I think it was mainly due to democrats voting in the primary and picking Brat which is obvious by the turn out numbers vs 2012's.... then it was Brat playing Cantor as a ''Big Business/Wall street'' supporter, then it was Cantor's stance on immigration, but primarily his stance on H1B visas...From Bloomberg:" 38%: The increase in turnout in the 7th District Republican primary from 2012 to 2014. See the
Cantor pollster John McLaughlin, who had the majority leader up by more than 30 percentage points among Republicans a couple of weeks ago in his surveys, pointed to mischief from Democrats who participated in the Republican contest. Virginia law permits so-called crossover voting, as there is no registration by party. There was no Democratic primary yesterday in the 7th, a Republican-leaning area."
Looks like open primary played a big role in Cantor's defeat.
The image of Bussing illegal immigrants all over the country, which concerned many Americans, coupled with Cantor being painted as one who is on board with immigration reform played a big role in his loss.
And mainly against the GOP's big business and corporate business stances...
Why Cantor?s loss is especially bad news for big business - The Washington PostIt's true that Cantor enjoyed a strong relationship with business, and it went far beyond tech to Wall Street especially. The industry that gave him the most campaign contributions was the securities and investment sector. Individuals from the private equity firm Blackstone were his biggest financial supporters. Cantor went to bat for the industry repeatedly over politically unpopular issues, including the taxation of income at private equity firms at the lower capital gains rate.
That's no surprise: for decades, the GOP and big business have worked closely together to build a political alliance that until recently appeared airtight. But now with Tea Party activist groups charging the traditional wing of the GOP with "crony capitalism"--and Cantor's loss--the balance of power is creeping away from the pro-business faction of the Republican Party.
The business lobbying groups can sense this, and they've made no secret of their intense dislike of the Tea Party wing, as Tom Hamburger and I reported last year. Dirk Van Dongen, the longtime chief lobbyist for the National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors, called Tea Party lawmakers and their activist supporters "the Taliban minority."
That enmity can only now be escalating, with people like Brat going directly after the lobbying crowd. Cantor is following the agenda of the Business Roundtable and the Chamber of Commerce pursuing policies that are good for big business, but come at the exclusion of the American people, said Brat earlier this year according to the conservative website Watchdog.org.
seems to me that Brat and OWS might actually have something in common, maybe?