What if Trayvon was White and Zimmerman was Black? The Answer

[NYcarbineer]

What if Trayvon was White and Zimmerman was Black?


That's a question that keeps popping up and thanks to a quick internet search we have the answer. The Answer? No real difference legally. BIG DIFFERENCE politically. Indeed, lynching is alive and well in America, however, reversed from Jim Crow. This is what liberals mean by "Social Justice."

George Zimmerman:
White
Weak and Flabby
Profiled a "Suspicious Looking" Black Teen
Shot an Unarmed Black Teen (2012)
Obvious Signs of Injury on Zimmerman
Branded a Racist
Florida Stand Your Ground Law not Cited
Charged with 2nd Degree Murder by the State (Skipping a Jury)
Found Not Guilty by a Majority White Jury
Wall to Wall Media Coverage
Black Protests Across the Nation
Sporadic Protestor Violence and Property Damage in Major Cities
Obama and Holder Remarks on the Case
Investigated for Civil Rights Violations by the DOJ
Lives under Death Threats and Fear of Retaliation



Roderick Scott:
Black
Large and Muscular
Profiled a "Suspicious Looking" White Teen
Left his own Property while Armed to Confront a White Teen After Calling 911 (2009)
No Signs of Injury on Scott (Teen was Shot Before he got to Scott)
No Allegations of Racial Bias
No Stand Your Ground Law in NY
Jury Decided there was Enough Evidence for Possible manslaughter
Found Not Guilty by a Majority White Jury
Local Media Coverage
No White Protests
No White Violence
No Remarks by the President or Attorney General
No Civil Rights Investigation by the DOJ
Continues to Live a Peaceful Life



Roderick Scott Claims Self-Defense in Teen's Shooting - Rochester
Jury Finds Roderick Scott Not Guilty - Rochester
Not in the Media: Roderick Scott found not guilty of manslaughter | Radio Vice Online
Jury finds Roderick Scott not guilty (indicted for self-defense shooting)

Why do you think one case proves anything about another case?

Look at the op. Compare and contrast one against the other. Both cases were correctly decided. But what are their differences?

The parents of Cervini consider Scott a murderer.

How do you know both cases weren't, ultimately, injustices?

 

[rdean]

What if Trayvon was White and Zimmerman was Black? The Answer

Zimmerman would be sitting on death row. We know it. Everyone knows it. It would be ridiculous to say otherwise.

 

[NYcarbineer]

This commentary was written in March of 2012, comparing AND contrasting the 2 cases:

Police wasted no time charging Scott with murder. A grand jury knocked the charge down to manslaughter. Scott testified in his own defense. A jury acquitted him.

Scott was charged right away. No charges have been filed against George Zimmerman, the man who killed Trayvon. Scott is black and Cervini was white. Zimmerman is white and Martin was black. People think race was a factor in Martin’s killing. People thought race was a factor in charging Scott.

I guess some people do see some differences in the 2 cases.

Recalling Roderick Scott » The Rochesterian

 

[rdean]

Media Photos

When a white kid does it, right wingers think it's "cute", but when a black kid does it, right wingers think the kid should be quickly "shot" and thrown away as having "deserved it".

 

[B. Kidd]

Gangster culture.
A plague on our house no matter what the race.

 

[Zona]

In this case ... This case.....if things were reversed, there is a very very good chance martin would have been immediately arrested. At the very least.

 

[Publius1787]

Why do you think one case proves anything about another case?

Look at the op. Compare and contrast one against the other. Both cases were correctly decided. But what are their differences?

The parents of Cervini consider Scott a murderer.

How do you know both cases weren't, ultimately, injustices?

The fact that you had to ask that question implies that both cases were decided correctly. In the absence of evidence the accused has the right to be presumed innocent against unfounded charges. Thus the system worked properly. The lesson? Don't bring unfounded charges against the accused unless you know you have enough evidence to prove your case without jury nullification and appealing to emotion.

 

[Publius1787]

Media Photos

A thug is a thug is a thug. No matter what color he/she is. Is that what your trying to prove or are you seeing race where there isn't? It seems some people can't put the racial lens down to the point where their imagination is running wild. See a doctor.

 

[Publius1787]

Media Photos

A thug is a thug is a thug. No matter what color he/she is. Is that what your trying to prove or are you seeing race where there isn't? It seems some people can't put the racial lens down to the point where their imagination is running wild. See a doctor.

 

[Publius1787]

What if Trayvon was White and Zimmerman was Black? The Answer

Zimmerman would be sitting on death row. We know it. Everyone knows it. It would be ridiculous to say otherwise.

Funny. So why isn't the fella in my op sitting on death row?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Look at the op. Compare and contrast one against the other. Both cases were correctly decided. But what are their differences?

The parents of Cervini consider Scott a murderer.

How do you know both cases weren't, ultimately, injustices?

The fact that you had to ask that question implies that both cases were decided correctly. In the absence of evidence the accused has the right to be presumed innocent against unfounded charges. Thus the system worked properly. The lesson? Don't bring unfounded charges against the accused unless you know you have enough evidence to prove your case without jury nullification and appealing to emotion.

That's not the lesson. It's not the prosecutor's job to play psychic.

At least you agree that Zimmerman may have gotten away with murder.

 

[NYcarbineer]

What if Trayvon was White and Zimmerman was Black? The Answer

Zimmerman would be sitting on death row. We know it. Everyone knows it. It would be ridiculous to say otherwise.

Funny. So why isn't the fella in my op sitting on death row?

Because he wasn't predetermined to be, as you call Trayvon, a 'thug'.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

great question.

if a black george zimmerman had shot dead a white trayvon martin the racists in the usa would be calling for zimmerman's head and questioning why he had a right to a gun.

God you're stupid....

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

What if Trayvon was White and Zimmerman was Black? The Answer

Zimmerman would be sitting on death row. We know it. Everyone knows it. It would be ridiculous to say otherwise.

Yet another moron.....

 

[Sunshine]

I look forward to the day when I click on 'new posts' and the word 'Trayvon' is not on the screen.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

What if Trayvon was White and Zimmerman was Black? The Answer

Zimmerman would be sitting on death row. We know it. Everyone knows it. It would be ridiculous to say otherwise.

Funny. So why isn't the fella in my op sitting on death row?

You can show libs cases like this all day. If it doesnt fit the agenda they ignore them.
Intellectually dishonest? Or total morons? You decide.

 

[Mad Scientist]

Trayvon seemed like a regular, nice young man.

 

[LeftofLeft]

What if Trayvon was White and Zimmerman was Black?


That's a question that keeps popping up and thanks to a quick internet search we have the answer. The Answer? No real difference legally. BIG DIFFERENCE politically. Indeed, lynching is alive and well in America, however, reversed from Jim Crow. This is what liberals mean by "Social Justice."

George Zimmerman:
White
Weak and Flabby
Profiled a "Suspicious Looking" Black Teen
Shot an Unarmed Black Teen (2012)
Obvious Signs of Injury on Zimmerman
Branded a Racist
Florida Stand Your Ground Law not Cited
Charged with 2nd Degree Murder by the State (Skipping a Jury)
Found Not Guilty by a Majority White Jury
Wall to Wall Media Coverage
Black Protests Across the Nation
Sporadic Protestor Violence and Property Damage in Major Cities
Obama and Holder Remarks on the Case
Investigated for Civil Rights Violations by the DOJ
Lives under Death Threats and Fear of Retaliation



Roderick Scott:
Black
Large and Muscular
Profiled a "Suspicious Looking" White Teen
Left his own Property while Armed to Confront a White Teen After Calling 911 (2009)
No Signs of Injury on Scott (Teen was Shot Before he got to Scott)
No Allegations of Racial Bias
No Stand Your Ground Law in NY
Jury Decided there was Enough Evidence for Possible manslaughter
Found Not Guilty by a Majority White Jury
Local Media Coverage
No White Protests
No White Violence
No Remarks by the President or Attorney General
No Civil Rights Investigation by the DOJ
Continues to Live a Peaceful Life

Roderick Scott: The 'Black George Zimmerman' Acquitted of Murder in 2009

Trayvon Martin vs. Christopher Cervini
Those who are saying that if Zimmerman had been black and Martin white, he would have been convicted, should take a good look at the Scott case.

Despite the fact the verdict in the Scott case resulted in one less African American being incarcerated in an American prison, neither President Obama, nor Rev. Al Sharpton – nor the NAACP have chosen to publicly comment on the jury’s decision.

Roderick Scott Claims Self-Defense in Teen's Shooting - Rochester
Jury Finds Roderick Scott Not Guilty - Rochester
Not in the Media: Roderick Scott found not guilty of manslaughter | Radio Vice Online
Jury finds Roderick Scott not guilty (indicted for self-defense shooting)

Why do you think one case proves anything about another case?

George Zimmerman is Latino.

 

[ScienceRocks]

93% of 49% of all murders are against other blacks. If you think blacks don't use stand your ground a lot you're not thinking.

 

[Wyatt earp]

travvon would of ran like hell to a nieghbors house and called 911....