Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
Inspired from here: Islam + Gay Gatherings + Copycats = Be Safe For Awhile People!
Anything that is so flagrantly depraved that regular Americans would not be willing to shed blood to defend. That was an easy question to answer.
The truth is, many Americans are outraged they attacked on our soil (again), and saddened for the individuals who fell. But they are not outraged at WHAT was attacked. And that was the very depravity that seems to have taken on a life of its own in cult form, forcing all of us to play along under threat of blackmail, fines or jail; all as a sort of state-elevated neo-religion.(behaviors of a sub-culture are not a race of people) courtesy of King Obama and his court of rainbow-jesters in positions of power.
It goes without saying that part of the reason the bodies were left in the club for so long was that HIV can only survive outside a living body for "x" hours, if memory serves. So it's quite likely that while the public was being told "we can't go in for fear of a device". The reality is the law enforcement teams were probably waiting out a period of time to insure their maximum safety in a zone that almost certainly was a biohazard. And I say this judging from the survivors I saw; about half of which the males were in the wasting-away phase of HIV/AIDS. (thin arms, chests becoming concave, hallowing around the facial muscles) They gather in these clubs to pick up on anonymous sex, compulsively. The lack of use of condoms even today in a reckless and manic group of sex-addicts is nothing to admire. Good on the police chief for taking action to protect his men before they entered the biohazard blood zone.
When Islamics view the US as "representative of a depraved cult whose main feature is the goal of spreading itself to the far corners of the earth, mentally and physically", they're going to see ALL of us as soft targets; for the root cause of a scant few in reality. They see us all as enablers of this cult. If you truly believe in all the values of the Church of LGBT, then by all means knit arms with them and stand to face your new enemy. But when should a line be drawn to publicly perpetuate a value system that most of us don't share? Would we line up and die for a porn shop collective? A row of prostitute houses in Nevada? The regional headquarters of the KKK?
The PC-spinners are in overdrive and nobody is questioning why the bodies were left in the club for so long. In any other situation I can think of in recent memory, bodies are immediately removed to a secure location. It's just a lingering "WTF" that makes you pause. If we talk about why the bodies were left in place so long, we have to talk about the reason why. And that would lead to the revelation of lifestyle and hazard. And that would lead to talk about whether or not that lifestyle is something worth rigorously defending, or dying for.
It's a touchy subject. What would you do? Would you have jumped right in that club to start removing bodies? Or would you wait a couple of days time to be sure HIV had become unviable? Does your common sense tell you something about LGBT that your social personality refuses to see?
Anything that is so flagrantly depraved that regular Americans would not be willing to shed blood to defend. That was an easy question to answer.
The truth is, many Americans are outraged they attacked on our soil (again), and saddened for the individuals who fell. But they are not outraged at WHAT was attacked. And that was the very depravity that seems to have taken on a life of its own in cult form, forcing all of us to play along under threat of blackmail, fines or jail; all as a sort of state-elevated neo-religion.(behaviors of a sub-culture are not a race of people) courtesy of King Obama and his court of rainbow-jesters in positions of power.
It goes without saying that part of the reason the bodies were left in the club for so long was that HIV can only survive outside a living body for "x" hours, if memory serves. So it's quite likely that while the public was being told "we can't go in for fear of a device". The reality is the law enforcement teams were probably waiting out a period of time to insure their maximum safety in a zone that almost certainly was a biohazard. And I say this judging from the survivors I saw; about half of which the males were in the wasting-away phase of HIV/AIDS. (thin arms, chests becoming concave, hallowing around the facial muscles) They gather in these clubs to pick up on anonymous sex, compulsively. The lack of use of condoms even today in a reckless and manic group of sex-addicts is nothing to admire. Good on the police chief for taking action to protect his men before they entered the biohazard blood zone.
When Islamics view the US as "representative of a depraved cult whose main feature is the goal of spreading itself to the far corners of the earth, mentally and physically", they're going to see ALL of us as soft targets; for the root cause of a scant few in reality. They see us all as enablers of this cult. If you truly believe in all the values of the Church of LGBT, then by all means knit arms with them and stand to face your new enemy. But when should a line be drawn to publicly perpetuate a value system that most of us don't share? Would we line up and die for a porn shop collective? A row of prostitute houses in Nevada? The regional headquarters of the KKK?
The PC-spinners are in overdrive and nobody is questioning why the bodies were left in the club for so long. In any other situation I can think of in recent memory, bodies are immediately removed to a secure location. It's just a lingering "WTF" that makes you pause. If we talk about why the bodies were left in place so long, we have to talk about the reason why. And that would lead to the revelation of lifestyle and hazard. And that would lead to talk about whether or not that lifestyle is something worth rigorously defending, or dying for.
It's a touchy subject. What would you do? Would you have jumped right in that club to start removing bodies? Or would you wait a couple of days time to be sure HIV had become unviable? Does your common sense tell you something about LGBT that your social personality refuses to see?
Because as of this moment there are only two votes; and they're both in the "would've waited" option.
