What is your Presidential election voting record?

.

I wasn't asking you if you did.

If you think about what the comment says ... You wouldn't believe me even if it was true ...
It's what the words in the statement meant ... :auiqs.jpg:

Unless are you saying you are not a Democrat, a Liberal ... Or that you don't know a lot of Democrats that say they are Liberals?
Speaking for myself, I generally don't label myself since I feel differently about different issues. On social issues I'm liberal but I'm more conservative on fiscal ones. I also consider myself a moderate on many issues. I don't think I'm unique among the people I know even though we all tend to vote Democratic.
 
You are lying. The goal of the Democrat Party is to make the US a Socialist shithole and you idiots can't help yourself.
Wait, have you moved the goalposts? The Democrats were Marxists, now they're Socialists? If you mean the Social Democratic model of Europe you may be accurate. If you mean the failed socialism of authoritarian Venezuela, you are way off the mark.
 
1980 Reagan
1984 Reagan
1988 Bush
1992 Bush
1996 Dole
2000 Bush
2004 Bush
2008 McCain
2012 Romney
2016 McMullin
2020 Biden
 
By 2008 I was tired of the RINOs.

Bush was better than either that loony tune Gore or that scumbag traitor traitor Kerry but at the end of the day he was Democrat Light.

Neither McCain or Romney ran an effective campaign. The Worthless Negro should have never been President, even with all the stupid racist Negroes and White Guilt Pukes voting for him. Most unqualified person ever to run.

You seem to think that anyone who is not a far right wing loon is Democrat light. That is obnoxious.
 
Speaking for myself, I generally don't label myself since I feel differently about different issues. On social issues I'm liberal but I'm more conservative on fiscal ones. I also consider myself a moderate on many issues. I don't think I'm unique among the people I know even though we all tend to vote Democratic.
.

That's fine, and kind of sounds like you are all over the board ... Way to keep your bases covered.

Me ... Not so much ... Classical Liberal ... Conservative in limiting the size and power of the Federal Government ...
Strict Constructionist in regard to the US Constitution and the 18 Enumerated Powers.

My Politics is guided by Principles ... Not so much by Desires ... I respect Liberty and Freedom.

.
 
922936932591173632_jpg-2675246.JPG
 
That's fine, and kind of sounds like you are all over the board ... Way to keep your bases covered.​
I prefer to think of it as pragmatism, the opposite of ideology. If it works it is a keeper.

Me ... Not so much ... Classical Liberal ... Conservative in limiting the size and power of the Federal Government ...
Strict Constructionist in regard to the US Constitution and the 18 Enumerated Powers.​
Government should be exactly the size it needs to be to accomplish what we want it to do for us. But no bigger.
I view the Constitution as a living document that, like everything else, needs to evolve to survive.

My Politics is guided by Principles ... Not so much by Desires ... I respect Liberty and Freedom..
I'm not sure I see the difference between Principles and Desires.
Everyone respects liberty and freedom but no one agrees what they are.
 
I prefer to think of it as pragmatism, the opposite of ideology. If it works it is a keeper.

Government should be exactly the size it needs to be to accomplish what we want it to do for us. But no bigger.
I view the Constitution as a living document that, like everything else, needs to evolve to survive.

I'm not sure I see the difference between Principles and Desires.
Everyone respects liberty and freedom but no one agrees what they are.
.

That's what I am talking about ...
You don't even understand Responsible Governance guided by Principles more than Desires.

You're part of the problem ... But you have a vote ... I would say "Good Luck" ...
But I kind of hope you fail ... Miserably ... :auiqs.jpg:

So ... Have A Lovely Day ... I Don't Hate You.

.
 
Last edited:
i was born in 1988, but i'll put how i would have voted. my political views are all over the map...i mostly pick the candidate with the best personality and entertainment value

1968 Nixon
1972 Nixon
1976 Reagan
1980 Reagan
1984 Reagan
1988 Bush
1992 Perot
1996 Buchanan
2000 Bush
2004 Bush
2008 Paul
2012 Paul
2016 Christie
2020 Beto
that 2020 vote explains a ton. whoo boy
 
Post your Presidential voting record.

Here is mine:

1968 Wallace
1972 Nixon*
1976 Ford
1980 Reagan*
1984 Reagan*
1988 Bush*
1992 Perot
1996 Dole
2000 Bush*
2004 Bush*
2008 Paul
2012 Paul
2016 Trump*
2020 Trump**

* My candidate won
** Election stolen
You were voting in 1968? We have a lot of people Here older than me.

As for me, I voted for Carter in my first election as a naive college kid, and then for the Republican in every presidential election since. In the senatorial races, I had a mix of Dems and Republicans, but it will be straight R going forward.
 
You were voting in 1968? We have a lot of people Here older than me.

As for me, I voted for Carter in my first election as a naive college kid, and then for the Republican in every presidential election since. In the senatorial races, I had a mix of Dems and Republicans, but it will be straight R going forward.
I was in Vietnam in 1968. I was 21. I did an overseas mail ballot.

I voted for George Wallace because his wife was a family friend.
 
I was in Vietnam in 1968. I was 21. I did an overseas mail ballot.

I voted for George Wallace because his wife was a family friend.
Thank you for your service. As far as the overseas mail ballot, I’m in support of it for: 1) military stationed away from home, 2) disabled, and 3) elderly over 75.

I was in California when I heard that Wallace was shot at a Maryland mall. Remember that day well.
 
That's what I am talking about ...
You don't even understand Responsible Governance guided by Principles more than Desires.

You're part of the problem ... But you have a vote ... I would say "Good Luck" ...
But I kind of hope you fail ... Miserably ... :auiqs.jpg:

So ... Have A Lovely Day ... I Don't Hate You..
Neither Google nor I ever heard of a discipline called "Responsible Governance guided by Principles more than Desires". Did you just make it up or can you point me to a resource?
 
Thank you for your service. As far as the overseas mail ballot, I’m in support of it for: 1) military stationed away from home, 2) disabled, and 3) elderly over 75.

I was in California when I heard that Wallace was shot at a Maryland mall. Remember that day well.
We do mail in and early voting very well here in Florida.

It can work if we manage it properly and don't allow the Democrats to use the process to create fraudulent ballots.

That would never happen in a Blue state. The Democrats would use the process to steal elections like we saw in 2020 and in the midterms last year.
 
Neither Google nor I ever heard of a discipline
.

Principles ... Those things ... That mean more than just something you want someone to do for you.
Responsible ... How it relates to others ... How it shapes everything with Respect to real values ... Not just what you want.
Governance ... The Limits ... To Govern is to set limits and parameters ... By using Laws.

That doesn't mean ... One pretends a Principle can be discarded ... Simply because they want to change or write a Law to suit their Desires.

It's not a Google link ... :auiqs.jpg:

.
 
Last edited:
We do mail in and early voting very well here in Florida.

It can work if we manage it properly and don't allow the Democrats to use the process to create fraudulent ballots.

That would never happen in a Blue state. The Democrats would use the process to steal elections like we saw in 2020 and in the midterms last year.
Wow, another Squealer.

Nice one porky.
 
Principles ... Those things ... That mean more than just something you want someone to do for you.
Responsible ... How it relates to others ... How it shapes everything with Respect to real values ... Not just what you want.
Governance ... The Limits ... To Govern is to set limits and parameters ... By using Laws.

That doesn't mean ... One pretends a Principle can be discarded ... Simply because they want to change or write a Law to suit their Desires.

It's not a Google link ... :auiqs.jpg:.
OK, now I understand. It is just some nice sounding words and phrases you strung together with no relevance in the real world. Or can you offer up some examples?
 

Forum List

Back
Top