Constitution meant it to be used. The scum is probably sitting under his little rock enjoying his 15 minutes untouched fully aware of what he has accomplished. And the federal and state laws protects the LPAB.

I personal know how it feels to have someones freedom of speech lashed out on ones race and religion.

“I've learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.”― Maya Angelou
People who burn the American flag and end up beaten up or even some of them dead, should be charged with incitement to riot.

See, we agree.
 
WHEN FREEDOM OF SPEECH CROSSES THE LINE.

When freedom of speech incites violence against a race, religion or one’s sexual orientation and causes death of innocent people it crosses the line and is no longer a matter of principle and the person or persons that miss-used their First Amendment Rights should be held accountable. The person that made this video knew what it would incite and is responsible for the death of the Ambassadors. And he is scum at the bottom of the cesspool. Punk ass little bitch hiding behind the Constitution is not how the framers of the Constitution meant it to be used. The scum is probably sitting under his little rock enjoying his 15 minutes untouched fully aware of what he has accomplished. And the federal and state laws protects the LPAB.

I personal know how it feels to have someones freedom of speech lashed out on ones race and religion.

“I've learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.”― Maya Angelou

if i tell you to fuck off......does that "incite" you......?

at her age she needs all the incitement she can get
 
This thread should earn the MOST DISGUSTING thread of the week here.. You and your thread are a disgrace. Christians are bashed CONTINUALLY and offended.. that doesn't afford anyfuckingone to SLAUGHTER innocent people... nor does it negate our protection under the United States Constitution to speak freely without fear of the government.. LEFTISTS always seek to rob our freedoms and perpetually blame the victims or speech for what CRAZED lunatics commit.

Muslims do not disrespect Christ and GOD and we claim to be more civilized them them and we stoop to this low, say a lot about Christianity.

Chopping off innocent people's head isn't disrespecting CHRIST?? Crucifying CHRISTIANS simply for their beliefs isn't disrespecting CHRIST????????

Under Iran's brutal Islamic Sharia Laws, women usually get stoned for crimes against chastity. While men who even murder someone in a fit of rage in these cases, usually get only a few years in jail.

Under Iran's strict Sharia law, women sentenced to execution by stoning have their hands bound behind their back. They are wrapped from head to toe in sheets before being seated in a pit. The ditch is filled up to their breasts with dirt, and the soil is packed tightly before people assemble to execute the woman by pitching rocks at her head and upper body.

Contrast the above to what Jesus said about stoning and adultery:
According to the Gospel of John, the Jewish Priests (Pharisees), in an attempt to discredit Jesus, brought a woman charged with adultery before him. The Pharisees reminded Jesus that adultery was punishable by stoning under Law of Moses and challenged Jesus to judge the woman so that they might then accuse him of disobeying the law. Jesus thought for a moment and then replied, “He that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her.”

WHAT A CROCK OF SHIT POST.. You're an ignorant ASS!
 
Perhaps the people here at USMB who attack Christianity or people who believe in God can be charged with incitement to riot when the DNC is stormed and Debs is harmed or, heaven forgive them, killed?

That too falls into the classification of blaming the protagonists for the actions of others.
 

Forum List

Back
Top