What "State Secrets" Did Joe Biden Sell ?

This article was in 2015, about Ukraine and corrupt Prosecutor General, Shokin. Before V.P. Biden asked for Shokin to be fired.....

This useless and pointless, unnecessarily lengthy link might have some significance if Viktor Shokin were failing to engage in prosecutions of corruption. Problem is, Biden's extorionary demand for Shokin's dismissal, is just the opposite.

Biden was opposed to Shokin DOING HIS JOB of prosecuting corruption in the Burisma case, of which the Bidens were part of the corruption.
 
Confirmed. Trump met with Russian agent during campaign

1693104616799.jpeg
 
I did no such thing. You're senile, gramps.
OF course you did, and your lying about it, simply compounds the offense.

Here's the original chart from fivethirtyeight not showing any vertical red line>>
1693105089115.jpeg

And here is your unsigned, fake ALTERED chart, showing a red vertical line that wasn't in the original chart >>
1693105168711.jpeg
 
This useless and pointless, unnecessarily lengthy link might have some significance if Viktor Shokin were failing to engage in prosecutions of corruption. Problem is, Biden's extorionary demand for Shokin's dismissal, is just the opposite.

Biden was opposed to Shokin DOING HIS JOB of prosecuting corruption in the Burisma case, of which the Bidens were part of the corruption.
You've made that up.

Shokin was not doing his job and was not investigating corruption....he was being paid off not to investigate and so were his prosecutors, in raw diamonds....

The story you hear now from Shokin about why he was fired was conjured up, by Giuliani and his new found Ukrainian and Russian operative and oligarch friends for Trump beginning in 2018....
 
This useless and pointless, unnecessarily lengthy link might have some significance if Viktor Shokin were failing to engage in prosecutions of corruption. Problem is, Biden's extorionary demand for Shokin's dismissal, is just the opposite.

Biden was opposed to Shokin DOING HIS JOB of prosecuting corruption in the Burisma case, of which the Bidens were part of the corruption.
Nope.... Burisma corruption took place back in 2010-2012 when the owner, zlochevsky was part of the Ukrainian government, he issued govt contracts to himself and friends....this was before Hunter was hired as a Board of Director member for Burisma.
 
You've made that up.

Shokin was not doing his job and was not investigating corruption....he was being paid off not to investigate and so were his prosecutors, in raw diamonds....

The story you hear now from Shokin about why he was fired was conjured up, by Giuliani and his new found Ukrainian and Russian operative and oligarch friends for Trump beginning in 2018....
Burisma corruption took place when they were paying Hunter (clueless about energy & Ukraine) $80,000/month to get access to the "big guy"

Obviously Shokin WAS investigating corruption, because that's why Biden (who was part of the corruption) wanted him fired. Your BS left media lines are easier to refute than learning to count 1..2..3.
 
Last edited:
Nope.... Burisma corruption took place back in 2010-2012 when the owner, zlochevsky was part of the Ukrainian government, he issued govt contracts to himself and friends....this was before Hunter was hired as a Board of Director member for Burisma.
More useless and pointlless knowledge, What matter is when Hunter WAS working for Burisma.
 
Nope.... Burisma corruption took place back in 2010-2012 when the owner, zlochevsky was part of the Ukrainian government, he issued govt contracts to himself and friends....this was before Hunter was hired as a Board of Director member for Burisma.
Burisma corruption took place when they were paying Hunter (clueless about energy & Ukraine) $80,000/month to get access to the "big guy"
 
Funny how easy it for people to believe anything when it fits their bias. They will ignore everything to the contrary, even the evidence saying that Biden was making a joke. Albeit a stupid, ill-timed and ill-advised joke, but a joke nonetheless.






Biden is an idiot. So much so that it would be impossible for him to get away with this kind of treasonous activity for fifty years.

I suppose this is the price we must pay for four years of the left taking everything uttered by the last moron, Trump, seriously...
biden is a joke...duh
 
Confirmed. Trump met with Russian agent during campaign

That ain't no bullshit.




And after that, this fucking country still had the temerity to let that bitch run for the WH.

Instead, the Clintons should have been shot at sunset for treason before a firing squad.
 
This useless and pointless, unnecessarily lengthy link might have some significance if Viktor Shokin were failing to engage in prosecutions of corruption. Problem is, Biden's extorionary demand for Shokin's dismissal, is just the opposite.

Biden was opposed to Shokin DOING HIS JOB of prosecuting corruption in the Burisma case, of which the Bidens were part of the corruption.

You're deranged, gramps. The record shows Shokin spent 2 years protecting Zlochevsky.
 
OF course you did, and your lying about it, simply compounds the offense.

Here's the original chart from fivethirtyeight not showing any vertical red line>>
View attachment 820733
And here is your unsigned, fake ALTERED chart, showing a red vertical line that wasn't in the original chart >>
View attachment 820735

Nope. I showed the chart as 538 described it...


FiveThirtyEight told Reuters that it is not true that Biden received all the votes in the overnight dump: “these batches were NOT 100% Biden votes; behind the blue line, there is also a red line representing the thousands of votes Trump gained."
 
Burisma corruption took place when they were paying Hunter (clueless about energy & Ukraine) $80,000/month to get access to the "big guy"

Obviously Shokin WAS investigating corruption, because that's why Biden (who was part of the corruption) wanted him fired. Your BS left media lines are easier to refute than learning to count 1..2..3.

Nope. Paying Hunter $80K was not a crime.

And if Shokin was investigating Zlochevsky, why did he help Zlochevsky evade prosecution in Great Britain?
 
You're deranged, gramps. The record shows Shokin spent 2 years protecting Zlochevsky.
The issue is Shokin, Burisma, and the Bidens, not Zlo whatever his name is.
I don't give a rat's ass what else he did.
 
The Moron in Chief POS most probably sold everything .....plus the kitchen sink!

...and will continue selling if the paying is good.

Sad times my friends!
 

Forum List

Back
Top