But as the article notes, without the crazy, there'd not be a Trump. LOL For all the positives in his record, he wouldn't have the record without the crazy.
What if Trump weren’t nuts?
"But the fantasy, Greenberg said, is just that. After winning in 2016 on racially charged themes, and needing to regularly reinforce his ties with his base in order to keep a skeptical conservative establishment at heel, Trump had no choice but to organize his presidency around divisive messaging."
That is, he was elected because of his crazy, but if not for the crazy he should be cruising with a 55% approval rating. LOL
What if Trump weren’t nuts?
"But the fantasy, Greenberg said, is just that. After winning in 2016 on racially charged themes, and needing to regularly reinforce his ties with his base in order to keep a skeptical conservative establishment at heel, Trump had no choice but to organize his presidency around divisive messaging."
That is, he was elected because of his crazy, but if not for the crazy he should be cruising with a 55% approval rating. LOL